Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Tue Dec 27, 2016, 06:24 PM Dec 2016

Obama administration is close to announcing measures to punish Russia for election interference

Source: The Washington Post

By Ellen Nakashima December 27 at 1:32 PM

The Obama administration is close to announcing a series of measures to punish Russia for its interference in the 2016 presidential election, including economic sanctions and diplomatic censure, according to U.S. officials.

The administration is still finalizing the details, which are also expected to include covert action that likely will involve cyber operations, the officials said. An announcement on the public elements of the response could come as early as this week.

The sanctions part of the package culminates weeks of debate in the White House about how to revise an executive order from last year meant to give the president authority to respond to cyberattacks from overseas, but which did not originally cover efforts to influence the electoral system.

The Obama administration last year rolled the order out to great fanfare as a way to punish and deter foreign hackers who harm the United States’ economic or national security.

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/the-white-house-is-scrambling-for-a-way-to-punish-russian-hackers-via-sanctions/2016/12/27/0eee2fdc-c58f-11e6-85b5-76616a33048d_story.html?utm_term=.1032b861bf4c&wpisrc=nl_evening&wpmm=1

34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama administration is close to announcing measures to punish Russia for election interference (Original Post) DonViejo Dec 2016 OP
They should take away Trump's twitter account until he is sworn in. gordianot Dec 2016 #1
Trump should have his Twitter account taken away indefinitely. Initech Dec 2016 #13
Donald will immediately reverse them bucolic_frolic Dec 2016 #2
The optics would be terrible. Charles Bukowski Dec 2016 #5
i doubt his supporters will be watching 0rganism Dec 2016 #14
We've seen there are three options with such an order. Igel Dec 2016 #22
exactly still_one Dec 2016 #25
Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2016 #3
How do you know there is no actual evidence? sheshe2 Dec 2016 #4
Rush Limbaugh told him. Charles Bukowski Dec 2016 #6
I suppose If one is totally ignorant related to reliable news and sources one would think that etherealtruth Dec 2016 #7
Ooopsie...poof! sheshe2 Dec 2016 #9
It was a test of #FakeNews bucolic_frolic Dec 2016 #12
that was trump! he's a DU troll. Sunlei Dec 2016 #15
Oh n0oooos! sheshe2 Dec 2016 #16
Say hi to Vlad for me. Botany Dec 2016 #8
they gone sheshe2 Dec 2016 #11
lol red dog 1 Dec 2016 #18
I wonder . . . Richard D Dec 2016 #10
I wonder how many Russians will be allowed to migrate to the US once Trump is in office. olddad56 Dec 2016 #17
Or how many adoptions are getting shut down right now HoneyBadger Dec 2016 #20
Just the hot ones. EL34x4 Dec 2016 #28
Why did Obama wait so long? red dog 1 Dec 2016 #19
What was hacked wasn't so much the machines Igel Dec 2016 #24
There were no real recounts done red dog 1 Dec 2016 #27
My thoughts as well. triron Dec 2016 #30
This! OMG! Thank you! Reading this was like tonic. nt LaydeeBug Dec 2016 #32
I'm not a politician or a lawyer ... GeorgeGist Dec 2016 #21
I agree, and Obama would have been right to call for an immediate FBI-CIA-NSA investigation ... red dog 1 Dec 2016 #29
+1000 smirkymonkey Dec 2016 #23
Too late Obama to save our country. This is worth just about nothing. apcalc Dec 2016 #26
yep triron Dec 2016 #31
Disagree. Doing Nothing Would Facilitate Cover-Up TomCADem Dec 2016 #33
oh wow, he'd doing more than telling them to cut it out? Skittles Dec 2016 #34

gordianot

(15,242 posts)
1. They should take away Trump's twitter account until he is sworn in.
Tue Dec 27, 2016, 06:30 PM
Dec 2016

The United States is about to swear in to the Presidency a domestic traitor.

Initech

(100,088 posts)
13. Trump should have his Twitter account taken away indefinitely.
Tue Dec 27, 2016, 07:54 PM
Dec 2016

And I think nothing less than full sanctions and a full trade embargo should be acceptable. They fucked up big time with this one. And Tillerson should not be allowed to collect his prize billions.

bucolic_frolic

(43,218 posts)
2. Donald will immediately reverse them
Tue Dec 27, 2016, 06:30 PM
Dec 2016

and be seen as cozying up to Russia and praising Putin

He won't think anything of it

What will the American public think?

0rganism

(23,959 posts)
14. i doubt his supporters will be watching
Tue Dec 27, 2016, 08:09 PM
Dec 2016

of those that are, some will approve
the remainder will likely be placated by the pending removal of support from the UN

Igel

(35,323 posts)
22. We've seen there are three options with such an order.
Tue Dec 27, 2016, 10:28 PM
Dec 2016

1. Enforce it.

2. Annul it.

3. Ignore it.

For (3) there are all sorts of excuses. Don't have the money; don't have the manpower; don't interpret it the same way; say that it's in progress; say that it's covert.

It's the same set of options for dispensing with a bill that was passed by Congress and signed into law.

