Iran slammed for conducting 'virginity test' on jailed artist
Source: Middle East Eye
Iran was criticised by rights groups this week after it confirmed carrying out a virginity test on a woman imprisoned for her artwork.
Atena Farghadani, a painter and political activist, was arrested in August 2014 after publishing a cartoon depicting MPs and government officials as barnyard animals on Facebook in protest against a draft law restricting access to birth control.
Farghadani, 28, was sentenced to 12 years and nine months in prison for crimes including gathering and colluding against national security, insulting members of parliament through paintings and spreading propaganda against the system. In a letter smuggled out of prison last October, Farghadani said she had been forced by authorities to submit to a virginity test, a procedure described by Amnesty International as a violation of international law on torture.
She said the procedure took place shortly before a trial for illegitimate relations with her lawyer after the two shook hands in court.
Read more: http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/amnesty-slams-iran-over-virginity-test-jailed-painter-1608442466
Atena Farghadani, 28, seen here with an art piece, was tried for 'illegitimate relations' with her lawyer after they shook hands
Remember this when people post videos from the Iran government fake-news channel as if it has any moral authority whatsoever
Unicorn
(424 posts)MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)potone
(1,701 posts)The Iranian people deserve much better. Time is not on the mullahs' side; the population is young and well-educated and eventually they will prevail over that bunch of medieval clerics who have brought them nothing but insane laws and tyranny. I'm surprised that the regime has lasted this long.
moonbabygo
(281 posts)Akicita
(1,196 posts)But for some reason our President wouldn't support them when they were crying out for support. I never understood that.
potone
(1,701 posts)The government tried to paint the protesters as agents of foreign powers. Given our lamentable history of interference in that country, the best thing that we could do was to stay out of it and hope that they would succeed. They didn't that time, but someday they will. So far it is the Revolutionary Guard that is keeping the regime in place; it will take them deciding not to support the government over the people that will enable the Iranians to boot out the mullahs and re-establish a true democracy.
Given the demographics of Iran, and the fact that there are now two generations of Iranians who were born after the Shah was overthrown and don't remember the evils of his rule, the appeal of the regime is clearly declining. They aren't impressed by the "Great Satan" fear-mongering and they want to be part of a wider world.
I am hopeful for that country in the long run; the government can't control the Internet and the Iranians are technologically savvy. All the mullahs have going for them is fear and it is not as potent a weapon as it used to be. I think it is going to be increasingly difficult for them to hang on to power.
Akicita
(1,196 posts)keep the regime in place is going to help enable the Iranians to boot out the mullahs.
And don't kid yourself. The mullahs have the Muslim faith going for them as well as fear. Many Iranians are indoctrinated by their faith to believe that the way the mullahs are running the country is the way it should be. Not all those in the crowds supporting the Mullahs and chanting "Death to America" are doing so out of fear.
potone
(1,701 posts)But what I see changing here is that Iranians don't all view this as a choice between Islam and democracy. That is the mullahs' claim, of course, but there are Iranian politicians who want a more open society and one that is less repressive. There has been a power struggle going on for some time within the Iranian government and the joy of the people when the nuclear agreement was signed was obvious.
I know it won't be easy to overthrow this government, but the Iranian people are the heirs to a long and rich cultural tradition, and they don't identify solely with Islam. It will be interesting to see how this plays out, but, as I said, I am hopeful in the long run. That is, of course, unless we wreck the environment of our planet first. Then all bets are off.
However, I don't want to end on such a downer note, so let me wish you a good weekend!
Akicita
(1,196 posts)because the country just got a lot richer and because the agreement was framed to the people of Iran as very one sided in favor of Iran.
I think Iran's fate in regards to their government will be decided by the people forcing a moderating change or by an all out Middle East war well before the planet's environment is destroyed.
You have a great weekend too.
Fred Drum
(293 posts)is there anything else you dont understand, we can help
ask for assistance
Akicita
(1,196 posts)I never understood why you refused to offer your alternative to cavity searches when you were railing against them on that other thread. Please assist me by explaining what your alternative is. Be as detailed as possible.
I greatly appreciate the help. You can answer me on the other thread if that would be more appropriate. I asked the same question there but that was before you made your generous offer to help me understand.
Coventina
(27,121 posts)Ending with vague threats.
At least, that was my experience.
on edit: LOL! I should become a professional psychic!
Fred Drum
(293 posts)i considered you a friend after our discussion
edit: add friend to little red book
edit2: use less f words
Coventina
(27,121 posts)Well, shucks.
Sorry about that.
Your posts are a little hard to understand sometimes.
