Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bozita

(26,955 posts)
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 05:00 PM Jul 2012

Man accused of trying to run over fundamentalist group

Source: Press & Guide

Man accused of trying to run over fundamentalist group
Published: Friday, July 13, 2012
By J. Patrick Pepper
Twitter: @jpeppernews


DEARBORN - Mike Mohamad Agemy was trying to “stop the hate.” That’s what he told police June 17 after he was arrested for trying to run over a group of Christian fundamentalists who were denouncing Islam in front of the largest mosque in the country, Dearborn’s Islamic Center of America.

A police report obtained under the Freedom of Information Act provides details about the incident that has touched off a firestorm of commentary on right-wing blogs and fanned the notion held by some that Dearborn’s Muslim community is hostile to Christians.

The group Agemy is accused of assaulting is called the “Bible Believers.” Based out of California, they had already been in the news that weekend for their anti-Islam demonstration at the Arab International Festival in East Dearborn. That display, which included a pig’s head on a pike and signs about Islam that many found offensive, led some festival-goers to pelt them with eggs, plastic bottles and reportedly rocks.

According to police as well as a statement Agemy provided detectives, two days after the festival confrontation, Agemy was driving east down Ford Road when he saw the demonstrators standing on a grassy median in front of the Islamic Center. Curious, he merged his white Ford Explorer into the turnaround lane and headed toward the mosque to check it out.


Read more: http://www.pressandguide.com/articles/2012/07/13/news/doc50003e8378b0f826281472.txt?viewmode=fullstory

41 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Man accused of trying to run over fundamentalist group (Original Post) Bozita Jul 2012 OP
No sympathy Scootaloo Jul 2012 #1
I'd like to see the fundies charged, as well. Warpy Jul 2012 #2
You sell your first amendment rights pretty cheaply ProgressiveProfessor Jul 2012 #14
I'm not sure that we don't take this too far primavera Jul 2012 #40
Charged for exercising their first amendment rights? RZM Jul 2012 #16
Posting in a general forum and denouncing a specific faith at its house of worship Warpy Jul 2012 #20
Is it? RZM Jul 2012 #21
You "don't much care" for their message? Zyzafyx Jul 2012 #31
Go away n/t RZM Jul 2012 #35
exactly heaven05 Jul 2012 #29
Maybe he was blinded by their halos? n/t jtuck004 Jul 2012 #3
Post removed Post removed Jul 2012 #4
Not all Muslims see the US as the "great Satan" ... JoePhilly Jul 2012 #6
The easiest way to drop this "my imaginary friend is better than yours" BS? alp227 Jul 2012 #5
It's like watching two roaches fighting. sofa king Jul 2012 #13
Well said! denvine Jul 2012 #26
Especially when it's the same damn imaginary friend Marrah_G Jul 2012 #32
Do we know he actually tried to "run them over"? primavera Jul 2012 #41
I have no problem with the pelting with eggs nt HomerRamone Jul 2012 #7
They should settle it by having their gods fight in a Texas cage death match video game may3rd Jul 2012 #8
ha! heaven05 Jul 2012 #30
If a Christian christx30 Jul 2012 #33
And while He had His Holy Cheek turned... randome Jul 2012 #38
"See, we told you all that Muslims were violent anti-American terrorists" Hugabear Jul 2012 #9
Get some lions... dash_bannon Jul 2012 #10
No, that's an absurd notion. xfundy Jul 2012 #27
head in hands... TeamPooka Jul 2012 #11
The guy is an idiot. Archae Jul 2012 #12
Well, as the saying goes magic59 Jul 2012 #15
A protest, even an extremely bigoted one 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #37
What a waste, using his car NoPasaran Jul 2012 #17
While I don't condone running over people Incitatus Jul 2012 #18
Not good. Canuckistanian Jul 2012 #19
Stop the hate by running down people with a car? Throd Jul 2012 #22
it's what all the cool kids are doing awoke_in_2003 Jul 2012 #23
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes slackmaster Jul 2012 #24
Sounds like some of Dearborn's Homer Wells Jul 2012 #25
"Stop The Hate" by attempting to run over people saying something you do not like??? Suji to Seoul Jul 2012 #28
Drat. I was hoping this was the Phelps crew. E-Z-B Jul 2012 #34
Way to disabuse them of the notion that muslims are irrational and violent. 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #36
while i understand the sentiment, I can't condone the practice booley Jul 2012 #39
 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
1. No sympathy
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 05:02 PM
Jul 2012

Really, dude? Trying to run people over won't "stop the hate," congratulations for restocking their ammo. And now, you go to jail. Dumbass.

That said, I'm not sure why the fundies would dodge... I mean, they're guaranteed to go to heaven, right?

Warpy

(111,277 posts)
2. I'd like to see the fundies charged, as well.
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 05:12 PM
Jul 2012

There's a difference between freedom of speech and incitement to riot, which is what denouncing any religion outside its place of worship is likely to do.

There are no people with clean hands in this little drama.

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)
14. You sell your first amendment rights pretty cheaply
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 06:15 PM
Jul 2012

How did you feel about Occupy? They certainly were inflammatory too.

primavera

(5,191 posts)
40. I'm not sure that we don't take this too far
Sun Jul 15, 2012, 01:13 PM
Jul 2012

First of all, not all speech is protected - you can't threaten someone with physical violence, for example, and use the 1st Amendment as a shield against prosecution for assault. Neither is incitement to violence protected. Intentional infliction of emotional distress is not a protected form of speech. So we already have limited freedom of speech, and yet we haven't spontaneously combusted; the only question is how we wish to define those limits.

