5 downtown janitors sue for $4.5 million, say supervisor snapped bras, slapped buttocks
Source: Oregonian/Oregon Live
The sexual harassment and abuse occurred between the hours of 5:30 p.m. and 2 a.m. -- when the Bank of America Financial Center was empty of most of its white-collar workers -- according to a lawsuit filed earlier this month in Multnomah County Circuit Court.
Read more: http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2016/04/five_downtown_janitors_sue_for.html
1939
(1,683 posts)you out source your janitorial work to a separate company so that when this happens (and it is very common) you can claim that your contract forbids you from exercising direct supervision and therefore are not responsible for the supervisor's conduct and that they have to sue the janitorial contractor.
Sam_Fields
(305 posts)Such as supervisor employees knew what was going on and did nothing. Any way the corporate insurance will most likely make a payout to settle the lawsuit.
csziggy
(34,136 posts)From the link in the OP:
Both he and the company the lawsuit identifies as his employer -- Terrace Tower U.S.A., which owns the building -- are listed as defendants. Terrace Tower U.S.A. didn't return a call seeking comment.
<SNIP>
The five plaintiffs worked at the Bank of America building, at 121 S.W. Morrison St., for as few as five months to as many as 10 years. The suit claims that Terrace Tower U.S.A. was aware of the harassment and abuse no later than fall 2014.
All five plaintiffs were employed by ABM Onsite Services - West, according to the suit. By November 2015, their employer had transferred them to jobs in other buildings, the suit states.
Why wasn't the supervisor charged with a crime? Did the employees ever try to report it - and if they did were they ignored by the cops?
1939
(1,683 posts)but the actual employer of the supervisor and the plaintiffs is an outfit called ABM Onsite Services which is probably a guy in a cheap office somewhere with a desk and a phone who contracts for janitorial work from various buildings and who hires people and sends them off to work. Terrace Tower of course can mount a pretty good defense that they had no control over the hiring, firing, and discipline of the employees of ABM Onsite Services and that the suit should be against them. The lawyer knows that ABM has zero assets where Terrace owns a building.
csziggy
(34,136 posts)That happened when I had to threaten a lawsuit once. I didn't want to sue the property owner but he had to be part of the case since he hired the responsible party- and as the lawyer put it he was the deep pockets.
In the end we sort of settled the case. I got no money (which I didn't want) but the crop dusting pilot who had been spraying my property instead of the land next door was fired and the property owner stopped growing crops that needed to be air sprayed.
The one time I saw the pilot he reminded me of the one in Independence Day.
Democat
(11,617 posts)Maybe you could add "Oregon" to the thread title.
Sam_Fields
(305 posts)Democat
(11,617 posts)Based on the title.
Judi Lynn
(160,545 posts)I was told that that line is exactly meant to replicate the headline as it is, with no alterations.
There was a time years ago we could put an additional word in parentheses to help focus the LBN headline, as you suggest, but that doesn't work for me, now, and I haven't seen it done by anyone else in LBN, either.