What Obama Said to Putin on the Red Phone About the Election Hack
Source: NBC News
Determined to stop Russia's interference in the presidential campaign, at least one of President Obama's senior advisers urged him to make the ultimate threat to Russian President Vladimir Putin, U.S. officials told NBC News:
Mess with the vote and we will consider it an act of war.
But Obama opted not to issue a warning that specific when he spoke to Putin about the hacking during a September meeting at the G-20 summit in China, said intelligence officials offering NBC News exclusive new details.
This time Obama used the phrase "armed conflict."
"International law, including the law for armed conflict, applies to actions in cyberspace," said part of a message sent over the Red Phone on Oct. 31, according to a senior U.S. official. "We will hold Russia to those standards."
Read more: http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/what-obama-said-putin-red-phone-about-election-hack-n697116
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)Those days are gone for the foreseeable future .
Captain1way
(33 posts)The president told Putin that if he continued he would consider it an legitimate reason to start an armed conflict with Russia
Put in continued as he was doing, now the ball is in the presidents court
Do you think we're gonna see anything close to an armed conflict?
Or did Putin call Obama's bluff?
Sunlei
(22,651 posts).99center
(1,237 posts)"He meant that the nightmare scenario officials feared didn't occur: An attempt by Russia to manipulate the voting results or throw them into question."
Kolesar
(31,182 posts)groundloop
(11,523 posts)I want to believe that it couldn't happen, but on the other hand I'm not positive that it didn't.
.99center
(1,237 posts)I think he would've authorized the use of another digital weapon on Russia's infrastructure if our intelligence agencies confirmed they hacked or got into our voting tubes.
Ilsa
(61,698 posts)he's already turned the NSA or whomever on to a retaliatory project. It'll be so top secret, Trumputin won't find out about it until it's over.
My guess is it'll be something to cause distrust between putin and his friends, or destroy his holdings or cause him to lose power.
.99center
(1,237 posts)Trump won't comprehend the few PDB's he bothers to read.
triron
(22,023 posts)may indicate this but unfortunately there are so many forms of election interference (e. g. suppression of minority vote with Cross check) it would be difficult to isolate.
http://www.cpegonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Unexplained-Patterns-in-2016-and-Earlier-U.S.-Elections.pdf
mopinko
(70,251 posts)i am not certain, but i am pretty sure that they were watching the whole thing very closely on the day.
if anything funky would have happened it either would have been stopped before it happened, or stopped when it happened.
he sure would have shared the intel w hillary's campaign, and pretty sure if there were any, she would have challenged it.
triron
(22,023 posts)covertly and stayed hidden throughout voting. Forensic examination of voting machines may have shown something but that was not allowed.
mopinko
(70,251 posts)the cia could prolly get a look at any voting machine they were interested in. i mean, they are the cia.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)for corporate Democrats to attack RUSSIA than their opponents with a track record of doing this shit.
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)Putin is depended on foreign trade currency coming from two sources,Oil and Minerals. Watch for a major down spike in Oil.
If someone thinks we do Military,for get about it.
Response to Captain1way (Reply #2)
Post removed
Captain1way
(33 posts)I was speaking into my phone
Did you really need to insult me?
Xipe Totec
(43,890 posts)triron
(22,023 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Ignoring that's it includes, but is not limited, to armed conflict is the fatal flaw in your premise (specifically, a fallacious use of the 'or' qualifier).
Conflict by its very nature, is a multi-faceted concept, including (but not limited to... see how it works?) covert action, cyber-action, sanctions, diplomatic language, etc.
Try not to limit yourself, you can be so much more.
JudyM
(29,283 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,567 posts)Actually they may have already done that which might be why Putin ordered a M$ Outlook ban just a couple months ago.
bucolic_frolic
(43,325 posts)there are so many news stories, and newsy stories ...
did anyone figure out what went on in MI WIS PA? They stopped
all the recounts, there were more votes than voters in some places,
the voter logs or books are missing, some have shown how to hack
remotely (I think vote-flipping) was what they were talking about.
If we don't count, and can't reconstruct the trail, there's no evidence,
and we have nothing to go on, perhaps thankfully since we have nothing
to go to armed conflict on.
There were stories in the 1990s about "walking around money". Campaigns
would come to town and sprinkle cash, supposedly to hire/motivate
party loyalists and GOTV. Did we look there?
Something motivated every last fool to vote, more so than sometimes voters.
Nitram
(22,892 posts)Russia's actions under Putin are a clear and present danger to our democracy.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)we still ended up with putin calling the bluff, as I see it.
Devil Child
(2,728 posts)Putin knew he could act with impunity and any US response would be tepid at best. Considering how easily Putin has outmaneuvered Obama he will have no problem playing Trump for the fool he is.