Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,994 posts)
Tue Jun 12, 2012, 06:16 PM Jun 2012

Obama: Debt, deficits were 'baked into the cake'

Source: Politico

Obama: Debt, deficits were 'baked into the cake'

.....................

"We signed two trillion dollars in spending cuts into law," Obama said. "Spending under my administration has grown more slowly than under any president in 60 years."

Obama said that the country's budget deficits and big debt were the result of the George W. Bush's two tax cuts, as well as the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.

"They baked all this stuff into the cake with those tax cuts... and the war," Obama said.

"It's like somebody goes to a restaurant, orders a big steak dinner, a martini and all that stuff, then just as you're sitting down they leave and accuse you of running up the tab," Obama said.



Read more: http://www.politico.com/politico44/2012/06/obama-debt-deficits-were-baked-into-the-cake-125978.html

67 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama: Debt, deficits were 'baked into the cake' (Original Post) kpete Jun 2012 OP
perfect analogy... FirstLight Jun 2012 #1
Indeed lsewpershad Jun 2012 #3
sorry FirstLight Jun 2012 #7
Martin Bashir, MSNBC. elleng Jun 2012 #20
If the Bush tax cuts were so bad why isn't he in favor of letting them all lapse? dkf Jun 2012 #2
because anyone who campaigns on getting rid of all of the tax cuts qazplm Jun 2012 #8
He wants you and I to have tax cuts but not the richer ones Rosa Luxemburg Jun 2012 #25
That isn't enough. dkf Jun 2012 #36
That is a nice sentiment, however the country is nowhere near insolvency. Sirveri Jun 2012 #52
Are you arguing we owe no debt to the social security system? dkf Jun 2012 #53
No, I'm saying that Social Security (and other government held) debt doesn't/shouldn't count. Sirveri Jun 2012 #62
We can't save Europe. girl gone mad Jun 2012 #27
Believe me I am not in favor of us having to save Europe. dkf Jun 2012 #37
European Central Bank DallasNE Jun 2012 #44
It's because people like you "do not want to have to pay more taxes" Kolesar Jun 2012 #40
Saving money for retirement isn't fun either but you just have to do it. dkf Jun 2012 #43
Obama has to make sure this is clear to people. siligut Jun 2012 #4
NOW he's going to let them know??? Skittles Jun 2012 #6
He did say it in his speeches and Bernanke and Giethner touched on it siligut Jun 2012 #12
much of the country seems to have forgotten dubya was ever president Skittles Jun 2012 #14
And that is what the GOP wants, W made them look bad even with all their tricks. siligut Jun 2012 #30
Even if we don't like the motivation demwing Jun 2012 #15
"baked into the cake"? Skittles Jun 2012 #18
Ok, have a good night... /nt demwing Jun 2012 #22
awwwwwwwww Skittles Jun 2012 #32
Were you itching for a fight? demwing Jun 2012 #45
Repub congress and their Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act in 1999 Rosa Luxemburg Jun 2012 #28
He has been saying it all along except our media do not highlight it Rosa Luxemburg Jun 2012 #26
Oh, dear. Now I've got MacArthur Park running through my head. tanyev Jun 2012 #5
AND that is why we have such an anemic recovery bossy22 Jun 2012 #9
As businessmen always say, "Youve got to spend money to make money" ErikJ Jun 2012 #11
your spending=my income bossy22 Jun 2012 #17
and his wife. lastlib Jun 2012 #13
You're doing all the wrong things, hoping to get credit for it. lumberjack_jeff Jun 2012 #10
You might find this funny Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2012 #19
That is hilarious. Skinner Jun 2012 #24
That's hysterical. n/t lumberjack_jeff Jun 2012 #33
LOL nt Mojorabbit Jun 2012 #41
OK. OK. So he misspoke. Wilms Jun 2012 #48
It's funny because .. sendero Jun 2012 #64
On top off everything else Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2012 #67
He acts like someone else has been President for the past four years. nt woo me with science Jun 2012 #16
Takes a long time to undo the damage of the Bush years Rosa Luxemburg Jun 2012 #23
Especially when you extend so many of his policies. nt woo me with science Jun 2012 #29
Do you want a tissue? Kolesar Jun 2012 #39
No, I'd like not to be patronized woo me with science Jun 2012 #42
it couldn't be because he has gotten absolutely zero cooperation with Congress librechik Jun 2012 #49
His choices are a matter of record. woo me with science Jun 2012 #50
perhaps--I don't think we were watching the same thing, however. n/t librechik Jun 2012 #51
Here's a post of interest. woo me with science Jun 2012 #65
Yeah, but you have to remember that there was a sharp increase in spending levels. Igel Jun 2012 #54
kick otherone Jun 2012 #56
Some how B*sh got Congress to let him go in to two uneeded wars. If Obama harun Jun 2012 #59
Excellent! Rosa Luxemburg Jun 2012 #21
Love the way he put that. liberal N proud Jun 2012 #31
Sounds suspicious. RUMMYisFROSTED Jun 2012 #34
Better analogy? 3 Repubs trash a bar and walk out when Obama walks in and say, "Put it on his tab" ErikJ Jun 2012 #35
Great to hear Obama saying this in that way. JDPriestly Jun 2012 #38
"Someone left the cake out in the rain..." LiberalEsto Jun 2012 #46
Damn! That was my first thought! geardaddy Jun 2012 #47
I am just so tired of hearing people say that. BlueIris Jun 2012 #55
If only they had been special brownies instead of cake. woo me with science Jun 2012 #57
The cake? KamaAina Jun 2012 #58
We have moved on to woo me with science Jun 2012 #60
So tax cuts lead to less revenue? high density Jun 2012 #61
Hmm. Sounds like the President skipped lunch. sofa king Jun 2012 #63
Good! Glad O said this but why is he even considering more guaranteed taxpayer loans for new nukes? wordpix Jun 2012 #66
 

