Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
Fri May 6, 2016, 04:28 PM May 2016

President Obama’s Message to Bernie Sanders: ‘Everybody Knows’ Delegate Math

Source: ABC

As Bernie Sanders pledges to take his presidential campaign all the way to the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia this July, President Obama appeared to imply that Sanders' efforts are all but over – even if he won’t explicitly call on Sanders to drop out.

Asked whether he believes the Vermont senator should end his campaign given the current delegate count, he replied, “I think on the Democratic side, just let the process play itself out. You mentioned the delegate math. I think everybody knows what that math is.”

According to ABC News’ estimates, Hillary Clinton has 2,205 delegates compared to Sanders' 1,401 delegates.

Nevertheless, Obama commended Sanders for “an extraordinary job raising a whole range of issues” that are important to Democratic voters.

Read more: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/president-obamas-message-bernie-sanders-delegate-math/story?id=38932152

95 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
President Obama’s Message to Bernie Sanders: ‘Everybody Knows’ Delegate Math (Original Post) Cali_Democrat May 2016 OP
When Hillary gets the required number of delegates, every delegate she gets after Thinkingabout May 2016 #1
What are you trying to say? morningfog May 2016 #4
jibberish is what they're saying. Obama is dead wrong. No one will get the total roguevalley May 2016 #8
What a bunch of unmitigated horseshit leftynyc May 2016 #11
You sound like the angry one. mcranor May 2016 #29
That's bs. It's long over already The Second Stone May 2016 #46
I have zero interest in the superdelegate count at this time. SusanCalvin May 2016 #48
+1 :) Old Crow May 2016 #51
That's a load of bs. You are deeply interested The Second Stone May 2016 #53
You're kidding, right? SusanCalvin May 2016 #56
Then why are you compulsively posting about it? The Second Stone May 2016 #70
I'll be the judge of whether my actions are compulsive, SusanCalvin May 2016 #71
You will be the writer of your own posts and everyone who reads them will The Second Stone May 2016 #77
OK. Whatever. "Conversation" over, at least for my part. nt SusanCalvin May 2016 #79
I sure will. beastie boy May 2016 #57
That's nice. Hope you're having a good time being condescending.... nt SusanCalvin May 2016 #58
What better response to someone in denial! beastie boy May 2016 #61
According to you. SusanCalvin May 2016 #62
He's part of the $1million well spent by the CTR people Ned_Devine May 2016 #65
Ah. I see your point, thanks. SusanCalvin May 2016 #66
Correct The Record is HRC's superpac run by David Brock Ned_Devine May 2016 #72
Good grief. SusanCalvin May 2016 #75
According to me and the math. beastie boy May 2016 #69
No need to apologize. SusanCalvin May 2016 #74
If I brought you any closer to the reality reflected in the numbers, I will consider my mission beastie boy May 2016 #78
Nope. SusanCalvin May 2016 #81
Then I must admit that both me and a certain basic science have failed miserably. beastie boy May 2016 #83
Hard not hate Hillary supporters isn't it? nt Lucky Luciano May 2016 #82
And math. beastie boy May 2016 #84
I have a doctorate in math actually. Lucky Luciano May 2016 #86
I must say, I was tempted to alert. But only for a brief moment of weakness. beastie boy May 2016 #88
What issue do I have with math? Lucky Luciano May 2016 #90
See my response #57 which started this whole mishigas. beastie boy May 2016 #92
I acknowledge (again) the math is tough to overcome. Lucky Luciano May 2016 #95
In some cases, very. SusanCalvin May 2016 #85
Oh, yes. They will. JDPriestly May 2016 #7
Hear, hear, hear, hear and Hear!!!! ReRe May 2016 #14
I think so too, also what the President said at the WH Correspondent's Dinner about Bernie. :) appalachiablue May 2016 #18
Agreed. NPR reports zentrum May 2016 #43
"if we nominate Hillary, it will be harder to defeat Trump" greymouse May 2016 #17
Yes, everyone does. Hillary - 1,704 to Bernie - 1,414 pledged delegates with 933 left in play. morningfog May 2016 #2
