Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bench scientist

(1,107 posts)
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 02:04 PM Oct 2016

BREAKING: Senior Congressional Aide Says Chaffetz Tweeted Comey Letter Before Democrats Even Saw It

Source: Daily Kos

FBI Director James Comey’s recent letter to Congress about the Hillary Clinton email investigation is looking more and more like a political dirty trick. Earlier this evening, we learned that the FBI didn't have a warrant to read the emails discovered on Anthony Weiner’s computer, and therefore Comey doesn’t know if they are even significant to the Clinton investigation. Now, Shareblue reports that Comey may have provided early access to his innuendo-filled letter to Republican Congressman Jason Chaffetz, enabling him to tweet about it and frame the media narrative before Democratic members of Congress even received copies of the letter.

Here is the statement by a senior Democratic congressional aide (emphasis in original):

Democratic Ranking Members on the relevant committees didn’t receive Comey’s letter until after the Republican Chairmen. In fact, the Democratic Ranking Members didn’t receive it until after the the Chairman of the Oversight and Government Reform Committee, Jason Chaffetz, tweeted it out and made it public.
If true, this implies that FBI Director Comey may have deliberately helped Republicans by giving them a heads-up about his bombshell letter while depriving Democrats in Congress of an equal opportunity to consider its contents and prepare their reaction to it in the media.

This may constitute evidence of intent to influence the presidential election, which would be a violation of the Hatch Act. If Comey had acted evenhandedly, he would have sent the letter to both Republican and Democratic members of Congress at the same time.

James Comey’s reckless and possibly illegal actions as FBI Director in t

Read more: http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/10/29/1588520/-BREAKING-Senior-Congressional-Aide-Says-Chaffetz-Tweeted-Comey-Letter-Before-Democrats-Even-Saw-It



