Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Huey P. Long

(1,932 posts)
Sun Jun 24, 2012, 07:19 PM Jun 2012

Members of Congress trade in companies while making laws that affect those same firms

Source: Washington Post

Members of Congress trade in companies while making laws that affect those same firms
By Dan Keating, David S. Fallis, Kimberly Kindy and Scott Higham, Published: June 23
-
One-hundred-thirty members of Congress or their families have traded stocks collectively worth hundreds of millions of dollars in companies lobbying on bills that came before their committees, a practice that is permitted under current ethics rules, a Washington Post analysis has found.

The lawmakers bought and sold a total of between $85 million and $218 million in 323 companies registered to lobby on legislation that appeared before them, according to an examination of all 45,000 individual congressional stock transactions contained in computerized financial disclosure data from 2007 to 2010. Almost one in every eight trades — 5,531 — intersected with legislation. The 130 lawmakers traded stocks or bonds in companies as bills passed through their committees or while Congress was still considering the legislation. The party affiliation of the lawmakers was almost evenly split between Democrats and Republicans, 68 to 62.

Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) reported buying $25,000 in bonds in a genetic-technology company around the time that he released a hold on legislation the firm supported. Rep. Ed Whitfield (R-Ky.) sold between $50,000 and $100,000 in General Electric stock shortly before a Republican filibuster killed legislation sought by the company. The family of Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Tex.) bought between $286,000 and $690,000 in a high-tech company interested in a bill under his committee’s jurisdiction.

The trades were uncovered as part of an ongoing examination by The Post of the intersection between the personal finances of lawmakers and their professional duties. Earlier this year, Congress responded to criticism of potential conflicts of interest by passing the Stock Act, which bars lawmakers, their staffs and top executive branch officials from trading on inside information acquired on Capitol Hill.
-


Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/members-of-congress-trade-in-companies-while-making-laws-that-affect-those-same-firms/2012/06/23/gJQAlXwVyV_story.html

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Members of Congress trade in companies while making laws that affect those same firms (Original Post) Huey P. Long Jun 2012 OP
Golly gee. It's almost like...oh...what's that word...? progressoid Jun 2012 #1
Two words Duer 157099 Jun 2012 #18
I can't believe that they manage to keep getting elected Savannahmann Jun 2012 #2
What are the odds that any of the Supreme Court Justices have bought or shorted stock in AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2012 #3
34 Lawmakers Changed Their Investments after Receiving Private Briefings About 2008 Economic Crisis Huey P. Long Jun 2012 #19
I'm shocked! BadtotheboneBob Jun 2012 #4
The Real News - "No One Seems All That Worked Up About It." jtuck004 Jun 2012 #5
It is called Insider Trading clang1 Jun 2012 #6
Yep.. However, Congress Critters are not subject to criminal law if they ignore the Stock Act 2banon Jun 2012 #10
Let's face it - "It's perfectly legal for the 1% to do that" FreakinDJ Jun 2012 #7
EVERYTHING is bought and paid for n/t clang1 Jun 2012 #9
Major investigation needed. I wish we could clean house. The Wielding Truth Jun 2012 #8
8% approval rating Enrique Jun 2012 #11
It's the best Democracy money can buy. What's to complain about? n/t clang1 Jun 2012 #12
What's interesting is that congress specifically prohibits other federal employees from doing this Major Nikon Jun 2012 #13
...Can't share the wealth now... lol. n/t clang1 Jun 2012 #14
These congressmen should be indicted on insider trading laws wordpix Jun 2012 #15
Those who make the laws can also break the laws clang1 Jun 2012 #16
Scum! L0oniX Jun 2012 #17
 

Savannahmann

(3,891 posts)
2. I can't believe that they manage to keep getting elected
Sun Jun 24, 2012, 07:53 PM
Jun 2012

Anyone who did that should be thrown out of Congress.

