Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jpak

(41,758 posts)
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 02:59 PM Apr 2016

Wisconsin toddler shot mom dead in front of grandma, 1-year-old brother as family drove down highway

Source: New York Daily News

The Wisconsin mom shot and killed by her 2-year-old son was driving with her own mother and another of her sons when the boy found the loaded weapon under a seat, police said.

Patrice Price, a 26-year-old mom from Milwaukee, died Tuesday after her son grabbed a gun that had slid out from under the front seat. The tot fired a single bullet through the driver’s seat, Milwaukee police said in a statement.

Price’s mother and 1-year-old son were sharing the passenger seat at the time of the mid-traffic shooting, police said.

Neither the toddler in the back seat or the 1-year-old in the front was in a car seat, police said.

<more>

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/wisc-toddler-shot-mom-dead-front-grandma-baby-brother-article-1.2616247

63 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wisconsin toddler shot mom dead in front of grandma, 1-year-old brother as family drove down highway (Original Post) jpak Apr 2016 OP
So a completely stupid and uncaring parent was shot because Fresh_Start Apr 2016 #1
the child did kill the driver. nt barbtries Apr 2016 #2
TY...I misread it Fresh_Start Apr 2016 #11
Two-factor eradication sofa king Apr 2016 #3
She was the driver muriel_volestrangler Apr 2016 #4
Uh, the way I read it, the mother was driving. louis-t Apr 2016 #5
It may not have been her gun. thesquanderer Apr 2016 #7
Not Her Car erpowers Apr 2016 #10
Absolutely ReRe Apr 2016 #13
psst... view poster's profile notadmblnd Apr 2016 #16
That was a cheap shot. The poster's profile seems irrelevant. Laurian Apr 2016 #20
No, the cheap shot was taken by the poster notadmblnd Apr 2016 #25
I think you have let this election cycle completely take over your brain stem.. snooper2 Apr 2016 #50
I think I must have hit a nerve with you. notadmblnd Apr 2016 #57
Thank you. n/t snacker Apr 2016 #17
She was stupid and uncaring, all right, just not because of the gun. mostlyalurker Apr 2016 #21
"This woman was not stupid and uncaring" awoke_in_2003 Apr 2016 #32
Thank you! Her neglect of her children was directly connected to her death. Coventina Apr 2016 #33
My mother died on thanksgiving day of 1981 awoke_in_2003 Apr 2016 #36
I'm sorry for your loss, Awoke. It seems like so many parents don't understand Coventina Apr 2016 #37
This is so wrong. joshcryer Apr 2016 #41
Thanks for your post. joshcryer Apr 2016 #43
She was in her boyfriend's car. Her's was recently stolen. postulater Apr 2016 #46
How horrible for the toddler denvine Apr 2016 #6
The stupid here is just incomprehensible. Every single idiot parent who drives LuckyLib Apr 2016 #8
They should have their children confiscated from them. n/t Coventina Apr 2016 #34
Dear freakin god Blandocyte Apr 2016 #9
The toddler may have fired in self-defense from the danger his idiot mother put him and his sibling Akicita Apr 2016 #12
Conservatives may not believe in Darwin mwrguy Apr 2016 #14
Too late in this case though ... Nihil Apr 2016 #62
stories like this... SCantiGOP Apr 2016 #15
Anyone who thinks they need a firearm to protect themselves from the gov't is not mentally vkkv Apr 2016 #22
I've often argued that Scalia's 'original intent' should apply SCantiGOP Apr 2016 #27
Where are the bloody-handed gumpers? Darb Apr 2016 #18
I am fully Anti-Handgun and anti-auto & semi-automatic rifles. vkkv Apr 2016 #26
She most likely didn't know the gun was there. hack89 Apr 2016 #29
If you are the driver of a car and safeinOhio Apr 2016 #40
So the woman was a stupid gun humper responsible for her own death? hack89 Apr 2016 #45
People Control, Not Gun Control Sancho Apr 2016 #19
Loaded gun Old Codger Apr 2016 #23
+1...nt freebrew Apr 2016 #28
What amazes me most about this story... turbo_satan Apr 2016 #24
One less ammosexual. nt valerief Apr 2016 #30
You know it wasn't her gun or her car? hack89 Apr 2016 #35
Apparently that doesn't matter, sarisataka Apr 2016 #44
The ammosexual boyfriend should lose his gun rites for life. stone space Apr 2016 #54
That's nice. nt hack89 Apr 2016 #55
That's the same things sarisataka Apr 2016 #56
Plesase stop comparing gays with gunhumpers. stone space Apr 2016 #61
Way to dehumanize sarisataka Apr 2016 #42
You need to reread the story buddy. romanic Apr 2016 #47
When you trust an ammosexual, you ARE an ammosexual. Buddy. valerief Apr 2016 #58
Like I give a shit. romanic Apr 2016 #59
The "stupid one" is the security guard boyfriend... Moonwalk Apr 2016 #31
He probably wasn't a good kid. RoccoR5955 Apr 2016 #38
We need good toddlers with guns to stop the bad toddlers with guns!! Coventina Apr 2016 #39
you beat me to it! (nt) apnu Apr 2016 #49
Damn ... the NRA must be feeling so conflicted on this one ... Nihil Apr 2016 #63
So many levels of fail here. apnu Apr 2016 #48
Guns don't kill people. nruthie Apr 2016 #51
Them's the risks BeyondGeography Apr 2016 #52
The boyfriend should lose his gun rites for life. stone space Apr 2016 #53
Yet another terrible gun tragedy GOPblows431 Apr 2016 #60

