Wisconsin Agrees To Presidential Vote Recount At Third-Party Candidates' Request
Source: NPR
The Wisconsin Elections Commission announced Friday that it would hold a statewide recount of the presidential vote. The move was in response to petitions from two candidates, the Green Party's Jill Stein and independent Rocky Roque De La Fuente.
Read more: http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/11/25/503349326/people-have-donated-millions-to-jill-steins-recount-campaign-is-it-worth-it
shenmue
(38,506 posts)LisaL
(44,973 posts)If candidate files and has money to pay for it, WI was going to agree.
The other two states (MI and PA) are way more tricky than that.
marybourg
(12,631 posts)LisaL
(44,973 posts)MichMan
(11,932 posts)Some people hope for a miracle.
EL34x4
(2,003 posts)At worst, Trump might net a few hundred to his.
Either way, Trump will brag about winning on election day and then winning the recount.
HelenWheels
(2,284 posts)Two WI Clerks came fore ward to admit they had a "math" error in their count. Funny thing is both of their counts were very favorable to Trump.
Archae
(46,328 posts)Looks like Walker and his masters, the Koch brothers were busy elsewhere.
EricMaundry
(1,619 posts)If WI was hacked, maybe this will uncover it. I choose to believe.
Akacia
(583 posts)videohead5
(2,172 posts)That were way off was Pennsylvania ,Michigan and Wisconsin.Ohio's polls was not off. NC and FL polls was really close.this should make everyone suspicious.
FailureToCommunicate
(14,014 posts)RiverStone
(7,228 posts)INdemo
(6,994 posts)Koch Brothers Governor with Walker so dont hold your breath.
Which is one huge reason why Wisconsin was delivered to Trump in the first place.
Baitball Blogger
(46,715 posts)JonLP24
(29,322 posts)marybourg
(12,631 posts)Wisconsin Elections Commission Receives Two Presidential Election Recount Petitions (emphasis mine).
This post is: Wisconsin Agrees To Presidential Vote Recount At Third-Party Candidates' Request (emphasis mine)
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)I guess that one word makes it a completely different story.
marybourg
(12,631 posts)They received the petitions in your article. Several hours later, after they checked them for correctness and completeness, they accepted them and agreed to a recount.
Acceptance in this case is a term of art. It's not the same as received, which is a physical act and does not imply legal acceptance and agreement to the recount. There was no certainty that they would be accepted when they were received.
But since you seem to be intent on claiming the distinction of "breaking" a story "first" on DU, and making an issue of this, you can have any prize that's involved. I defer to you.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)I thought you said "No, your post was:" 'a dupe' which is what I thought when I posted "how can my post be a dupe" but reading again I see the message goes with the subject line.
I already acknowledged the one word makes a difference so no need to explain.
Apologize for the confusion.
It is needed, and I know if the Repukes were in this position that they wouldn't roll over. Neither should we.
KewlKat
(5,624 posts)would have the kind of cash that the Green party has?
marybourg
(12,631 posts)from the beginning.