Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(70,304 posts)
Sun May 29, 2016, 05:42 PM May 2016

Feinstein Dismisses Clinton Email Controversy: ‘Enough Is Enough’

Source: mediaite.com




Feinstein Dismisses Clinton Email Controversy: ‘Enough Is Enough’
by Sam Reisman | 4:10 pm, May 29th, 2016
video 98

In an interview with ABC’s This Week that aired Sunday, Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein dismissed the controversy over Hillary Clinton‘s use of a private email server, saying, “enough is enough,” and encouraging voters to deal with more pressing issues facing the country.

HC broke no law. I read all 42 pages of the report. The conclusion of the report does not say that. What it does say is that the [State] Department does not handle these electronic platform operations well.”

She continued: “I mean, what do people want? This goes on and on and on. We’re reaching the final stages of a primary. Hillary Clinton is going to win this primary. I say enough is enough. Let’s get to the major problems facing this nation.”

Read more: http://www.mediaite.com/online/feinstein-dismisses-clinton-email-controversy-enough-is-enough/






94 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Feinstein Dismisses Clinton Email Controversy: ‘Enough Is Enough’ (Original Post) riversedge May 2016 OP
The State Dept Report pmorlan1 May 2016 #1
Sen Feinstein has been on the Intelligence Commitee for years. I trust her riversedge May 2016 #2
Feinstein and her husband have made a lot of money from the War business and now Ferd Berfel May 2016 #9
That's a fact. libdem4life May 2016 #12
Yes they did. 840high May 2016 #50
let them eat cake she says. it will be good when she leaves roguevalley May 2016 #57
She helps get HRC in, and then her blooming Blum will get more billions laserhaas May 2016 #75
I agree. She is my Senator along with Boxer, who will step down this term, and hopefully still_one May 2016 #15
more's the pity grasswire May 2016 #17
You Trust George Bush Too? billhicks76 May 2016 #18
Her 2002 IWR vote gives me reason not to Trust Her or Hillary. But I'm not a real Democrat. bahrbearian May 2016 #21
I dont...Dianne Feinstein, Strong Advocate of Leak Prosecutions, Demands Immunity For David Petraeus AntiBank May 2016 #23
DiFi is an HRC supporter. She's not going to be honest about what HRC did Press Virginia May 2016 #28
Plus given her position and relation to Hillary... scscholar May 2016 #30
I do not trust Feinstein ArcticFox May 2016 #36
Feinstein Does NOT Represent THE LAW! Hillary Certainly Has Some Problems With THE TRUTH! CorporatistNation May 2016 #45
Feinstein doesn't give a SHIT Plucketeer May 2016 #81
Except that is what 90% of the posts here have been doing. On that State still_one May 2016 #5
'Enough is enough' indeed. Both Sec. Clinton and Sen. Feinstein should retire. JonLeibowitz May 2016 #3
and as a Californian, you have an absolute right to that point of view, and I have the opposite still_one May 2016 #11
You think Feinstein-Burr is a good idea? JonLeibowitz May 2016 #16
Ha Ha,, the jaw drop is sooooo apropos laserhaas May 2016 #76
I'm sure she would still be entitled as a VIP... TipTok May 2016 #22
Yes Owl May 2016 #29
Let's get to the major problems facing this nation. SmittynMo May 2016 #4
Are you from California? still_one May 2016 #7
Hmm, a five letter word awoke_in_2003 May 2016 #67
Imagine the possibilities SmittynMo May 2016 #71
Is that a three dimensional chess board, 25 squares on each of 3 levels? Ned Flanders May 2016 #84
Imagination not necessary awoke_in_2003 May 2016 #91
Sanders and Feinstein! yallerdawg May 2016 #6
When she's in charge of the FBI and the Justice Department Cassiopeia May 2016 #8
I trust her -not you. riversedge May 2016 #19
Your trust an HRC supporter who pretends classified Intel must be marked Press Virginia May 2016 #31
You think classified material is not supposed to be marked? ConservativeDemocrat May 2016 #41
I refer you to the SF 312 which says it may not be marked Press Virginia May 2016 #74
It is still SUPPOSED TO BE marked ConservativeDemocrat May 2016 #80
The document that says it may be marked or unmarked can't be fulfilled? Press Virginia May 2016 #90
