Denmark considers compulsory language test for all two-year-olds
Source: Independent
Denmark considers compulsory language test for all two-year-olds
Parents could face cuts to child benefit if they don't comply, indicates Education Minister
May Bulman |
6 hours ago|
Children in Denmark could be required to take part in a language programme from the age of two, if a government minister's proposals are implimented.
Ellen Trane Nørby, Danish Minister for Education and member of the Liberal party, has put forward plans for a policy that requires parents to agree for their children to be enrolled in the programme or risk have their child benefits cut, according to Danish news outlet Jyllands-Posten.
There is currently a compulsory language programme in place for between 15 and 30 hours per week for Danish three year olds.
But Ms Nørby said some children were "lagging behind" and put forward plans to extend the the current system to apply to children regardless of whether their parents work or stay at home in order to improve rates of integration.
Read more: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/denmark-compulsory-language-test-all-two-year-olds-a7342091.html
madaboutharry
(40,212 posts)that documented how many children, especially boys, who were late talkers ( beginning to speak between ages 3 and 4 ) were children who were intellectually gifted in math and science and often grew up to become mathematicians, doctors, scientist, and engineers.
I think the name of the book was Late Talkers Late Walkers.
This proposal from the Danish government seems a bit extreme. I wonder if it could do more harm than good. Not far away in Finland children don't begin school until they're 7 years old.
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)Rather than simply trying to rush kids to speaking?
madaboutharry
(40,212 posts)regardless if it's aimed at immigrants where a foreign language (not Danish) is spoken in the home. I don't know a lot about language acquisition but 2 is so young.
Monk06
(7,675 posts)age
Every year beyond this window makes language acquisition more difficult
mwrguy
(3,245 posts)Denmark is pretty xenophobic
TomVilmer
(1,832 posts)84 percent of non western immigrants in Denmark are already using public daycare, compared to 88 of all children. This program is directed to a very small number of children, which everybody agrees could use some help. But since we have that kind of a government, help is given as punishment, to make everybody feel sad about it...
Yo_Mama
(8,303 posts)will have a bad early school experience if their language skills aren't up to par.
Javaman
(62,530 posts)xocet
(3,871 posts)n/t
Javaman
(62,530 posts)tblue37
(65,377 posts)19th-century edition of Grimm's Fairy Tales.
Freaked her out.
mopinko
(70,112 posts)didnt talk till he was almost 3, and went from zero to complete sentences in perfect english in about a month.
he is working on a phd in theoretical math on a full boat scholarship.
olddad56
(5,732 posts)He knew the alphabet at 18 months and could tell pronounce any printed letter in the alphabet you pointed to.
His mom read to him every evening from the time she was a couple months pregnant.
mopinko
(70,112 posts)to promote singing to babies for mothers, fathers, grandparents and siblings from early pregnancy, as you say.
how old is he now? how is he faring?
olddad56
(5,732 posts)He is a math major at Cal and a jazz musician, and an all around great kid.
virgogal
(10,178 posts)YOHABLO
(7,358 posts).
closeupready
(29,503 posts)member state directives in situations where directives are at odds. So I wouldn't worry that this xenophobic proposal stands.
The Primacy of European Union law (sometimes referred to as "supremacy" is an EU law principle that when there is conflict between European law and the law of Member States, European law prevails; the norms of national law have to be set aside. This principle was developed by the European Court of Justice, and, as interpreted by that court, it means that any norms of European law always take precedence over any norms of national law, including the constitutions of member states. Although national courts generally accept the principle in practice, most of them disagree with this extreme interpretation and reserve the right, in principle, to review the constitutionality of European law under national constitutional law.[1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primacy_of_European_Union_law
Yo_Mama
(8,303 posts)education programming for those who need it.
Response to Yo_Mama (Reply #15)
closeupready This message was self-deleted by its author.
Sand Rat Expat
(290 posts)Providing or mandating earlier language classes for very young children, not so much. If there's a language barrier when the children of immigrants or refugees begin to attend school, their education is going to suffer as a result. Giving them the assistance they need to thrive in school and wider society isn't xenophobic. Rather the reverse, in my opinion.
Yo_Mama
(8,303 posts)In GA we have a strong early childhood intervention for children with developmental delays/handicaps. These sorts of programs are as egalitarian as it gets. For the child of a single mother living on a low income to get the type of intervention that upper middle-class/upper class children get only make sense for society, in my opinion.
And the language proficiency deficits are of course not just going to show up in children with non-Danish family backgrounds. It will show up in other circumstances as well, such as autism:
https://www.sciencenews.org/article/increase-denmark%E2%80%99s-autism-diagnoses-caused-reporting-changes
Sand Rat Expat
(290 posts)The separation by race/ethnicity obviously isn't okay. But I don't see why anyone would have issues with language proficiency classes, as closeupready apparently does. I guess some people will just flip out over anything.
Igel
(35,317 posts)--language ability when you start school is very strongly connected with success in school
--many immigrant families are monolingual at home, and since it's easy to only speak your L1 you neglect what has to be one of your kid's L1s for full membership in nearly any society
--language ability--we're talking number of words and fluency--is connected with reading readiness. We often use the word "phonemic awareness," but the educational establishment as of a few years ago had no idea how to teach it (or that you can't teach it directly because it's an emergent property of speakers, not of the language).
closeupready
(29,503 posts)So, I'm good with that. Cheers.
Quantess
(27,630 posts)If you learn a new language, can you gain a "race"?
In any case, this is an attempt to increase integration, and to minimize ghettos. Sweden has notorious ghettos and could take a hint from Denmark.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)?
Quantess
(27,630 posts)I now get to feel discriminated against whenever someone fails to address me in both languages.
Sand Rat Expat
(290 posts)Can you explain why you feel that Denmark's proposal is racist, please? Because I'm just not seeing it.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Four allegations makes a pattern? Bless your little heart, regardless of your shape or form.
Yo_Mama
(8,303 posts)And no, I will not disappear from this thread.
It is absolutely the reverse of xenophobia to ensure that children get the support they need, even in early childhood, to have the best possible outcomes in school and later life.
In GA, we have formalized intervention programs for BABIES who are identified as having special needs:
https://dph.georgia.gov/Babies-Cant-Wait
There are a lot of poor people in GA. Many of them people of color, some of them immigrants. The program will provide THEIR children who are identified as having special needs the same types of things that our upper and middle class families have always been able to give their children. Nothing about that is racist or xenophobic or whatever.
Any meaningful intervention that can be provided to a very young child early on pays off hugely for that person as an adult and for society. Investing in your citizens is egalitarian rather than "ist".
closeupready
(29,503 posts)Georgia is not the topic here. Denmark is, and as I've posted, they've been attempting to implement a number of xenophobic pieces of legislation over the last few months, likely in reaction to some of the terrorism that has occurred in Western Europe recently. This is merely the latest.
I'm sure we'll see more attempts to penalize immigrants. But as I've said repeatedly, as a member state of the EU, it's not Denmark whose laws prevail in the event of a conflict between Danish laws and EU laws; it's the EU.
GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)There is nothing racist, xenophobic or any other phobic with insuring that Children in a Nation can actually speak the language of that nation.
I love the concept of the EU and love Europe. But the EU was coming close to a suicide pact. And the Members of the European Parliament Are starting to figure that out.
We are entering a phase of power being removed from Brussels. Hopefully the EU will persevere, and drop the idea of a United States of Europe.
RelativelyJones
(898 posts)This will equip children with the language skills they need to make the most of their talents from the beginning of school, and not feel alienated by language barriers not overcome until 8 or 9.