Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,056 posts)
Wed Jun 27, 2012, 02:02 AM Jun 2012

PG&E says 1956 pipe test led to San Bruno disaster

Source: SF Chronicle

A strength test that Pacific Gas and Electric Co. says it conducted in 1956 of the San Bruno pipeline that exploded in 2010 damaged an already-defective weld and ultimately caused the disaster, the company said Tuesday.

The company made the assertion in defending itself against accusations by California Public Utilities Commission staffers that it failed to conduct such a test, commonly performed using high-pressure water to try to expose any weaknesses, and thus violated pipeline industry standards.

The company based its argument on the recollection of a former employee that a pressure test was conducted on the San Bruno pipeline around the time it was installed.

State regulators have also blamed the company for shoddy record keeping, control room breakdowns, a faulty emergency response to the Sept. 9, 2010, explosion that killed eight people, and a culture that "emphasized profits over safety." If the utilities commission upholds the findings, PG&E could be fined hundreds of millions of dollars.

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/PG-E-says-1956-pipe-test-led-to-San-Bruno-disaster-3665019.php

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

bluesbassman

(19,379 posts)
1. I'm no engineer, but seriously? A 54 year old test?
Wed Jun 27, 2012, 02:07 AM
Jun 2012

If it damaged the pipe that much you'd think it would've failed a lot sooner, Also, I gotta tell you I'm a little freaked out that they have 50+ year old gas mains in service.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
2. We really need to start revoking corporate charters over this shit
Wed Jun 27, 2012, 02:09 AM
Jun 2012

Forget fines of ten thousand dollars or whatever. Blow them out of the water.

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
3. "The company based its argument on the recollection of a former employee"
Wed Jun 27, 2012, 02:30 AM
Jun 2012

For safety tests you are usually supposed to keep some paperwork.

bleever

(20,616 posts)
5. "No one could have anticipated..."
Wed Jun 27, 2012, 03:39 AM
Jun 2012

And then, "I believe it was, 'Bin Laden determined to strike inside U.S."


No one could connect all the dots, because there were so many dots, and it's not our fault because of Jamie Gorelick.


truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
7. Oh and then there is that little fact that the
Wed Jun 27, 2012, 04:54 AM
Jun 2012

Guy handling the money coffers of P G & E had set aside some five million dollars to replace that section of pipe,several years before the catastrophe. But the company found other things to do with the money, some of which, IIRC, had come from a state fund for repairs.

Dustlawyer

(10,497 posts)
8. Sounds very much like what happened in the BP explosion in Texas City that killed 15 in 2005!
Wed Jun 27, 2012, 09:43 AM
Jun 2012

With Tort Reform taking the teeth out of lawsuits, these companies do not worry anymore. The caps on damages for "frivolous " lawsuits mean they don't have to spend a bunch to avoid these situations that they still do not believe will happen. Then they say what was said above, "No one could have seen this coming," and my all time favorite, "we have the best safety program ..." and as you start digging you find that they routinely ignored problems. My guess is that the cathotic protection broke down long ago. This line was way overdue to be replaced.

Gregorian

(23,867 posts)
10. Talking with someone in the field, and in the area where it happened, they did a spike test
Wed Jun 27, 2012, 12:26 PM
Jun 2012

as an equivalent to a more careful test. Along with allowing the pipeline to be aged, engineers in the field are saying it was the decision to substitute a different test for the more usual test. It was probably cheaper and easier. It's not just one person. That's the trouble with corporations. There are tiers of people, none of which know it all.

Little do people know that many of the San Francisco area's water mains are made of redwood. I keep coming back to how we spend our taxes. Our military is killing us. We should be using our troops to rebuild the country, not tear down the Middle East.

iemitsu

(3,888 posts)
11. i second your idea gregorian.
Wed Jun 27, 2012, 02:04 PM
Jun 2012

we need to invest our resources in rebuilding our own communities rather than in trying to control the rest of the world.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»PG&E says 1956 pipe t...