= new reply since forum marked as read
Call me an ideologue! Rather be that than a flat out liar! 
Greenpeace Activist
http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/im-the-greenpeace-activist-who-asked-hillary-clinton-to-pledge-to-reject-fossil-fuel-contributions-at-the-purchase-ny-campaign-rally/
Hillary Clinton's campaign and the Super PAC supporting her have received more than $4.5 million from the fossil fuel industry.
[font size=4]BULLY!!![/font]
Poor, poor Hillary. All these "bullies" attacking her.
Almost makes me want to shed a tear for her and her supporters.
.
.
.
.
Naw. I take that back. I have no tears for these people,
only for the millions they have hurt.
industry, but like Bernie, although Bernie gets much less, she has received donations from those who work in that industry.
So the facts are a bit different.
The problem in her case is she is accepting money from bundlers who deal with those folks, and it looks bad.
About dang time -
"A Greenpeace report found that Clinton has received over $1 million from lobbyists and bunddlers connected to the fossil fuel industry and that her Super PAC has received over $3 million from donors in the industry. "
Woohoo, taking off the gloves to defend a lie! 
I SAY TO Hillary supporters now, IN TIME some of you WILL see at sometime in the future. MAY it not be too late.
I DO NOT TRUST voting anymore AND I DO believe NOW that so many Primaries have been "rigged" in her favor!
I WILL add I've had thoughts of just letting her get elected BECAUSE I honestly, truly and with all my heart KNOW the country will FINALLY see the REAL HILLARY and THIS Democratic Party for what it's become!
THIS is just a passing thought because I simply can't in good conscience support her and WILL forever think of him as POTUS even if he doesn't get elected!
BERNIE IS THE REAL DEAL!
***** 
***** 
At least Bernie doesn't LITERALLY poke it in the eyes of voters...
Yep-she doesn't like being questioned. She tries to turn it into a gender issue in the debates, but she couldn't do it here. Her answer and attitude were a bit unhinged. Definitely not Presidential.
Where's the cool as a cucumber Secretary who sat though 8 hours of being grilled by Congress? Sounds like someone might be down in the polls---
I guess Greenpeace is on her enemies list.
I love the pivot to Sanders being the source of the question.
This should be good. 
Now it's somehow Bernie's fault?
They stick to their own goals and issues in a singular fashion. If she wants to make an enemy of Greenpeace, such would be ill advised however.
You are building a fine straw man out of a Greenpeace activist, however much you stuff it tho, it will not be, a Sanders poppet
Oh Twitter...
I am a Bernie supporter with compassion.
Think of what these presidential candidates go through. Day after day... mobs of people. Constant stress from so many angles we can't even imagine. I for one have some days that I have gotten angry with people. Haven't you?
I call for compassion from all of us.
...and what it could mean to everyone on earth and all of its critters if she blows up at somebody with the nukes to answer back, or even no nukes. (Even a limited use of nukes will trigger "nuclear winter" and we won't have to wait for global warming to do in our only planet.)
And that is not the only danger, of course--although it's the biggest one--with an unstable president. There is also commander in chief of all the other weapons and all the military services. There are REALLY touchy relations right now with China (a nuke power) and Russia (a nuke power), threats by North Korea, and extraordinary chaos in the Middle East, in Iraq, concerning which Clinton made the WRONG decision to back Bush's war on Iraq; in Libya--concerning which Clinton made the WRONG decision to support invasion and the killing of Gaddaffi ("We came. We conquered. He Died!"--with a laugh, spoken by Clinton, on vid) which caused utter destabilization of Libya; and her decision to try to do the same to Syria--all of which has given rise to IS, the worst and craziest jihadists (and worst woman haters) yet.
And one more: her decision as Sec of State to support a fascist military coup in Honduras, which unleashed fascist death squads and the murders, rapes and other brutalities against thousands of women who have led the peaceful opposition to the fascists. And this wretched decision of Clinton's aroused universal hostility in Latin America to President Obama, who has had to delay his original intention to improve relations with Latin America, until now, at the end of his presidency.
Clinton furthermore has a war criminal as an close adviser (Henry Kissinger, for godssakes) and a warmonger as an adviser (Robert Kagan--author of Bush, Cheney & Rumsfeld's blueprint for destabilizing and taking over the Middle East--the "Project for a New American Century"
.