dkf

(37,305 posts)
2. If the Bush tax cuts were so bad why isn't he in favor of letting them all lapse?
Tue Jun 12, 2012, 06:26 PM
Jun 2012

I can see extending them perhaps until we save Europe, but they all need to go and I've never heard him support an eventual lapse of the entire Bush cut. He needs to realize taxing the top 2% isnt going to cut it.

qazplm

(3,626 posts)
8. because anyone who campaigns on getting rid of all of the tax cuts
Tue Jun 12, 2012, 06:51 PM
Jun 2012

will not be elected President. So if you want him to be pure and unemployed, then he should campaign against all of the tax cuts.

 

dkf

(37,305 posts)
36. That isn't enough.
Tue Jun 12, 2012, 08:53 PM
Jun 2012

Believe me I do not want to have to pay more taxes, but I will do it to keep this country solvent.

And no I am not in the top whatever percent. Maybe I am in the top half since I do pay taxes now.

Sirveri

(4,517 posts)
52. That is a nice sentiment, however the country is nowhere near insolvency.
Wed Jun 13, 2012, 03:11 PM
Jun 2012

Half the debt we owe to ourselves (closer to 60%), kind of hard to go bankrupt that way. The debt ceiling is just a political tool the Republicans created to force policy.

Sirveri

(4,517 posts)
62. No, I'm saying that Social Security (and other government held) debt doesn't/shouldn't count.
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 02:27 AM
Jun 2012

It's like opening a savings account, and then spending the money from that account and saying that that puts you into debt.

It's great if you want to pay shell games with your accounts and claim that you're deep in debt when in reality you are hardly in debt at all.

girl gone mad

(20,634 posts)
27. We can't save Europe.
Tue Jun 12, 2012, 07:55 PM
Jun 2012

I don't know how I can make it any clearer.

Europe's crisis ultimately stems from a lack of available euro in their economy to pay down debts. You can blame this on whatever you choose, Germany's surplus, lazy Greeks, yadda, yadda.

The US doesn't have the legal authority to create euro.

Please don't reply with "IMF loans". More debt will not save Europe.

 

dkf

(37,305 posts)
37. Believe me I am not in favor of us having to save Europe.
Tue Jun 12, 2012, 08:56 PM
Jun 2012

My point is that with the anxiety over Europe at distressing levels I can see postponing a tax increase til things stabilize.

DallasNE

(7,403 posts)
44. European Central Bank
Tue Jun 12, 2012, 10:31 PM
Jun 2012

Needs to engage in a round of quantitative easing. I have been saying that for at least a year now. The tools are available -- they just need the leadership to put it all in place.

 

dkf

(37,305 posts)
43. Saving money for retirement isn't fun either but you just have to do it.
Tue Jun 12, 2012, 10:26 PM
Jun 2012

To me paying taxes means paying down debt. My worst nightmare is it gets so large it is unmanageable.

siligut

(12,272 posts)
4. Obama has to make sure this is clear to people.
Tue Jun 12, 2012, 06:28 PM
Jun 2012

I know it is near impossible with the right-wing doing their best to blame him, but he can do it.

I saw a bumper sticker a few days ago with W's smiling face and the caption, "Miss me yet?".

Skittles

(153,164 posts)
6. NOW he's going to let them know???
Tue Jun 12, 2012, 06:45 PM
Jun 2012

how about when they first realized the true wreckage left by the last misadministration? Before he decided we all had to LOOK FORWARD and NOT BACKWARDS? NOW it just looks like a pitiful cry for votes.

siligut

(12,272 posts)
12. He did say it in his speeches and Bernanke and Giethner touched on it
Tue Jun 12, 2012, 07:12 PM
Jun 2012

But they were always drowned out or over shadowed. Just a few weeks ago Mitt wanted to directly attack Obama on the economy but was told to back off as it would allow Obama to rebuke head on and make it clear whose mess he was cleaning up after.

