In Ohio, Clinton opposes Obama auto parts trade standard
Last edited Sun Mar 13, 2016, 02:20 AM - Edit history (1)
Source: AP
In Ohio, Clinton opposes Obama auto parts trade standard
Hillary Clinton wants tougher rules on auto imports than the Obama administration negotiated in a sweeping Pacific trade deal
Associated Press By Lisa Lerer, Associated Press
18 minutes ago
CLEVELAND (AP) -- Hillary Clinton wants stricter rules on auto imports than the Obama administration negotiated in a sweeping Pacific trade deal that's a major priority for the White House.
Under the Trans-Pacific Partnership, automobiles could be imported tax-free into the U.S. even if most parts in those vehicles were made in countries that are not in the trade alliance.
That's drawn opposition from auto-state senators, such as Ohio Democrat Sherrod Brown, who say it would encourage manufacturers to use cheaper parts from China, which is not part of the agreement.
"It's one of the reasons I oppose the Trans-Pacific Partnership," said Clinton, campaigning with Brown in Youngstown on Saturday night. "When I saw what was in it, it was clear to me there were too many loopholes, too many opportunities for folks to be taken advantage of.......
Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/ohio-clinton-opposes-obama-auto-parts-trade-standard-200310438--election.html#
http://l3.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/IJw6uC5YZEMm8oACOXWpAQ--/YXBwaWQ9eW5ld3NfbGVnbztmaT1maWxsO2g9NTc4O2lsPXBsYW5lO3B5b2ZmPTA7cT03NTt3PTk2MA--/
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton speaks during a campaign event at the Nelson-Mulligan Carpenters Training Center in St. Louis, Saturday, March 12, 2016. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)
>>>>>>>>>
Clinton, Brown to call for tougher trade standards tonight
1 Comment
Published: Sat, March 12, 2016 @ 3:04 p.m.
YOUNGSTOWN During a campaign rally in Youngstown tonight, Hillary Clinton, the Democratic presidential frontrunner, will call for higher trade standards to assist the auto industry.
Clinton will discuss standards that result in U.S. automakers facing unfair competition from overseas automakers whose cars are largely built with parts made in China, according to a campaign aide.
Clinton will attend a rally at M7 Technologies, 1019 Ohio Drive in Youngstown. She is expected to speak at 7:45 p.m. The doors will open two hours prior.
Clinton opposes weak rules of origin that allow cars made with cheaper materials from other countries, particularly China, to receive benefits of being made in America and eligible for preferences under trade deals, the aide said.
Under the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the content threshold for vehicles is 45 percent, meaning cars could receive the benefits of the trade agreement as long as at least that percentage of the car was built in the United States.
U.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown, a Cleveland Democrat, will be with Clinton at tonight's event. Brown has opposed this standard for automakers.
Clinton will also discuss her opposition to the rules of origin for the steel industry, the aide said. Clinton will discuss what her campaign calls China's trade abuses with steel that led, in part, to recent layoffs at Vallourec Star.
While numerous surrogates including her husband, former President Bill Clinton are campaigning throughout Ohio today, just three days before the state's primary, the candidate is making only two stops. One is in Cleveland and the other is in Youngstown.
...........
- See more at: http://www.vindy.com/news/2016/mar/12/clinton-brown-call-tougher-trade-standards-tonight/?nw#sthash.JNdXpFfv.dpuf
Chakab
(1,727 posts)she'd pandering to.
Meanwhile... anti-free-trade Hillary is speaking in Ohio while pro-free-trade Hillary is lobbying congress members for free trade agreements.
DhhD
(4,695 posts)revbones
(3,660 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)Angel Martin
(942 posts)is inversely proportional with Sander's polling results
left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)So, she wants it both ways.
HRC can distance herself from Obama.
Bernie can't.
No wonder voters don't trust Hillary.
PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)but dont tell anyone. and we trust anything els she's saying now why???
Bassomar
(58 posts)She pushed the TPP more than 50x and now she opposes it. How convenient. pander-in-chief.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)She can then declare victory for American workers and sign it into law, as originally planned.