Looks Chaffetz timed this to sandbag the Democratic House members after it had gone public.
Hope he loses big in UT. ( unlikely though)
87 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
BREAKING: Senior Congressional Aide Says Chaffetz Tweeted Comey Letter Before Democrats Even Saw It (Original Post) bench scientist Oct 2016 OP
I've been carping about the HATCH ACT since this story broke. MADem Oct 2016 #1
Former Bush Admin official files complaint against FBI w/its OSC spooky3 Oct 2016 #4
exactly spooky, these guys need to be charged. bench scientist Oct 2016 #9
Agree!!! spooky3 Oct 2016 #12
to repukes planning impeachment of new Pres. HRC: BushCo claims of WMD in Iraq wordpix Oct 2016 #60
agreed!! bench scientist Oct 2016 #6
#ComeyandChaffetzInBed" New hashtag Maraya1969 Oct 2016 #62
Chaffetz CLEARLY has an agenda: Raster Oct 2016 #2
Same individuals hang with the Wellstone ruled Oct 2016 #16
Yes. I am born and raised in the Church... though we parted company years ago... Raster Oct 2016 #19
Dominionists have been saying for almost two decades that they'll do just this Crash2Parties Oct 2016 #23
Let's add Elimanation of Public Schools. Wellstone ruled Oct 2016 #30
Yes. I grew up in Southeast Arizona... Raster Oct 2016 #33
So did I padfun Oct 2016 #86
Safford High... Raster Oct 2016 #87
Let's be clear. There is more than one church. pangaia Oct 2016 #81
Completely agree... although two in particular have made their anti-woman, anti-gay... Raster Oct 2016 #82
Time to share all about him on Twitter, Facebook and the rest of socail media Maraya1969 Oct 2016 #17
He does it, and HRC's approval ratings will be hovering at 100 percent duffyduff Oct 2016 #38
? Blue_Roses Oct 2016 #73
It is true. duffyduff Oct 2016 #74
Old enough to know it's rude to ask someone's age but, Blue_Roses Oct 2016 #75
Not only did they go up, but ReformedGOPer Oct 2016 #79
Makes you wonder how much arm twisting was applied to Comey groundloop Oct 2016 #3
I want to see Comey's emails. LisaL Oct 2016 #5
I want to see Comey investigated under the Hatch act. bench scientist Oct 2016 #8
Yes!!! FarPoint Oct 2016 #42
And Chaffetz! cynzke Oct 2016 #57
How is any of this legal? DK504 Oct 2016 #7
He didn't just allow it to be leaked. He is the one who "leaked" it if you want to call it that. LisaL Oct 2016 #11
"Allowed it"? world wide wally Oct 2016 #27
It's a ShareBlue allegation. Wilms Oct 2016 #10
Chaffetz tweet: yallerdawg Oct 2016 #15
That was a blatant, bald-faced lie... Raster Oct 2016 #32
4 hours later! yallerdawg Oct 2016 #40
Just informed HIM, not a whole bunch of people? Hmmmmm. George II Oct 2016 #63
4 hours after Chaffetz tweet... yallerdawg Oct 2016 #65
How many different laws were broken? Warning graphic picture. Botany Oct 2016 #18
Absolutely, and this dipshit has a major hardon to be "Big Man on Campus"... Raster Oct 2016 #29
Wassup w his mascara and subtle eyeliner? elehhhhna Oct 2016 #37
Chaffetz is a huge TURD and I hope his career is destroyed. sarae Oct 2016 #46
Comey losing his job may be the least of his worries.... paleotn Oct 2016 #21
Someone on MTP claimed Hillary needs to back off.... Spitfire of ATJ Oct 2016 #22
That was Andrea Mitchell. yallerdawg Oct 2016 #24
bwahahahahaha yd! - I snorted aloud at your well played snark. bench scientist Oct 2016 #35
I picture her at a beltway cocktail party ridiculing what Michelle wears while gardening. Spitfire of ATJ Oct 2016 #41
Ughhhhh sarae Oct 2016 #48
A President can fire the FBI director at will. Crash2Parties Oct 2016 #31
Another blatant lie from Andrea Mitchell. yardwork Oct 2016 #84
Chaffetz only re-endorsed trump a few days ago before the letter went public. SleeplessinSoCal Oct 2016 #25
Oh yes, I remember Chaffetz in a supposed moment of candor... Raster Oct 2016 #28
Chaffetz is SO full of shit. sarae Oct 2016 #49
He must have. But how to determine that ethical action? SleeplessinSoCal Oct 2016 #59
This little scheme. That's what. Get the FBI to investigate Chaffetz? SleeplessinSoCal Oct 2016 #55
Normally I'd say charging him would backfire and be taken as "rigging" LiberalLovinLug Oct 2016 #26
Since he tweeted it would this make Chaffetz guilty of it as well since he is an elected official? cstanleytech Oct 2016 #34
Whoa, too many facts. Won't matter to Trumplodytes. Or Trump. Beartracks Oct 2016 #43
Yup - facts get in the way of a good story. erronis Oct 2016 #50
Pelosi Statement on FBI Letter to GOP Congressional Chairmen yallerdawg Oct 2016 #44
Chaffetz is the guy who switched to Trump because he liked Trumps "grab them by the ......." comment JI7 Oct 2016 #47
The media universally condemned Hillary for saying Republicans got it first.... Spitfire of ATJ Oct 2016 #51
Hillary covers her bases. She's smart and fact driven, unlike our most of our media. bench scientist Oct 2016 #52
TIME TO INVESTIGATE THIS ASSHAT...... cynzke Oct 2016 #53
I wonder if greytdemocrat Oct 2016 #54
Speaking of the possibility of Comey violating the Hatch Act, red dog 1 Oct 2016 #56
Comey may get eaten by the shark he tried to jump. McCamy Taylor Oct 2016 #58
I don't think it was "coincidence" that all of the Democratic Ranking members, who were cc'ed.... George II Oct 2016 #61
Have you seen "Pg. 2" - and "Pg. 3," by the way? yallerdawg Oct 2016 #66
I did finally see page 2, but I didn't realize there was a page 3! Even worse in that case. George II Oct 2016 #67
There were only 7 Democrats on the alleged page 2. yallerdawg Oct 2016 #69
See my post 66. Doesn't even meet the lowest standards of general correspondence. George II Oct 2016 #70
Just searched for and found it. The third page was the name of Cummings, the last of the CC'ed.... George II Oct 2016 #68
Of course, this is the reason both Hillary and Nancy Pelosi... yallerdawg Oct 2016 #71
Here is the letter: George II Oct 2016 #72
Lock him up! Lock him up! Lock him up! lapucelle Oct 2016 #76
Ye-ah.. looks like Comey gave a heads up to him before Cha Oct 2016 #77
PURGE THE FBI! Odin2005 Oct 2016 #80
Curiouser and curiouser. Nitram Oct 2016 #85
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #

MADem

(135,425 posts)
1. I've been carping about the HATCH ACT since this story broke.
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 02:06 PM
Oct 2016

That's "pernicious" interference by ANY measure.

