Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marybourg

(12,631 posts)
Fri Nov 25, 2016, 09:21 PM Nov 2016

Wisconsin Agrees To Presidential Vote Recount At Third-Party Candidates' Request

Source: NPR

The Wisconsin Elections Commission announced Friday that it would hold a statewide recount of the presidential vote. The move was in response to petitions from two candidates, the Green Party's Jill Stein and independent Rocky Roque De La Fuente.

Read more: http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/11/25/503349326/people-have-donated-millions-to-jill-steins-recount-campaign-is-it-worth-it

24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wisconsin Agrees To Presidential Vote Recount At Third-Party Candidates' Request (Original Post) marybourg Nov 2016 OP
Holy shit shenmue Nov 2016 #1
That really is no surprise. LisaL Nov 2016 #2
Why is that? nt marybourg Nov 2016 #3
Because of the rules different states have for recounts. LisaL Nov 2016 #4
Do we really expect that 27K votes for Hillary will be found ? n/t MichMan Nov 2016 #5
I don't. LisaL Nov 2016 #6
At best, she might net a few hundred to her total. EL34x4 Nov 2016 #10
Two clerks admit error in count HelenWheels Nov 2016 #22
Seriously? Wow! Here's hoping... Archae Nov 2016 #7
Anything is better than nothing EricMaundry Nov 2016 #8
Audit! Not just a recount! nt Akacia Nov 2016 #9
The 3 State Polls videohead5 Nov 2016 #11
Adding this to my Santa wish list. Come on Wisconsin! FailureToCommunicate Nov 2016 #12
How long till we know the results? Would love a miracle!! RiverStone Nov 2016 #13
shall everyone not forget that Wisc has a Repuke INdemo Nov 2016 #14
It's happening! Baitball Blogger Nov 2016 #15
Dupe JonLP24 Nov 2016 #16
No, your post was: marybourg Nov 2016 #17
How is my post one when it was posted earlier JonLP24 Nov 2016 #18
It was different. marybourg Nov 2016 #19
I misread your subject line JonLP24 Nov 2016 #20
K&R mvd Nov 2016 #21
with 2 candidates requesting recall, do they share expenses? Hard to believe Mr De La Fuente KewlKat Nov 2016 #23
I think they were collaborating marybourg Nov 2016 #24

LisaL

(44,973 posts)
2. That really is no surprise.
Fri Nov 25, 2016, 09:35 PM
Nov 2016

If candidate files and has money to pay for it, WI was going to agree.
The other two states (MI and PA) are way more tricky than that.

 

EL34x4

(2,003 posts)
10. At best, she might net a few hundred to her total.
Fri Nov 25, 2016, 10:48 PM
Nov 2016

At worst, Trump might net a few hundred to his.

Either way, Trump will brag about winning on election day and then winning the recount.

HelenWheels

(2,284 posts)
22. Two clerks admit error in count
Sat Nov 26, 2016, 07:14 AM
Nov 2016

Two WI Clerks came fore ward to admit they had a "math" error in their count. Funny thing is both of their counts were very favorable to Trump.

Archae

(46,328 posts)
7. Seriously? Wow! Here's hoping...
Fri Nov 25, 2016, 10:08 PM
Nov 2016

Looks like Walker and his masters, the Koch brothers were busy elsewhere.

videohead5

(2,172 posts)
11. The 3 State Polls
Fri Nov 25, 2016, 11:13 PM
Nov 2016

That were way off was Pennsylvania ,Michigan and Wisconsin.Ohio's polls was not off. NC and FL polls was really close.this should make everyone suspicious.

INdemo

(6,994 posts)
14. shall everyone not forget that Wisc has a Repuke
Sat Nov 26, 2016, 12:09 AM
Nov 2016

Koch Brothers Governor with Walker so dont hold your breath.

Which is one huge reason why Wisconsin was delivered to Trump in the first place.

marybourg

(12,631 posts)
17. No, your post was:
Sat Nov 26, 2016, 01:30 AM
Nov 2016

Wisconsin Elections Commission Receives Two Presidential Election Recount Petitions (emphasis mine).

This post is: Wisconsin Agrees To Presidential Vote Recount At Third-Party Candidates' Request (emphasis mine)

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
18. How is my post one when it was posted earlier
Sat Nov 26, 2016, 01:33 AM
Nov 2016

I guess that one word makes it a completely different story.

marybourg

(12,631 posts)
19. It was different.
Sat Nov 26, 2016, 01:41 AM
Nov 2016

They received the petitions in your article. Several hours later, after they checked them for correctness and completeness, they accepted them and agreed to a recount.

Acceptance in this case is a term of art. It's not the same as received, which is a physical act and does not imply legal acceptance and agreement to the recount. There was no certainty that they would be accepted when they were received.

But since you seem to be intent on claiming the distinction of "breaking" a story "first" on DU, and making an issue of this, you can have any prize that's involved. I defer to you.

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
20. I misread your subject line
Sat Nov 26, 2016, 01:48 AM
Nov 2016

I thought you said "No, your post was:" 'a dupe' which is what I thought when I posted "how can my post be a dupe" but reading again I see the message goes with the subject line.

I already acknowledged the one word makes a difference so no need to explain.

Apologize for the confusion.

mvd

(65,174 posts)
21. K&R
Sat Nov 26, 2016, 02:09 AM
Nov 2016

It is needed, and I know if the Repukes were in this position that they wouldn't roll over. Neither should we.

KewlKat

(5,624 posts)
23. with 2 candidates requesting recall, do they share expenses? Hard to believe Mr De La Fuente
Sat Nov 26, 2016, 09:29 AM
Nov 2016

would have the kind of cash that the Green party has?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Wisconsin Agrees To Presi...