Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SecularMotion

(7,981 posts)
Mon May 16, 2016, 05:46 PM May 2016

Reid blames Sanders' 'people' for Nevada convention chaos

Source: CNN

Washington (CNN)Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid sharply criticized Bernie Sanders' supporters for turning the Nevada Democratic Convention into chaos over the weekend, saying the Vermont senator should not "accept" how his backers behaved.
"I've been dealing with Nevada state conventions for 50 years: To say I was disappointed was an understatement," Reid told CNN in the Capitol on Monday.

"I hold his people accountable, and I'm sure if Bernie found out about it, he would not accept what happened there," Reid said.

Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/16/politics/nevada-convention-chaos-bernie-sanders-hillary-clinton/index.html

144 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Reid blames Sanders' 'people' for Nevada convention chaos (Original Post) SecularMotion May 2016 OP
Yep, sure thing Harry. Just like Richard Daley had nothing to do with the Chicago fiasco in 68 LiberalArkie May 2016 #1
yeah they had control and stole it from hill. no wait ... roguevalley May 2016 #46
Richard Daley was the Mayor, in charge of the PD. Harry Reid is the Senate Dem Leader. MADem May 2016 #98
Since they seem to have a problem with parlimentary procedure, I would venture that they may also still_one May 2016 #101
The Metropolitan police showed up only after the hotel said "You ALL have to leave." MADem May 2016 #122
Lange ordered state troopers present at the Paris Las Vegas hotel to lock the bathrooms and confisca w4rma May 2016 #120
LOL@ USUncut--you do realize it's the PRAVDA of the Sanders campaign? MADem May 2016 #121
"in consultation with the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department and event organizers(Lange)" w4rma May 2016 #125
Oh please--State Troopers Shutting Down Bathrooms? MADem May 2016 #133
Good question: Why would Lange coordinate with the police to shut down bathrooms? w4rma May 2016 #134
The HOTEL did that, because NVDem Party overstayed their welcome by 4 hours. MADem May 2016 #136
Your link said that she coordinated with the police to shut down the convention. w4rma May 2016 #137
My link said the HOTEL representative wanted them GONE. nt MADem May 2016 #138
Here is a detailed explanation of Hillary's Nevada election theft: w4rma May 2016 #139
You give me a gish gallop from the SANDERS FOR PRESIDENT reddit? REEEEAaaaly? MADem May 2016 #140
No wonder you act so naive. You won't read anything outside of Hillary's protected sources. (nt) w4rma May 2016 #142
You can't find a neutral reporting agency to justify your claims? MADem May 2016 #143
My excerpt is FILLED to the brim with links to original sources. *Original* sources. (nt) w4rma May 2016 #144
Surprise surprise! 99th_Monkey May 2016 #2
If you read the article... JohnnyRingo May 2016 #54
What more do I want ? 99th_Monkey May 2016 #59
He spoke on the phone with Sanders before the primary. JohnnyRingo May 2016 #63
"Bernie assured him he wouldn't put up with such behavior. Was Sanders lying?" 99th_Monkey May 2016 #81
Well, their outburst solved everything then. JohnnyRingo May 2016 #97
What "proper channels" were available to them? 99th_Monkey May 2016 #117
Maybe Bernie should have run as the Independent that he is. JohnnyRingo May 2016 #118
Oh please! If Bernie had run as an Independent 99th_Monkey May 2016 #119
That's because he actually would be a Nadesque spoiler. JohnnyRingo May 2016 #124
The curtain has been pulled back far enough.... Jackilope May 2016 #127
He would have 40-50% a chance of winning IMHO. nt 99th_Monkey May 2016 #135
Hey Harry, Google it and watch a few videos. agracie May 2016 #3
Is this the same Harry who wasn't going to interfere in the Nevada primary? wallyworld2 May 2016 #45
And the same Harry MurrayDelph May 2016 #55
Yep! Duval May 2016 #60
Now why does this (cough -DNC) not surprise me? EndElectoral May 2016 #4
His retirement will be like a toilet flushing sound, bringing in new blood for things floriduck May 2016 #5
Just what I would expect - trashing a Senator who has shenmue May 2016 #14
Your measuring quantity. I'm measuring quality. nm floriduck May 2016 #17
That's the point - you're ignoring Reid's quality. Hortensis May 2016 #106
Maybe ask yourself what really matters to you and why? I did that already. floriduck May 2016 #113
Democracy. Sanctity of one man one vote. Hortensis May 2016 #115
Government of, by and for the people, securing freedom, justice, and prosperity for all floriduck May 2016 #116
Service is not enough. Ned Flanders May 2016 #35
He did not serve well. 840high May 2016 #50
Senator who has served his country for decades Omaha Steve May 2016 #70
Served.... sendero May 2016 #104
Where is his outrage about Wendell Pierce? I'm sure we'll see it any second now.. JonLeibowitz May 2016 #6
Dirty-Harry-Says-What? AzDar May 2016 #7
Thanks Rush redstateblues May 2016 #84
Go dry your powder, Harry. n/t Scootaloo May 2016 #8
...And let the whining begin! beastie boy May 2016 #9
Nonsense! JDPriestly May 2016 #15
Yawn. The loser's laundry list makes another appearance on DU. stopbush May 2016 #18
It's the Hillaryites who are losing the future of the Democratic Party. JDPriestly May 2016 #40
Sanders is stuck in the 60s. stopbush May 2016 #62
And he keeps moving Hillary to the left Omaha Steve May 2016 #71
Not really. stopbush May 2016 #74
How Hillary Clinton’s positions have changed as she’s run against Bernie Sanders Omaha Steve May 2016 #79
From the article you cite: stopbush May 2016 #82
Clinton voted for 'virtually every' trade agreement, killing millions of jobs, Sanders says Omaha Steve May 2016 #85
As First Lady, Hillary voted on nothing. stopbush May 2016 #88
As first lady, Clinton spoke favorably in the 1990s and in the early 2000s of NAFTA Omaha Steve May 2016 #89
Speaking favorably isn't voting. stopbush May 2016 #90
So she didn't support it, even though her book says she did? Omaha Steve May 2016 #91
Excuse me, but you titled #85: stopbush May 2016 #94
. Omaha Steve May 2016 #95
LOL! MADem May 2016 #99
Red baiting. blackspade May 2016 #109
Had a hard time following the thread, did you? MADem May 2016 #123
Your "facts" are an illusion that you have constructed for yourself. blackspade May 2016 #129
What are you having a problem with? MADem May 2016 #131
No problems here. blackspade May 2016 #141
It's always EVERYONE ELSE.... apcalc May 2016 #61
Have you looked at the responses in this thread? beastie boy May 2016 #21
Then why were Bernie supporters called Bernie Bros. JDPriestly May 2016 #24
Really? Andy823 May 2016 #29
As a 72-year-old woman, I love being called a Begrnibro. JDPriestly May 2016 #41
The first time I heard it Andy823 May 2016 #65
We are NOT equal in every way. Duval May 2016 #64
US News: The Clinton Foundation pays women less than the men Omaha Steve May 2016 #72
And, of course, crickets...............from Hillary supporters. eom zalinda May 2016 #93
So let me get this straight. passiveporcupine May 2016 #73
Great Post pmorlan1 May 2016 #128
You are not serious, are you? beastie boy May 2016 #37
So has Bernie... Gavile May 2016 #102
I'm just mild about Harry! KamaAina May 2016 #10
Bernie supporters don't handle the truth well. underthematrix May 2016 #11
+1111 wisteria May 2016 #16
Hillary supporters ignore the truth mindwalker_i May 2016 #19
Most of them here didn't even read the article JohnnyRingo May 2016 #58
So do I.Good for Harry for putting it sufrommich May 2016 #12
Harry the leading Conservadem??? PatrynXX May 2016 #13
If anyone has seen video footage of chairs being kiva May 2016 #20
Was there too! Mark 750 May 2016 #27
Ralston is really pimping this story, kiva May 2016 #80
Reid is a perceptive leader MariaThinks May 2016 #22
My Senator - I'm so ashamed Mark 750 May 2016 #23
It's like Harry wants the Democrats to lose Android3.14 May 2016 #25
Bernie is agreeing with Harry off camera, so to speak. Count on it. Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #26
Maybe, maybe not Mark 750 May 2016 #30
Which has what to do with anything? Either you think a Hillary and Drumpf WH would be the Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #31
really - 2 choices only Mark 750 May 2016 #38
Adults have two choices in Nov, Bernie/Hillary or Drumpf...period Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #39
Jackie Wilson said - great Van Morrison song Mark 750 May 2016 #43
If you have that background and will sit back and let Drumpf take over, something went Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #47
Just can't accept a pleasant comment about a great musician, can you? mac56 May 2016 #76
I did you forget you ended with your last sentence? Nt pkdu May 2016 #83
Yes, my Democratic Party... Mark 750 May 2016 #92
Suspending Roberts Rules of Order in order to shut out the participatory process of people who were highprincipleswork May 2016 #28
You know what? Fuck that guy. Ed Suspicious May 2016 #32
Apparently Harry forgot his morning enema. Left Coast2020 May 2016 #52
Ha ha...good one laserhaas May 2016 #87
Agreed laserhaas May 2016 #86
Take a Hike Harry Ccarmona May 2016 #33
There too long, Harry. You've forgotten you are there to serve them. Thus the need for change. n/t jtuck004 May 2016 #34
Well, you know how "those people" can be!! 7962 May 2016 #36
Chicago 1968 catnhatnh May 2016 #42
Go fuck yourself Harry. You are a disgrace. onecaliberal May 2016 #44
here you go... islandmkl May 2016 #105
Of course! Theyre stalking me now. onecaliberal May 2016 #114
Someone loves to polish those axhandles. Feeling the Bern May 2016 #48
He's right but he's wrong in his assessment of Bernie. Bernie encourages this crazy crap. Metric System May 2016 #49
Your comment made me laugh. nt Duval May 2016 #67
Go back to sleep Harry. jalan48 May 2016 #51
Reid & Barbara Boxer were there to provide muscle to the wrongdoing. pacalo May 2016 #53
Oh, i think Bernie knew... I'm sure if Bernie found out about it, he would not accept what happened trueblue2007 May 2016 #56
Of course he does, bless his heart. frylock May 2016 #57
Yes Harry, maybe next time we should all bend over and BigBearJohn May 2016 #66
How dare the serfs interrupt the coronation. JEB May 2016 #68
An absolutely horrible thread. longship May 2016 #69
Good bye, Reid. You left a whole lot of trash in your state party for the rest of us to clean up. nt w4rma May 2016 #75
The Democratic Party is doing it's best to piss away any and all support from liberals. bunchofpenguins May 2016 #77
If Sanders sanctions this behavior then he disrespects himself. Thinkingabout May 2016 #78
Post removed Post removed May 2016 #96
Yup...he's a tool laserhaas May 2016 #100
Harry "stepping stone to single payer" Reid and the cover up of G**S ... Baobab May 2016 #103
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #107
Reid is full of shit on this one. blackspade May 2016 #108
The man has been a sparkling example of a big-talk do-nothing so Ho-Hum. nt Bonobo May 2016 #110
Get going Harry!! dicksmc3 May 2016 #111
It's UNDER THE BUS WITH YOU, HARRY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Darb May 2016 #112
Harry Reid In Bed For HRC - Blaming The Victim As Usual cantbeserious May 2016 #126
I blame Reid for cheating in Nevada. AtomicKitten May 2016 #130
He holds people accountable than cannot be seen doing anything out of order... MrMickeysMom May 2016 #132