"Jason in the House" needs to be "Jason in the BIG House." Little fucker.

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
60. to repukes planning impeachment of new Pres. HRC: BushCo claims of WMD in Iraq
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 04:18 PM
Oct 2016

and Cheney's outing of Valerie Plame are then on the table. They want to go the Banana Republican route, we should match them.

Raster

(20,998 posts)
2. Chaffetz CLEARLY has an agenda:
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 02:07 PM
Oct 2016
Jason Chaffetz, R-Hypocrite, Utah, has made it very clear that once Clinton is elected, he plans on doing nothing but investigating, obstructing and creating general havoc for the Clinton Administration. Those are his stated goals.

Once we look a bit deeper at Chaffetz we find: (1) Chaffetz has a very bad case of "big man on campus," in other words, Chaffetz sees bigger and better for himself, and not just a regular run-of-the-mill Republican Congressman; (2) Chaffetz has already let it be known that he will be challenging Paul Ryan for the House Speaker position; and (3) Chaffetz appears to have the backing of the Congressional Freedom Caucus, the "Teapublican High Command." This entire Clinton persecution is Chaffetz "making his bones," and proving to the Teapublican High Command that he is willing to do whatever it takes to earn their backing.

Incidentally, the Freedom Caucus is the real reason the Orange Boner resigned from his Speakership and they are the rabble leading the "Night of the Long Knives" challenge against Speaker Ryan.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_Caucus

The Freedom Caucus, also known as the House Freedom Caucus, is a congressional caucus consisting of conservative Republican members of the United States House of Representatives. It was formed by a group of Congressmen as a "smaller, more cohesive, more agile and more active" group of conservatives.

Many members are also part of the Republican Study Committee, another conservative House group. The caucus is sympathetic to the Tea Party movement. According to its mission statement, "The House Freedom Caucus gives a voice to countless Americans who feel that Washington does not represent them. We support open, accountable and limited government, the Constitution and the rule of law, and policies that promote the liberty, safety and prosperity of all Americans."
 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
16. Same individuals hang with the
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 02:42 PM
Oct 2016

the American Independence Party based in Utah. This is just the tip of the Iceberg. You haven't seen anything yet,rest assured there is more to come. Watch for noise out of Orin Hatch,he has Little Jason's back on this.

After the Federal Case against the Bundy Militia went South,you just knew something was up. These groups have the same agenda and the Militia's are just dupes and window dressing. And oh BTW,they do have a common connection and that is their respective Religions.

Raster

(20,998 posts)
19. Yes. I am born and raised in the Church... though we parted company years ago...
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 02:44 PM
Oct 2016

...and I have suspected --for years now-- that the Church is no longer content with their brand of a theocracy in just their State...

ACTIONS THAT WOULD BE TAKEN IMMEDIATELY:

1. Repeal Roe v. Wade;
2. Legally codify: "A woman must learn in quietness and full submissiveness. Do not permit a woman to teach or exercise authority over a man; she is to remain quiet."
3. Constitutional amendment PROHIBITING same-sex marriage and any form of marriage equality.

Crash2Parties

(6,017 posts)
23. Dominionists have been saying for almost two decades that they'll do just this
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 02:54 PM
Oct 2016

...and they are right on schedule.

 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
30. Let's add Elimanation of Public Schools.
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 03:02 PM
Oct 2016

Privatize all Governmental Agencies,like Fire,Police,Roads and other Infrastructure. Privatize all Federal Lands,Eliminate the EPA,and zero use of Solar or Wind Power cause they own or have access to Billions in Coal Deposits. How about zero minimum wage,Activation of the Relief Society in ever town and village. For Pay Hospitals only. We could go on and on for quite some time.

Utah is a land onto itself,outsiders not welcome.