Fresh_Start

(11,330 posts)
1. So a completely stupid and uncaring parent was shot because
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 03:02 PM
Apr 2016

1) her toddler wasn't secure in a carseat
2) her gun wasn't secured either

they are lucky the toddler didn't kill the driver so that the entire family died

muriel_volestrangler

(101,321 posts)
4. She was the driver
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 03:08 PM
Apr 2016

and the gun may well have belonged to her security guard boyfriend - they found his gun belt in the car.

erpowers

(9,350 posts)
10. Not Her Car
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 03:20 PM
Apr 2016

She was driving, but is was not her car. It was her security guard boyfriend's car. So, he may have left the gun under the seat and not told her. The 2 year old may have been buckled in the back seat. The article said the young man had just learned how to unbuckle his seat belt and he got out of his seat, picked up the gun, and fired one round into the back of the driver seat which struck his mother.

This woman was not stupid and uncaring. We do not know this woman, or how she felt about the world and issues. We do not know how the gun got into the car. We do not even know if she knew their was a gun in the car in which she was driving. Even if she had put him in a car seat, once he learned how to unbuckle the car seat the same thing could have happened.

This is first and foremost a tragic incident in which three children have lost their mother. Also, a woman has died at far too young of an age.

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
25. No, the cheap shot was taken by the poster
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 04:29 PM
Apr 2016

who made judgemental comments about the victim in the story- apparently without reading the article. Callous, unfeeling and only caring about themselves and theirs. I find that it is a trait shared with the person they support for President of the US. Pointing that out is not a cheap shot.

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
50. I think you have let this election cycle completely take over your brain stem..
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 09:33 AM
Apr 2016

You may want to disable access to the Intertubes and keep your TV on non-stop Spongebob for two weeks to clear that out. Let me know if that doesn't work for you and we will go on to phase 2 of treatment

mostlyalurker

(37 posts)
21. She was stupid and uncaring, all right, just not because of the gun.
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 04:09 PM
Apr 2016

Not having a two year old and a one year old secured in car seats in the back seat of the car is all the proof of stupidity and carelessness you need. That being said she in no way deserved what happened and since she was DRIVING the car when she was shot....everybody else in that car is damm lucky to be alive, as are the other people on the road at the time. Since her mother s now going to be raising her kids, I can only breath a sigh of relief that she is apparently uninjured.

 

awoke_in_2003

(34,582 posts)
32. "This woman was not stupid and uncaring"
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 05:13 PM
Apr 2016

yes, she was. Not having her kids in a car seat greatly increases their risk of injury in a car accident. If you don't have enough time in your precious little life to secure your children safely in the car, you are stupid and uncaring.

