Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,953 posts)
Tue Oct 11, 2016, 10:36 AM Oct 2016

U.S. Supreme Court declines to hear tobacco arbitration dispute

Source: Reuters

The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday let stand lower court rulings allowing Pennsylvania and Maryland to keep tens of millions of dollars in a dispute with tobacco companies involving the massive 1998 settlement over deceptive marketing and advertising of cigarettes.

The justices declined to hear appeals, filed by Reynolds America Inc, Altria Group Inc and other companies that were part of the settlement, of rulings that had favored Pennsylvania and Maryland regarding the amount of the annual payment that those states should receive under the deal.

The dispute centered on the 2003 annual payment that companies that participated in the settlement were required to make to the various states as part of the deal.

An arbitration panel found that six states, including Pennsylvania and Maryland, had not met their side of the bargain to ensure, as required, that companies that were part of the settlement did not disproportionately lose market share as a result of the terms of the deal to competitors that shunned it.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]


Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-tobacco-idUSKCN12B1P7



U.S. | Tue Oct 11, 2016 | 9:56am EDT
By Lawrence Hurley | WASHINGTON
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. Supreme Court declines to hear tobacco arbitration dispute (Original Post) Eugene Oct 2016 OP
SCOTUS has swung left with Scalia gone. lark Oct 2016 #1
I'm fine with them not letting seats be filled, as long as it's the conservatives keeling over. nt onehandle Oct 2016 #2

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
2. I'm fine with them not letting seats be filled, as long as it's the conservatives keeling over. nt
Tue Oct 11, 2016, 11:30 AM
Oct 2016
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. Supreme Court declin...