Raster

(20,998 posts)
82. Completely agree... although two in particular have made their anti-woman, anti-gay...
Mon Oct 31, 2016, 09:16 AM
Oct 2016

...agendas perfectly clear. NO ON H8! anyone? And while there are other churches passing the same fetid plate, these two are the most influential, wealthy and infrastructured, so their reach is literally far and wide.

Maraya1969

(22,500 posts)
17. Time to share all about him on Twitter, Facebook and the rest of socail media
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 02:42 PM
Oct 2016

@RepChaffetz

Here are some good hashtags I found out last night to get seen.


I can't get these to come out right. It shows the hashtag, the audience numbers that the hashtag will get, how many times it will get retweeted and exposure per hour


Audience Retweet Exposure/hour

#trump 1,850 2,967 14,649,638

#imwithher 1,096 1,971 3,032,946

#rt 3,421 4,929 32,532,125



https://ritetag.com/best-hashtags-for/antitrump


(I'm just learning this hashtag thing but it makes sense if you want your message to get to the most people)

 

duffyduff

(3,251 posts)
38. He does it, and HRC's approval ratings will be hovering at 100 percent
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 03:11 PM
Oct 2016

Don't these people ever learn? WRT Bill Clinton, the more those GOP idiots investigated him and even impeached him, the better his approval ratings.

People can smell bullshit a mile away.

 

duffyduff

(3,251 posts)
74. It is true.
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 08:06 PM
Oct 2016

How old are you?

BC's approval numbers went up when the GOP investigated to the ying-yang. The same would happen with Hillary if they pull the same crap.

Blue_Roses

(12,894 posts)
75. Old enough to know it's rude to ask someone's age but,
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 08:27 PM
Oct 2016

you're right. They did go up because I am old enough to remember. Maybe my age had something to do with how I initially read your post.

groundloop

(11,523 posts)
3. Makes you wonder how much arm twisting was applied to Comey
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 02:18 PM
Oct 2016

Not that he should be off the hook if indeed there was some arm twisting applied by the House teapublicans, but everything that transpired should be on the table for all Americans to see.

DK504

(3,847 posts)
7. How is any of this legal?
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 02:26 PM
Oct 2016

Comey doesn't get a search warrant for a non-threatening situation, a non-situation at that, and allowed it to be leaked. Comey is influencing an election along with Jag-off Chafing, where is Loretta Lynch?

LisaL

(44,974 posts)
11. He didn't just allow it to be leaked. He is the one who "leaked" it if you want to call it that.
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 02:28 PM
Oct 2016

He doesn't have a warrant, he claims he doesn't know if emails are significant, yet he send a letter to congress 11 days before the election.

world wide wally

(21,755 posts)
27. "Allowed it"?
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 02:56 PM
Oct 2016

He leaked it himself! Even after being told not to by his boss.
Plus it is against FBI rules to even comment on investigations.
Lock his sorry ass up!

 

Wilms

(26,795 posts)
10. It's a ShareBlue allegation.
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 02:28 PM
Oct 2016

Who are they??

http://shareblue.com/company/

Not exactly Breaking News quality. Even Kos is saying, "if true".

I'd wait for substantiated info.

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
15. Chaffetz tweet:
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 02:40 PM
Oct 2016

FBI Dir just informed me, "The FBI has learned of the existence of emails that appear to be pertinent to the investigation." Case reopened

9:57 AM - 28 Oct 2016

https://twitter.com/jasoninthehouse/status/792047597040971776

Raster

(20,998 posts)
32. That was a blatant, bald-faced lie...
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 03:03 PM
Oct 2016

...and intended to inflame the knuckledraggers as much as possible, as quickly as possible. Chaffetz, R-Hypocrite, Utah, KNEW EXACTLY WHAT HE WAS DOING.

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
40. 4 hours later!
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 03:14 PM
Oct 2016

First related Nancy Pelosi tweet:

My statement on the @FBI's letter to GOP Congressional Chairmen: http://bit.ly

2:02 PM - 28 Oct 2016

Yeah - I'm sure Democrats knew.

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
65. 4 hours after Chaffetz tweet...
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 05:24 PM
Oct 2016

Nancy Pelosi tweeted:

San Francisco – Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi released the following statement in response to FBI Director James Comey’s letter to eight Republican Committee Chairmen:

https://twitter.com/NancyPelosi

Botany

(70,585 posts)
18. How many different laws were broken? Warning graphic picture.
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 02:43 PM
Oct 2016


Fucking republicans ..... they can't win an honest race so they have to swift boat.