Coventina

(27,121 posts)
33. Thank you! Her neglect of her children was directly connected to her death.
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 05:15 PM
Apr 2016

Not only that, but it endangered everyone else on the road with her.

I feel sorry for the kids, not her.

 

awoke_in_2003

(34,582 posts)
36. My mother died on thanksgiving day of 1981
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 05:20 PM
Apr 2016

when I was 13 years old. It affects me to this day, and I didn't cause it. I feel for these kids.

Coventina

(27,121 posts)
37. I'm sorry for your loss, Awoke. It seems like so many parents don't understand
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 05:22 PM
Apr 2016

how their actions and choices can have such negative consequences on the humans they chose to bring into the world.
It seems so unbelievably selfish to me.

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
41. This is so wrong.
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 05:58 PM
Apr 2016

At that age kids learn to unbuckle and get out of their seat, naturally. If the gun slid out from under the seat and the toddler saw it, the instinct is to be good and get the object. This was a complete tragedy.

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
43. Thanks for your post.
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 06:00 PM
Apr 2016

I was prepared to be judgemental, but you opened my eyes to the matter. Tragedy all around.

denvine

(802 posts)
6. How horrible for the toddler
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 03:10 PM
Apr 2016

Imagine growing up knowing you killed your mother. Stupidity is rampant!

LuckyLib

(6,819 posts)
8. The stupid here is just incomprehensible. Every single idiot parent who drives
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 03:13 PM
Apr 2016

with children not secured needs to get pulled over and hit with a huge fine. Unfortunately, it's often folks who can't afford such fines who disregard safety and don't belt up their kids.

Blandocyte

(1,231 posts)
9. Dear freakin god
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 03:17 PM
Apr 2016

Those poor kids, especially the 2 year old. The boyfriend who lost his girlfriend due to what seems to be his own negligence. What a nightmare.

Akicita

(1,196 posts)
12. The toddler may have fired in self-defense from the danger his idiot mother put him and his sibling
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 03:25 PM
Apr 2016

in by not buckling them in.

 

Nihil

(13,508 posts)
62. Too late in this case though ...
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 08:13 AM
Apr 2016

... considering the she'd already had 3 children and the equally stupid boyfriend
is still able to reproduce.

SCantiGOP

(13,871 posts)
15. stories like this...
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 03:42 PM
Apr 2016

are the reason I cannot go to the gun forum here on DU. Some of those folks are probably good-intentioned Democrats, but I have to question some of the NRA-cloned arguments I have seen there.

I reject the idea that we are ever going to have a citizens' army overthrow a dictatorial government, so the possession of anything other than hunting rifles and small handguns for personal defense is, in my opinion, totally indefensible and dangerous to our society.

Short version of my position: Guns DO kill people, and every day.

 

vkkv

(3,384 posts)
22. Anyone who thinks they need a firearm to protect themselves from the gov't is not mentally
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 04:23 PM
Apr 2016

fit enough to OWN a firearm.

Given that, I have a few slow-shooting bolt-action target rifles and skeet shotgun.

My preference is that handguns were entirely illegal.

SCantiGOP

(13,871 posts)
27. I've often argued that Scalia's 'original intent' should apply
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 04:50 PM
Apr 2016

Anyone should be able to own a single shot musket or rifle. If you get really good at it you can get off maybe 2 shots a minute and probably hit anything within 50 feet.
If you had explained to the Founding Fathers what you can do with a semi-automatic assault rifle, and then ask them if they want anyone to be able to have one, they would have thought you were out of your freaking mind.

(On edit, I looked up 'musket range' and found out you could hit something up to 100 yards if you were good. But forget about a mass shooting - someone will come knock the crap out of you while you are reloading after your first shot. Here is the entry:

Based on the Jäger rifle, long rifles known as "Pennsylvania Rifles" were used by snipers and light infantry throughout the Revolutionary War. The grooved barrel increased the range and accuracy by spinning a snugly fitted ball, giving an accurate range of 300 yards compared to 100 yards for smoothbore muskets.

