Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

.99center

(1,237 posts)
Tue Dec 20, 2016, 03:34 PM Dec 2016

What Obama Said to Putin on the Red Phone About the Election Hack

Source: NBC News

Determined to stop Russia's interference in the presidential campaign, at least one of President Obama's senior advisers urged him to make the ultimate threat to Russian President Vladimir Putin, U.S. officials told NBC News:

Mess with the vote and we will consider it an act of war.

But Obama opted not to issue a warning that specific when he spoke to Putin about the hacking during a September meeting at the G-20 summit in China, said intelligence officials offering NBC News exclusive new details.

This time Obama used the phrase "armed conflict."
"International law, including the law for armed conflict, applies to actions in cyberspace," said part of a message sent over the Red Phone on Oct. 31, according to a senior U.S. official. "We will hold Russia to those standards."

Read more: http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/what-obama-said-putin-red-phone-about-election-hack-n697116

27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What Obama Said to Putin on the Red Phone About the Election Hack (Original Post) .99center Dec 2016 OP
Handled like a true Proffessional. Wellstone ruled Dec 2016 #1
I'm not so sure about that Captain1way Dec 2016 #2
not a bluff, you steal our shit we're going to fight back. Sunlei Dec 2016 #5
President Obama warned Putin about directly manipulating voting results. .99center Dec 2016 #7
So there may be no retaliation by the US eom Kolesar Dec 2016 #9
Are we CERTAIN Russia didn't manipulate voting totals??? groundloop Dec 2016 #13
Based on President Obama's past use of Stuxnet against Iran .99center Dec 2016 #14
I agree, and I bet Ilsa Dec 2016 #18
There's no reason for them to conceal any operation from Trump. .99center Dec 2016 #19
I think the paper by Ron Baiman triron Dec 2016 #15
something would have happened. mopinko Dec 2016 #17
may have already happened triron Dec 2016 #21
i wonder, tho. mopinko Dec 2016 #22
Republicans are far more likely to manipulate voting totals, but for some reasons, it's easier yurbud Dec 2016 #25
Watch and see. Wellstone ruled Dec 2016 #8
Post removed Post removed Dec 2016 #10
Sorry Captain1way Dec 2016 #11
How's the Russian ambassador to Turkey doing these days? nt Xipe Totec Dec 2016 #12
Why would we target him? triron Dec 2016 #16
Ignoring that's it includes but is not limited to armed conflict is the flaw in your premise LanternWaste Dec 2016 #27
How is he holding Russia to those standards now that we have agreement from both the FBI and CIA? JudyM Dec 2016 #3
should have sent the blue screen of death attached to any files they took Sunlei Dec 2016 #4
!!! BumRushDaShow Dec 2016 #20
So bucolic_frolic Dec 2016 #6
Russian cyber attacks and interference in our elections is an attack on the nation. Nitram Dec 2016 #23
well, it didn't help heaven05 Dec 2016 #24
Putin called Obama's bluff Devil Child Dec 2016 #26
 

Captain1way

(33 posts)
2. I'm not so sure about that
Tue Dec 20, 2016, 03:41 PM
Dec 2016

The president told Putin that if he continued he would consider it an legitimate reason to start an armed conflict with Russia

Put in continued as he was doing, now the ball is in the presidents court

Do you think we're gonna see anything close to an armed conflict?

Or did Putin call Obama's bluff?

.99center

(1,237 posts)
7. President Obama warned Putin about directly manipulating voting results.
Tue Dec 20, 2016, 04:10 PM
Dec 2016

"He meant that the nightmare scenario officials feared didn't occur: An attempt by Russia to manipulate the voting results or throw them into question."

groundloop

(11,523 posts)
13. Are we CERTAIN Russia didn't manipulate voting totals???
Tue Dec 20, 2016, 07:54 PM
Dec 2016

I want to believe that it couldn't happen, but on the other hand I'm not positive that it didn't.

.99center

(1,237 posts)
14. Based on President Obama's past use of Stuxnet against Iran
Tue Dec 20, 2016, 08:19 PM
Dec 2016

I think he would've authorized the use of another digital weapon on Russia's infrastructure if our intelligence agencies confirmed they hacked or got into our voting tubes.