she would have to win 80-99% of the vote to get those delegates and she won't. No. This is far roguevalley May 2016 #9
That all depends on what the meaning of the word "is" is? Uncle Joe May 2016 #3
Like the current POTUS, his natural successor won't have to be a math wiz either. "I think..... Tarheel_Dem May 2016 #5
Well.... ReRe May 2016 #16
Obama is such a sadist! beastie boy May 2016 #6
pathetic. She has to win 80-85% of the elections to follow to get that vote total and she roguevalley May 2016 #10
I am assuming you mean delegates when you say "elections". In which case Bernie needs to get 80-85% beastie boy May 2016 #13
You know... ReRe May 2016 #19
Just for you: beastie boy May 2016 #30
beastie boy... ReRe May 2016 #36
I am flatteered. Was it my rejection of physical violence against Bernie? beastie boy May 2016 #38
I agree with Obama, “I think on the Democratic side, just let the process play itself out." Sunlei May 2016 #12
True. appalachiablue May 2016 #22
I also agree with Obama. beastie boy May 2016 #40
Be thankful to Senator Sanders, he's no quitter and is very helpful to thousands/millions of voters. Sunlei May 2016 #42
Ummm... Obama didn't endorse either of them. beastie boy May 2016 #44
I meant he's 'fair' to both Clinton and Sanders. I wish they would team-up. Sunlei May 2016 #49
Obama greymouse May 2016 #15
Whew, Whoo.... ReRe May 2016 #31
Aw, Obama is worried about his "legacy" Helen Borg May 2016 #20
Obama's approval rating is soaring among Democrats Cali_Democrat May 2016 #24
Like a middle class person whose wages have been less than stagnating... Helen Borg May 2016 #26
No kidding. Kall May 2016 #27
I remain convinced both Clinton and Sanders are unelectable, Sen. Walter Sobchak May 2016 #21
Clinton and Trump are both unelectable, yet one will almost certainly be elected. thesquanderer May 2016 #32
I wouldn't bet on that, Sen. Walter Sobchak May 2016 #50
Obama knows that Sanders' great popularity is a critique of his presidency. JDPriestly May 2016 #23
Obama's approval rating is soaring among Democrats Cali_Democrat May 2016 #25
And yet, Sanders has done quite well thus far in the primaries. JDPriestly May 2016 #34
Sanders is being rejected by Democratic voters Cali_Democrat May 2016 #35
Whoosh. Kall May 2016 #45
3.1 million votes many from Southern states that will not vote Democratic in November. JDPriestly May 2016 #73
I waited until Texas voted. I waited until Florida voted. I waited until NY voted. beastie boy May 2016 #80
-- NJCher May 2016 #67
The preface to zentrum May 2016 #28
Once again ABC is using the Super-Delegates to inflate Hillary's jwirr May 2016 #33
No delegates vote until the convention Cali_Democrat May 2016 #37
The math hasn't worked for sanders since Super Tuesday.... beachbumbob May 2016 #39
funny how often I keep reignoring those already being ignored...these damn main page posts! NRaleighLiberal May 2016 #41
I'm not allowed to question Obama's actions or statements here am I? retrowire May 2016 #47
Or, to put it differently, beastie boy May 2016 #54
pro gun =/= pro gun violence retrowire May 2016 #63
Tell that to the people who got screwed out their jobs AND their lives. beastie boy May 2016 #64
I saw your point. retrowire May 2016 #68
Obama was never "left" of the Democratic Party. beastie boy May 2016 #76
i cant form my own opinion of Obama? retrowire May 2016 #87
Absolutely you can! beastie boy May 2016 #89
You tell me. retrowire May 2016 #91
Yeah, that's pretty batshit crazy. beastie boy May 2016 #93
You're clearly not following, I should've left you be when you stooped low in the first place. nt retrowire May 2016 #94
The Big "O" is readying himself to hop on the campaign trail with Hillary. Trust Buster May 2016 #52
Obama said what 'that' math is. You mean the superdelegates? ViseGrip May 2016 #55
The center right just keeps fanning the flames! coffeeAM May 2016 #59
Bernie has the Right to Keep Running fred v May 2016 #60

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
1. When Hillary gets the required number of delegates, every delegate she gets after
Fri May 6, 2016, 04:34 PM
May 2016

That time will never show up for Sanders.