Skittles

(153,164 posts)
14. much of the country seems to have forgotten dubya was ever president
Tue Jun 12, 2012, 07:15 PM
Jun 2012

remember those ridiculous "tax refund" checks he sent out? It should be pointed out exactly what everyone ended up paying for THAT travesty

siligut

(12,272 posts)
30. And that is what the GOP wants, W made them look bad even with all their tricks.
Tue Jun 12, 2012, 08:02 PM
Jun 2012

It was a nightmare people want to forget.

 

demwing

(16,916 posts)
15. Even if we don't like the motivation
Tue Jun 12, 2012, 07:17 PM
Jun 2012

it's still the right message.

Would we rather he not say it at all, just because it's late in the game?

 

demwing

(16,916 posts)
45. Were you itching for a fight?
Wed Jun 13, 2012, 12:33 AM
Jun 2012

I can't, because I agree with you, mostly.

Tone. That's all...tone.

Rosa Luxemburg

(28,627 posts)
28. Repub congress and their Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act in 1999
Tue Jun 12, 2012, 07:55 PM
Jun 2012

Republicans lit the fuse for our downfall and took the rest the world with us.

bossy22

(3,547 posts)
9. AND that is why we have such an anemic recovery
Tue Jun 12, 2012, 06:51 PM
Jun 2012

This is the time when we need government to spend. Stop listening to Alan Greenspan

 

ErikJ

(6,335 posts)
11. As businessmen always say, "Youve got to spend money to make money"
Tue Jun 12, 2012, 07:12 PM
Jun 2012

I thought the Cons were so business saavy.

 

lumberjack_jeff

(33,224 posts)
10. You're doing all the wrong things, hoping to get credit for it.
Tue Jun 12, 2012, 06:57 PM
Jun 2012

Cutting government payrolls, thinking that it'd score you points with the teabagger crowd, is stupid. It is stupid because a) facts don't matter to these assholes. You're still a "tax and spend socialist Kenyan". 2) the economy is suffering from is a lack of consumers - a liquidity trap. The more people you fire, the bigger the problem gets.

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
19. You might find this funny
Tue Jun 12, 2012, 07:32 PM
Jun 2012

I was at a party a few months ago and there was a full blow Teabagger there who used the term "Keynesian Economics" so I ask him if he knew what that was and he said defiantly it was "Some commie thing from Kenya".

I lost it at that point and couldn't stop laughing.

sendero

(28,552 posts)
64. It's funny because ..
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 09:18 AM
Jun 2012

.... all the Libertarian money sites yak on endlessly about Keynesians ruining the economy. If you point out that :

Alan Greenspan is a fucking libertarian and he used libertarian ideas to justify packing the economy with money in the early 2000s, a major contributing factor to our current economic malaise.

Keynes NEVER said deficit spending was to be used in all situations, it's only supposed to be used during downturns. When things are good you are supposed to replenish the Treasury. But REPUBLICANS like Reagan and BushShrub went FULL BORE KEYNESIAN during their administrations, running up huge debt to finance wars and tax cuts.

if you point these obvious and irrefutable facts out, you just get your post deleted.

And while I'm at it, almost as many people go around spouting the words Marxist and Socialist without having the slightest fucking clue what those words mean.

Face it, America is largely populated by idiot cows that believe whatever they hear on talk radio. I'm lost all sympathy for them and will enjoy vindictive pleasure when they get theirs.

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
67. On top off everything else
Sat Jun 16, 2012, 12:27 AM
Jun 2012

Everyone has been talking forever about the baby boomers reaching retirement age so we know there's going to be a large percentage of people that are going to be supported by the government. This Teabagger was one of them.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
42. No, I'd like not to be patronized
Tue Jun 12, 2012, 10:23 PM
Jun 2012

and assumed to have no attention span or memory of the past four years.

You will know them by their ACTIONS, not their words.

librechik

(30,674 posts)
49. it couldn't be because he has gotten absolutely zero cooperation with Congress
Wed Jun 13, 2012, 01:16 PM
Jun 2012

even when he supposedly had a super majority. Which included 12 dyed-in-the-wool Repub-voting Blue Dogs--and Lieberman. Yeah, why didn't he just fix everything? What is the matter with Obama???? It's obviously his fault!

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
50. His choices are a matter of record.
Wed Jun 13, 2012, 02:32 PM
Jun 2012

From the people he chose to keep and hire for his administration, to the battles he chose and those he didn't, to the military policies he has backed and continues to back....All these things are recent history and current reality.