 

Darb

(2,807 posts)
18. Where are the bloody-handed gumpers?
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 03:47 PM
Apr 2016

You notice they never sound off when guns are the exact problem in a situation and it would not have happened if they and others like them hadn't made our society the gun-polluted, blood stain that it is. They only come out to spew bullshit when their toys are threatened.

Come on gun humpers, come tell us how this is a good thing that that stupid person could get a handgun and let it sit out so her child could kill her. Tell us how we need people to be able to do that. Come on over.

 

vkkv

(3,384 posts)
26. I am fully Anti-Handgun and anti-auto & semi-automatic rifles.
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 04:41 PM
Apr 2016

I do own a few small caliber, target, bolt-action rifles and skeet shotgun - kept unloaded and all are locked in a safe. Home protection is literally the LAST thing I worry about in this world. I worry far more about a vehicle accident, falling down stairs or off a ladder.. You might think target or skeet shooting is a stupid "sport", that's okay, I think golf is stupid. The physics of propelling such a small object past the speed of sound so accurately is intiguing.

It would do a LOT more good if those who are anti-handgun and anti-high capacity semi-auto assault style weapons would be more clear about what they are against.

I don't believe that a lot of Dems want to take away hunting / target rifles from people.

TIP:: This needs to be clear. When anti-gunners complain about "guns", it is "handguns" that should be specified to give the movement more power.. just saying 'No more guns" isn't going to get it done.

BAN ALL HANDGUNS NOW!


hack89

(39,171 posts)
29. She most likely didn't know the gun was there.
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 04:57 PM
Apr 2016

It was her boyfriends car and his gun. He was a armed security guard - if so, that means he was trained, licensed and bonded.

safeinOhio

(32,688 posts)
40. If you are the driver of a car and
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 05:38 PM
Apr 2016

the cops find a bag of drugs under the seat, you are responsible even if you didn't know it was there.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
45. So the woman was a stupid gun humper responsible for her own death?
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 06:15 PM
Apr 2016

that was what Darb was implying. He put the blame solely on her.

Sancho

(9,070 posts)
19. People Control, Not Gun Control
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 03:48 PM
Apr 2016


This is my generic response to gun threads where people are shot and killed by the dumb or criminal possession of guns. For the record, I grew up in the South and on military bases. I was taught about firearms as a child, and I grew up hunting, was a member of the NRA, and I still own guns. In the 70’s, I dropped out of the NRA because they become more radical and less interested in safety and training. Some personal experiences where people I know were involved in shootings caused me to realize that anyone could obtain and posses a gun no matter how illogical it was for them to have a gun. Also, easy access to more powerful guns, guns in the hands of children, and guns that weren’t secured are out of control in our society. As such, here’s what I now think ought to be the requirements to possess a gun. I’m not debating the legal language, I just think it’s the reasonable way to stop the shootings. Notice, none of this restricts the type of guns sold. This is aimed at the people who shoot others, because it’s clear that they should never have had a gun.

1.) Anyone in possession of a gun (whether they own it or not) should have a regularly renewed license. If you want to call it a permit, certificate, or something else that's fine.
2.) To get a license, you should have a background check, and be examined by a professional for emotional and mental stability appropriate for gun possession. It might be appropriate to require that examination to be accompanied by references from family, friends, employers, etc. This check is not to subject you to a mental health diagnosis, just check on your superficial and apparent gun-worthyness.
3.) To get the license, you should be required to take a safety course and pass a test appropriate to the type of gun you want to use.
4.) To get a license, you should be over 21. Under 21, you could only use a gun under direct supervision of a licensed person and after obtaining a learner’s license. Your license might be restricted if you have children or criminals or other unsafe people living in your home. (If you want to argue 18 or 25 or some other age, fine. 21 makes sense to me.)
5.) If you possess a gun, you would have to carry a liability insurance policy specifically for gun ownership - and likely you would have to provide proof of appropriate storage, security, and whatever statistical reasons that emerge that would drive the costs and ability to get insurance.
6.) You could not purchase a gun or ammunition without a license, and purchases would have a waiting period.
7.) If you possess a gun without a license, you go to jail, the gun is impounded, and a judge will have to let you go (just like a DUI).
8.) No one should carry an unsecured gun (except in a locked case, unloaded) when outside of home. Guns should be secure when transporting to a shooting event without demonstrating a special need. Their license should indicate training and special carry circumstances beyond recreational shooting (security guard, etc.). If you are carrying your gun while under the influence of drugs or alcohol, you lose your gun and license.
9.) If you buy, sell, give away, or inherit a gun, your license information should be recorded.
10.) If you accidentally discharge your gun, commit a crime, get referred by a mental health professional, are served a restraining order, etc., you should lose your license and guns until reinstated by a serious relicensing process.