roguevalley

(40,656 posts)
8. jibberish is what they're saying. Obama is dead wrong. No one will get the total
Fri May 6, 2016, 04:47 PM
May 2016

delegates needed to close this and his comments are bs. He's only worrying about his legacy, not what's best for the country. He dislikes HRC as much as everyone else. She's covered his administration in corruption that's going to be part of the history written about it. ACA will be over with single payer and that's his great legacy. He should stay the hell out or endorse. Otherwise, he only makes me angry.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
11. What a bunch of unmitigated horseshit
Fri May 6, 2016, 04:56 PM
May 2016

Yes, I sure Pres Obama whispered in your ear and told you all this crap and that's why you feel the obligation to share his TRUE and REAL feelings with the rest of us. I thought we had enough of the pathetic going on but apparently some of you aren't done yet. Go get angry. Nobody cares.

 

The Second Stone

(2,900 posts)
46. That's bs. It's long over already
Fri May 6, 2016, 05:57 PM
May 2016

Clinton's pledged and superdelegate count already put her way over the top.

SusanCalvin

(6,592 posts)
48. I have zero interest in the superdelegate count at this time.
Fri May 6, 2016, 06:04 PM
May 2016

When she has a majority of the elected delegates, let me know.

SusanCalvin

(6,592 posts)
56. You're kidding, right?
Fri May 6, 2016, 06:14 PM
May 2016

I don't even know what the superdelegate count is at this point. And, no, I'm not interested in knowing.

Mind read much?

https://m.

 

The Second Stone

(2,900 posts)
70. Then why are you compulsively posting about it?
Fri May 6, 2016, 07:02 PM
May 2016

I call bs. It is the only thing on your mind when you are posting about it. I don't need to be a mind reader to know that because I can read your posts. Try reading your own posts, and you will see where people are getting the idea that you are thinking about the superdelegates and their count. I'd advise you stay away from a poker table.

SusanCalvin

(6,592 posts)
71. I'll be the judge of whether my actions are compulsive,
Fri May 6, 2016, 07:07 PM
May 2016

As you are welcome to be of your own.

I will say that if you are under the impression you're helping your candidate, you're certainly not with me. I try not to let other people push me into doing the opposite of what they want rather than what I want, but sometimes it's sure tempting.

 

The Second Stone

(2,900 posts)
77. You will be the writer of your own posts and everyone who reads them will
Fri May 6, 2016, 07:16 PM
May 2016

be the judge of them. They are full of bs. And yes, I will be the judge of deciding what I think about your posts and your deep insincerity in your motives. If I didn't want to judge your posts, I'd put you on ignore.

And I know that I have none to little influence over you, and I'm fine with that. But when someone trots along and says "I don't care about 'x'", I find that to be bullshit.

beastie boy

(9,421 posts)
57. I sure will.
Fri May 6, 2016, 06:17 PM
May 2016

In the mean time, in hopes of expanding your interests, I would like to let you know that she leads in pledged delegates, superdelegates and popular vote by increasingly prohibitive margins.

SusanCalvin

(6,592 posts)
62. According to you.
Fri May 6, 2016, 06:34 PM
May 2016

Needless to say, my opinion is different.

Dunno what your aim is here, come to think of it. If it's to contribute to lowering my opinion of a particular group of Hillary supporters, you have succeeded.

 

Ned_Devine

(3,146 posts)
65. He's part of the $1million well spent by the CTR people
Fri May 6, 2016, 06:45 PM
May 2016

I tend not to respond to people that just signed up last month and only write condescending posts

SusanCalvin

(6,592 posts)
66. Ah. I see your point, thanks.
Fri May 6, 2016, 06:53 PM
May 2016

What's CTR? (I mean, in more detail than what's all too obvious from the context?)

I'm just kinda interested in knowing who pays people to be jerks. If I really needed the money, I could do that.... ;->

 

Ned_Devine

(3,146 posts)
72. Correct The Record is HRC's superpac run by David Brock
Fri May 6, 2016, 07:08 PM
May 2016

They recently infused $1million to create an online "presence" with people like Beastie Boy here to "defend" Hillary and basically cause a nuisance, because she's so inevitable ya' know.

