Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

WhiteTara

(29,718 posts)
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 05:06 PM Apr 2016

FAA orders urgent fix to engines that could shut down on Boeing 787s

Source: Seattle Times

The Federal Aviation Administration on Friday ordered airlines to urgently modify engines on Boeing 787 Dreamliners, due to an icing problem that can cause a specific model of GE engine to shut down in flight. The problem affects 176 Dreamliners at 29 airlines, about 44 percent of the worldwide fleet, the FAA said.

The FAA’s airworthiness directive follows a Jan. 29 incident in which one of the two engines on a Japan Airlines (JAL) 787 shut down in midair and couldn’t be restarted. The jet, flying from Vancouver, B.C., with 166 people on board, was about 90 miles from Tokyo’s Narita Airport when the right-hand engine failed.

According to data on that flight provided by aircraft-tracking firm Flightradar24, the pilots landed safely on one engine about half an hour later.

On planes with the same engine model on both wings, the problem could cause a potentially catastrophic dual shutdown of both engines.

Read more: http://www.seattletimes.com/business/boeing-aerospace/faa-orders-engine-fix-on-176-boeing-787s/



Add that to the list of planes I won't fly.
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
FAA orders urgent fix to engines that could shut down on Boeing 787s (Original Post) WhiteTara Apr 2016 OP
Take my car please. Skink Apr 2016 #1
777 had a similar issue Duckhunter935 Apr 2016 #2
Yikes - just checked my flights and I'm due to return from London on one May 11th to SFO. DiehardLiberal Apr 2016 #3
Maybe they will have it fixed by then WhiteTara Apr 2016 #6
Nice thought but I was a safety researcher in the DiehardLiberal Apr 2016 #8
I cross mine with you! WhiteTara Apr 2016 #10
Des Plaines! Des Plaines! forest444 Apr 2016 #4
After checking with my risk management officer (myself), I'll pass. nt silvershadow Apr 2016 #5
Close call... SoapBox Apr 2016 #7
Makes me wonder... yourpicturehere Apr 2016 #9

DiehardLiberal

(580 posts)
3. Yikes - just checked my flights and I'm due to return from London on one May 11th to SFO.
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 05:25 PM
Apr 2016

Not happy about that..

DiehardLiberal

(580 posts)
8. Nice thought but I was a safety researcher in the
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 08:39 PM
Apr 2016

Industry. Nothing happens that quickly. Fingers X'd!! And legs and eyes. 😳

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
7. Close call...
Sat Apr 23, 2016, 08:28 PM
Apr 2016

I wonder how long they've really known about the issue.

It makes me think of the Airbus A330 pitot tubes (air speed indicators) freezing over...the Air France crash in the South Atlantic...and Airbus, FAA knew of the issue.

yourpicturehere

(54 posts)
9. Makes me wonder...
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 07:08 AM
Apr 2016

Coupla evenings ago, when I was outside I heard a jet coming over low (we never get low jets, we are too far out) and it sounded like one engine was cutting out and starting back up. He continued across the field across from the house, still very low and I watched it til it was out of sight. ( I'll admit, I was happy when he got waaay past the house...it was scary.)

I asked my husband, who has worked on aircraft for years, if that sounded normal and he said "no".

It appeared that it was headed for Ft. Campbell, but it didn't appear to be a military plane.

Now I wonder if it was one of "those" engines.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»FAA orders urgent fix to ...