Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Wed May 11, 2016, 06:56 PM May 2016

US Approves UN Use Of Force To Protect Civilians In Conflict

Source: ASSOCIATED PRESS

UNITED NATIONS (AP) -- The United States is announcing its support for a set of principles that give a green light for U.N. peacekeeping troops and police to use force to protect civilians in armed conflicts.

U.S. Ambassador Samantha Power told a high-level U.N. meeting Wednesday focusing on the responsibility to protect civilians that the United States was "proud" and "humbled" to join 28 other countries that have pledged to abide by the 18 pledges.

U.N. peacekeepers from these 29 countries are now required to act in cases where civilians are in danger.

"The Kigali Principles are designed to make sure that civilians are not abandoned by the international community again," she said, recalling how U.N. peacekeepers left Rwanda before the 1994 genocide and Srebrenica before the 1995 massacre.

Read more: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/UN_UNITED_NATIONS_PROTECTING_CIVILIANS?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2016-05-11-18-24-52

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

newthinking

(3,982 posts)
1. "Responsibility to protect" will become a tool. While a good concept the framework
Wed May 11, 2016, 07:01 PM
May 2016

to keep it from being used to push regime change and cause civil wars is not in place.

pampango

(24,692 posts)
4. "Responsibility-to-protect" civilians has been UN policy since 2005. Not perfect but better than
Thu May 12, 2016, 06:45 AM
May 2016

a collective "responsibility-to-ignore" abuses against civilians or to rely on individual countries to "protect" civilians in other countries when, where and how it sees fit.

That each individual state has the primary responsibility to protect its populations from genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and ethnic cleansing. And it is also a responsibility for prevention of these crimes

That the international community should encourage or assist states to exercise this responsibility.

The international community has the responsibility to use appropriate diplomatic, humanitarian and other peaceful means to help protect populations threatened by these crimes. When a state manifestly fails in its protection responsibilities, and peaceful means are inadequate, the international community must take stronger measures, including collective use of force authorized by the Security Council under Chapter VII.

http://responsibilitytoprotect.org/index.php/about-rtop/learn-about-rtop

R2P has been invoked in 18 countries since 2005, including Gaza, Zimbabwe, Burma, Iraq and Kyrgyzstan.

ManiacJoe

(10,136 posts)
5. I am a firm believer in truth in labeling.
Thu May 12, 2016, 06:08 PM
May 2016

If the "peace keepers" are not allowed to keep the peace, the UN should be honest in using the "observer" label.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»US Approves UN Use Of For...