If someone emails you something without any classification markings ConservativeDemocrat Jun 2016 #92
She's so full of it...last week she encouraged Bernie to keep running libdem4life May 2016 #10
and the huge deposits to the clinton fund hopemountain May 2016 #54
I think they found the thread that will unravel the proverbial sweater . libdem4life May 2016 #56
yes - so many intricate details - and hopemountain May 2016 #58
It's coming. libdem4life May 2016 #59
It sure is Ms.Feinstein! 7wo7rees May 2016 #13
Brought To You By The Bought And Paid For Turncoat billhicks76 May 2016 #14
Back in 2008, after I filed a complaint with the Public Corruption Task Force - they shut it down laserhaas May 2016 #78
Bait And Switch billhicks76 May 2016 #88
Why is DF doing this? SmittynMo May 2016 #20
She is an intelligent women and knows the REAL Deal when she sees it...... riversedge May 2016 #72
See ya all at the convention!!!!! SmittynMo May 2016 #73
look at that face, just look at it, look at that funny old face of yours Voice for Peace May 2016 #24
Is this from Trump? Thinkingabout May 2016 #26
no it's from Roar of the Greasepaint, Smell of the Crowd Voice for Peace May 2016 #48
Hum, wonder if he gets his information from the same source. Thinkingabout May 2016 #49
the song just popped into my head when I saw her picture Voice for Peace May 2016 #51
Wasn't there an article in more than one publication Kingofalldems May 2016 #25
Unnamed sources is not the FBI dorkzilla May 2016 #34
Betting or hoping? Kingofalldems May 2016 #35
Betting dorkzilla May 2016 #37
That's a hell of a lot longer than Sanders. Kingofalldems May 2016 #39
He founded the Congressional Progressive Caucus in 1991 dorkzilla May 2016 #40
He's not more of a Democrat than me. Kingofalldems May 2016 #43
Lol, okay your majesty...it's all about you, got it. dorkzilla May 2016 #46
You said he's more of a Democrat than most. Kingofalldems May 2016 #52
I did nothing of the sort dorkzilla May 2016 #55
Bye now. This is nonsense. Kingofalldems May 2016 #63
Nonsense indeed! nt dorkzilla May 2016 #64
I've been an active CA Democrat for 56 years, since I was 16 and canvassed for JFK... Peace Patriot May 2016 #69
Wrapping themselves in party flags and touting their own goodness, bodes for naught laserhaas May 2016 #79
OMG, an "I'm a better democrat" pissing contest! Ned Flanders May 2016 #85
Typical post from you. Kingofalldems May 2016 #87
I'm flattered... Ned Flanders May 2016 #89
Oh Ha Ha. SammyWinstonJack May 2016 #42
Oh ha ha yourself. Facts are sometimes difficult to accept. Kingofalldems May 2016 #44
Nope. Jester Messiah May 2016 #27
Feinstein has made millions and millions of dollars while a senator - ish of the hammer May 2016 #32
blood money, in fact MisterP May 2016 #38
No Crime Huh? Really? Says Who? scottie55 May 2016 #33
I'm sure the FBI is packing their toys and going home cliffordu May 2016 #47
Dear Senator Feinstein: Here's a suggestion -- saltpoint May 2016 #53
The "broke no law" line is getting old. Gore1FL May 2016 #60
Can you name one law she has riversedge May 2016 #65
Re-read my post for understanding. nt Gore1FL May 2016 #66
Feinstein! ReRe May 2016 #61
Diane Feinstein - a woman I once respected - and now just another Establishment Hack. DrBulldog May 2016 #62
Time for Hillary to withdraw for the sake of the party. Hoppy May 2016 #68
Actually, enough is enough with Feinstein. emsimon33 May 2016 #70
It's over? Before the FBI is wrapped up? Really. Sienna86 May 2016 #77
The big issue is the Foundation taking millions laserhaas May 2016 #83
"I hear" that the reason it's quiet is because there is a lot of libdem4life Jun 2016 #94
She's on a roll for Hillary these past few days isn't she? Arazi May 2016 #82
Apparently, Democrats are no longer concerned with open government laws, tabasco May 2016 #86
I've always loved Jello Biafra's nickname for her. roamer65 Jun 2016 #93

pmorlan1

(2,096 posts)
1. The State Dept Report
Sun May 29, 2016, 05:48 PM
May 2016

is not the one she should be reading if she is looking for laws broken. She'll have to read the FBI report for that.

riversedge

(70,304 posts)
2. Sen Feinstein has been on the Intelligence Commitee for years. I trust her
Sun May 29, 2016, 05:51 PM
May 2016

when she says Hillary broke no laws.