If Clinton is so volatile that she can't take an honest question from a Greenpeace member, and blows up at the Sanders campaign which had nothing to do with it, is she not telegraphing instability, and would she not be a tool for these evil men to manipulate?
If Clinton can't take the pressure of this campaign, she can't take the pressure of the office she is seeking. There are MANY women with the intelligence and steadiness and leadership abilities to hold that office. I'm afraid Clinton is not one of them.
It is not a matter of compassion. Indeed, I have actually felt compassion for Clinton as a woman--though I'm a strong Sanders supporter. I have felt sorry for her, as a woman, as a person. But I think she's so caught up in a tangle of lies and ambition that I profoundly distrust her. I will take you a secret. I was not at all surprised at this outburst. I sensed some months ago that she was barely holding it together. I saw such tension in her eyes, in her face and in her posture, during one of the early debates, that it startled me. I thought: am I projecting, just because I'm a Sanders supporter? I thought about it a lot--wondered if I was fantasizing. Well, I'm thinking now that it was a good perception.
I agree with your call for compassion from all of us. But I would also light a candle for compassion FOR all of us--for all who will suffer from a Clinton presidency, and for all who will suffer from any Republican presidency. And a third candle for the alternative that we are blessed with: Bernie Sanders.
Show some love, click the link for much more text, and some lovely photos.
by Cassady Sharp
March 28, 2016
We flew our thermal airship over a Clinton campaign event in Seattle asking Hillary to say no to fossil fuel money.
Greenpeace flew its thermal airship last week in Seattle before the Washington State Democratic caucus with a message urging Secretary Clinton to “Say No To Fossil Fuel Money.” Joined by more than 20 partners, Greenpeace has been campaigning for Secretary Clinton to drop her fossil fuel connections since January.
Greenpeace also flew its thermal airship with the message to Secretary Clinton last month in Las Vegas during the Democratic Nevada caucus. Volunteers have also brought the demand for Clinton to reject fossil fuel money to more than 10 fundraisers, debates and rallies across the country. Secretary Clinton responded to Greenpeace’s request last month committing to initiate a process that would reverse the effect of the Citizens United decision and restore the full protections of the Voting Rights Act. However, the statement did not include a commitment to reject fossil fuel money.
According to data compiled by Greenpeace’s research department, Secretary Clinton’s campaign and the Super PAC supporting her have received more than $4.5 million from the fossil fuel industry during the 2016 election cycle. While Greenpeace does not officially endorse any political candidate or party, we’re determined to show each candidate that our membership is looking for meaningful climate action and environmental justice in their platforms and policies.
I posted this earlier, in another thread.
$ from people in the industry isn't the same as from the company.
http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/272001-sanders-my-answer-is-a-lot-shorter-than-clinton-on-fracking
By Devin Henry - 03/06/16 10:03 PM EST
Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders on Sunday night mocked Hillary Clinton’s numerous conditions for allowing hydraulic fracturing operations.
“My answer is a lot shorter,” he said, responding to a debate question about whether the candidates support fracking, a procedure in which pressurized water and chemicals are injected into the ground to release oil and natural gas.
“No, I do not support fracking,” he said to cheers from the debate crowd in Flint, Mich.
Clinton said she opposes individual fracking operations if a series of conditions are met: if local communities oppose it, if the drilling releases methane or contaminates water or if fracking operators aren't required to identify the chemicals they are using.
FULL story at link.
And she seems to have a persistent cough & hoarse voice.
I'm betting she's edgy from her campaign schedule.
Friend or foe, let's pray she makes it through to the convention.
been blackballed from doing jury service for doing such.
Haven't been called for jury duty in over a week.
Of course one isn't notified of this which make me wonder how many other Sanders support have been put 'in the tank'?
Willing to serve on Juries: Yes
Chance of serving on Juries: 40% (explain)
No, I'm in the can as I suspect many Bernie supporter are.
Doesn't matter much other than the cowardly approach in the way it is handled i.e. no notice/reason given.
Greenpeace doesn't speak for Bernie so get your head out of your *** and think straight, heck Sea Shepherd and Greenpeace no longer get along SS calls them a lobbying group and thats all. Eh Don't quite agree. But saying that to another female kinda doesn't help much. Naturally she things Bernie went negative negative means lying naturally he must be lying. I haven't found anything of the sort. But she does often lie about him. 
I'm just waiting to see what happens when she goes after his wife. I suppose hillary will attack her for not doing the laundry or dishes and letting a MAN do it.
