Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,034 posts)
Thu May 19, 2016, 06:53 PM May 2016

(California) Senate passes 11 new gun control measures

Source: SF Chronicle

SACRAMENTO — The state Senate passed nearly a dozen gun-control bills Thursday, saying the package of legislation is the most ambitious action ever taken to protect communities from gun violence.

Crafted in response to the mass shooting in San Bernardino in December, the 11 bills add to California’s reputation as already having some of the strictest gun laws in the country.

Among the most controversial of the bills is SB1235, which requires background checks for people buying ammunition, a license for people selling bullets and submit purchasing data to the Department of Justice. Another bill, SB1446 by Sen. Loni Hancock, D-Berkeley, would make it illegal to possess magazines that hold more than 10 rounds of ammunition. Hancock said current penal code does not prohibit possession of large capacity magazines, although the sale or manufacturing of large capacity magazines is illegal in the state.

...

If both houses were to approve the bills, it’s unclear whether Gov. Jerry Brown would sign them. He’s vetoed gun-control bills in the past, including one similar to de Leon’s bill for background checks to purchase ammunition.

Read more: http://www.sfchronicle.com/politics/article/State-Senate-passes-11-new-gun-control-measures-7750920.php?t=2e3c5eb3f17d4f3860&cmpid=twitter-premium

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
(California) Senate passes 11 new gun control measures (Original Post) alp227 May 2016 OP
How do you ban existing high-cap mags? AtheistCrusader May 2016 #1
Leave at home. Who, but a militia type or one too lazy to reload, need hicap mags? Hoyt May 2016 #2
That would still be possession, and a crime under that bill. AtheistCrusader May 2016 #3
Door to door is how scscholar May 2016 #4
Door to door what? CompanyFirstSergeant May 2016 #5
And what amount is the State willing to pay oneshooter May 2016 #6
Good work for the one of hte most progressive/liberal State Senates. Agnosticsherbet May 2016 #7

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
1. How do you ban existing high-cap mags?
Thu May 19, 2016, 06:56 PM
May 2016

Like, on what grounds?

Sale and manufacture, sure. But ban? Interesting. What are people supposed to do with them? Even a pistol mag runs upwards of 30$. High cap rifle mags can be hundreds (For a Beta-C mag or something like that.)

That's going to cause some consternation.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
2. Leave at home. Who, but a militia type or one too lazy to reload, need hicap mags?
Thu May 19, 2016, 07:00 PM
May 2016

Last thing I'd worry about is what some gun yahoo is going to do with his expensive lethal weapons accessories.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»(California) Senate passe...