SusanCalvin

(6,592 posts)
75. Good grief.
Fri May 6, 2016, 07:13 PM
May 2016

Not saying anyone is or isn't a shill, but if this is the kind of thing real ones are doing, then what on earth do they think they're accomplishing? I can understand undermining your candidate for free (people can have odd notions of what's effective), but I hope nobody's *paying* for stuff like this.....!

beastie boy

(9,421 posts)
69. According to me and the math.
Fri May 6, 2016, 07:01 PM
May 2016

Math must also be a paid Hillary shill, right?

I guess I should apologize for lowering your opinion of a particular basic science...

SusanCalvin

(6,592 posts)
74. No need to apologize.
Fri May 6, 2016, 07:09 PM
May 2016

If you are confident that you're accomplishing what you want to accomplish, then by all means carry on.

beastie boy

(9,421 posts)
78. If I brought you any closer to the reality reflected in the numbers, I will consider my mission
Fri May 6, 2016, 07:18 PM
May 2016

accomplished.

SusanCalvin

(6,592 posts)
81. Nope.
Fri May 6, 2016, 07:25 PM
May 2016

There are those who might have a chance of influencing my opinion (about anything, not just whatever the topic was here). You are not one of them.

I will say that I will form my own opinions, tempting as it is to go directly against yours. But that's me, not any influence of yours.

"Conversation" over on my end.

beastie boy

(9,421 posts)
83. Then I must admit that both me and a certain basic science have failed miserably.
Fri May 6, 2016, 07:31 PM
May 2016

It's too late for me, but there is always hope that the rules of math will change eventually.

Good night.

Lucky Luciano

(11,258 posts)
86. I have a doctorate in math actually.
Fri May 6, 2016, 07:40 PM
May 2016

Doesn't change the fact that you are being an asshole.

Bernie should stay in and keep pounding away at his agenda.

I know this will be hidden - oh well!

beastie boy

(9,421 posts)
88. I must say, I was tempted to alert. But only for a brief moment of weakness.
Fri May 6, 2016, 07:55 PM
May 2016

Then I felt pity for the mathematician who has issues with math.

Did I ever say Bernie should drop out? No. All I was commenting on was a certain poster being in denial of a certain basic science.

And now it appears this affliction is contagious. What is it with Bernie supporters and numbers? Not even PhDs in math are immune!

Lucky Luciano

(11,258 posts)
90. What issue do I have with math?
Fri May 6, 2016, 07:59 PM
May 2016

Probability if Bernie taking it is very low...but he should keep pounding away nevertheless.

beastie boy

(9,421 posts)
92. See my response #57 which started this whole mishigas.
Fri May 6, 2016, 08:13 PM
May 2016

That issue. Just a reminder, you called me an asshole over it. So now you tell me you have no issue over my post and you insulted me for nothing?

That's not very nice for an educated gentleman/lady like yourself!

Oh, that reminds me... being a PhD in math, could you do a quick calculation based on the lead in pledged delegates, superdelegates and popular vote Hillary enjoys, of Bernie's odds to win the nomination?

If you can't find the exact numbers online, I will oblige, just let me know.

Lucky Luciano

(11,258 posts)
95. I acknowledge (again) the math is tough to overcome.
Fri May 6, 2016, 08:31 PM
May 2016

Glad to see Bernie keep poking his finger in the eyes of the establishment though. Hope he keeps doing it after she beats trump.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
7. Oh, yes. They will.
Fri May 6, 2016, 04:45 PM
May 2016

And Hillary will have a hard time getting Hillary's votes.

The insults thrown at Bernie voters will backfire. I talk to a lot of Bernie supporters.

Trump is bad, but based on the polls, if we nominate Hillary, it will be harder to defeat Trump.

This election is about the trade agreements, corruption, jobs and other economic issues.

Hillary and Bernie agree on social issues. So if voters want Bernie's ideas to prevail on economic issues, they are highly unlikely to vote for Hillary. Hillary is extremely weak on economic issues. Bill Clinton's bills made a mess of our economy. The extreme privatization that the Democratic Party has silently and sometimes loudly accepted since 1980 has not worked out well at all resulting in a very out-of-date infrastructure in our country.

It will be a crying shame if Clinton is our nominee even if she wins the White House through her scare tactics. I do not want another year of Kissinger's foreign policy.

So Feel the Bern!

California has yet to vote. I'm out there campaigning. And Bernie has a good chance to win a lot of delegates in California.