For instance, can I get some clarification about this "little red book" of yours?
I immediately think of Chairman Mao's book, but you seem to be using as some variant of the "little black book" of the swingin' bachelor variety?
well known figure in communist china
google is your friend
edit: cant vote in primaries, oh no, registered as communist
edit2: still can vote for pres, US is good
edit3: trying not to be vulgar
Coventina
(27,121 posts)Which, as I stated in my previous post was the most obvious parallel to which you were referring.
I was merely seeking clarification, so thank you for that.
Maybe the Communist Party should hold their own primaries?
Fred Drum
(293 posts)if you would like some info, as to how us commies think, i can help
its aligned with Ds alot
its not a big leap, pardon the pun.
i dont want to kill the rich, just treat them like us
Coventina
(27,121 posts)The floor is yours!
Fred Drum
(293 posts)we will, however, have to vote for hillary
we can change the world, if we want to
platform
1. UBI
2. your turn
Coventina
(27,121 posts)I'm sorry I don't know what UBI means.
Fred Drum
(293 posts)everyone eats
Coventina
(27,121 posts)Cheers!
2. obscene profits should be looked at, notes taken in little red book
if you are unsure what an obscene profit is, watch CNBC
Coventina
(27,121 posts)I'm not exactly sure of what it should be (probably somewhere in the 5 million a year range), but firmly believe that income should be taxed at 100% over that limit.
Fred Drum
(293 posts)5 million rly
i got 3 kids, cant live on $4,500,000
15/hr bad
Fred Drum
(293 posts)the alternative to doing cavity searches is not to do them
the alternative to not raping women in iranian jails, is not to rape women in iranian jails
further enlightenment needed ???
Akicita
(1,196 posts)metal detector at the jail should be allowed to take the gun into her jail cell with her because she was not allowed to be "safe space" searched. That doesn't sound reasonable to me. What if she then shot a fellow inmate or guard? Enlighten me.
Fred Drum
(293 posts)no, of course i didn't
Fred Drum
(293 posts)favorite iranian
antonio asfandario
fuck, i cant spell
Akicita
(1,196 posts)get the gun away from her? What's your alternative? That's what I'm asking. I'm hoping you have a good one because I don't want people to be cavity searched either and if you have an alternative I'd like to hear it.
Fred Drum
(293 posts)a prisoner in custody must be searched
dont use that to justify a traffic stop to sticking my fist up your ass
do you need further clarification
Akicita
(1,196 posts)Fred Drum
(293 posts)no?
Akicita
(1,196 posts)I'm beginning to think you don't have an answer.
Fred Drum
(293 posts)not all problems have solution
being a mathematician, i accept this
there is a following, mostly mocked, that think harm reduction is better than elimination
your answer, search all crotches
Akicita
(1,196 posts)certainly not for average everyday traffic stops with little probable cause. Whatcha think?
Fred Drum
(293 posts)thats where i started
Akicita
(1,196 posts)Fred Drum
(293 posts)were rape
dude does that to someone i care for.
i wouldn't file a law suit
Akicita
(1,196 posts)arrested. As the discussion went on an I started pointing out cases, in particular the woman with the gun, and asked what your alternative was, when I could finally get an answer out of you, you said that the alternative to doing cavity searches is not to do them.
It's all good though. Sounds like we are on similar ground now.
Akicita
(1,196 posts)mdbl
(4,973 posts)KG
(28,751 posts)US population: 318 million - 28 executions in 2015
Iran pop: 77 million - 977+ executions in 2015
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment_by_country#Numbers_executed_in_2015
MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)that is one of the reasons radical islam flourishes - people look for any excuse to justify and even condone their behavior.
this woman is in jail for holding hands and a cartoon. When does that happen in the US?
For anyone to equate US rights with Iran has a different agenda.
Akicita
(1,196 posts)Fred Drum
(293 posts)we do virginity test with state troopers on the side of the road
what else do you have up you ass
edit: just looking for drugs, so OK
Fred Drum
(293 posts)disregard
padfun
(1,786 posts)The USA is the last that should be talking. This woman wouldn't be alive in half of American counties.
marble falls
(57,112 posts)victim's artwork or hand shakes.
uhnope
(6,419 posts)marble falls
(57,112 posts)uhnope
(6,419 posts)marble falls
(57,112 posts)Fred Drum
(293 posts)as if AMERICANS don't do that
do you need links
try google "new castle police probe woman's vagina for 5 hours"
pennsylvania, a small province in iran, and whatabout kyrgyzstan
Akicita
(1,196 posts)Fred Drum
(293 posts)are you?