MADem

(135,425 posts)
98. Richard Daley was the Mayor, in charge of the PD. Harry Reid is the Senate Dem Leader.
Tue May 17, 2016, 03:51 AM
May 2016

smh.

You do know that Harry Reid doesn't order the police around?

still_one

(92,213 posts)
101. Since they seem to have a problem with parlimentary procedure, I would venture that they may also
Tue May 17, 2016, 04:44 AM
May 2016

not be aware of who has jurisdiction over what anything

MADem

(135,425 posts)
122. The Metropolitan police showed up only after the hotel said "You ALL have to leave."
Tue May 17, 2016, 05:53 PM
May 2016

They overstayed their rent of the hall by four hours, and the "event security" people bailed on them.

The lack of leadership by Team Sanders is telling. If he thought he was building a movement, he's working hard at destroying it with this nonsense.

 

w4rma

(31,700 posts)
120. Lange ordered state troopers present at the Paris Las Vegas hotel to lock the bathrooms and confisca
Tue May 17, 2016, 04:53 PM
May 2016

“Contrary to procedures and precedents set by the committee, nearly none of the 64 people were presented with the opportunity to be heard by the committee or to demonstrate that they are registered Democrats,” said credentials committee co-chair Leslie Sexton.

After 10 PM, when the convention was scheduled to end, Lange ordered state troopers present at the Paris Las Vegas hotel to lock the bathrooms and confiscate pizzas that Sanders delegates had ordered. When Sanders delegates tried to protest the results, Lange illegally ended the convention, then fled the building with a phalanx of state troopers escorting her out.
http://usuncut.com/news/bernie-sanders-responds-nevada-debacle/

MADem

(135,425 posts)
121. LOL@ USUncut--you do realize it's the PRAVDA of the Sanders campaign?
Tue May 17, 2016, 05:49 PM
May 2016

Don't you think it odd that never was heard a discouraging word at that website about "The Bern?"

How does a state trooper "lock" a public bathroom? With his super-special state trooper key?


And you believe that foolishness? That the state troopers said "Aye aye, ma'am" to a private citizen, running a PRIVATE association (there's no "government" in Democratic Parties, hate to tell you--they're as private as a Moose Lodge or the Shriners)? Get real. It's great that this kind of easily refuted nonsense is pumped out by "helpers," certainly--it's absurd on its face.