No Republican forced him keep on Geithner, or push for bank settlements, or propose and speak stirringly of austerity budgets while extending the Bush/Obama tax cuts. No Republican made him escalate the drone wars or expand the MIC into multiple new countries. No, Republican votes don't tell the whole story, and it is flatly inconsistent with reality to claim that they do.

You are entitled to your own opinions about this Presidency, and of course you can point out, rightly, that he is better than the alternative. But you are not entitled to rewrite history and claim that his many corporate choices were solely and wholly the result of being overwhelmed by Republicans.

We have been here watching the whole time, remember?

Have you seen this yet?: http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002803945




Igel

(35,317 posts)
54. Yeah, but you have to remember that there was a sharp increase in spending levels.
Wed Jun 13, 2012, 08:41 PM
Jun 2012

The baseline was raised rather nicely during *'s last budget year when the budget allocations were finally approved.

That happened in months 5 and 6 (and also 7) of that budget year.

Very easy to forget that and misassign the "blame" (or credit) for those spending increases.

harun

(11,348 posts)
59. Some how B*sh got Congress to let him go in to two uneeded wars. If Obama
Thu Jun 14, 2012, 05:24 PM
Jun 2012

really wanted to get Congress to play along, they'd play.

 

ErikJ

(6,335 posts)
35. Better analogy? 3 Repubs trash a bar and walk out when Obama walks in and say, "Put it on his tab"
Tue Jun 12, 2012, 08:30 PM
Jun 2012

Better analogy? 3 Repubs trash a bar and walk out when Obama walks in and say "Put it on his tab"

I heard another joke about the banksters trashing a bar and walking out saying put it on their tab. Something like that.
 

LiberalEsto

(22,845 posts)
46. "Someone left the cake out in the rain..."
Wed Jun 13, 2012, 08:16 AM
Jun 2012

"and I think that I can't take it, 'cause it took so long to bake it,
and I'll never have that recipe again,
oh nooooooooooooo"*

Somehow it seems weirdly appropriate.



*song "MacArthur Park" by Jimmy Webb, first recorded by Richard Harris, 1968.

BlueIris

(29,135 posts)
55. I am just so tired of hearing people say that.
Wed Jun 13, 2012, 08:50 PM
Jun 2012

It won't change the fact that no one in government has managed to provide adequate solutions.

high density

(13,397 posts)
61. So tax cuts lead to less revenue?
Thu Jun 14, 2012, 06:27 PM
Jun 2012

The GOP has been telling us for decades that lower taxes bring in more money. And the media has been repeating it for decades even though we have tons of firm proof now that this never is the case.

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
66. Good! Glad O said this but why is he even considering more guaranteed taxpayer loans for new nukes?
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 09:38 AM
Jun 2012
Latest news is his admin. is considering $8.3 billion for just two new nukes in GA. If the corpos can't pay US back, we taxpayers will have to bail them out AND possibly pay more billions to complete the job.

http://org2.democracyinaction.org/o/5502/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=9662

It's absurd the O admin is even considering giving this loan. This comes on top of other news that we already spent at least $88 million to help out another private nuke corp, US Enrichment Corp, which wants $190 million more.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/14/science/earth/energy-department-steps-in-to-help-uranium-enrichment-company.html?_r=1&smid=tw-share

"The federal government will own the centrifuges and lease them back to USEC. The Energy Department said that arrangement did not amount to the renationalization of the uranium enrichment project because it could become the basis for a commercial business.

The USEC plant could enrich uranium for ordinary civilian-style fuel for Watts Bar 1, a reactor built by the Tennessee Valley Authority that generates electricity but is also used to produce tritium, the form of hydrogen used in the hydrogen bomb. snip

"The department is taking control of tons of uranium left over from USEC’s enrichment operations that is considered to be waste and is thus listed by the company as a liability. That will in effect add $88 million to the company’s balance sheet, officials said. The aid was granted in anticipation of approval of the deal in Congress, where the nuclear weapons argument resonates. The administration hopes that lawmakers will grant its request for substantially more aid to the company, perhaps an additional $190 million or so, department officials said. snip

"But critics say that USEC, which started its life in 1998 with technology dating from the wartime Manhattan Project and has been working ever since to develop an alternate technology, is unlikely to come up with one that can compete with mature designs built by Urenco, a European consortium, and Areva of France. Urenco recently opened a centrifuge plant near Eunice, N.M.

Representative Edward J. Markey, Democrat of Massachusetts, criticized the rescue plan. “The real risks of this nuclear bailout is for taxpayers, who will be on the hook for questionable government handouts that are worth more than the entire company,” he said.

USEC has been seeking a $2 billion loan guarantee to build a full-scale enrichment plant, but the Energy Department has said that it was not certain that the technology was ready." more

The "free" nuclear energy is NOT free AT ALL!
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Obama: Debt, deficits wer...