Coventina
(27,121 posts)Fred Drum
(293 posts)raping a woman on the side of the road in pennsylvania is no where near equivalent to raping a woman in iran
Coventina
(27,121 posts)I'd say, "Nice try" except that it wasn't.
Fred Drum
(293 posts)didn't spend 5 minutes reading about it huh
google "new castle vaginal search"
first fucking link
i don't see where they mention any crime, committed or suspected, by anyone
i.e. the cops weren't charged with rape because they are state sanctioned
Coventina
(27,121 posts)cavity-searched NOT by the roadside, but after her arrest, and at a hospital.
So
1. You don't have a credible source and
2. The circumstances don't fit what you are ranting about people getting anally probed on the roadside.
I'm not buying what you're selling.
Fred Drum
(293 posts)... None the less, she was restrained to a bed by her wrists and ankles as a doctor performed an internal inspection of her vagina and rectum.
thats not from a right wing trash site, its a legal filing
just for the lulz, no drugs were found
additionally, google "texas roadside vaginal search"
or "convenience store parking lot strip search"
but for you, fingers in ears, i didn't see it, it didn't happen
for those too fucking lazy to look
https://cases.justia.com/federal/district-courts/pennsylvania/pawdce/2:2015cv01175/225815/55/0.pdf?ts=1454593998
on edit: after reading complaint again, the term "rectal packing" reminded me of "rectal feeding" something those goddamn iranians would do, or CIA
Coventina
(27,121 posts)Those types of searches are illegal, and in the Texas case, the trooper in question was prosecuted for it.
You need to learn the difference between "state sanctioned" and "illegal behavior".
And, regarding the court case you provide the link for: anyone can file a lawsuit for anything. It doesn't prove the woman's case that she was the victim of unreasonable search & seizure. The fact that you can't provide a link that isn't a right-wing blog reporting on this is a massive case of FAIL.
Fred Drum
(293 posts)some reply , some don't
is this not a valid link
https://cases.justia.com/federal/district-courts/pennsylvania/pawdce/2:2015cv01175/225815/55/0.pdf?ts=1454593998
and please, i would love to read a link showing a cop was prosecuted. please provide
edit:
re-reading it is tough
so Plaintiff was directed to
repeatedly prod her personal areas by inserting her fingers into her vagina to remove the item,
which was determined not to exist. Id
Coventina
(27,121 posts)It proves nothing.
Here is a link to the cop being prosecuted (and pleading guilty) to his illegal behavior:
http://www.nbcdfw.com/news/local/Former-Trooper-Expected-to-Plead-Guilty-to-Oppression-Related-to-Roadside-Cavity-Search-260398061.html
Fred Drum
(293 posts)hopefully more will
my link is to a lawsuit, it proves nothing.
the case will be settled i'm sure, jameson hospital has insurance
i wonder if iran has insurance. if so, we're all good , move along
you will get back to me when the stipulated facts are presented, i'm sure
Coventina
(27,121 posts)You are the one trying to equate the US with Iran, not me.
I'm merely pointing out that your position is not supported by the facts.
Fred Drum
(293 posts)the US gov't only dogs
see , they are worse than us
we should fix our shit, and if you think that woman in new castle is making it up, talk to anita hill.
we're all lefties, some of us carry little red books
Coventina
(27,121 posts)I was not trying to make that case at all.
I never said the woman from New Castle was making it up, I merely said that your right-wing source did not report the story as you did.
Fred Drum
(293 posts)that i referenced
dont imply i'm right wing, i'll write that shit down in my little red book
Coventina
(27,121 posts)If you didn't want that as your source, you should have posted the link to the lawsuit in the first place.
AGAIN: Filing a "legal document" does not mean that the contents thereof are true or in any way meritorious. Anyone who has been through a nasty divorce can tell you that.
I tremble in fear over being listed in your "little red book."
Fred Drum
(293 posts)google can be tricky, tricky, tricky, tricky
my little red book dont lie
Akicita
(1,196 posts)Fred Drum
(293 posts)actually sad
edit: don't fucking waste your time replying
Akicita
(1,196 posts)the authorities should do about it? Nothing? Are the rectum and vagina considered "safe spaces" for hiding drugs and weapons in your mind? Can suspects be forced to undergo an X-ray examination? I read about a woman who was found to be hiding a small pistol in her vagina. What is your solution?
Fred Drum
(293 posts)only way to be sure
edit: again, dont reply to this
Akicita
(1,196 posts)And I'll reply if I want to. You can always block me if you want to be cowardly about it. You throw bombs but then refuse to offer an alternative that's reasonable.