If anyone "locked the bathrooms" it would have been the hotel facilities coordinator, because the group had OVERSTAYED their allotted time--they were no longer authorized use of the facilities. But, oh, it sounds SO MUCH BETTER to put a few jackbooted state police in there (instead of the Metropolitan police, who were only called because the Sanders people were behaving so monstrously).



Let's try a dose of truth for a change, shall we?

Jennifer Forkish, a spokeswoman for Caesars Las Vegas, which owns the hotel, said in a statement that the convention "ran four hours past its scheduled end time, forcing the security paid for by event operators to leave their posts as their shifts ended. Without adequate security personnel, and in consultation with the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department and event organizers, a decision was made that it was in the best interest of everyone in attendance to end the event."

Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/wtf-happened-at-the-nevada-democratic-state-convention-20160517#ixzz48x2ObsO0


The Sanders delegates--and that's what they were, hand-picked SANDERS delegates--who behaved in boorish fashion disgraced their candidate, disgraced his movement, and likely sounded the loudest, if not the final, death knell to his campaign. If this kind of crap keeps on as Bernie limps in last to the finish line, he won't only not have a "movement" to build in future, he could very well lose his Senate seat. Heckuvajob, Berners!
 

w4rma

(31,700 posts)
125. "in consultation with the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department and event organizers(Lange)"
Tue May 17, 2016, 06:40 PM
May 2016

And your source agrees with US Uncut. I find US Uncut to have a very good track record of accuracy.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
133. Oh please--State Troopers Shutting Down Bathrooms?
Tue May 17, 2016, 08:01 PM
May 2016

LOL! Yeah, whatever.

USUncut is garbage. Feel-good garbage.

 

w4rma

(31,700 posts)
134. Good question: Why would Lange coordinate with the police to shut down bathrooms?
Tue May 17, 2016, 08:12 PM
May 2016

Why would she "pass" rules making her a dictator and allowing her to hold her chair position for life, without elections?

MADem

(135,425 posts)
136. The HOTEL did that, because NVDem Party overstayed their welcome by 4 hours.
Tue May 17, 2016, 08:28 PM
May 2016

Security, hired for the event, left when their time was up.

The HOTEL wanted them gone.

Everyone in that room was a trespasser.

It's in the RS link.

 

w4rma

(31,700 posts)
137. Your link said that she coordinated with the police to shut down the convention.
Tue May 17, 2016, 08:31 PM
May 2016

Why do Clintonites lie about every little tiny thing? Do you learn it from your dishonest candidate? The one with the worst unfavorables and who is seen as the least honest in the history of Democratic candidates?

 

w4rma

(31,700 posts)
139. Here is a detailed explanation of Hillary's Nevada election theft:
Tue May 17, 2016, 08:39 PM
May 2016

"Temporary Rules" debacle:
• Item #1 on agenda of convention was to vote for these "Temporary Rules" to pass. This was conducted by paper ballot.
• Vote was supposed to be held after convention started, but instead it was held immediately at 10 am early at 9:30 when not everyone was inside the convention and not everyone who was inside had ballots. But you know who was inside and had all their ballots ready? All the Hillary earlybirds (early-hawks) that knew this vote was going to happen early. Vote passed.
• Motion to have a re-vote of the Temporary Rules was demanded by citizens. Nevada Democratic Party Chair Roberta Lange instead held a voice vote that the temporary rules would stay. Some AYES, resounding NAYS. But who cares! She votes to pass it. Video of that CHILLING MOMENT here, (PS the beginning of this video is confusing because Roberta Lange is on screen, but the voice is from a woman talking OFF-screen. The voice is of a concerned citizen demanding a re-vote.) :



Sanders delegates debacle:
• 64 delegates were ejected from the convention because they didn't have "the proper credentials", even though they did. They weren't allowed to prove they were credentialed. Shady.
• Most, if not all, of these ejected were Sanders delegates.
• Therefore, Clinton won by 30 delegates. How convenient.

Highlights from the resulting daylong/nightlong shitstorm:
• Barbara Boxer mocks Sanders supporters (who were objecting to how things were going down): http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/05/15/barbara_boxer_to_nevada_democrats_if_you_boo_me_youre_booing_bernie_sanders.html
• Roberta Lange commandeered all mics and surrounded herself by police so that no Sanders people could get on the mic
• Eventually Dan Rolle (NV 2nd Congressional District Candidate) was able to get on the mic and he made a motion to call for the removal of Roberta Lange as Chair. As soon as he made that motion, his microphone was cut immediately. Of course. Motion was ignored. Great explanation of why this motion was ignored, here. Thanks /u/wormhog! Happens at 42:40 here: https://www.periscope.tv/FenyxFX/1yNGawjozjrxj CRAP this periscope link expired - NEW LINK: Happens at 42:40 here:
?t=43m24s
• Nevada Democratic Party employs stalling tactics and psychological tactics to try to force people to leave. Making them wait hours while nothing happened, playing music SUPER LOUD, charging $5 for tiny little bottles of water. People online started ordering pizza for those inside. Some pizzas got in, but once it was realized what was going on, police started intercepting the pizzas and throwing them in the dumpster. the pizzas had to be moved outside.
• Jesse Sbaih (NV 3rd Congressional District Candidate) gets on microphone and makes motion for a recount to resounding cheers. Motion is ignored (it is against the rules to ignore a motion). Happens at 16:50 here:
?t=16m50s
• Roberta Lange jumps onstage and in like 15 seconds makes a bunch of motions that basically say "all the shady votes that happened here tonight stand, the pro-Hillary delegate results stand, and this meeting is adjourned". She does voice votes on all this. NAYs are ridiculously louder every time. But she passes everything regardless, ignoring the nays, then runs off stage. COMPLETE CHAOS ENSUES Videos of this: From Periscope Superhero FENYXFX great video, 21:42 here:
&feature=youtu.be&t=21m42s
From Adryenn Ashley - great closeup video, start at 3:50 https://www.facebook.com/AdryennAshley/videos/10153761902337695/ From Asia Zamora, this one well captures the pain and sadness of the aftermath of democracy being stolen from us, start at 2:30 though: https://www.facebook.com/asia.zamora.3/videos/1195756427101567/
• Police come in and everyone is told to leave or they will get arrested. Here's a pic: https://mobile.twitter.com/Clyatt/status/731725898211151872 Video of DNC leaders running out side door: https://www.facebook.com/AlexanderLChambers/videos/1059531310749260/
• RESULTS: By the rule change and delegate suppression there is a change of 8 net delegates. Instead of Bernie winning by 19-16, the result is 20-15 Clinton now. Thank you to /u/puppuli for this info!

https://www.reddit.com/r/SandersForPresident/comments/4jid77/basic_stepbystep_of_what_went_down_yesterday_at/

MADem

(135,425 posts)
140. You give me a gish gallop from the SANDERS FOR PRESIDENT reddit? REEEEAaaaly?
Tue May 17, 2016, 08:41 PM
May 2016

And of course, it's not at ALL partisan!