Most of you know that a license is no big deal. Besides a driver’s license you need a license to fish, operate a boat, or many other activities. I realize these differ by state, but that is not a reason to let anyone without a bit of sense pack a semiautomatic weapon in public, on the roads, and in schools. I think we need to make it much harder for some people to have guns.
 

Old Codger

(4,205 posts)
23. Loaded gun
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 04:26 PM
Apr 2016

Where a toddler could get to it and it was most likely a glock, they have no safety and most likely are the cause of abut 90% of unintentional shootings, anyone who would leave one around with a cartridge in the chamber is an idiot and should no be allowed to own any gun

hack89

(39,171 posts)
35. You know it wasn't her gun or her car?
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 05:19 PM
Apr 2016

and that she most likely was not aware the gun was there?

 

stone space

(6,498 posts)
54. The ammosexual boyfriend should lose his gun rites for life.
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 10:22 AM
Apr 2016

But the mother bears some responsibility for exposing her kid to an irresponsible ammosexual's guns without taking proper precautions.

Parents need to protect their children from irresponsible ammosexuals.

And special precautions need to be taken for the protection of any children when parents date an ammosexual.

Good parents don't just ASSume that ammosexuals in their childrens' lives are responsible.

 

stone space

(6,498 posts)
61. Plesase stop comparing gays with gunhumpers.
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 08:11 AM
Apr 2016
That's the same things

Conservatives say; before they change the "ho" to "am"


It is homophobic and offensive in the extreme.

Despite what some gunhumpers claim here on DU, gays are most certainly not deadly weapons.

They are human beings, just like everybody else.


Moonwalk

(2,322 posts)
31. The "stupid one" is the security guard boyfriend...
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 05:12 PM
Apr 2016

Granted, the kids should have been in car seats, but I can't say for sure if that would have changed the situation, given that there are all kinds of seats and the kid may have been able to get out of such a one.

What bothers me is the gun being in the backseat. I'm sure the boyfriend didn't imagine his girlfriend needing the car, and likely left the gun back there out of convience (security guard; so gun in car to put on for the job). But come on! Even if he thought the gun was well hidden, the car could still have been broken into, the gun found, stolen and used by a criminal.

If you're too lazy to take the gun with you into the house, at least don't leave it *loaded* while in the car. Even if you don't anticipate a toddler getting his hands on it, at least be paranoid enough, and safety minded enough to fear a car thief getting his hands on it.

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
38. He probably wasn't a good kid.
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 05:33 PM
Apr 2016

Because only a good kid would not have shot his mom. He was a bad kid, and should not have been allowed to have a gun.
"I'm the NRA, and I vote!"

 

Nihil

(13,508 posts)
63. Damn ... the NRA must be feeling so conflicted on this one ...
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 08:15 AM
Apr 2016

> He probably wasn't a good kid.
> Because only a good kid would not have shot his mom.
> He was a bad kid, and should not have been allowed to have a gun.
> "I'm the NRA, and I vote!"

On the other hand, "One bullet, one kill" also applies ...

What to do, what to do?


apnu

(8,758 posts)
48. So many levels of fail here.
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 08:18 AM
Apr 2016

1) loose gun in the car.
2) Two year old toddler not in a child booster seat. Unless the car was a tiny sports car, and if the child was belted in properly, there's no way they should have been able to reach the floor to pick up the gun.
3) Grandma and one year old in lap of the passenger seat.
4) loose gun in the car.

 

stone space

(6,498 posts)
53. The boyfriend should lose his gun rites for life.
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 09:42 AM
Apr 2016


You don't lend out your gun-filled cars out to folks with small kids.




Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Wisconsin toddler shot mo...