Ferd Berfel

(3,687 posts)
9. Feinstein and her husband have made a lot of money from the War business and now
Sun May 29, 2016, 05:53 PM
May 2016

hubby is poised to make upwards of $1billion from killing the postal service. Good republicans are in favor of both.

She's just protecting past and future income.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
75. She helps get HRC in, and then her blooming Blum will get more billions
Mon May 30, 2016, 10:46 AM
May 2016

Oligarchs loving oligarchs - who make much - while in public service

still_one

(92,397 posts)
15. I agree. She is my Senator along with Boxer, who will step down this term, and hopefully
Sun May 29, 2016, 05:58 PM
May 2016

Kamala Harris will take over from the good things Barbara Boxer has done for our state

 

billhicks76

(5,082 posts)
18. You Trust George Bush Too?
Sun May 29, 2016, 06:01 PM
May 2016

Trust has nothing to do with status or seniority. Her family makes tens of millions off the intelligence industry. Good thing you only have one vote come Election Day.

 

Press Virginia

(2,329 posts)
28. DiFi is an HRC supporter. She's not going to be honest about what HRC did
Sun May 29, 2016, 07:00 PM
May 2016

She's also not in a position to make an honest assessment of what HRC did.

 

scscholar

(2,902 posts)
30. Plus given her position and relation to Hillary...
Sun May 29, 2016, 07:02 PM
May 2016

I'm sure she has more information than we have.

ArcticFox

(1,249 posts)
36. I do not trust Feinstein
Sun May 29, 2016, 07:17 PM
May 2016

I have always liked Senator Boxer, but Feinstein always seemed a little too corporate and militaristic.

CorporatistNation

(2,546 posts)
45. Feinstein Does NOT Represent THE LAW! Hillary Certainly Has Some Problems With THE TRUTH!
Sun May 29, 2016, 07:32 PM
May 2016
MSNBC To the deniers... Watch THIS Video... It is not comforting to think that she may well be the Democratic Nominee...

Hillary really betrayed Andrea Mitchell... The entire context of this report was of a solemn nature... A Funeral so to speak...

Andrea Mitchell "I do not see this report as ...ANYTHING BUT... DEVASTATING!"

Chuck Todd "After this I don't think that she could get confirmed for Attorney General!"

Lots of FIBBING by Hillary here.. for more than a year!

 

Plucketeer

(12,882 posts)
81. Feinstein doesn't give a SHIT
Mon May 30, 2016, 12:45 PM
May 2016

for her average constituents. I write her from time to time and get responses MONTHS later - and then usually just blanket form letters written for the many. She's another Howard Dean and she hasn't even left the Senate yet! She's as good a case for term limits and campaign finance reform as ANYONE you can dredge up. Diane (and Boxer) are there because they were wealthy and to get MORE wealthy still. Whatever noble idea they might have championed when they first ran for the Senate has been totally obscured to them by wads and wads of hundred dollar bills.

still_one

(92,397 posts)
5. Except that is what 90% of the posts here have been doing. On that State
Sun May 29, 2016, 05:52 PM
May 2016

Department Report they have been spewing that Clinton will be indicted for sure.

JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)
3. 'Enough is enough' indeed. Both Sec. Clinton and Sen. Feinstein should retire.
Sun May 29, 2016, 05:51 PM
May 2016

For different reasons, of course. Hillary for varied reasons, Feinstein because she proposed the ludicrous Feinstein-Burr bill.

Whoever proposes banning encryption has no business representing California in the U.S. Senate. And as a California voter I could not possibly care less what she has to say, especially on issues concerning technology like this one.

still_one

(92,397 posts)
11. and as a Californian, you have an absolute right to that point of view, and I have the opposite
Sun May 29, 2016, 05:55 PM
May 2016

point of view, and am also a Californian

So let's see what June 7th brings

SmittynMo

(3,544 posts)
4. Let's get to the major problems facing this nation.
Sun May 29, 2016, 05:51 PM
May 2016

Yeah, like getting DF out of office. What an arrogant &^%$#. Shit, her state hasn't even voted yet, and does absolutely nothing for the democratic process.

