Obama to nominate replacement for Scalia
Source: KSPR via CNN
President Barack Obama will nominate someone to replace Justice Antonin Scalia on the Supreme Court, sources told CNN Saturday night. Scalia, 79, died in his sleep in Texas on Saturday.
Read more: http://www.kspr.com/news/politics/urgent-obama-to-nominate-replacement-for-scalia/21051736_37984062
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)durablend
(7,460 posts)wordpix
(18,652 posts)brett_jv
(1,245 posts)saltpoint
(50,986 posts)nominate Scalia's replacement. He should do it at the soonest available and possible time after thoughtful deliberation and consultation.
And then, in my opinion, he should cram the nomination down the Republicans' throat and shame them exuberantly if they balk.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)Thor_MN
(11,843 posts)And bring up the nomination Monday morning at 6AM.
erlewyne
(1,115 posts)The Supreme Court Justices should step down
at least a year before they expire. Probably save us
a couple million dollars.
trillion
(1,859 posts)I'm hoping for a good one! I bet he does give us a gift.
saltpoint
(50,986 posts)waste a lot of time letting the country know he was going to nominate Scalia's replacement.
This is such a big story. Probably going to get to be an even bigger one in the coming days and weeks.
villager
(26,001 posts)...but at least this will help call out the derelict Senate in a more public way...
Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)Lots of 4/4 ties though...
villager
(26,001 posts)At least.
stevebreeze
(1,877 posts)to do nothing?
randys1
(16,286 posts)wolfie001
(2,252 posts)wordpix
(18,652 posts)dchill
(38,503 posts)It's his right and responsibility.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)Hopefully it will be very soon.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)GOP will be gunning for 'em. Don't want to give 'em any stupid fodder like forgetting to pay their taxes for fifteen years or some shit.
femmocrat
(28,394 posts)As soon as possible.
Let's just hope they don't drag out the funeral like they did for reagan.
Paulie
(8,462 posts)DawgHouse
(4,019 posts)houston16revival
(953 posts)Say what you want about them,
THEY WON'T BE ABLE TO HIDE
livetohike
(22,145 posts)still_one
(92,219 posts)the presidency
houston16revival
(953 posts)it could motivate conservatives more than liberals
highlighting the issue could bring more liberals to the ballot box
A case similar to Bush v. Gore could wind up 4-4 and head to the House
Republicans showing their try colors could alienate some
It really could play into HRC's wheelhouse, elevating choice to #1 issue
Obama will be cerebral, classy, and relentless. He is SO competitive.
I am so glad we have a President who can go coast to coast to the final
buzzer
No lazy somnambulents like GWB and RWR
eggplant
(3,911 posts)ffr
(22,670 posts)GOP's obstructionism should be expected, in their desperate hope to hurt America further and prevent a Obama from nominating Scalia's replacement.
BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)...have someone that stops all these shenanigans. Maybe someone like that nice Mr. Crud or is it Cruise ??
ffr
(22,670 posts)ericson00
(2,707 posts)and a recess appoint would drive the Republicans crazy
Snarkoleptic
(5,997 posts)Cue that sound of bubble wrap popping in the distance and tiny republiclown heads explode!
LastLiberal in PalmSprings
(12,586 posts)Snarkoleptic
(5,997 posts)I like when the ppl praising Scalia's devotion to the constitution also demand POTUS not be allowed to appoint a replacement.
Love that guy!
LastLiberal in PalmSprings
(12,586 posts)Strictly stated, the Constitution requires the President to appoint a new Supreme Court justice and the Senate to approve (or disapprove) of the selection. There's nothing in the Constitution that says, "when it's politically advantageous to the Republicans."
Manifestor_of_Light
(21,046 posts)She's no dummy and she's a lawyer.
Moostache
(9,895 posts)There is no exception in the Constitution because one political party obsessed with "shoving things down throats" has a sad.
Fuck the Republicans on this one. I don't care if Obama was due to leave office next week, he has the authority and the duty to nominate justices. If I were him, I would line up 6 or 7 candidates and dare the GOP to pout in public about how unfair it is to follow the Constitution in an election year...THAT would be priceless TV.
Lodestar
(2,388 posts)Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)thelordofhell
(4,569 posts)I dare these pricks to block the first Native American to be nominated for the Supreme Court!!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027607027
Geronimoe
(1,539 posts)for the "most qualified ever".... Hillary Clinton.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)tclambert
(11,087 posts)What would Justice Thomas say? Wait, can he speak without Scalia telling him what to say?
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)SunSeeker
(51,571 posts)liberalnarb
(4,532 posts)longship
(40,416 posts)YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)liberalnarb
(4,532 posts)We need 14 repug votes to nominate a new justice. That's not going to happen. We're screwed.