Fred Drum
(293 posts)i try to every day, sometimes successfully, mostly not
so, a gun can be physically hidden there, as my ass also, i suppose
clothing hinders detection of weapons, and you can also prevent reasonable law enforcement efforts to protect little children, so my solution is
WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU SAYING
Akicita
(1,196 posts)I am not saying anything. I'm asking. You are very vociferous in decrying the cavity search of people suspected of hiding drugs, weapons, or other evidence of a crime in their orifices. What's your alternative? What are authorities supposed to do about people hiding those things in what you would call their their "safe spaces"?
Say the woman who hid the gun in her vagina set off a metal detector when she was brought in to be booked? What do the authorities do if they cannot invade her safe space? Let her bring a gun into jail? In my mind, if she refuses to cooperate they should get a court order if necessary to do a cavity search.
I am just asking what your reasonable alternatives to cavity searches are. I can't think of any.
Fred Drum
(293 posts)cavity searches are required
you dont have to say anything else
we disagree, as in
i see that you were speeding, do you have any weapons in your cunt, you wont mind a search, eh ... hillbilly laugh
banjo music commences
besides the blatant generalization, no harm no foul
edit: banjo music clashes with screaming
christx30
(6,241 posts)continuing with the meme of the woman hiding a pistol in her vagina.
You're booking her on a crime, let's say... passing hot checks, credit card fraud, hit and run, ect. You take her mug shot, and finger prints. During the booking, she sets off the metal detector.
She admits she has a pistol in there for self protection. She refuses requests or orders to remove it. The law says you can't bring guns into jail with you. What do you do? Release her, despite the crimes she's committed? How would you handle it?
Sure, nuke from orbit, only way to make sure. Or you could give us a serious answer.
marble falls
(57,112 posts)Fred Drum
(293 posts)but, i don't think a cop is going to stick his finger up my ass
a life could be lost, his or mine, one way or the other.
alternatively, i might enjoy randome fingers up my ass, then, no harm, no foul
but strapping my girl to a table and prodding, thats what stalking is for, motherfucker will pay
Fred Drum
(293 posts)alert
MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)IronLionZion
(45,462 posts)That kind of logic always baffles me. One would think the virginity test would be much more disgraceful to her honor than anything she does with her hands. This is clearly an intimidation tactic to humiliate a powerless person for daring to even have a lawyer defend her in what is probably not a fair trial to begin with.
The US should attach some human rights conditions to lifting the sanctions in the nuclear deal.
Fred Drum
(293 posts)spread your legs, just wanna check
AMERICAN justice
Akicita
(1,196 posts)support terrorism even though Iran is the #1 state sponsor of terrorists in the world.
Fred Drum
(293 posts)usa #1
we da best at everything
SunSeeker
(51,574 posts)They would both like to end access to birth control. And as that Limbaugh attack on Ms. Fluke demonstrates, women who dare call for access to birth control are accused by right wingers of being "sluts."
http://gawker.com/5889676/rush-limbaugh-women-who-want-birth-control-are-sluts
TexasMommaWithAHat
(3,212 posts)The repuklicans want to end women's right to abortion, while on the other hand, aybe 1 in 500 believe birth control should be illegal. And the issue with Ms. Fluke was her insistence that the other people pay for her birth control. The republicans don't want to pay for school lunches and health care for little children, for fuck's sake. They're selfish pricks, but it's not remotely the same as the situation in Iran.
Akicita
(1,196 posts)Those who oppose birth control for religious reasons just don't want to be forced to pay for other people's birth control. Same with RW nuts like Limbaugh. And it crosses party lines. I highly doubt that many of the Little Sisters of the Poor are Republicans for instance. They care to much about the poor.
tabasco
(22,974 posts)When the good people of Iran rise up against these tyrants, the cowardly barbarians will get their just rewards. I hope I live to see the day.
Akicita
(1,196 posts)in that part of the world who ardently support even female genital mutilation. It's religious indoctrination and affects both men and women.
tabasco
(22,974 posts)Thanks for asking.
Akicita
(1,196 posts)indoctrinated. It used to be similar in the US over a hundred years ago but we evolved and are still evolving.
Yo_Mama
(8,303 posts)It's a different mindset - so different that it is effectively a different world.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-32748248
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,350 posts)... whether to imprison, whip, and beat her, or simply have her stoned to death?
Good that the judge is (religion which can not be named).
Mary Mac
(323 posts)We think you're both crazy.
ck4829
(35,077 posts)They violated her so they could protect a concept that only exists in their heads.