 

Ned Flanders

(233 posts)
84. Is that a three dimensional chess board, 25 squares on each of 3 levels?
Mon May 30, 2016, 02:17 PM
May 2016

Just curious, because I hear Hillary is really good at three dimensional chess.

 

Press Virginia

(2,329 posts)
31. Your trust an HRC supporter who pretends classified Intel must be marked
Sun May 29, 2016, 07:03 PM
May 2016

and only the sender of the information is responsible for its identification?

DiFi had better get those 312's updated so the signators don't have to worry about protecting anything that isn't marked

ConservativeDemocrat

(2,720 posts)
41. You think classified material is not supposed to be marked?
Sun May 29, 2016, 07:26 PM
May 2016

*blink blink*

Yeah. Let's just say that I do indeed believe her and not you.

- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community

ConservativeDemocrat

(2,720 posts)
80. It is still SUPPOSED TO BE marked
Mon May 30, 2016, 12:24 PM
May 2016

Always.

Without such markings, it is not possible to fulfill the other aspects of SF 312.

All that is saying is that if someone hands you information that you know to be classified, you still need to follow the correct procedures, even if the person who gave it to you, failed to follow the agreement. There is no law that makes people responsible for the unwitting transferal of information they did not know to be classified.

I simply cannot believe that I'm having to explain such basic concepts to a Democrat, rather than some idiot Republican.

- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community

 

Press Virginia

(2,329 posts)
90. The document that says it may be marked or unmarked can't be fulfilled?
Mon May 30, 2016, 09:40 PM
May 2016

there is a process for the recipient to verify the classification level and a responsibility until that verification is established.

ConservativeDemocrat

(2,720 posts)
92. If someone emails you something without any classification markings
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 02:22 AM
Jun 2016

Then you have absolutely no reason to believe it is classified.

- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
10. She's so full of it...last week she encouraged Bernie to keep running
Sun May 29, 2016, 05:54 PM
May 2016

I'm awaiting the information about the Clinton Foundation. That's where it all comes full circle. Seems possible the formerly wiped emails reconstruction is nigh and then the immunity, the deposed aides, Guccifer, the Canadian "fund" and some underground news today.

Flame away but I sense some type of impending disclosures imminent.

hopemountain

(3,919 posts)
54. and the huge deposits to the clinton fund
Sun May 29, 2016, 07:52 PM
May 2016

by international "investors" following us govt. "sanctioned" "arms" "trade" "deals".

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
56. I think they found the thread that will unravel the proverbial sweater .
Sun May 29, 2016, 07:59 PM
May 2016

Now they have the Canadian laundering site smoking gun, they have a clearer path to finding enough to get them out of the Democratic Catbird Seat. The sooner the better. They are holding the party hostage as cover for their, um, misdeeds.

hopemountain

(3,919 posts)
58. yes - so many intricate details - and
Sun May 29, 2016, 08:04 PM
May 2016

most likely, more. i wonder if they will subpoena bill's longtime friend - the one who had those funds deposited into her account.

well, as long as it takes.

this is a yuge reason for bernie to remain a candidate - no matter what chris matthews and df think.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
59. It's coming.
Sun May 29, 2016, 08:11 PM
May 2016

and there is going to be a lot of roasted crow for these Clinton worshippers. Their little black book will not likely mow over these events.

7wo7rees

(5,128 posts)
13. It sure is Ms.Feinstein!
Sun May 29, 2016, 05:56 PM
May 2016

This is wrong in every direction! Keep on covering up!

Enough is surely enough!