Ilsa

(61,698 posts)
18. I agree, and I bet
Tue Dec 20, 2016, 08:48 PM
Dec 2016

he's already turned the NSA or whomever on to a retaliatory project. It'll be so top secret, Trumputin won't find out about it until it's over.

My guess is it'll be something to cause distrust between putin and his friends, or destroy his holdings or cause him to lose power.

.99center

(1,237 posts)
19. There's no reason for them to conceal any operation from Trump.
Tue Dec 20, 2016, 09:19 PM
Dec 2016

Trump won't comprehend the few PDB's he bothers to read.

triron

(22,023 posts)
15. I think the paper by Ron Baiman
Tue Dec 20, 2016, 08:25 PM
Dec 2016

may indicate this but unfortunately there are so many forms of election interference (e. g. suppression of minority vote with Cross check) it would be difficult to isolate.

http://www.cpegonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Unexplained-Patterns-in-2016-and-Earlier-U.S.-Elections.pdf



mopinko

(70,251 posts)
17. something would have happened.
Tue Dec 20, 2016, 08:34 PM
Dec 2016

i am not certain, but i am pretty sure that they were watching the whole thing very closely on the day.
if anything funky would have happened it either would have been stopped before it happened, or stopped when it happened.

he sure would have shared the intel w hillary's campaign, and pretty sure if there were any, she would have challenged it.

triron

(22,023 posts)
21. may have already happened
Tue Dec 20, 2016, 09:36 PM
Dec 2016

covertly and stayed hidden throughout voting. Forensic examination of voting machines may have shown something but that was not allowed.

mopinko

(70,251 posts)
22. i wonder, tho.
Tue Dec 20, 2016, 09:39 PM
Dec 2016

the cia could prolly get a look at any voting machine they were interested in. i mean, they are the cia.

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
25. Republicans are far more likely to manipulate voting totals, but for some reasons, it's easier
Wed Dec 21, 2016, 01:19 PM
Dec 2016

for corporate Democrats to attack RUSSIA than their opponents with a track record of doing this shit.

 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
8. Watch and see.
Tue Dec 20, 2016, 04:37 PM
Dec 2016

Putin is depended on foreign trade currency coming from two sources,Oil and Minerals. Watch for a major down spike in Oil.

If someone thinks we do Military,for get about it.

Response to Captain1way (Reply #2)

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
27. Ignoring that's it includes but is not limited to armed conflict is the flaw in your premise
Wed Dec 21, 2016, 05:31 PM
Dec 2016

Ignoring that's it includes, but is not limited, to armed conflict is the fatal flaw in your premise (specifically, a fallacious use of the 'or' qualifier).

Conflict by its very nature, is a multi-faceted concept, including (but not limited to... see how it works?) covert action, cyber-action, sanctions, diplomatic language, etc.

Try not to limit yourself, you can be so much more.

bucolic_frolic

(43,325 posts)
6. So
Tue Dec 20, 2016, 04:06 PM
Dec 2016

there are so many news stories, and newsy stories ...
did anyone figure out what went on in MI WIS PA? They stopped
all the recounts, there were more votes than voters in some places,
the voter logs or books are missing, some have shown how to hack
remotely (I think vote-flipping) was what they were talking about.

If we don't count, and can't reconstruct the trail, there's no evidence,
and we have nothing to go on, perhaps thankfully since we have nothing
to go to armed conflict on.

There were stories in the 1990s about "walking around money". Campaigns
would come to town and sprinkle cash, supposedly to hire/motivate
party loyalists and GOTV. Did we look there?

Something motivated every last fool to vote, more so than sometimes voters.

Nitram

(22,892 posts)
23. Russian cyber attacks and interference in our elections is an attack on the nation.
Wed Dec 21, 2016, 11:12 AM
Dec 2016

Russia's actions under Putin are a clear and present danger to our democracy.

 

Devil Child

(2,728 posts)
26. Putin called Obama's bluff
Wed Dec 21, 2016, 01:25 PM
Dec 2016

Putin knew he could act with impunity and any US response would be tepid at best. Considering how easily Putin has outmaneuvered Obama he will have no problem playing Trump for the fool he is.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»What Obama Said to Putin ...