Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,025 posts)
Tue Jun 12, 2012, 05:05 PM Jun 2012

(UK) More jobseekers told to do unpaid work or face possible loss of benefits

Source: The Guardian

The government will tell up to 70,000 jobseekers that they must work unpaid for four weeks or lose their benefits for three months under an expansion of the mandatory work activity programme.

Employment minister Chris Grayling said the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) would also tighten up rules to stop jobseekers from "gaming the system" –evading mandatory placements by temporarily signing off the dole –after it found up to half of those assigned mandatory work had done just that.

Introduced in May last year, mandatory work activity requires claimants to carry out up to 30 hours unpaid work a week for up to four weeks for community benefit in an attempt to get jobseekers back into the habit of work.

Read more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2012/jun/12/jobseekers-work-unpaid-lose-benefits

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

cstanleytech

(26,293 posts)
1. 30 hours seems extreme imo.
Tue Jun 12, 2012, 05:21 PM
Jun 2012

Now a minimum of 16 makes sense especially if they use them for things like cleaning roads, providing assistance for the elderly and disabled.

jpbollma

(552 posts)
2. Wouldn't this just take jobs that would normally have to be paid positions?
Tue Jun 12, 2012, 05:35 PM
Jun 2012

Are the unemployed just being used as unpaid labor by some companies or the state?

cstanleytech

(26,293 posts)
3. Could someone be paid for it? Sure. Is it likely? Nope, not in this economy.
Tue Jun 12, 2012, 05:48 PM
Jun 2012

Plus looked at from another angle by providing the help they meet people and perhaps they can make connections that could lead to a job so that they can get back to full time work.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
7. Unpaid labour is not "working for the money they receive"
Tue Jun 12, 2012, 07:32 PM
Jun 2012

And it's disgusting that you'd defend a policy that isn't based on lowering unemployment but simply on punishing the unemployed.

Why do you post here if you're a Thatcherite, btw?

 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
10. they already worked for the money they are receiving
Wed Jun 13, 2012, 12:28 PM
Jun 2012

You don't receive "unemployment insurance" unless you were employed to begin with. Your over-the-counter, employed income means that money is going into the unemployment insurance bucket to protect you if you lose your job. The whole right-wing fight against unemployment insurance is that supposedly people would be paid *more* if the companies that employed them weren't forced to pay into the unemployment insurance bucket, and that then individual people could choose to do what they wanted with that extra bit of money. So right-wingers claim that money would otherwise have been wages. In that case, you did the work and the money went into the insurance bucket instead of your pocket, for a rainy day.

Well the rainy day is here, and that income was your prior withheld wage.

It has been set aside for you and is intended to keep you afloat while you re-group and look for new *paid* work. Now you may, during your unemployed time, *choose* to do volunteer work as one means of networking. But since it is *volunteer* work and *uncompensated* it is, by definition, *not mandatory.*

This is way down the slippery slope to slavery, period. Even by right-wing thinking, you earned that money when you were employed. And yes, unless the unemployment compensation meets or exceeds the wages that would be paid to a normally employed person, it is taking paying work away.



 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
12. they are direct benefits here, too. just referred to as "insurance"
Wed Jun 13, 2012, 01:55 PM
Jun 2012

In the same way that social security here is referred to as an insurance program.

Companies and employees pay social security and fica taxes into the social security pool.
Companies also pay into the unemployment pool, and when they lay off employees, the government pays benefits out of the unemployment pool to the unemployed employees.

undeterred

(34,658 posts)
8. Yeah, because the "habit of work" is something you forget when you only
Tue Jun 12, 2012, 07:52 PM
Jun 2012

do the full time work of looking for a job in a shitty economy.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»(UK) More jobseekers told...