 

billhicks76

(5,082 posts)
14. Brought To You By The Bought And Paid For Turncoat
Sun May 29, 2016, 05:58 PM
May 2016

Who wants you to bend over and accept having ALL your texts, emails, phone conversations and GPS coordinates to be recorded and read by military contractors and their accomplices like her husband. Enough with these fake relics from a time where people couldn't properly vet them. The age of communication has exposed these parasites that feed for dollars at the expense of a democracy's integrity.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
78. Back in 2008, after I filed a complaint with the Public Corruption Task Force - they shut it down
Mon May 30, 2016, 11:01 AM
May 2016

Here's my Dec. 7, 2007 Complaint
http://docslide.us/documents/clocked-18-usc-3057-a.html


Then, here's the shut down of the Public Corruption Task Force (with threats reported against career prosecutors)
http://articles.latimes.com/2008/mar/20/local/me-shakeup20

Senator Feinstein actually appears to come to my rescue. I have her email, for direct communication;
and she sends USAG Mukasey, a letter - asking him to explain what's going on with the shut down.
http://www.feinstein.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases?ID=ecfa735e-9a7f-a6c9-dfb2-f03c0133794e

Then - all of sudden - her email changed, her staff stopped answering my calls, and

Nothing Happened!

SmittynMo

(3,544 posts)
20. Why is DF doing this?
Sun May 29, 2016, 06:02 PM
May 2016

There is absolutely no reason at all for her to say this. NONE. Why can't she wait like the rest of us? That is, unless someone's been really pushing her to help get Bernie out of the race. This is definitely some form of corruption, with her bullshit predictions. I really don't give a shit what she has to say. And all of the Establishment know that Bernie is going NOWHERE. When will they learn?

One would think she had better things to talk about. Like where is Donald going to get all that water?

See ya all at the convention!!!!!

riversedge

(70,304 posts)
72. She is an intelligent women and knows the REAL Deal when she sees it......
Mon May 30, 2016, 09:11 AM
May 2016


Still4Hill Retweeted
Pat Fuller ?@bannerite 17h17 hours ago

Ask yourself why they are so admired by so many? They R the real deal. Not some phony con man [Trump] selling u snake oil!

 

Voice for Peace

(13,141 posts)
24. look at that face, just look at it, look at that funny old face of yours
Sun May 29, 2016, 06:40 PM
May 2016

I knew first look I took at it,
you've got a face that the world adores..

look at those eyes, as wise and as deep as the sea!
look at that nose, it shows what a nose should be!

as for your smile, it's lyrical,
friendly and warm as a summer's day!
your face is just a miracle!
and I mean that in the nicest way...

 

Voice for Peace

(13,141 posts)
51. the song just popped into my head when I saw her picture
Sun May 29, 2016, 07:47 PM
May 2016

dont think he gets anything from my own head but maybe he knows the same songs.

Kingofalldems

(38,481 posts)
25. Wasn't there an article in more than one publication
Sun May 29, 2016, 06:46 PM
May 2016

that said the FBI has found no evidence of criminal wrongdoing?

Pretty sure I saw it here.

So that kinda wraps it all up for this latest Hillary outrage, completely ginned up by the right wing.

dorkzilla

(5,141 posts)
34. Unnamed sources is not the FBI
Sun May 29, 2016, 07:16 PM
May 2016

I'll wait till named sources say the same. I'm betting the named sources will say something else though.

I read that the earth was only 6000 years old somewhere once too,but I didn't believe that either.

dorkzilla

(5,141 posts)
37. Betting
Sun May 29, 2016, 07:20 PM
May 2016

I take no solace in a Democratic tainting the party by association as I've been a registered Democrat for 32 years.

dorkzilla

(5,141 posts)
46. Lol, okay your majesty...it's all about you, got it.
Sun May 29, 2016, 07:36 PM
May 2016

I'll just take the word of some anonymous internet poster over someone who's record I can check.

And if you're comparing this warmongering "democrat" to Sanders just because Feinstein calls herself a democrat, good luck with that.

Kingofalldems

(38,481 posts)
52. You said he's more of a Democrat than most.
Sun May 29, 2016, 07:48 PM
May 2016

I responded. You chose a personal insult. Says a lot about you.

Just about 10 more days BTW. Enjoy.

dorkzilla

(5,141 posts)
55. I did nothing of the sort
Sun May 29, 2016, 07:57 PM
May 2016

You chose to make it about you and I was pointing out how self-centered the statement was. Says more about you if anyone, specially in light of your choice of screen name. King? Okie dokie!

Moreover, instead of focusing on the real comparison of Feinstein versus Sanders, you continued to make it about you.

Why do birds suddenly appear
Every time you are near....

Peace Patriot

(24,010 posts)
69. I've been an active CA Democrat for 56 years, since I was 16 and canvassed for JFK...
Mon May 30, 2016, 01:48 AM
May 2016

...and the first Governor Brown, and was President of the Young Democrats in San Bernardino County, CA, when it was a very blue, labor friendly county.

