Sam Donaldson Rejects Comparison To Reporter Who Interrupted Obama
Source: Huffington Post
Sam Donaldson Rejects Comparison To Reporter Who Interrupted Obama
Posted: 06/16/2012 1:12 pm Updated: 06/16/2012 1:18 pm
NEW YORK -- Shortly after Daily Caller reporter Neil Munro interrupted President Barack Obama's remarks on changes in immigration policy Friday, Editor-in-Chief Tucker Carlson suggested to The Huffington Post that the reporter's actions were similar to those of former White House correspondent Sam Donaldson during the Reagan years.
In a later official statement, Carlson again mentioned Donaldson when taking issue with ABC News anchor Diane Sawyer dismissing Munro as a "heckler."
I dont remember Diane Sawyer scolding her colleague Sam Donaldson for heckling President Reagan," Carlson said. "And she shouldnt have. A reporters job is to ask questions and get answers."
But Donaldson, remembered for his aggressive questioning during the Reagan years and for sparring with White House press secretaries as an ABC News correspondent, rejected the comparison to Munro.
Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/16/sam-donaldson-tucker-carlson-daily-caller-obama-interrupted_n_1602526.html
hlthe2b
(102,421 posts)For Tucker Carlson to say that he would if he can give this man a raise for this rude attempt to interrupt the president is reflective of what Ive said above and, to me, lowers my opinion of Tucker.
More at http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/16/sam-donaldson-tucker-carlson-daily-caller-obama-interrupted_n_1602526.html
Yeah, Sam... That is tremendous.
siligut
(12,272 posts)Hard to get any lower.
Good for you Donaldson. I can imagine Sam scurrying away from a press conference like Neil did.
WingDinger
(3,690 posts)Fact, I am going to TRY to find it. Oh here it is!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
siligut
(12,272 posts)Now I feel kind of sorry for him.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)wordpix
(18,652 posts)graywarrior
(59,440 posts)Response to siligut (Reply #4)
WingDinger This message was self-deleted by its author.
WingDinger
(3,690 posts)That breaks barriers far more effectively, regarding taboo things than interrupting. Sam is on fire, and this critique of interruptus oedipal
disrespectus give him a raise Tucker Carlson, must be responded to in another venue. This is a direct charge of some buncha racists by official media. WOW. Rethugs aint gonna like that.
Overseas
(12,121 posts)emulatorloo
(44,211 posts)jaysunb
(11,856 posts)Thank You Sam
GeorgeWW3
(11 posts)it would be the first payment he has ever actually received for playing journalist on his own nickel. Huff Post pays nothing, why would a greedy little shriveled nut sack George Will impersonator pay for theatrics and gossip from a alien limey who can't behave himself? I'd like to see him interrupt the Queen without getting disemboweled.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Reagan often did not take questions, and Donaldson had a voice that could cut through ten inches of steel--he could be heard even if Reagan had the hearing aids set to "CHS==Can't Hear Shit."
Donaldson never spoke out of turn, he bellowed when there was no opportunity to ask questions, just as the other reporters did (less effectively than SD). Often, it worked--Reagan would turn, and respond. After a while, it was a cat-n-mouse game. Reagan would EXPECT SD to bellow, and have a quip handy--it made for good television all around.
I LOVE what SD said about this:
Never once did I interrupt a president in any way while he was making a formal statement, a speech, honoring awardees or in any other way holding the floor. Yes, almost always when he was finished in the Rose Garden or in the Briefing Room or at a photo opportunity with other world leaders I tried to question him (only rarely was it a shout on the rope line, more often a more normal tone of voice) and other reporters of course did the same thing along with me.
What this man did yesterday is something new, to me wrong and unusual. I think it is probably the result of the growing incivility of the times, the competition among reporters and news organizations to be noticed not only for the work product but for the theatrics of the gathering and there is one more factor, lets face it: Many on the political right believe this president ought not to be there they oppose him not for his polices and political view but for who he is, an African American! These people and perhaps even certain news organizations (certainly the right wing talkers like Limbaugh) encourage disrespect for this president. That is both regrettable and adds, in this case, to the general dislike of the press on the part of the general public.
For Tucker Carlson to say that he would if he can give this man a raise for this rude attempt to interrupt the president is reflective of what Ive said above and, to me, lowers my opinion of Tucker.
citysyde
(74 posts)from Tucker Carlson OTHER than pure hose manure?
MADem
(135,425 posts)At least the good stuff will fertilize the roses!!!
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)chelsea0011
(10,115 posts)after he speaks and is walking away without asking questions or has taken questions and is done and walking away. What happened yesterday had nothing in common with anything like that. I honestly believe that having a black POTUS encourages disrespect from the RW. Racists fill that party. I can't think of another reason that they show so much disrespect to the office of POTUS.
randome
(34,845 posts)The more I TRY -just for the sake of objectivity- to see things as NOT racist, I always end up at a dead end.