Come on. I was born at night--but not last night.

 

w4rma

(31,700 posts)
142. No wonder you act so naive. You won't read anything outside of Hillary's protected sources. (nt)
Tue May 17, 2016, 09:01 PM
May 2016

MADem

(135,425 posts)
143. You can't find a neutral reporting agency to justify your claims?
Tue May 17, 2016, 09:57 PM
May 2016

If you can't, then maybe you might want to get outside YOUR bubble a bit more.

Don't get angry with me simply because I'm not going down your rabbit hole.

And the name calling? You can stow that, too. It's not a good look.

JohnnyRingo

(18,635 posts)
54. If you read the article...
Mon May 16, 2016, 07:49 PM
May 2016

...you'll see he's pretty supportive of Sanders and is probably his best ally in the senate. He and Bernie spoke before the Nevada Primary to avert trouble.

He even supports Sanders' wishes to stay in until the convention. I'm not sure what more you want of him.

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
59. What more do I want ?
Mon May 16, 2016, 07:56 PM
May 2016

Well, Harry could start by not saying this kind of nonsense --> ""I hold his people accountable, and I'm
sure if Bernie found out about it, he would not accept what happened there,"

JohnnyRingo

(18,635 posts)
63. He spoke on the phone with Sanders before the primary.
Mon May 16, 2016, 08:04 PM
May 2016

Bernie assured him he wouldn't put up with such behavior. Was Sanders lying? He might have been, you know better than me.

I have a feeling your whole problem is that Reid endorses Clinton. Bernie supporters seem to see anyone who isn't 100% on Team Bernie as the enemy. Hillary people know we're all on the same side against the GOP, including Sanders.

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
81. "Bernie assured him he wouldn't put up with such behavior. Was Sanders lying?"
Mon May 16, 2016, 09:25 PM
May 2016

Unless Bernie's "assurance" includes telling his supporters they need to ignore DNC improprieties,
dirty tricks, etc.; then his conversation with Harry is irrelevant and off-point.

When Clintonitas who hold key positions in the party, use those positions of public trust to flaunt their
dirty tricks to favor "their candidate", thus abusing the public trust, I doubt that Bernie's
insisting his own supporters "allow" this and quietly endure such abuse.

JohnnyRingo

(18,635 posts)
97. Well, their outburst solved everything then.
Tue May 17, 2016, 03:11 AM
May 2016

There's no further reason to complain because the Bernie supporters went through proper channels and resolved the issue right there at the hall.

Good work Berniacs!

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
117. What "proper channels" were available to them?
Tue May 17, 2016, 12:09 PM
May 2016

None. They were at the assigned place to resolve differences FAIRLY, and according
to already existing rules, rules that were arbitrarily changed to favor Clinton.

At least the Bernie abuse didn't go down quietly, but was exposed.

JohnnyRingo

(18,635 posts)
118. Maybe Bernie should have run as the Independent that he is.
Tue May 17, 2016, 03:45 PM
May 2016

You have to ask yourself why Sanders chose to join a party that favors mainstream Democrats. Is he so arrogant that he thought he'd redesign it in his own vision of Socialist Democrat?

Obviously, Sanders believed there was an advantage to running under the Democratic tent but called foul when he wasn't promoted as the front runner.

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
119. Oh please! If Bernie had run as an Independent
Tue May 17, 2016, 03:57 PM
May 2016

All you Hillarians would be screaming bloody murder with nasty accusations about Bernie
being a Naderesque "Spoiler", and you know that's true.

BTW - Be careful what you ask for. He could still do that, if he's provoked enough.

JohnnyRingo

(18,635 posts)
124. That's because he actually would be a Nadesque spoiler.
Tue May 17, 2016, 06:26 PM
May 2016

The only difference I see now is that he's trying that after he discovered that he can't win as a Democrat. He knows he can't win as an Indy now either, so his only function would be to ensure a Democratic loss in November.

It should be easy to figure out why the Democratic Party doesn't like Bernie Sanders. If my senator, the great Sherrod Brown of Ohio decides to back Bernie, I'll follow.

Jackilope

(819 posts)
127. The curtain has been pulled back far enough....
Tue May 17, 2016, 06:44 PM
May 2016

It would be GREAT if he ran as an Independent. I could actually vote for someone I wanted.

MurrayDelph

(5,299 posts)
55. And the same Harry
Mon May 16, 2016, 07:54 PM
May 2016

who not only refused Jeff Merkely's attempts at filibuster reform but punished him for suggesting that Senators who want to filibuster should have to, you know, stand up and filibuster?

 

floriduck

(2,262 posts)
5. His retirement will be like a toilet flushing sound, bringing in new blood for things
Mon May 16, 2016, 05:55 PM
May 2016

that apply to this century. Searchlight is where he needs to be.

shenmue

(38,506 posts)
14. Just what I would expect - trashing a Senator who has
Mon May 16, 2016, 06:09 PM
May 2016

served his country for decades.



Shame on you.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
106. That's the point - you're ignoring Reid's quality.
Tue May 17, 2016, 07:40 AM
May 2016

Senator Reid has been a very talented liberal and progressive power in the Senate. If you support progressive change, you should regret his leaving.

Btw, if every progressive in Congress who didn't happen to support Bernie Sanders for president was "flushed," as you put it, and therefore every liberal, you could count those remaining on one hand and the Republicans would rule Congress completely. Maybe ask yourself what really matters to you and why?

 

floriduck

(2,262 posts)
113. Maybe ask yourself what really matters to you and why? I did that already.
Tue May 17, 2016, 09:51 AM
May 2016

Their are enough responses below to support my position so I won't repeat them. So now it's your turn.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
115. Democracy. Sanctity of one man one vote.
Tue May 17, 2016, 10:09 AM
May 2016

Government of, by and for the people, securing freedom, justice, and prosperity for all. Plus a bunch of specifics but pretty much fall under all that, like very affordable high-quality education and healthcare.

I'm afraid I see a huge clash between what might be your goals and your apparent preferred means of achieving them. For instance, I cannot imagine how "flushing" Senator Reid and those in Congress like him could result in anything but 100% failure of everything Bernie says he wants to achieve and 100% victory by the enemies of government truly of, by and for the people.

There are many millions of those, you know; they hold both houses of congress now and many state governments and are hugely funded. Their leaders are thrilled that we are losing an extremely powerful and competent liberal progressive leader to retirement.

 

floriduck

(2,262 posts)
116. Government of, by and for the people, securing freedom, justice, and prosperity for all
Tue May 17, 2016, 10:13 AM
May 2016

Unfortunately, we have a government of, by and for the wealthy and corporations. And the others just don't see the freedom, justice and prosperity at the same levels as those of the wealthy. It's apparent you and I see life through different lenses. So we will agree to disagree.