Change is coming. Like it or not.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
14. Hear, hear, hear, hear and Hear!!!!
Fri May 6, 2016, 05:03 PM
May 2016

I think PO left himself a little hole between Hill and Bernie. He did give Bernie a little compliment there.

zentrum

(9,865 posts)
43. Agreed. NPR reports
Fri May 6, 2016, 05:44 PM
May 2016

…that O said Bernie should not drop out.

The WH is not Bernie's only goal, whereas it is HRC's only goal.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
2. Yes, everyone does. Hillary - 1,704 to Bernie - 1,414 pledged delegates with 933 left in play.
Fri May 6, 2016, 04:34 PM
May 2016

I agree with Obama. Bernie's has done an extraordinary job raising issues and we need to let the process play out.

roguevalley

(40,656 posts)
9. she would have to win 80-99% of the vote to get those delegates and she won't. No. This is far
Fri May 6, 2016, 04:48 PM
May 2016

from over.

Uncle Joe

(58,417 posts)
3. That all depends on what the meaning of the word "is" is?
Fri May 6, 2016, 04:34 PM
May 2016

President Obama just acknowledged present tense math while also stating to "let the process should play itself out."

It sounds to me like President Obama just stated that Bernie should run so long as he can whether it be until Washington D.C. has held its vote or the convention.

Hillary simple doesn't have those delegates cited in the OP, super delegates can't vote until the convention, so ABC is misleading with this article.

Thanks for the thread, Cali_Democrat.

Tarheel_Dem

(31,240 posts)
5. Like the current POTUS, his natural successor won't have to be a math wiz either. "I think.....
Fri May 6, 2016, 04:39 PM
May 2016

everybody knows what that math is".

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
16. Well....
Fri May 6, 2016, 05:05 PM
May 2016

Last edited Fri May 6, 2016, 06:06 PM - Edit history (2)

... it's GWB's "math death."

Sorry... edited because I stumbled over my words/typed too fast.

beastie boy

(9,421 posts)
6. Obama is such a sadist!
Fri May 6, 2016, 04:45 PM
May 2016

Everybody knows what the delegate math is, yet Obama wants Bernie to go on humiliating himself with more crazy talk about a "path to victory"!

C'mon, Mr. President, just because Bernie is losing, there is no need to kick him on his way out!

roguevalley

(40,656 posts)
10. pathetic. She has to win 80-85% of the elections to follow to get that vote total and she
Fri May 6, 2016, 04:50 PM
May 2016

won't. No one knows math around here. They just want to undermine Bernie's support, you know, the love and support that HRC doesn't have and never will. Sad all around

beastie boy

(9,421 posts)
13. I am assuming you mean delegates when you say "elections". In which case Bernie needs to get 80-85%
Fri May 6, 2016, 05:01 PM
May 2016

of the delegates just to get even with Hillary.

Hey, you're right, no one knows math around here. But I am with Obama: let Bernie duke it out with the math!

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
19. You know...
Fri May 6, 2016, 05:09 PM
May 2016

... there's allot of things I've been mad at PO about, but I would never ever call him a "sadist." PO didn't kick Bernie, as you wish he had.

beastie boy

(9,421 posts)
30. Just for you:
Fri May 6, 2016, 05:20 PM
May 2016


No, Obama didn't literally kick Bernie, nor would I wish he did, but... Everyone knows what the delegate math is, but keep on running, Bernie!

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
12. I agree with Obama, “I think on the Democratic side, just let the process play itself out."
Fri May 6, 2016, 05:00 PM
May 2016

Bernie came to the Correspondents Dinner and President Obama was very complimentary of him there too.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
42. Be thankful to Senator Sanders, he's no quitter and is very helpful to thousands/millions of voters.
Fri May 6, 2016, 05:38 PM
May 2016

That's why Obama endorses both of them

beastie boy

(9,421 posts)
44. Ummm... Obama didn't endorse either of them.
Fri May 6, 2016, 05:46 PM
May 2016

Nor would I expect him to. A top dog getting into a catfight is not very dignified.

And I can't honestly say Bernie has been helpful to me. So I will follow the sizable majority of the Democratic voters and reserve my gratitude, if you don't mind.

greymouse

(872 posts)
15. Obama
Fri May 6, 2016, 05:04 PM
May 2016

that's the guy who claimed liberal policies and just about the first thing he did was appoint Rahm Emanuel, wasn't it, who called us fucking retards?

