Court rules police may be liable for pepper ball injuries
Source: LAT
Police officers may be held liable for injuring someone with a pepper ball intended to disperse a crowd, a federal appeals court decided Wednesday.
The unanimous ruling by a three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals was a setback for police agencies defending themselves against lawsuits arising out of the Occupy movement. Students from UC Davis have sued police for dousing them with pepper spray, and UC Berkeley students have sued campus police for using batons during a protest. Oakland also has been sued by Occupy protesters.
Wednesday's ruling stemmed from an April 2004 incident in which UC Davis and city police tried to disperse a crowd at a party by shooting pepper balls, which break on impact and spray a powder akin to mace or pepper spray.
About 1,000 people were at a Davis apartment complex to celebrate UC Davis' annual Picnic Day. The police wanted to break up the party because the street was congested, partygoers had parked illegally and some minors were drinking alcohol, the court said. Police in riot gear entered the complex, and an officer fired a pepper ball into an area where UC Davis student Timothy Nelson was standing with friends.
Read more: http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-uc-davis-pepper-20120712,0,3671184.story
mountain grammy
(26,650 posts)The gestapo tactics of the police are outrageous and the courts must put a stop to it.. finally, three judges not bought and paid for.. can there be more??
leftyohiolib
(5,917 posts)made against ows. another reason why potus must be re-elected
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)more than any other Circuit.