 

Ned Flanders

(233 posts)
35. Service is not enough.
Mon May 16, 2016, 07:14 PM
May 2016

You don't get points for the length of your career. As an adult, I'm expected to hold a job most of my life. But what kind of job are you doing?

This, from another one of the "Impeachment is off the table" crowd. Who voted for war in Iraq. And more. I've never understood why he gets such high marks, except for managing to keep his job in a conservative state, and perhaps prevent more damage. But he has been notably silent, and/or wrong, when it counted. How long before he commented on the Bundy Militia, for example?

sendero

(28,552 posts)
104. Served....
Tue May 17, 2016, 05:52 AM
May 2016

.... by folding like a paper napkin over and over and over. Reid is one of the huge mistakes in the Democratic party.

beastie boy

(9,367 posts)
9. ...And let the whining begin!
Mon May 16, 2016, 06:01 PM
May 2016

Harry is a DINO! Harry is a Hillbot! Harry is a neo-liberal third way sellout!

Just a reminder to all the angry children: Harry has been a Democrat representing Nevada since before most of you were born!

Disgusting. Just disgusting...

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
15. Nonsense!
Mon May 16, 2016, 06:10 PM
May 2016

The organizers of the Nevada convention deliberately made rules that would deny the 1/2 of their delegates who support Bernie the ability to participate meaningfully in the convention.

The response of the Bernie supporters to their silencing by the authoritarian organizers of the convention was reasonable.

We are going to see another 1968 unless the Hillary crowd wises up.

I registered voters on a California college campus today. The youth of America are excited and energized by Bernie's candidacy.

The elderly among us (including myself) need to encourage the young to back the candidate that speaks to them and their view of the world.

How much longer will Harry Reid have to deal with our dying environment, overly expensive healthcare and the student debts of our college graduates? Odds are he will not deal with those problems as long as the people protesting and wishing to speak at the Nevada convention will.

Harry Reid is very wrong on this. Very wrong.

He and Hillary are relics of the past. Don't tell me that in addition to being corrupt, our Democratic Party is obsolete.

It happens. Parties do become so mired in the attitudes, values and customs of the past that they just disappear and are replaced.

I would like to think that the Democratic Party leadership can read the handwriting on the wall and accommodate the Bernie supporters. Because Bernie's supporters are the future.

And inversely, Hillary's are the past.

stopbush

(24,396 posts)
18. Yawn. The loser's laundry list makes another appearance on DU.
Mon May 16, 2016, 06:17 PM
May 2016

So predictable...and so useless.

Had Sanders somehow won the nomination, 95% of your complaints would still remain.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
40. It's the Hillaryites who are losing the future of the Democratic Party.
Mon May 16, 2016, 07:23 PM
May 2016

Hillary is yesterday. Bernie is the candidate for tomorrow.

His views especially on trade and jobs respond to the concerns of young Americans.

Go to a college campus. Just walk around and ask people who they support. You will be amazed.

The leaders of tomorrow's America support Bernie Sanders. Even I, an older Bernie supporter, am amazed by the depth of knowledge about and enthusiasm for Sanders.

It isn't just a craze. It is very deep.

Today the topics were the Andrea Mitchell interview of Bernie Sanders which made the students very angry and the Nevada Convention which also made them angry.

If the goal of the Hillaryites is to discourage voting by America's youth, they are sure achieving it. But that is not my goal.

I'm for Bernie.

stopbush

(24,396 posts)
74. Not really.
Mon May 16, 2016, 09:13 PM
May 2016

She and Sanders voted the same 93% of the time in the Senate. Her platform has been plenty progressive since she announced.

You give Sanders credit where none is due.

Omaha Steve

(99,655 posts)
79. How Hillary Clinton’s positions have changed as she’s run against Bernie Sanders
Mon May 16, 2016, 09:19 PM
May 2016

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/04/29/how-hillary-clintons-positions-have-changed-while-running-against-bernie-sanders/

In the course of fending off Sanders’s challenge, Clinton appears to have conceded to him on a couple of major economic policy issues. The former U.S. senator and secretary of state has abandoned the centrist positions she previously held on trade and Social Security and taken stances closer to Sanders’s views.

Add in the Keystone pipeline, TPP, gay marriage,....

stopbush

(24,396 posts)
82. From the article you cite:
Mon May 16, 2016, 09:32 PM
May 2016

"Clinton has made some adjustments to her thinking when it comes to Social Security over the past couple years," Manley said.

"On many economic issues, Clinton’s positions are more moderate than those of Sanders. Unlike him, she hasn’t fully endorsed a $15 hourly minimum wage nationwide, saying only that if presented with a bill to create one, she wouldn't veto it. She has rejected Sanders’s proposals for universal, federal health insurance and for eliminating tuition at public colleges and universities.

"When it comes to financial reform, Clinton has endorsed only a limited version of the kind of huge sales tax on purchases of stock and other securities that Sanders has proposed. Sanders’s tax, economist Baker said approvingly, would amount to "digging the guts out of Wall Street."

As far as her position on TPP, Politifact reported:

In her 2014 memoir Hard Choices, she wrote:

"Because TPP negotiations are still ongoing, it makes sense to reserve judgment until we can evaluate the final proposed agreement. It’s safe to say the TPP won’t be perfect -- no deal negotiated among a dozen countries ever will be -- but its higher standards, if implemented and enforced, should benefit American businesses and workers."

"In fairness to Clinton, the TPP was still under negotiation when Clinton made the "gold standard" comment. The partners only finalized the deal this year. It’s quite possible the deal looks dramatically different than it did at the early stages of negotiations, when Clinton was at the State Department -- something Clinton spokesman Nick Merrill pointed out to us for this fact-check. The negotiations have been conducted in secret, so it’s hard for us to assess that ourselves. Also, as secretary of state, she spoke as a representative of the Obama administration, which was and remains wholeheartedly in favor of the deal."

So, no, Sanders has not been pulling her to the left. She's gotten there all on her own, long before that DINO decided to run for the D nomination.

Omaha Steve

(99,655 posts)
85. Clinton voted for 'virtually every' trade agreement, killing millions of jobs, Sanders says
Mon May 16, 2016, 10:06 PM
May 2016

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/apr/10/bernie-s/clinton-voted-virtually-every-trade-agreement-kill/

By Linda Qiu on Sunday, April 10th, 2016 at 5:29 p.m.

Snip: "Well, when you vote for virtually every trade agreement that has cost the workers of this country millions of jobs," he said, "when you support and continue to support fracking, despite the crisis that we have in terms of clean water, and essentially, when you have a super PAC that is raising tens of millions of dollars from every special interest out there, including $15 million from Wall Street, the American people do not believe that that is the kind of president that we need to make the changes in America to protect the working families of this country."

Snip: As first lady, Clinton spoke favorably in the 1990s and in the early 2000s of the North American Free Trade Agreement, signed by President Bill Clinton.

"Creating a free trade zone in North America — the largest free trade zone in the world — would expand U.S. exports, create jobs and ensure that our economy was reaping the benefits, not the burdens, of globalization. Although unpopular with labor unions, expanding trade opportunities was an important administration goal," she wrote in her 2003 memoir, Living History.