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
31. Whew, Whoo....
Fri May 6, 2016, 05:20 PM
May 2016

... don't get us started! Politics is a bitch. And Bernie is running an active rambunctious campaign. He is no where near stopping. My son got to attend one of his rallies the other day, and he said everyone to a person in that room was HAPPY. Vibes & energy were so high in that Hall, you could cut them with a knife.

It's a new day, greymouse. Keep the faith. GOTV. This ain't a time to look back so much as it is to put the peddle to the metal. If you can't get out, then donate to Bernie's election fund.

Go Bernie!

 

Sen. Walter Sobchak

(8,692 posts)
21. I remain convinced both Clinton and Sanders are unelectable,
Fri May 6, 2016, 05:11 PM
May 2016

But there is no real advantage to Sanders folding his tent now and letting his organization scatter in the winds if they are to be leveraged in the general election. There is no energy to be transferred then.

thesquanderer

(11,991 posts)
32. Clinton and Trump are both unelectable, yet one will almost certainly be elected.
Fri May 6, 2016, 05:21 PM
May 2016

And since Trump is the "more" unelectable, I expect it to be Clinton.

 

Sen. Walter Sobchak

(8,692 posts)
50. I wouldn't bet on that,
Fri May 6, 2016, 06:07 PM
May 2016

This election is going to hinge on GOTV, yet will feature both parties struggling a disaffected and indifferent activist base. Clinton will bring out the boomers who have been with her and Bill for the last quarter century and the reliable minorities in many states that aren't really competitive either way. Nobody knows how much riff-raff is going to show up for Trump in the general election or if there is a "silent majority" among Republicans who really are ready to vote for Trump.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
34. And yet, Sanders has done quite well thus far in the primaries.
Fri May 6, 2016, 05:23 PM
May 2016

This election, as I said, is about the environment, wealth inequality, jobs and trade policy as well as student loans, regulating Wall Street, child care stopping the wars and universal healthcare.

Obama has not delivered what most Americans want in terms of those policies. Hence, we have two strong candidates in Sanders and Trump who offer change in the Obama policies in those areas.

Everybody in the Democratic Party likes Obama. It's the policies of his administration that a lot of people really don't like. Hillary and the establishment Republican candidates represent those failed policies.

The majority of the country if you include both Trump and Sanders supporters, while embracing very different solutions to those problems, are avidly and vociferously rejecting Obama's and Hillary's ideas on them.

So that is why I say that the successes of both Trump and Sanders are critiques of Obama's policies in those areas.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
35. Sanders is being rejected by Democratic voters
Fri May 6, 2016, 05:23 PM
May 2016

in favor of Hillary.

Hillary is leading him by 3.1 million votes and 300 pledged delegates.

A far larger margin that Obama had over Hillary in 2008.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
73. 3.1 million votes many from Southern states that will not vote Democratic in November.
Fri May 6, 2016, 07:09 PM
May 2016

Wait until California votes.

Over four million people voted in the California primary in 2008.

Over two million each for Obama and Hillary.

Hillary won California that year, but from what I am seeing on the street, Bernie is doing extremely well. It may just be the areas that I go to. We shall see.

I think Bernie is going to get a lot of raw votes in California and Oregon, possibly in other states yet to vote.

http://politics.nytimes.com/election-guide/2008/results/states/CA.html

Don't count your chickens before they hatch.

And remember. The Republicans have finished their primary season pretty much, so they may turn up the heat in Congress. I would not count that one out.

This year is about the unexpected.

I will still be surprised if Trump is allowed to take the Republican nomination.

beastie boy

(9,421 posts)
80. I waited until Texas voted. I waited until Florida voted. I waited until NY voted.
Fri May 6, 2016, 07:24 PM
May 2016

I waited until Pennsylvania voted.

I guess I can wait until California votes.

zentrum

(9,865 posts)
28. The preface to
Fri May 6, 2016, 05:17 PM
May 2016

…..his electoral math comment was O saying that he did not think Bernie should drop out.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
33. Once again ABC is using the Super-Delegates to inflate Hillary's
Fri May 6, 2016, 05:22 PM
May 2016

count. That will only be decided at the convention.

