Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,899 posts)
Mon May 16, 2016, 12:47 PM May 2016

U.S. top court rejects Exxon appeal in groundwater contamination case

Source: Reuters

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected Exxon Mobil Corp's (XOM.N) appeal of a $236 million judgment against the oil company in a case brought by the state of New Hampshire over groundwater contamination linked to a gasoline additive.

The justices left in place the New Hampshire Supreme Court's 2015 ruling upholding the judgment by a jury that in 2013 spurned Exxon's claims that the contamination linked to its fuel additive was not its fault but rather the fault of the local gas stations and storage facilities that spilled it.

Exxon argued in its appeal that its due process rights were violated because New Hampshire had not proved the company's liability for the alleged pollution at each individual site.

The additive at the center of the case is called methyl tertiary butyl ether, or MTBE. It is an oxygen-containing substance that was added to gasoline to promote more complete combustion and reduce air pollution.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]


Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-court-exxon-mobil-idUSKCN0Y71HD



World | Mon May 16, 2016 11:42am EDT
WASHINGTON | BY LAWRENCE HURLEY
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. top court rejects Exxon appeal in groundwater contamination case (Original Post) Eugene May 2016 OP
Whoohoo!! lark May 2016 #1
K&R Native May 2016 #2
Thank you for taking Scalia from us. Thank you whoever you are. Gregorian May 2016 #3
K&R mountain grammy May 2016 #4

lark

(23,105 posts)
1. Whoohoo!!
Mon May 16, 2016, 12:51 PM
May 2016

GO SCOTUS! So nice to have Scalia not swinging everything so far right. 4-4 split isn't ideal and will have some bad outcomes, but it's better than 5-4 to the right. Best would be Obama's nominee getting approved, but don't really see that happening.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. top court rejects Ex...