As a senator from New York, Clinton had the opportunity to vote on 10 trade deals. She said yes to six and no to the Dominican Republic-Central America Free Trade Agreement (DR-CAFTA) and the deal with Andean countries. She skipped the votes on agreements with Jordan and Peru, which came up when she was running for president the first time, but supported both deals.

More at politifact link.

Omaha Steve

(99,655 posts)
89. As first lady, Clinton spoke favorably in the 1990s and in the early 2000s of NAFTA
Mon May 16, 2016, 10:29 PM
May 2016

Your hiding her record?

stopbush

(24,396 posts)
90. Speaking favorably isn't voting.
Mon May 16, 2016, 10:33 PM
May 2016

You said that she "voted" on specific things, then cited legislation she never voted on.

Plenty of Congressmen say one thing and vote another way. Ex: Sanders rails against pork barrel military spending, yet he supported the F35 boondoggle because it brought pork to VT.

You are distorting her record.

stopbush

(24,396 posts)
94. Excuse me, but you titled #85:
Tue May 17, 2016, 01:01 AM
May 2016

85. Clinton voted for 'virtually every' trade agreement, killing millions of jobs, Sanders says

"Voted for" is not the same as being on the record. First ladies don't vote.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
99. LOL!
Tue May 17, 2016, 04:03 AM
May 2016

If "speaking favorably" were the same as voting, then Bernie Sanders is a communist!


Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders visited the medical school on his trip to Yaroslavl, Russia, in 1988. PHOTO: COURTESY OF VALERY VOLOVENKO



Bernie Sanders Declines to Disavow Past Praise of Cuban Communism at Debate
http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2016/03/09/bernie_sanders_on_fidel_castro_and_cuban_communism_at_debate_video.html






And...to my detractors...I used the conditional tense, please take note.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
123. Had a hard time following the thread, did you?
Tue May 17, 2016, 05:58 PM
May 2016

When your team tries to equate the vague "speaking favorably" with "voting," a bit of pushback is entirely justified.

Get over it, and get over the fact that your candidate has lost the battle and the war. He has screwed himself out of a legacy by failing to rein in or disavow the Paulbot Wing of his Brigade. He has made a strategic error of monumental proportions. Not the 1st time, either.

It's all over but the internet shit-flinging and bitter recriminations.

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
129. Your "facts" are an illusion that you have constructed for yourself.
Tue May 17, 2016, 07:26 PM
May 2016

To what end, I won't speculate because I don't know you.
As for "the internet shit-flinging and bitter recriminations" I'll leave that kind of thing to you all over at camp weathervane since that seems to be your "team's" area of expertise.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
131. What are you having a problem with?
Tue May 17, 2016, 07:38 PM
May 2016

He did go to Russia, he did praise Castro.

If you pull the string, you will see that I am saying one stupid comparison about Clinton (voting as a FLOTUS) is as silly as claiming that Sanders is a commie.

What--you take issue with any of that?

You're saying FLOTUS casts votes in the legislature?

Or Sanders IS a commie?

Come on, let's hear it.

smh. RIF.

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
141. No problems here.
Tue May 17, 2016, 08:52 PM
May 2016

But you seem to be having a few making any kind of logical sense.
The point was that Clinton's record contains more than just votes.
Her support for various treaties and policies are very relevant as is her 'evolution' on them.

Do try to keep up.

apcalc

(4,465 posts)
61. It's always EVERYONE ELSE....
Mon May 16, 2016, 08:02 PM
May 2016

everyone else is corrupt, a liar, in the tank, an establishment hack....

None of em want to take responsibility ..always someone else's fault.....

beastie boy

(9,367 posts)
21. Have you looked at the responses in this thread?
Mon May 16, 2016, 06:33 PM
May 2016

They are full of ad hominem attacks and declaring Harry guilty by association. Not even an attempt to show where and how he is wrong.

This is what I find truly disgusting!

i may disagree with you about the reasonableness of the conduct of Bernie supporters; I may disagree with you about your chances of creating chaos at the convention; I may disagree with you on the effectiveness of your approach to solving the problems you listed; I may disagree with you on whether Harry is right or wrong; I may disagree with you on the future of the Democratic Party...

But I would never bash Nina Turner's person on account of my opinions.

I am surprised you don't find all the gratuitous smearing of Harry Reid, a distinguished veteran Democrat, anything but disgusting.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
24. Then why were Bernie supporters called Bernie Bros.
Mon May 16, 2016, 06:50 PM
May 2016

The entire Hillary defense is an ad hominem attack on Bernie supporters.

It's a matter of your point of view.

Andy823

(11,495 posts)
29. Really?
Mon May 16, 2016, 06:59 PM
May 2016
In case you've been stuck in your Volvo listening to eight-track tapes the last four decades, woman are not treated like frail little flowers anymore! They are the equal of MEN in EVERY WAY. They are now police, firefighters, construction workers, sailors... every job type represented by the Village People is now commonly performed by a woman

That's exactly why it was so SHOCKING and DEGRADING to hear Bernie Sanders mention a WOMAN'S butt. This is 2015, and women have earned the right to not have their butt's mentioned, even idiomatically!

Let's get this straight: MEN have butts. WOMEN have unmentionable parts below their necks.

Clear, BernieBros?





Check out this link and see all the names that rec'd this post, and all the ones Manny called "Bernie bros" that responded to his post.

Of course maybe Manny real was a Hillary plant, right?


http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251772854

For any jury. Manny was banned here on DU and is not an active poster.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
41. As a 72-year-old woman, I love being called a Begrnibro.
Mon May 16, 2016, 07:25 PM
May 2016

But I also know that the term was originally invented as a dig.

Andy823

(11,495 posts)
65. The first time I heard it
Mon May 16, 2016, 08:09 PM
May 2016

Was from Manny. As I asked before was Manny a Hillary troll? Seems to me that the name did not bother those who posted on the thread I linked to, nor did it bother any of those who rec'd that thread. The new meme that it was all made up BS from the Hillary camp only started after so many of Bernie's "bros" started acting like assholes. I think the idea of blaming it all on Clinton was thought up by Weaver or Devine to get the heat of of them and Bernie for the actions of some of Bernie's supporters.

 

Duval

(4,280 posts)
64. We are NOT equal in every way.
Mon May 16, 2016, 08:07 PM
May 2016

May I politely remind you of the fact that women do not get the same pay for the same work?

Omaha Steve

(99,655 posts)
72. US News: The Clinton Foundation pays women less than the men
Mon May 16, 2016, 08:47 PM
May 2016

http://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2016-05-12/hillary-clintons-equal-pay-hypocrisy

By Peter Roff | Contributing Editor
May 12, 2016, at 3:20 p.m.

