Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(70,266 posts)
Tue Dec 6, 2016, 09:26 PM Dec 2016

Despite dueling court rulings, Michigan recount keeps going

Source: Detroit Free Press





Tresa Baldas , Paul Egan and Kathleen Gray , Detroit Free Press 7:56 p.m. EST December


In a 2-1 opinion, the 6th Circuit said Goldsmith "did not abuse (his) discretion" in ruling that the start of the recount should be accelerated to Monday, from a planned start date of Wednesday.

Though that's a blow to the Michigan Republican Party, which sought to stop the recount, the ruling also contained hope for state Republicans, because it was limited to Goldsmith's action in doing away with a planned two business day delay in starting the recount in Michigan. It didn't address whether the recount itself was lawful.

Minutes after the 6th Circuit issued that opinion, the Michigan Court of Appeals released a 3-0 opinion, following a hearing Tuesday afternoon, saying the state Board of Canvassers never should have allowed the recount to proceed because Stein -- who received just over 1% of the vote -- did not qualify as an "aggrieved candidate" under state law..........................

Read more: http://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/2016/12/06/sixth-circuit-court-michigan-recount/95044646/



--and the beat goes on.....


The beat goes on, the beat goes on
Drums keep pounding
A rhythm to the brain
La de da de de, la de da de da
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Despite dueling court rulings, Michigan recount keeps going (Original Post) riversedge Dec 2016 OP
In a system dominated by 2 politicial parties I would opine that Stein qualifies as an cstanleytech Dec 2016 #1
Federal courts supersede state courts meow2u3 Dec 2016 #2
Bingo. roamer65 Dec 2016 #5
? on court conflicts oley Dec 2016 #3
We really need to NUKE our own capital Plucketeer Dec 2016 #4
Lansing or D.C.? roamer65 Dec 2016 #6
Actually, I like the whispers song better ..... ( and the beat goes on) zonkers Dec 2016 #7

cstanleytech

(26,306 posts)
1. In a system dominated by 2 politicial parties I would opine that Stein qualifies as an
Tue Dec 6, 2016, 09:33 PM
Dec 2016

aggrieved candidate.

 

oley

(11 posts)
3. ? on court conflicts
Tue Dec 6, 2016, 09:41 PM
Dec 2016

lets say this case gets all the way to Mi supreme court and rules against stein but a lower federal court rules in favor for stein but the us supreme court declines to take the case who wins? I just assume the federal court does but i only have heard of the us supreme court overrulling a state supreme court.

 

Plucketeer

(12,882 posts)
4. We really need to NUKE our own capital
Tue Dec 6, 2016, 09:43 PM
Dec 2016

Surely someone can taunt Trump into giving us the launch codes!

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Despite dueling court rul...