 

beachbumbob

(9,263 posts)
39. The math hasn't worked for sanders since Super Tuesday....
Fri May 6, 2016, 05:34 PM
May 2016

Those who have political knowledge understand...

retrowire

(10,345 posts)
47. I'm not allowed to question Obama's actions or statements here am I?
Fri May 6, 2016, 06:03 PM
May 2016

lol

Pro TPP Obama disses the anti TPP candidate.

No shitttt

beastie boy

(9,421 posts)
54. Or, to put it differently,
Fri May 6, 2016, 06:11 PM
May 2016

Anti-gun Obama dissing pro-gun candidate.

See, it works both ways!

I really don't see any point in taking a single issue and making broad conclusions based on it.

beastie boy

(9,421 posts)
64. Tell that to the people who got screwed out their jobs AND their lives.
Fri May 6, 2016, 06:44 PM
May 2016

The "guns don't kill people" bullshit is too old and tired to be taken seriously.

Anyway, you missed my point completely. I gave you an example of how easy it is to point to a single issue and make broad-based judgements of character based on it. A pretty lame and lazy way of making an argument.

retrowire

(10,345 posts)
68. I saw your point.
Fri May 6, 2016, 06:55 PM
May 2016

But you trying to paint being pro gun as being a bad thing, while disregarding pro TPP isn't very helpful.

Gun's DO kill people. The mere presence of them exacerbate violence where it would not normally exist.

Surprise, surprise, BOTH of our candidates support gun control. Bernie is as "pro gun" as Hillary is. Neither of them want to ban guns all the way. That attack against Bernie is so dumb when you consider how similar Hillary and Bernie are on the issue.

And another surprise, allowing people to sue manufacturers for gun violence would not stop gun violence, bring victims back, prevent further gun violence or anything of the sort. It's a feel good idea to sue the gun manufacturers. They make weapons. Weapons maim and harm people. Suing them would not break their bank. It wouldn't even hurt them. It wouldn't control the output of guns basically.

Guns shouldn't be distributed haphazardly, and that's what gun control is about. But they're not going to be removed from our culture. Guns are far too ingrained within our nation.

ETA: And regarding the broad based judgments of character based on one policy? TPP does not define Obama. His turned back on the left defines Obama. He's done a lot of good for our nation. I'm happy about that. But he said "Hope and Change" would happen. He turned his back on Occupy. And kept hush about wall st. That's how we define Obama.

beastie boy

(9,421 posts)
76. Obama was never "left" of the Democratic Party.
Fri May 6, 2016, 07:14 PM
May 2016

He, like the majority of Americans who voted for him twice, is a mainstream Democrat. He never turned his back on us. He may have disappointed you, but that does not create in me or Obama a sense of obligation. Like it or not, you have little say in defining the Democratic party. You are on its fringes, like "blue dog" or Reagan Democrats.

And, I regret to inform you, when it comes to the big picture, you don't have much say in defining Obama.

retrowire

(10,345 posts)
87. i cant form my own opinion of Obama?
Fri May 6, 2016, 07:44 PM
May 2016

lol

Yes I can.

And that's sad that you think the party dictates what it is and not it's members. Really sad. It's as if you believe in allegiance factions over democracy or something.

beastie boy

(9,421 posts)
89. Absolutely you can!
Fri May 6, 2016, 07:59 PM
May 2016

It may be a batshit crazy opinion, but I will be the first one to defend your right to it!

...While we are on the subject of batshit crazy, would you care to explain how the majority of party members are not its members, and how the party is not defined by its majority?

retrowire

(10,345 posts)
91. You tell me.
Fri May 6, 2016, 08:08 PM
May 2016

It's batshit crazy for stating the fact that Obama promised to make things happen to thousands of grassroots activists, then turned his back on them as soon as he got the job?

uh ok. I get it.

beastie boy

(9,421 posts)
93. Yeah, that's pretty batshit crazy.
Fri May 6, 2016, 08:20 PM
May 2016

Ignoring millions of grassroots activists who got things happening thanks to Obama, and probably not even being aware of those millions of grassroots activists who worked their asses off to elect him... yeah, it is...

 

fred v

(271 posts)
60. Bernie has the Right to Keep Running
Fri May 6, 2016, 06:29 PM
May 2016

But when all the primaries are over, I hope he'll see the writing on the wall and drop out, for the good of the country.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»President Obama’s Message...