Raster

(20,998 posts)
29. Absolutely, and this dipshit has a major hardon to be "Big Man on Campus"...
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 03:00 PM
Oct 2016

...and it appears will do just about anything to get there.

sarae

(3,284 posts)
46. Chaffetz is a huge TURD and I hope his career is destroyed.
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 03:35 PM
Oct 2016

He has to be the single most unlikeable member of Congress, which is saying a lot.

paleotn

(17,970 posts)
21. Comey losing his job may be the least of his worries....
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 02:46 PM
Oct 2016

he could be prosecuted. But, then again, like Scott Bloch, he's probably get just a slap on the wrist.

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
22. Someone on MTP claimed Hillary needs to back off....
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 02:48 PM
Oct 2016

They said Comey is appointed to the job for ten years and she may have to work with him.

To that I say: KMA. He can be removed for using his job for political reasons.

bench scientist

(1,107 posts)
35. bwahahahahaha yd! - I snorted aloud at your well played snark.
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 03:09 PM
Oct 2016

A wealth of purposeful one sided misinformation.
I'm not fond of Mrs. Alan Greenspan...

sarae

(3,284 posts)
48. Ughhhhh
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 03:38 PM
Oct 2016

Of course it was! Lol. Andrea has a habit of popping up at the most obnoxious and irritating times. She has a really special talent for that.

Crash2Parties

(6,017 posts)
31. A President can fire the FBI director at will.
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 03:02 PM
Oct 2016

"according to a 2014 report* by the Congressional Research Service, “there are no statutory conditions on the President’s authority to remove the FBI Director.” In other words, the President can indeed fire the FBI director. An FBI director can also be removed by congress, through the impeachment process."

* http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41850.pdf

William S. Sessions is a good past example of a President firing a FBI director for ethics transgressions, included criticisms that he had used an FBI plane to travel to visit his daughter on several occasions, and had a security system installed in his home at government expense. Sounds bad, but IMO rather minor compared to trying to influence an election.

SleeplessinSoCal

(9,145 posts)
25. Chaffetz only re-endorsed trump a few days ago before the letter went public.
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 02:55 PM
Oct 2016

Last edited Sun Oct 30, 2016, 04:05 PM - Edit history (1)

I know that the dirty trick is out in the open, but this isn't being done by some activist like Rove or Atwater. They are in the govt.

I think this is a crisis. And Putin must be creaming his pants.

Raster

(20,998 posts)
28. Oh yes, I remember Chaffetz in a supposed moment of candor...
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 02:58 PM
Oct 2016

...told of not being able to look his 15-year old daughter in the eye and tell her he supported tRump.

What changed?

sarae

(3,284 posts)
49. Chaffetz is SO full of shit.
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 03:40 PM
Oct 2016

I think the lying asswipe had advance warning. Nothing is beneath him.

SleeplessinSoCal

(9,145 posts)
59. He must have. But how to determine that ethical action?
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 04:16 PM
Oct 2016

Via the FBI? Comey and Chaffetz have truly corrupted the electoral process. AND in the era of Trump, who refused to show proof via tax returns that he hasn't been doing business with truly bad actors. Terrifying how blind hatred can destroy the democratic process.

Anger is the #2 of the 7 deadly sins. Pride is #1. And Trump is synonymous with Pride.

LiberalLovinLug

(14,176 posts)
26. Normally I'd say charging him would backfire and be taken as "rigging"
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 02:55 PM
Oct 2016

And I'm sure Trump would exploit that angle to the fullest.

But when it is so obvious, so much evidence, it would be counterproductive to NOT fire and charge him immediately. Don't waffle. Make it about the law. Highlight how this was a pure partisan trick.

I think the Dems would gain more respect than they would lose by acting swiftly and objectively.

Beartracks

(12,821 posts)
43. Whoa, too many facts. Won't matter to Trumplodytes. Or Trump.
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 03:28 PM
Oct 2016

Or the rightwing blowhards on talk radio.

Or their collective sychophants and surrogates.

Or much of the media, which is independents and undecideds wil hear about it.