Hassin Bin Sober
(26,347 posts)Donaldson could bellow over the chopper sounds.
MADem
(135,425 posts)aint_no_life_nowhere
(21,925 posts)Carlson really expects us to believe Munro was just asking questions? He was arguing with the President and asking rhetorical questions. When Obama asked him not to interrupt Munro said "no, you have to take questions". You have to take questions? Munro was treating Obama like an underling. It's clear he wasn't there to ask questions but to argue and talk over the President which he tried to do.
siligut
(12,272 posts)Giving Carlson any credibility is an insult to journalists.
FailureToCommunicate
(14,026 posts)corkhead
(6,119 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)Deepstots
(3 posts)i never hear race brought up as much as i do here......
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)I don't think it has to do with race. The guy was a jerk and should have let the president finish.
Response to Deepstots (Reply #14)
Post removed
lunatica
(53,410 posts)quaker bill
(8,225 posts)No one yelled out "you lie" during any of their State of the Union Addresses. (Though I am quite sure many lies were told by at least two of them.) The "press" did not interrupt their prepared remarks.
What is different about this President from all the others who came before? They are all males and nearly all of them were freely elected to office. Why the lack of simple common courtesy to this one, and not the others? There is nothing this President has done that is less worthy of courtesy than Nixon. Do you have a better theory?
BTW, welcome to DU.
tibbiit
(1,601 posts)That is another example of how they have treated him.
tib
MrSlayer
(22,143 posts)It's just mostly about race. The other part of it is merely about being an asshole. Right wingers love to be assholes and bullies. They live for that kind of shit, they're just truculent, vituperative, cowardly punks.
KT2000
(20,593 posts)I think the RW has shown their disrespect for Obama in blatant ways. Remember when joe Walsh yelled "you lie" at the State of the Union address?
Showing disrespect like that is the dog whistle to the bigoted faction of the repub. party.
lastlib
(23,329 posts)... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
There are so many of them now - I'm getting them mixed up!
roody
(10,849 posts)They can't admit it is about race.
progressivebydesign
(19,458 posts).. in an unprecedented way from the republicans and media. So when Clinton was president do you recall any racist jokes being told at republican rallies? How about jokes about Clinton's race being sent around via email? Did republicans refer to him as "boy?" Did the media pundits have a standard meme about him "being in over his head?" and other dog whistle comments???
It has everything to do with race. It was decided the minute he was clearly going to win that election, that they would tear him down every day, and in ways that had to do with race. Are you unaware of the PAC that supports Romney that is planning to hire a "articulate black man" to tear down Obama?
I'm sorry but I find your question to be disingenuous.
SemperEadem
(8,053 posts)because it IS about race.
funny how it was never done to bush and he did far worse to the country and the office of the presidency.
madashelltoo
(1,704 posts)even said Tucker's name in the same sentence as his. You failed, Carlson. Your imp failed too. Now, go on, lick your wounds and sit in the corner.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)and send asshole Carlson a "tip". Tab is on top right of the home page.
A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)chervilant
(8,267 posts)BarbaRosa
(2,685 posts). . . but reagan had it worse. . .
LuckyLib
(6,821 posts)out, Munro even looks disrespectful. Loose tie, hands in pockets, no notebook, just hanging around waiting to be seen. Sam Donaldson challenged the bullshit Presidents would shovel out, but he did it as a reporter, not a provocateur. Munro's lack of respect for the office AND the man holding it was evident by his behavior and demeanor. Obama put him in his place. And as for Tucker? He was wearing knee-socks when Sam Donaldson was on the White House beat.
progressivebydesign
(19,458 posts)playing with his winkie...
SemperEadem
(8,053 posts)Munro, who serves as the Daily Caller's White House correspondent, said in a statement that he "timed the question believing the president was closing his remarks, because naturally I have no intention of interrupting the President of the United States."
1. they meant to say he used to serve as the WH correspondent. He'll never be allowed on the grounds again come monday. (/speculation)
2. The president ALWAYS says "I'll take questions now" when he is done with his remarks to open up the floor to reporters. The president hadn't said that, so either munro is a liar or this is proof of the premeditation of his actions.
randome
(34,845 posts)Because he's right. There is no comparison and everyone knows it.
NYC Liberal
(20,138 posts)It's the sad truth.
BumRushDaShow
(129,673 posts)Sam Donaldson made that statement?
But then again his name was used in vain.
You know it's bad when jerks like Chris Wallace and Geraldo Rivera come out and condemn you. I guess Munroach has become the Trump of the media. Full WhitePrivilege mode engaged.