Joe Walsh defends "game" comments amidst growing criticism.
Source: Chicago Tribune
By Katherine Skiba
Tribune reporter
7:18 p.m. CDT, June 1, 2012
WASHINGTON After taking heat for racially charged remarks, Rep. Joe Walsh issued a statement Friday asserting he was in no way critical of minorities, but an opposition group that had videotaped and distributed his remarks stepped up its attack.
The war of words erupted after Walsh, speaking May 26 at the Schaumburg Central Library, said the Democratic Party wants the Hispanic vote and they want Hispanics to be dependent on government just like they got African Americans dependent on government. Thats their game.
Read more: http://www.tinyurl.com/89emvga
Couldn't find the whole clip, but here is a short bit of it. Later, he also said something about plantations.
This guy is a farking worm.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)Never got a chance to see The Eagles though.
Heh...
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)It's better than the way we had.
begin_within
(21,551 posts)patrice
(47,992 posts)government, regulations, and control of ANY kind.
randome
(34,845 posts)patrice
(47,992 posts)trying to deny the money to anyone else but their select FEW.
Response to patrice (Reply #3)
patrice This message was self-deleted by its author.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)They provide a service the government wants done, paid for by taxpayers. As soon as they get that 'private' contract, they brag about what big entrepreneurs they are, doing some job that only they can do because they are just 'smart.' The fact that they may have received benefits from public education or other advantages eludes them in equity.
They want all those people on the dole or doing the scut work to go away and don't want to pay taxes on any of it, because it was all their own genius that did the work. It's that 'producers' versus the 'parasites' argument. I consider them to be egotistical and offensive. It does no good to discuss the situation, as they simply see themselves as 'better' than common humanity.
They always vote GOP or Tea, because they demand to keep all the profits they 'created' from 'their' work. To them, the Democratic Party is the part of 'losers, welfare cheats' and 'nanny staters.' So how to reason with anyone like that?
tanyev
(42,571 posts)Wouldn't want your kids to be dependent on government, would you?
Botany
(70,518 posts)Just like Walsh is dependent on the government for his pay check and health care." grr:
toddwv
(2,830 posts)They ignore the fact that when you try and compare the number of minorities serving in Congress as members of a particular party, there really is no comparison.
This is the Republican Party's idea of how to win minorities. Disparage them, attack the organizations that serve them and then try and shame them into thinking that the Republicans really have their best interests at heart even while cutting programs that affect them.
surrealAmerican
(11,362 posts)He's trying to appeal to the racism of his constituents. It disgusts me that this is an effective strategy for him and his fellow white, suburban republicans.
Jake2413
(226 posts)And I had the pleasure of attending one of his townhalls. As a staunch Progressive it was very painful but my wife said I had to go. So I made her sit in the front row. After his quick remarks of 20 minutes he took questions. A small business owner got up and said she needed more customers and how was he going to help. He went on to chastise her that she needed lower taxes not sales. I got so frustrated because he is so wrong, from the front row I got up and walked out muttering to myself that this was "bullshit", a few people heard me and wanted to argue but I kept going. My poor wife had to get up and follow me as I embarrassed her.
PatSeg
(47,501 posts)and it isn't just his politics. He seems to have no impulse control, strange things just blurt out of his mouth.
At a restaurant with constituents last year, he looked like a man who needed medication.
liberalhistorian
(20,818 posts)I certainly hope that we can send him home for keeps.
And if it's the Illinois home for the bewildered that's OK too.
(apologies to Garrison Keiller)
Judi Lynn
(160,545 posts)PatSeg
(47,501 posts)I can't imagine him serving a 2nd term in congress.
alp227
(32,034 posts)as Bob Herbert criticized the controversial book by Charles Murray, "The Bell Curve".
This "government dependence" talk is just a way to get voters CLUELESS about American civics to vote Republican. HELLO? Does Joe not realize that we ALL depend on government one way or another, whether:
- Tax credits for families
- Police, fire, and ambulance services
- The court system to uphold contracts
- Social Security/Medicare
- The public education system
It's so unbelievable how this mindless religion of individualism is so mainstream in this country.
madrchsod
(58,162 posts)Response to kurtzapril4 (Original post)
obamanut2012 This message was self-deleted by its author.