Second, pretty much every country in Europe has some variation on our First Amendment guaranteeing freedom of speech, yet most have on their books laws excluding hate speech from the normal freedom of speech protections. Yet they do not seem to have lapsed into tyranny.

Why wouldn't it work to have here some sort of anti hate speech laws? Occupy could still protest peacefully, as could right-wing groups, as long as they didn't engage in hate speech. But groups like Westboro Baptist, who exercise their "freedom of speech" only to disrupt, upset, and offend others as much as humanly possible, could be held accountable under the law. Would that really be so horrible?

 

RZM

(8,556 posts)
16. Charged for exercising their first amendment rights?
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 06:37 PM
Jul 2012

Are you seriously arguing that 'denouncing any religion outside its place of worship' is 'incitement to riot?'

The religion forum here isn't a house of worship, but there's a whole lotta denouncing that goes on there. I would hope nobody gets charged for it.

Warpy

(111,277 posts)
20. Posting in a general forum and denouncing a specific faith at its house of worship
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 07:29 PM
Jul 2012

is a false equivalency that would make even Ann Coulter blush.

Congratulations.

 

RZM

(8,556 posts)
21. Is it?
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 07:33 PM
Jul 2012

In the end, it's all speech, right?

As long as the protesters aren't breaking any laws I don't really have a problem with it. I don't much care for their message, but it's not my job to worry about how people choose to exercise their first amendment rights. Idiots are a dime a dozen and they love to do their thing in public. It's part of living in a free society.

Response to Bozita (Original post)

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
6. Not all Muslims see the US as the "great Satan" ...
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 05:21 PM
Jul 2012

If you believe that, then you also must think that every variation of Christianity believes and adheres to the exact same doctrines.

Which of course they do not.

What you did is take the worst belief of one part of Islam and apply it to all other parts of Islam ... should we do the same to the Christian religion? Do they all think it is OK to kill abortion DOCs, or Gays?

Should we say they do?

alp227

(32,034 posts)
5. The easiest way to drop this "my imaginary friend is better than yours" BS?
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 05:15 PM
Jul 2012

Be an atheist.

And Mike Agemy is a TURD, there is no excuse for intentionally running over someone (unless there's a compelling self defense reason).

primavera

(5,191 posts)
41. Do we know he actually tried to "run them over"?
Sun Jul 15, 2012, 01:18 PM
Jul 2012

The article didn't really make it clear as far as I could see. The article said that he never came closer than 6-8 feet of any of the protestors. If he was moving at 5 mph, simply forcing them to step out of the way, that would be different than gunning the engine and racing full speed towards the center of the group with the intention to seriously injuring or killing one or more of them, no?

 

may3rd

(593 posts)
8. They should settle it by having their gods fight in a Texas cage death match video game
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 05:31 PM
Jul 2012

WHo's god is righteous will win,
the losers must submit to the decision and convert

christx30

(6,241 posts)
33. If a Christian
Sat Jul 14, 2012, 01:40 PM
Jul 2012

Were watching that, would be pray for his God's victory? And if he did, would God turn to him and say, "thanks, but I'm trying to concentrate."

Hugabear

(10,340 posts)
9. "See, we told you all that Muslims were violent anti-American terrorists"
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 05:36 PM
Jul 2012

"And all we had to do was provoke them repeatedly until one of them acted out! That proves they're ALL violent terrorists!"

xfundy

(5,105 posts)
27. No, that's an absurd notion.
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 11:39 PM
Jul 2012

Perhaps you should rethink. We're all humans, but some of us, not me, want us all to be ruled by their interpretation of what an invisible man told them to do.

Speaking of the Invisible man--Does one watch as you get off, go to the bathroom, etc? Does he get off on judging you about that? Sounds like a problem, a big one, on his part, or yours.

 

magic59

(429 posts)
15. Well, as the saying goes
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 06:29 PM
Jul 2012

You go looking for trouble you generally find it.

"That display, which included a pig’s head on a pike and signs about Islam that many found offensive"

They call themselves Christians but they really work for Satan as many churches like them do.

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
37. A protest, even an extremely bigoted one
Sun Jul 15, 2012, 12:12 PM
Jul 2012

is still a far cry from violence.

You meet words with words. You don't meet it with violence.

They were asking for a counter-protest. Not vehicular manslaughter.

Canuckistanian

(42,290 posts)
19. Not good.
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 07:16 PM
Jul 2012

He's just angered a bunch of extremists beyond their usual insanity.

He's actually increased the hate. Way to go.

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
24. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 08:36 PM
Jul 2012

A round of stupid prizes for everyone involved in this ridiculous story.

 

Suji to Seoul

(2,035 posts)
28. "Stop The Hate" by attempting to run over people saying something you do not like???
Sat Jul 14, 2012, 12:37 AM
Jul 2012

Anyone else see the logical fallacy here?

booley

(3,855 posts)
39. while i understand the sentiment, I can't condone the practice
Sun Jul 15, 2012, 01:04 PM
Jul 2012

The Fundie Christian community has been pretty hostile to the Muslim community there. I can see how that would fray nerves.

But even if that was the case here, the guys actions are firmly in the "NOT HELPING" camp.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Man accused of trying to ...