On a day when most every media outlet in the country is giving its full attention to the Donald Trump/Paul Ryan summit, out comes a report from The Daily Caller that should be of interest to anyone following the financial dealings of Hillary and Bill Clinton. Apparently the former and potentially future first couple "received at least $100million from autocratic Persian Gulf states and their leaders, potentially undermining Democratic president candidate Hillary's claim she can carry out independent Middle east policies."

It's a revelation that won't shock anyone. The Clintons are notorious for doing a cash-only business, as just about everyone knows. No one cares – though they should – whether a "pro quo" went along with the "quid" as the funds were being raised.

How they were spent is another matter, one that should have Democrats up in arms but won't. According to various reports, the Clinton Foundation pays the men who work there 38 percent more than it pays the women. The wage gap, which Hillary has identified as one of the nation's most pressing problems, appears to be alive and well and prospering under her own roof.

None of that will matter to Democrats as they vote in the remaining primaries. It won't matter to delegates at the convention. And it won't matter to the women who travel the country as surrogates for the former first lady during the November campaign. The rules, after all, are as different for her as they were for him once he got caught in an embarrassing abuse of his own power in the workplace that has come to be known as The Lewinsky Affair.

FULL story at link.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
73. So let me get this straight.
Mon May 16, 2016, 08:55 PM
May 2016

Women are now filling all the positions that men previously held. Women have become equal to men.

however, if we say "kick his butt", it's OK, but not "kick her butt"?

So we are still delicate little flowers after all?

Give me a break.

That was a loaded question in the first place. Bernie didn't start with the butt kicking, the news anchor did. And he never said her or Hillary, just some butt.

So it was OK to kick republican butt, but not your current rival's butt?

You guys just keep cracking me up.

I'm a woman...an older woman who got to see plenty of sexual intimidation and sexism in my time, but I don't understand this sudden now "women are so fragile, they need their own special language" before this race.

You KNOW it's not sexist. You KNOW Hillary is trying to make every fucking thing about sex in this campaign, and you are all falling all over yourselves going along with it.

You make women out to be the weakest and whiniest forms of human life I've ever seen.

Well fuck that shit. I am a 66 year old woman and I have a butt and I'm proud of it. And if someone want to try to kick my butt, they are welcome to try. I won't consider it "sexist". I will consider it a challenge. I guess Hillary is just not up to the challenge, so she has to turn everything into sexism.

pmorlan1

(2,096 posts)
128. Great Post
Tue May 17, 2016, 06:51 PM
May 2016

I'm right there with you. I've been a feminist since the 70s and what passes for sexism on DU these days is pathetic. The Hillary campaign is setting women back decades with this nonsense.

beastie boy

(9,367 posts)
37. You are not serious, are you?
Mon May 16, 2016, 07:17 PM
May 2016

Are you suggesting we forget the thread and go into tit for tat of who called whom what and when?

What has it got to do with Harry and Nevada?

One thing is for sure: I am no longer surprised you find all the garbage thrown at Harry acceptable...

JohnnyRingo

(18,635 posts)
58. Most of them here didn't even read the article
Mon May 16, 2016, 07:54 PM
May 2016

After all, they can't be bothered with facts at a time of war.

In it Harry expresses support for Sanders, even lauding his wishes to remain in the race until the convention. The article states that Reid is Bernie's greatest ally in the senate and he called Sanders to avert the very trouble his people caused.

It just shows that to Bernie Bros you're either 100% with them or your a no good piece of shit Republican. That's a good reason people don't like them.

PatrynXX

(5,668 posts)
13. Harry the leading Conservadem???
Mon May 16, 2016, 06:08 PM
May 2016

thunk duh. I'd say what happened in Nevada is the beginning of troubling times of Anarchy ahead. But when I think of Conservadems/Blue Dogs, Harry is always at the top of the list. You change the rules at the last minute people cry foul and thats what happened.

kiva

(4,373 posts)
20. If anyone has seen video footage of chairs being
Mon May 16, 2016, 06:27 PM
May 2016

thrown, or hurled, or whatever term you like, could you please post it?

I was there and didn't see chairs or any physical objects thrown. I've viewed more than a dozen videos and haven't seen anything beyond some invectives being tossed around. I've asked four other people who were sitting in other areas, and none of them saw anything being thrown.

As far as I can tell, this comment started with Jon Ralston. Ralston is usually a reasonably good source, but I have seen nothing to back up his statement, so if you know of any evidence could you please post a link? Thanks.

 

Mark 750

(79 posts)
27. Was there too!
Mon May 16, 2016, 06:58 PM
May 2016

I saw no chairs thrown. I was up front where the crowd formed. One video shows someone lifting a chair, then putting it back down. Yes, Jon Ralston should answer to this. You know he is featured on MSNBC for Nevada politics. Make your own conclusions. Don't they have Brian Williams on the payroll?

kiva

(4,373 posts)
80. Ralston is really pimping this story,
Mon May 16, 2016, 09:20 PM
May 2016

probably because the news outlets are much more receptive to "Bernie supporters are scary" than "State chair is incompetent and dishonest". Ralston repeated the lie that Bernie supporters booed Nina Turner, despite her own denial that it never happened. He also uses Lange's glamour shot, not the crazed, gavel thumping image that she showed to the convention. Frankly I wonder if he was even there.

 

Mark 750

(79 posts)
23. My Senator - I'm so ashamed
Mon May 16, 2016, 06:50 PM
May 2016

This guy is just a back room servant of the power elite. Weak, no energy, no leadership, distant, not a man of the people. I was told he didn't want Jesse Sbaih in CD3(my district) of Nevada to run because he was a Muslim.

Jesse was the one calling for a recount at the end of the Nevada convention.

It's sad we don't have real leaders.

Jackie Wilson Said

(4,176 posts)
26. Bernie is agreeing with Harry off camera, so to speak. Count on it.
Mon May 16, 2016, 06:54 PM
May 2016

Bernie, like Harry, see ONE issue only after the convention.

Nothing else will matter to either of them once the decision is made, I dont need to say what that ONE thing is, liberals know

 

Mark 750

(79 posts)
30. Maybe, maybe not
Mon May 16, 2016, 07:02 PM
May 2016

"Good thing we didnt have Bernie or Bust types in the 60's or we might very well still be fighting in Vietnam"

You know the Clinton's have vacationed with Henry Kissinger, right?

Jackie Wilson Said

(4,176 posts)
31. Which has what to do with anything? Either you think a Hillary and Drumpf WH would be the
Mon May 16, 2016, 07:03 PM
May 2016

same or you dont.

If you do, then you belong on a right wing board, not here.

 

Mark 750

(79 posts)
38. really - 2 choices only
Mon May 16, 2016, 07:18 PM
May 2016

Give Sanders a vote and we possibly wouldn't have your 2 choices. When my wife and I vacation with people, it definitely is with people that share our interests and common values. You should question her judgement or motives. I have.