Response to DonViejo (Original post)

etherealtruth

(22,165 posts)
7. I suppose If one is totally ignorant related to reliable news and sources one would think that
Tue Dec 27, 2016, 06:42 PM
Dec 2016

Educate yourself. Do not rely on your ignorance and the ignorance perpetuated by others.

bucolic_frolic

(43,218 posts)
12. It was a test of #FakeNews
Tue Dec 27, 2016, 07:07 PM
Dec 2016

to see what the gullible public is willing to swallow

We're not that dumb here!

sheshe2

(83,815 posts)
16. Oh n0oooos!
Tue Dec 27, 2016, 08:22 PM
Dec 2016

He is on twitter and the intertubes now.

MIRT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Thanks for the laugh, Sunlei.

Botany

(70,533 posts)
8. Say hi to Vlad for me.
Tue Dec 27, 2016, 06:43 PM
Dec 2016

BTW 16 different agencies of the Fed. Government all said that
Russia interfered w/the elections.

enjoy your stay.

Richard D

(8,756 posts)
10. I wonder . . .
Tue Dec 27, 2016, 06:45 PM
Dec 2016

I wonder if Russia will be as badly punished as America will be under a drumpf presidency.
Russia is definitely getting the better deal here.

red dog 1

(27,827 posts)
19. Why did Obama wait so long?
Tue Dec 27, 2016, 09:14 PM
Dec 2016

"The Obama administration is close to announcing a series of measures to punish Russia for it's interference in the 2016 presidential election.."???

Obama should have called Hillary early on Wednesday November 9th to ask her NOT to concede, pending a thorough DOJ/CIA/NSA investigation of the Russian interference in the election.

That way, the election results would not have been officially confirmed, and recounts could have been asked for by HRC, especially in states with obvious voting anomalies like Florida, Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Arizona and North Carolina.

What did Obama do?

He called Hillary early in the AM on Wednesday and suggested that she SHOULD concede!
(Despite her having a plurality of the popular vote, with results still coming in)

WTF?


(K&R, thanks for posting, DonViejo)

Igel

(35,323 posts)
24. What was hacked wasn't so much the machines
Tue Dec 27, 2016, 10:39 PM
Dec 2016

as the populace.

The tool was the American press, freely using what turned out to be non-fake news in sensationalist ways that served another's purpose.

What's been avenged is the hacking of a political organization. The claim is that the RNC was also subject to phishing, but their security was better. Now, I've been the subject of phishing; I fell for it, as far as I know, once. When they say don't click on links in email that you don't know, they mean it. That's the hacking that'll be avenged. Having some stupid DNC folk stupidly click on stupid links embedded in fake email. And then not checking up on it when they were told they'd been hacked.


Anyway, it's with the populace that the voting anomalies lie, really. We can point to the recount that showed nothing, and to the non-recounts and claim that the lack of recount masks pretty much anything we want. (They didn't recount the votes in Pennsylvania, which means they're hiding that it was actually Iosip bin-Lloyd y Kyriakos that won the election, the guy I cast my write-in vote for! Yeah. Whatever.)

The little recounting that happened disproves those particular claims of "election hacking" in any normal sense of the phrase. What would be left would be having the courts try to rule that in their opinion voters were swayed by news that they shouldn't have heard, and then have the courts rule that individual state elections must be voided and reheld. Of course, given the law saying when other things have to happen, that would have required also having a court (and then the appeal court, then SCOTUS) rewrite not only 50 state laws in detail, but also federal law on the electoral college and inauguration. Yes, 50 state laws, because SCOTUS would be wrong to just say that those a particular candidate won have to be re-voted.

red dog 1

(27,827 posts)
27. There were no real recounts done
Wed Dec 28, 2016, 06:51 PM
Dec 2016

In WI, MI & PA, the votes counted on electronic voting machines..the ones with no paper trail...the ones called "push & pray"..were simply re-run through the same rigged, vote-flipping manner....those weren't recounts.
Funny how Trump did so much better in counties with "touch & pray" voting machines.

As far as the rest of your reply, I agree with most of it.

Except for your "the tool was the American press."

The real "tool" was that rat bastard & traitor FBI Director James Comey!

Were it not for Comey's Hatch Act-violating letter to GOP Congressional leaders,
"the American press" would not have mattered in those last 11 days before the election.

Clinton would have won, despite all the negative press she got, had it not been for Comey's treasonous act 11 days before the election..
HRC was ahead of Trump by more than 11 points, and Republicans were shaking in their boots fearing not only losing the election, but also the U.S. Senate.

IT'S COMEY'S FAULT!!

GeorgeGist

(25,322 posts)
21. I'm not a politician or a lawyer ...
Tue Dec 27, 2016, 09:54 PM
Dec 2016

but I suspect messing with our electoral system would fall under harming national security.

red dog 1

(27,827 posts)
29. I agree, and Obama would have been right to call for an immediate FBI-CIA-NSA investigation ...
Wed Dec 28, 2016, 06:57 PM
Dec 2016

..into the National Security breech which all the intelligence agencies agreed came from Russian hackers....Obama COULD have acted on November 9..but he didn't..and now it's too late.

apcalc

(4,465 posts)
26. Too late Obama to save our country. This is worth just about nothing.
Tue Dec 27, 2016, 11:01 PM
Dec 2016

Trump in, HRC out
Putin got what he wanted
What Obama does, Trump will undo.

Who is gonna save us from the goddam FBI, btw?

We are screwed.

TomCADem

(17,390 posts)
33. Disagree. Doing Nothing Would Facilitate Cover-Up
Wed Dec 28, 2016, 09:45 PM
Dec 2016

It is sort of like saying that the murder occurred, the victim is dead, therefore it is too late to do anything about it.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Obama administration is c...