AzDar
(14,023 posts)RepubliCON-Watch
(559 posts)TPP was "the gold standard"-Hillary
Geronimoe
(1,539 posts)Little doubt she praised her own work promoting TTP to Goldman Sachs.
riversedge
(70,243 posts)Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)d_legendary1
(2,586 posts)Despite her tougher line, Clinton did not specify what rules on domestic auto parts she would favor as she campaigned in advance of the Ohio presidential primaries Tuesday. The Pacific trade deal can only be accepted or rejected by Congress in full not further negotiated so her position underscores her opposition to the agreement.
The Democratic presidential contender came out against the trade agreement in the fall, driving a wedge between Obama and herself. As his secretary of state, she had advocated for the agreement dozens of times, calling it the "gold standard" of trade deals as it took shape.
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)Next week it will be something else.
turbinetree
(24,703 posts)she "was" in the State Department when Froman was hired to do this "trade deal", and she "had" access to the classified documents, to what was going down, because, she was after all the over all manager of the department.............. you would think you would want to keep informed of what is being discussed, so the "entire" team can be on the same page.
Did she not during these "group" / "team" meeting(s) want to be kept in the loop, did she or did she not voice some objections-----------------not after the fact now------------------------that is the issue here, where was she------------------she can't haven't it both ways.
She can not hide from the fact that she was in the loop on this issue (TPP)----------------it doesn't work that way, you delegate your authority and you have meetings to keep "you" the person in the loop, so that , when let's say the president ask whats going on with let's say TPP---------------------it's going fine it's the "Gold Standard of "trade deals"----------------this is just outright shameful, to the pandering
http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/rls/dos/99494.htm
Honk-----------------------for a political revolution Bernie 2016
Bradical79
(4,490 posts)It sounds like a reasonable response (if a bit vaugue), but it doesn'the mean much to me when she only opposed it after leaving a position of influence. Prior, she was TPP head cheerleader. It makes the pandering very transparent, and is a big liability should she win the nomination.
24601
(3,962 posts)Bradical79
(4,490 posts)24601
(3,962 posts)a surprise that she flip-flopped when challenged from the left.
I believe without reservation that if the strong challenge had come from her right, for example if Webb was the primary threat, that she would have dug in and doubled-down on her original position rather than disavowing it.
Bradical79
(4,490 posts)She has the same "I was for it before I was against it" Kerry had... but ×10. It seems nearly every major issue she talks about has involved changing her position at some point or outright obfuscation. It's reason #1 behind my own flip-flop on in regards to her candidacy
pandr32
(11,588 posts)I do not see that she is breaking with Pres.Obama, but is helping. Obviously we need a trade agreement, but like HC said, she wouldn't take a position until she knew what was in the deal, and that she was committed to protecting US workers interests. As details emerge we will see more of this. President Obama negotiated the best he could with those he had to work with. He himself said it wasn't perfect.
Some believe we should oppose a trade deal no matter what--that is an ideological position that will not fly, but does appeal to people that do not understand how trade works. We can never return to a time of isolation from an international economy. What we need to do is negotiate a better deal, and HC is digging in to where we can improve it.
djean111
(14,255 posts)pandr32
(11,588 posts)...and the President is still negotiating on the TPP. It could go on until 2021 if an extension is given after 2018 (the end of the expedited process). Obviously it would be helpful not to have a Republican President take over.
http://thefederalist.com/2015/06/09/top-nine-myths-about-trade-promotion-authority-and-the-trans-pacific-partnership/
djean111
(14,255 posts)The lying is, I have to admit, breathtaking.
pandr32
(11,588 posts)djean111
(14,255 posts)Here is my favorite, though -
Folksy stuff usually means yeah, it's gonna hurt.
Pretty much none of the things being refuted are what is so frightening about the trade agreements. None of the refuted "myths" are what we have been talking about, either.
pandr32
(11,588 posts)The TPP is still being negotiated and part by part will be sent to Congress for up or down votes lasting up to 2018, with the possibility of extending it even longer.
Bradical79
(4,490 posts)Especially in context to this thread in particular. Maybe you shouldn't be so condescending if you're just going to post a top 10 list from some right wing website that doesn't actually give insight on what'she being discussed.
pandr32
(11,588 posts)is ongoing. The TPP is going through the process, a long one.
djean111
(14,255 posts)Perfectly put. And the condescension is supposed to cow me and put me in my place. Nope.