 

Mark 750

(79 posts)
43. Jackie Wilson said - great Van Morrison song
Mon May 16, 2016, 07:29 PM
May 2016

I bought the album back in college, listening to it in my room with Village Voice front page - bones and skull
issue of the Watergate break-in taped to the door. Then got a draft notice - I wonder who was involved in that. Could it be Kissinger. That's how it matters. Please, adults - doesn't work.

Jackie Wilson Said

(4,176 posts)
47. If you have that background and will sit back and let Drumpf take over, something went
Mon May 16, 2016, 07:32 PM
May 2016

wrong these 40 years.

mac56

(17,569 posts)
76. Just can't accept a pleasant comment about a great musician, can you?
Mon May 16, 2016, 09:15 PM
May 2016

Just can't let it be nice for even a moment.

SMH.

 

Mark 750

(79 posts)
92. Yes, my Democratic Party...
Mon May 16, 2016, 10:53 PM
May 2016

corporate, military industrial creep. Sit back? Just worked for the Bernie grassroots in Nevada. Join with Senator Sanders and defeat Trump and get our party back. OK?

 

highprincipleswork

(3,111 posts)
28. Suspending Roberts Rules of Order in order to shut out the participatory process of people who were
Mon May 16, 2016, 06:59 PM
May 2016

legitimately there seems the great crime to me.

Keep on doing that, Harry Reid, and let's see where that gets ya.

I do expect more of the same from the Democratic Party. I hope they prove to be more clever than that, and he's definitely going to hear a word from me right now.

 

Ccarmona

(1,180 posts)
33. Take a Hike Harry
Mon May 16, 2016, 07:13 PM
May 2016

He's Against Bernie and against Alan Grayson; this guy is no hero to the Progressive cause. Retire already.

catnhatnh

(8,976 posts)
42. Chicago 1968
Mon May 16, 2016, 07:26 PM
May 2016

"The police are not here to create disorder. The police are here to preserve disorder." Quote by: Mayor Richard Daley. Source: 1968 Democratic Convention


Though your brother's bound and gagged
And they've chained him to a chair
Won't you please come to Chicago
Just to sing?

In a land that's known as freedom
How can such a thing be fair?
Won't you please come to Chicago
For the help that we can bring?

We can change the world
Rearrange the world
It's dying to get better-Crosby Stills Nash and Young-Chicago

islandmkl

(5,275 posts)
105. here you go...
Tue May 17, 2016, 07:12 AM
May 2016

On Tue May 17, 2016, 06:59 AM an alert was sent on the following post:

Go fuck yourself Harry. You are a disgrace.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=1452723

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Rude and ott, attacking Dems like this us a violation of tbe TOS.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue May 17, 2016, 07:04 AM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I suddenly felt like I was in 8th grade. Let's stay classy, folks.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: well-expressed sentiment...poster just used few words...unless Harry is a DU member, it isn't a call-out...and if he is a member, he deserves it
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Nevada was a mess, I do not care which side you are on, business should not be done that way. Glossing it over does not help.

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
 

Feeling the Bern

(3,839 posts)
48. Someone loves to polish those axhandles.
Mon May 16, 2016, 07:37 PM
May 2016

Harry, go give your faux poutrage someplace else please. Maybe if you attacked the Republicans like that, most of us on the left wouldn't yawn when you speak.

pacalo

(24,721 posts)
53. Reid & Barbara Boxer were there to provide muscle to the wrongdoing.
Mon May 16, 2016, 07:46 PM
May 2016

Reid is a joke when he can only stand up to his own constituency as a political favor.

I'm not impressed at Boxer's selling her soul to help her former son-in-law's sister Hillary, either.

trueblue2007

(17,223 posts)
56. Oh, i think Bernie knew... I'm sure if Bernie found out about it, he would not accept what happened
Mon May 16, 2016, 07:54 PM
May 2016

"I'm sure if Bernie found out about it, he would not accept what happened there,"

longship

(40,416 posts)
69. An absolutely horrible thread.
Mon May 16, 2016, 08:22 PM
May 2016

Despicable! From all sides.

For shame on you all! Such childish behavior.

 

w4rma

(31,700 posts)
75. Good bye, Reid. You left a whole lot of trash in your state party for the rest of us to clean up. nt
Mon May 16, 2016, 09:15 PM
May 2016
 

bunchofpenguins

(47 posts)
77. The Democratic Party is doing it's best to piss away any and all support from liberals.
Mon May 16, 2016, 09:16 PM
May 2016

Good job you pathetic excuse of a corporate wasteland.

Response to SecularMotion (Original post)

Baobab

(4,667 posts)
103. Harry "stepping stone to single payer" Reid and the cover up of G**S ...
Tue May 17, 2016, 05:46 AM
May 2016

cover up of the little known deal in 1994-1995

read my SlG link#1

Response to SecularMotion (Original post)

dicksmc3

(262 posts)
111. Get going Harry!!
Tue May 17, 2016, 09:27 AM
May 2016

Harry you are not looking for re-election so get the fuck out of the caucuses and primaries!! You disrupt the true Democratic principles with your bullshit!! Go have a glass of orange juice with Wasserman Schultz!! It's past time the Establishment moves over for the people to decide on the candidate without all the deception you and other Establishment assholes bring to the primaries and now the to the caucus in Nevada.. JUST GO AWAY HARRY!!

 

Darb

(2,807 posts)
112. It's UNDER THE BUS WITH YOU, HARRY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Tue May 17, 2016, 09:27 AM
May 2016

How dare you say anything about the wonderful, passionate, caring, delicious bernies.

 

AtomicKitten

(46,585 posts)
130. I blame Reid for cheating in Nevada.
Tue May 17, 2016, 07:36 PM
May 2016

Jon Ralston / USA Today (February 20, 2016):

I’d like to congratulate the winner of the Nevada Democratic caucus: Harry Reid. The story of the Nevada caucus is that a lame-duck senator and a self-neutered union conspired to revive the Clinton campaign in a remarkable bit of backroom maneuvering that helped Madame Secretary crush Sanders in Clark County, the key to winning almost any statewide election. The senator decided he would single-handedly save the state for Clinton. A gamble? Yes. But like going all-in with a straight flush. And it paid off.



Clinton voters bused in to caucus w/o registering:



“They’re letting them into the caucus right now without registering them,” a woman can be heard yelling as a steady line of people stream by.

“They’re going to do the count. They’re all going to be part of the count,” anther woman can be heard saying in reply.

“But they’re not registered,” a man says.

“They will register after this,” the woman can be heard saying.

“Clinton supports caught BREAKING the rules,” Porter writes in the video description. “This just happened at caucus location in Nevada. Hillary supporters were not registering to caucus, which is NOT allowed by the Democratic Party.”

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
132. He holds people accountable than cannot be seen doing anything out of order...
Tue May 17, 2016, 07:39 PM
May 2016

On the contrary, they were protesting because the chair threw out the Rule OF order, even before voting ON the rules.

Robert's Rules apply, unless you're trying to purposely be deceptive. But, you're willing to think something happened that did not, Harry.

... That's a bad sign, Harry.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Reid blames Sanders' 'peo...