 

AnotherMcIntosh

(11,064 posts)
3. What are the odds that any of the Supreme Court Justices have bought or shorted stock in
Sun Jun 24, 2012, 08:19 PM
Jun 2012

health insurance companies?

They wouldn't do that would they?

 

Huey P. Long

(1,932 posts)
19. 34 Lawmakers Changed Their Investments after Receiving Private Briefings About 2008 Economic Crisis
Mon Jun 25, 2012, 01:42 PM
Jun 2012

34 Lawmakers Changed Their Investments after Receiving Private Briefings About 2008 Economic Crisis

Last November, 60 Minutes aired a report showing that House Financial Services Chairman Spencer Bachus (R-AL) made tens of thousands of dollars trading stock as he was receiving private economic briefings during the height of the 2008 financial crisis. Due to weak insider trading rules, Bachus was cleared of any legal wrong doing by the Congressional Ethics Committee, but the case still motivated Congress to pass the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act, which supposedly prevents lawmakers from profiting off information they receive in private briefings with top economic officials.

However, the problem may go far beyond just Bachus. As the Washington Post reported on Monday, 34 lawmakers — including Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-OH) — shuffled their investment portfolios during the financial crisis, after speaking to high-ranking economic officials:


Pat Garofalo, News Analysis: After speaking with Paulson, Boehner shifted $50,000 to $100,000 out of a risky mutual fund, and spent tens of thousands of dollars more on a less-risky fund. Other lawmakers who were making investment decisions after receiving private information at the time included Sen. Kent Conrad (D-ND), Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), and Sen. Ben Nelson (D-NE). The lawmakers contend that their investments are overseen by outside advisers and that the private information had no bearing on their portfolio moves.

-
http://www.nationofchange.org/34-lawmakers-changed-their-investments-after-receiving-private-briefings-about-2008-economic-crisis-

 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
5. The Real News - "No One Seems All That Worked Up About It."
Sun Jun 24, 2012, 08:24 PM
Jun 2012

I'm wonder if it is a side effect from drinking of the ever popular highpopalorum or lopopahirum all these years...there is a big difference, you know.
 

clang1

(884 posts)
6. It is called Insider Trading
Sun Jun 24, 2012, 09:12 PM
Jun 2012

Obama signs STOCK Act to ban "congressional insider trading"

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57409314-503544/obama-signs-stock-act-to-ban-congressional-insider-trading/

President Obama on Wednesday signed the STOCK Act into law, a bipartisan bill designed to stop so-called "congressional insider trading."

All part of the racket. Guess no more easy money via this route now.

 

2banon

(7,321 posts)
10. Yep.. However, Congress Critters are not subject to criminal law if they ignore the Stock Act
Sun Jun 24, 2012, 09:38 PM
Jun 2012

Unless the original language has been re-inserted since last Sunday, law makers will be able to continue as they have without facing Felony consequences. The provision clause as of last week essentially allows for them to simply ignore the Legal intention and Ethical spirit of the "Stock Act"...

Enrique

(27,461 posts)
11. 8% approval rating
Sun Jun 24, 2012, 09:39 PM
Jun 2012

look who's running the house, the guy that passed out tobacco checks on the house floor.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
13. What's interesting is that congress specifically prohibits other federal employees from doing this
Sun Jun 24, 2012, 09:44 PM
Jun 2012

The golden rule is those with the gold make the rules.

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
15. These congressmen should be indicted on insider trading laws
Sun Jun 24, 2012, 10:13 PM
Jun 2012

Nuff said. If it's illegal on Wall St., it's illegal in Congress ---or should be.

 

clang1

(884 posts)
16. Those who make the laws can also break the laws
Sun Jun 24, 2012, 10:17 PM
Jun 2012

One-hundred-thirty members of Congress

Good luck...I don't think most people quite get the depth of all this (across the board). But hey, that's just me. I understand corruption when I see it and I see a huge rot. It's overwhelming.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Members of Congress trade...