Hillary Clinton Wikipedia Page Vandalized With Pornographic Images, Pro-Trump Message

[DonViejo]

Source: Slate



Above: A hacked version of Hillary Clinton's Wikipedia page that appeared for a short time Thursday (the actual page since been restored). We've blurred out the pornographic bits and references to a specific Twitter handle that appears to belong to a woman who has not used her account to express political opinions and does not have any obvious link to Donald Trump or the hack.

For those who are blissfully unaware, cuck is a term of derision commonly used by Trump fans on the white nationalist internet.

Update, 4:15 p.m.: A Twitter user claiming affiliation with a right-wing troll group has taken responsibility for the vandalism.

###



Read more: http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2016/10/13/hillary_clinton_wikipedia_page_vandalized_with_pornographic_images.html?wpsrc=newsletter_slatest&sid=5388f1c6dd52b8e4110003de

---

The message read:

Reminder that voting for Hillary Clinton this Novmeber [sic] means proving how much of a spineless, boring cuck you are. Nuclear war will be inevitable, as will be Bill Clinton raping more women and children. Save the America you know and love by voting for Donald Trump. Also girls send as pics to @Meepysheepy.

This message has been brought to you by Meepsheep and the Gay Nigger Association of America. Thank you for your time.

http://theslot.jezebel.com/hillary-and-bill-clintons-wikipedia-pages-subject-to-ex-1787755920?utm_campaign=socialfow_jezebel_twitter&utm_source=jezebel_twitter&utm_medium=socialflow

[onehandle]

1. Damn Russians. nt

[Odin2005]

15. This looks more like a 4chan thing to me.

[allan01]

2. can wikipdida go after this fellow?

[forest444]

3. This in a way is a step up for Wackypedia - plus all the free publicity.

It really is the encyclopedia ANYONE can edit.

[Foggyhill]

4. I'm betting they used podestà login to do that

Those pages are locked down so few can edit, same on his twitter account

Hés been pretty bad at basic internet security

[sarge43]

5. Congratulations Republicans. You all must be so very proud.

[bucolic_frolic]

6. There is no substitute

for having a dedicated round the clock team to monitor websites

I was part of an online group in 2000 which was open to the public, not
much functionality at that time so you couldn't lock people out, and we
had to monitor 24/7 and catch them in the act. It got them really ticked
off.

[vlyons]

7. Deplorables are a bottomless pit of hate and vulgarity

How sad that human beings take delight in such viciousness. They are not happy people.

[davepc]

8. That's an old school troll group

surprised they're still around.

[rivegauche]

9. This is really where we are today.

I'm almost at a loss for words.

The sick pieces of filth who did that are everywhere, literally. They are a cancerous boil on the ass of America.

Crude I know but OMFG.

[riversedge]

11. Agree.

[Eugene]

10. The page itself was not vandalized.

A common template used by that article and several others
(including Chelsea Clinton's) was vandalized. It should have
been protected because it was widely used, but this trick
has been done before.

[Denzil_DC]

17. That makes more sense.

I find it hard to believe they wouldn't have protected Clinton's Wikipedia entry from malicious changes, as they do other public figures' when the possibility of vandalism is heightened.

[Feeling the Bern]

12. This childishness is all they have left?

[Mc Mike]

13. Another glorious victory for dRumpfenfuhrer's fourth reich!

[Odin2005]

14. The emotionally stunted man-children at 4chan's /pol/ board are at it, again.

Apparently these morons didn't know that Wiki pages can be very quickly reverted.

[vercetti2021]

16. I'm not really surprised

I've been on the side of 4chan, reddit, 8chan, and many other dark web places. I've seen much worse than this and the kinds of vile humans that roam those sites. Not pretty. Luckily they got it fixed.