Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,630 posts)
Sat Oct 29, 2016, 08:37 PM Oct 2016

Appeals Court Might Revisit Arizona Ballot Collection Law

Source: Associated Press

By bob christie, associated press
PHOENIX — Oct 29, 2016, 8:03 PM ET

A federal appeals court may reconsider a ruling where a panel of its judges decided not to block a new Arizona law making it a felony to collect early ballots from voters.

A judge on the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Saturday requested a full court vote on whether to convene a so-called 'en banc' review of the opinion leaving the new law in place.

Usually such requests come from the losing party in a lawsuit, but a judge on the panel may also request a vote. En banc reviews normally involve a panel of 11 appeals court judges.

A split three-judge panel late Friday refused to block the law, meaning get-out-the vote groups won't be able to collect ballots from voters and deliver them to the polls.


Read more: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/appeals-court-revisit-arizona-ballot-collection-law-43164458

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Appeals Court Might Revisit Arizona Ballot Collection Law (Original Post) Judi Lynn Oct 2016 OP
Well, yeah, I guess it does need to be reviewed. TryLogic Oct 2016 #1
Dog, I hate the state I live in ... how f***ing RIDICULOUS is this law, srsly? brett_jv Oct 2016 #2
You collect 100 ballots. Igel Oct 2016 #3

brett_jv

(1,245 posts)
2. Dog, I hate the state I live in ... how f***ing RIDICULOUS is this law, srsly?
Sat Oct 29, 2016, 08:50 PM
Oct 2016

What is it meant to accomplish, anyway?

Is the thinking that if GOTV crews are allowed to collect ballots & deliver them to the polls, that they'll 'insert' a bunch of falsified ballots into the stack they're turning in? Is NOT the fact that doing such would already be considered a friggin' FELONY ... not considered to be 'enough' to stop this (imagined) threat to our very democracy itself? Is there something out there that indicates that the US Mail is the ONLY means of legitimately transporting ballots from point A to point B? Couldn't 'cheaters' just mail-in falsified ballots just as easily as they could insert them into the stack (if in fact, that IS 'the concern') transported by GOTV folks?

Cause I gotta say, to ME ... this law just looks like another means of voter suppression ... GOP has probably calculated that the folks who wait until the last minute to mail in their ballot (thus possibly missing the cut-off time for receipt) ... are more likely to be voting for Democrats, so ... let's make it as hard as possible for them to get their votes counted. Call me crazy, but ... that's what I'm assuming.

Igel

(35,359 posts)
3. You collect 100 ballots.
Sun Oct 30, 2016, 11:22 AM
Oct 2016

You turn in 70 from those who you know will vote. Quick, if my ballot was one of those you trashed how on Earth would I know it? Or if you opened it and changed it, could I tell? No.



Or you just collect those from people who you agree with. It makes the election process partisan.


The vote is sacred. Unless it passes through 3rd party, partisan hands. Then, since maybe it'll help us, we bless those hands and what they do.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Appeals Court Might Revis...