And I hereby formally adopt Bernie Sanders into the Democratic family! He has the values that my parents and grandparents believed in, and that I've believed in all these years. He is a New Deal Democrat who chose wisely and courageously, as a political office holder, to distance himself from corrupt oligarchs like Diane Feinstein who have taken over our party and turned it to shit--to war, and greed, and putrid cronyism, and transglobal corporate rule.

He was right to do that. I am extremely impressed with his doing that. I wish I had done that when I began to realize how utterly our party leaders were betraying us--starting circa Reagan, Iran-Contra and their failure to impeach Reagan for a clear, blatant violation of the Boland Amendment in the Reagan/'contra' war on Nicaragua! Our Democratic leaders went for the money--Reagan making the rich richer. It started then. I know this personally because of my political connections in CA at the time. They abandoned the New Deal and went for the money! I did not know, then, how pervasive it was going to be. I now know. And Feinstein is a major archetype of that disgusting betrayal. And Hillary Clinton is another.

Bernie Sanders is a Democrat and they are NOT.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
79. Wrapping themselves in party flags and touting their own goodness, bodes for naught
Mon May 30, 2016, 11:04 AM
May 2016

Hillary and Diane can just go spend their monies
(while of hopes & prayers, we never prove the way they got it)

 

Ned Flanders

(233 posts)
89. I'm flattered...
Mon May 30, 2016, 05:29 PM
May 2016

...you pay that much attention to my little posts. But you forgot to mock me for having so few.

 

scottie55

(1,400 posts)
33. No Crime Huh? Really? Says Who?
Sun May 29, 2016, 07:10 PM
May 2016

The problem is powerful people don't get prosecuted even when they do crimes.

Amerika.

Let the pillaging continue.

God speed!

saltpoint

(50,986 posts)
53. Dear Senator Feinstein: Here's a suggestion --
Sun May 29, 2016, 07:49 PM
May 2016

Let's let the FBI conclude its investigation.

If you have misgivings about the FBI, do proceed to voice them.

Otherwise, you do your job and let them do theirs.

Gore1FL

(21,151 posts)
60. The "broke no law" line is getting old.
Sun May 29, 2016, 08:21 PM
May 2016

I'd be happier if someone could raise that to "wasn't a incredibly stupid proactive mistake."

But alas, no one can.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
61. Feinstein!
Sun May 29, 2016, 08:30 PM
May 2016
Diane Feinstein coming out like this proves to me that Hillary MUST be guilty of something. Maybe DiFi's thumbprint is on Hillary's e-mails somewhere?

Difi knows nothing about Hillary's innocence or guilt. And wasn't the report a total of 81 pages?

People like DiFi in our government is just another reason to get Bernie Sanders into the White House.

emsimon33

(3,128 posts)
70. Actually, enough is enough with Feinstein.
Mon May 30, 2016, 02:26 AM
May 2016

She better be planning to retire because she will not win another term in the Senate.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
83. The big issue is the Foundation taking millions
Mon May 30, 2016, 02:02 PM
May 2016

From foreigners...while she was Sec. Of State

Its absurd that the media isnt pouncing all over influence peddling...Quid Pro Quo

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
94. "I hear" that the reason it's quiet is because there is a lot of
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 12:40 AM
Jun 2016

input into the contents of the emails. The coverup has failed and the issue has gone beyond just the stupidity and arrogance of flipping off protocol...and PBO. Hubris, unleashed and unfettered, is an addictive drug...hard to just stop.

Now it's up to the FBI to determine the results. State has bowed out which leaves PBO with some cover., although the AG is somehow in the mix. Since the FBI is not political, they are working hard not to appear partisan yet not to let it go. They can't. They have jailed people for much less than is already known.

All that's left to be determined, IMHO, is how powerful the Clintons are now. Do they carry the same weight now neither of them is in formal government service? I doubt it, but there will be preferential treatment, seems likely anyway.

 

tabasco

(22,974 posts)
86. Apparently, Democrats are no longer concerned with open government laws,
Mon May 30, 2016, 02:46 PM
May 2016

freedom of information, public access to government documents, and government by the people, in general.

Count me out, the party left me.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Feinstein Dismisses Clint...