Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,899 posts)
Wed Jul 6, 2016, 09:24 PM Jul 2016

DuPont ordered to pay $5.1 million in trial over Teflon-making chemical

Source: Reuters

A U.S. jury on Wednesday ordered DuPont to pay $5.1 million to a man who said he developed testicular cancer from exposure to a toxic chemical used to make Teflon at one of its plants, according to a DuPont spokesman.

It is the second time jurors in Ohio federal court have found against DuPont, which is facing more than 3,400 lawsuits from residents who say they contracted one of six diseases linked to perfluorooctanoic acid, known as PFOA or C-8, which is used to make products such as Teflon non-stick cookware.

Following a five-week trial, jurors deliberated for less than a day before finding DuPont was negligent and awarding $5.1 million in compensatory damages to David Freeman, an Ohio resident who said he developed testicular cancer from his exposure to C-8 in drinking water.

The jury also decided that DuPont had acted with actual malice, a finding that exposes the company to punitive damages, the amount of which will be determined at a proceeding starting Thursday.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]


Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-du-pont-verdict-idUSKCN0ZM2BX



World | Wed Jul 6, 2016 5:48pm EDT
NEW YORK | BY JESSICA DYE
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
DuPont ordered to pay $5.1 million in trial over Teflon-making chemical (Original Post) Eugene Jul 2016 OP
Small stuff for the company. chapdrum Jul 2016 #1
I'm glad the jury decided that DuPont "had acted with actual malice" ailsagirl Jul 2016 #2
If it's that dangerous (and I believe it is), can you imagine what cooking with it would silvershadow Jul 2016 #3
 

chapdrum

(930 posts)
1. Small stuff for the company.
Wed Jul 6, 2016, 09:59 PM
Jul 2016

It's standard procedure that an insurer pays the lion's share of fines assessed to any company, so it very rarely comes out of their coffers.

And of course, the larger they are, the better insurance they have.

ailsagirl

(22,897 posts)
2. I'm glad the jury decided that DuPont "had acted with actual malice"
Wed Jul 6, 2016, 10:15 PM
Jul 2016

They deserve everything they get-- and a thousand times more



PS 3400 lawsuits?? Sounds like dumdum!!

 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
3. If it's that dangerous (and I believe it is), can you imagine what cooking with it would
Thu Jul 7, 2016, 03:28 AM
Jul 2016

(and probably does) expose us all to?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»DuPont ordered to pay $5....