Texas governor rejects two provisions of health law
Last edited Tue Jul 10, 2012, 08:03 AM - Edit history (1)
Source: Reuters
Reuters) - Texas Governor Rick Perry said on Monday his state will not implement a Medicaid expansion or health insurance exchange, two provisions of the federal healthcare law upheld last month by the U.S. Supreme Court.
"I will not be party to socializing healthcare and bankrupting my state in direct contradiction to our Constitution and our founding principles of limited government," Perry said in a statement.
"I stand proudly with the growing chorus of governors who reject the Obamacare power grab. Neither a 'state' exchange nor the expansion of Medicaid under this program would result in better 'patient protection' or in more 'affordable care,'" Perry said. "They would only make Texas a mere appendage of the federal government when it comes to health care."
Some other states with Republican governors, including Wisconsin, Louisiana and Florida, also have said they would say no to the two provisions, with the hope that November elections will result in Republicans winning the White House and enough seats in Congress to repeal the law.
Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/07/09/us-usa-health-texas-idUSBRE8680O220120709
Perry's Medicaid plan would pass on $76 billion in federal funds for Texas
¬snip¬
State and federal Republican officials praised his move, saying the legislation could eventually leave the state holding the bag for billions in additional spending.
But the hospital industry and patient-care advocates say taxpayers will have to continue footing the bill for uninsured people, who will seek medical care when they're the sickest and most expensive to treat.
The hospital industry in Texas, which has agreed to more than $14 billion in reimbursement reductions that accompany the federal law, is a big supporter of the legislation for many reasons, said Steve Love, president of the Dallas-Fort Worth hospital council.
Only about half the adult population in Texas receives health insurance through an employer, because many Texans work in industries such as food service, retail and agriculture that don't provide coverage, Love said.
Read more here: http://www.sanluisobispo.com/2012/07/10/2137473/perrys-medicaid-plan-would-pass.html#storylink=cpy
railsback
(1,881 posts)Of course Perry would reject it.
HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)I am from NY and the difference is night and day.
joeglow3
(6,228 posts)awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)always have a scapegoat.
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)cstanleytech
(26,319 posts)yet when now thats its not the ruling they thought the deck was stacked with scotus that they were counting on they now say they are going to opt out.
Igel
(35,356 posts)SCOTUS threw out the penalty for not accepting the Medicaid expansion. It was optional under the law, not illegal if you paid the penalty.
The law itself says that states don't have to set up the exchanges. If they choose not to, the Federal government will.
Abiding by the terms of the law and the SCOTUS decision doesn't mean selecting one option over the other--just doing what the law, as interpreted by the SCOTUS, says.
I can see lots of other problems with Perry's decision. Just not a legal one.
LiberalFighter
(51,085 posts)Unless I am mistaken, the more states that let the federal government implement the exchanges the better it will be for everyone. And gets it closer to universal health care. Closer than what is initially intended under the law.
leftyohiolib
(5,917 posts)kentauros
(29,414 posts)Or a rocket surgeon.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)Teh stoopit. It burns.
Kingofalldems
(38,478 posts)They could not care less about anyone's health.
still_one
(92,397 posts)who keep electing these people
amfortas the hippie
(46 posts)i really really try.
It's the tea in their ears.
still_one
(92,397 posts)LibDemAlways
(15,139 posts)obligation to enact the law in its entirety" don't these assholes understand?
I hope the voters start wising up and firing a bunch of these losers' asses.
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)statehouse and remind Texas who won the Civil War.
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)Igel
(35,356 posts)Just as the "mandate" isn't obligatory--you don't have insurance, you pay the tan and no law's been broken--so also the Medicaid expansion always was. You don't accept it, you pay a penalty. SCOTUS chucked the penalty; now if you don't accept the Medicaid expansion, you pay nothing.
The exchange will be set up by the Feds. That's what the law says. It's what it's always said, and saying "no" is one of the options for staying in compliance with the law.
I wish folks would make the effort to understand what the law requires before posting.
lobodons
(1,290 posts)Perry and his fellow Gov.'s should be brought up on pre-meditated murder with special circumstances (multiple incidents) for denying constituents medicaid and health insurance.
uwep
(108 posts)Perry only has to read the ACA to understand that the state would make out very well, but I guess that is asking too much. This hypocritical governor does not have the common decency to take care of the poor and indigent of his state. He hold religious meetings and pretends that he is holy, but keeps the people in his state in poverty. Just look at where Texas stands on all social issues compared with other states. His "at will" state has created the most poverty jobs in this country.
Does anyone know how to educate this state on the ACA? The republicans are keeping the population of this state dumb ed down. They control the media in the major cities and their media spouts the party line. How many people is this governor going to kill.
bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)And make sure the Texas insurance exchange covers abortions too. They could have excluded abortion coverage had they set up their own exchange, but since they chose not to, too bad.
sakabatou
(42,174 posts)To which I'm sure he's paid into Social Security or gets money from it.
Deep13
(39,154 posts)amfortas the hippie
(46 posts)new knee, on my dime, not too long ago.
sakabatou
(42,174 posts)muntrv
(14,505 posts)Javaman
(62,534 posts)Canuckistanian
(42,290 posts)I hear RWers using this term all the time. What are they "protecting" patients FROM?
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)They_Live
(3,240 posts)failed presidential campaign bid, among other corporate welfare schemes.
magic59
(429 posts)Its simple, they will lose businesses and workers. These T-bagging govs are economic terrorists.
Deep13
(39,154 posts)bonzotex
(865 posts)...Rick Perry is an asshole.