Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,661 posts)
Wed Aug 3, 2016, 12:28 PM Aug 2016

Court: Union restrictions voided teacher retirement benefits

Source: Star Tribune

MADISON, Wis. — A state appeals court says Gov. Scott Walker's public union restrictions voided retirement benefits for Neenah teachers.

Neenah schools and teachers negotiated a two-year contract in 2009 that provided a stipend and medical benefits to retiring teachers. The contract included an evergreen clause that guaranteed the deal would continue after the contract expired.

Lawmakers passed Walker's restrictions in 2011. Neenah schools subsequently reduced benefits, prompting teachers to sue.

The 2nd District Court of Appeals ruled Wednesday that the school district acted properly, finding the 2009 contract didn't extend benefits beyond its expiration and the union restrictions voided the evergreen clause.

FULL story at link.

Read more: http://www.startribune.com/court-union-restrictions-voided-teacher-retirement-benefits/389062461/

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Court: Union restrictions voided teacher retirement benefits (Original Post) Omaha Steve Aug 2016 OP
I hope they appeal this. ananda Aug 2016 #1
According to the story HuskyOffset Aug 2016 #5
And THIS is why I don't want a "pension" at the mercy of a psychopath. NT Adrahil Aug 2016 #2
This isn't going to end well... freebrew Aug 2016 #3
contracts are only as valid as the aggrieved party is wealthy yurbud Aug 2016 #6
What's Walker's/Koch's influence over Wisconsin state courts? Gidney N Cloyd Aug 2016 #4

HuskyOffset

(889 posts)
5. According to the story
Wed Aug 3, 2016, 03:14 PM
Aug 2016

they are. From the linked story:

The teachers' attorney, Charles Hertel, said he doesn't believe the union restrictions invalidated pre-existing clauses and plans to appeal to the state Supreme Court.


I wish him luck, but if I recall, Walker has the state Supreme Court stacked. It does seem strange that a contract can be affected retroactively by a new law. Seems I read somewhere that laws aren't supposed to be retroactive.

freebrew

(1,917 posts)
3. This isn't going to end well...
Wed Aug 3, 2016, 01:10 PM
Aug 2016

for someone. What good are contracts and agreements if they can be voided this easily?

Hoping Walker gets what he deserves.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Court: Union restrictions...