==================

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
44. Pelosi Statement on FBI Letter to GOP Congressional Chairmen
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 03:30 PM
Oct 2016
San Francisco – Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi released the following statement in response to FBI Director James Comey’s letter to eight Republican Committee Chairmen:

“After an exhaustive review of Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal email server, the FBI concluded that charges would be unreasonable and unjustified. Nothing in Director Comey’s letter to the Republican Committee chairs suggests that assessment will or should change.

“Republicans have spent months attempting to bully the FBI into changing the conclusion of their review. Sadly but predictably, Republicans are doing their best to misrepresent this letter and warp the FBI’s work to serve their partisan conspiracy-mongering against Hillary Clinton.

“The Director of the FBI himself stated that, ‘the FBI cannot yet assess whether or not this material may be significant.’ Furthermore, there is not any indication that this review involves Secretary Clinton’s own use of emails. The public interest would be served by the FBI providing the facts, rather than allowing Republicans to stoke innuendo and falsehoods 11 days away from a presidential election.”


https://twitter.com/NancyPelosi/status/792109223345659904
 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
51. The media universally condemned Hillary for saying Republicans got it first....
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 03:46 PM
Oct 2016

Turns out she was right.

Not that their smugness will diminish.

cynzke

(1,254 posts)
53. TIME TO INVESTIGATE THIS ASSHAT......
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 04:04 PM
Oct 2016

For attempting to undermine this election. Something is rotten in Denmark?

red dog 1

(27,857 posts)
56. Speaking of the possibility of Comey violating the Hatch Act,
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 04:10 PM
Oct 2016

From New York Times Op Ed Contributor, Richard W. Painter, posted today, Oct. 30, 2016,

"The FBI's job is to investigate, not to influence the outcome of an election.
Such acts could also be prohibited under the Hatch Act, which bars the use of an official position to influence an election.
That is why the FBI would keep those aspects of an investigation confidential until after the election.
The usual penalty for (such) a violation is termination of federal employment.
And that is why on Saturday, I filed a complaint against the FBI with the Office of Special Counsel, which investigates Hatch Act violations. and with the Office of Government Ethics."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512560626#top

George II

(67,782 posts)
61. I don't think it was "coincidence" that all of the Democratic Ranking members, who were cc'ed....
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 04:54 PM
Oct 2016

....on the letter, all appeared on the SECOND page.

So here's my take on the chronology:

Perhaps only the first page of the letter was sent to the republican chairmen
Chaffetz sent it out to "select" people, possibly including the Trump campaign
Democrats got a copy of the letter first from republicans or even the press (who initially only posted the first page on their sites)
Only after Clinton made her statement about it being sent to republicans, the FULL letter was sent to the Democrats

That gave Trump the opportunity to falsely claim that Clinton was "politicizing" the letter by claiming it only went to republicans.

I also don't think it was coincidence that just hours before the letter went out, Chaffetz made a 180-turn on Trump and announced he was voting for him.

As baby bush used to say, "connect the dots"!

Oh, I really hope that this doesn't affect the election, that Clinton is elected President and Democrats take control of the Senate. THEN, I hope Democrats go "teabagger" on the republicans and investigate this incident to the hilt, prosecute Comey and get Chaffetz on the PUBLIC hot seat.

They truly are so slimy, they can't win elections based on their political postitions on the issues, so they have to lie, cheat, and steal to get into office.

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
66. Have you seen "Pg. 2" - and "Pg. 3," by the way?
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 05:28 PM
Oct 2016

I'd have to see how this is standard form to Congress.

When this is unprecedented!


yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
69. There were only 7 Democrats on the alleged page 2.
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 06:29 PM
Oct 2016

Guess they couldn't space it properly or change font size...or just add note:

Identical Letter Sent to Ranking Democratic Members of Each Committee

George II

(67,782 posts)
68. Just searched for and found it. The third page was the name of Cummings, the last of the CC'ed....
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 06:22 PM
Oct 2016

...and I noticed also that there's no notation "Page 1 of 3" or even "Page 1", implying that the letter was only ONE page.

Scummy to the core.

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
71. Of course, this is the reason both Hillary and Nancy Pelosi...
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 06:46 PM
Oct 2016

among many others, both mention this letter was only transmitted to Republicans, as you say.

"Oh what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive."

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»BREAKING: Senior Congress...