Some Oklahoma schools display signs warning staffers could be armed
Source: Fox News
Officials at an Oklahoma school district said they wanted to send a clear warning to protect against potential attacks, so they put up signs on Monday alerting that staff members could be carrying guns.
The signs were erected at public schools in Okay, according to the Muskogee Phoenix. The town's police department was reportedly disbanded in 2014, and even though sheriff's deputies are available, Superintendent Charles McMahan says that may not be enough.
"We don't want to be a soft target," he told the newspaper.
One sign reads, "ATTENTION: Please be aware that certain staff members at Okay Public Schools can be legally armed and may use whatever force is necessary to protect our students."
<more>
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/02/04/some-oklahoma-schools-display-signs-warning-staffers-could-be-armed.html
onehandle
(51,122 posts)Angel Martin
(942 posts)who ?
the mass shooters, or the people trying to stop them ?
onehandle
(51,122 posts)NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)Gee...
pocoloco
(3,180 posts)think it is OK to place other peoples kids jeopardy, and get a big
woody celebrating when one gets shot!
Fuck 'em all!
Runningdawg
(4,517 posts)I can tell you there are MANY more people packing at schools and not all of them are teachers. This is the way it has always been, but now of course they feel the need to advertise.
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)Many students had hunting rifles in their trucks, and nobody thought anything about it.
Human101948
(3,457 posts)Simple logic. And for many of the shooters they are the enemy anyway.
jonno99
(2,620 posts)Human101948
(3,457 posts)Proponents of this argument also ignore that the majority of mass shootings are murder-suicides. Thirty-six of the killers we studied took their own lives at or near the crime scene, while seven others died in police shootouts they had no hope of surviving (a.k.a. "suicide by cop" . These were not people whose priority was identifying the safest place to attack.
No less a fantasy is the idea that gun-free zones prevent armed civilians from saving the day. Not one of the 62 mass shootings we documented was stopped this way. Veteran FBI, ATF, and police officials say that an armed citizen opening fire against an attacker in a panic-stricken movie theater or shopping mall is very likely to make matters worse. Law enforcement agents train rigorously for stopping active shooters, they say, a task that requires extraordinary skills honed under acute duress. In cases in Washington and Texas in 2005, would-be heroes who tried to take action with licensed firearms were gravely wounded and killed. In the Tucson mass shooting in 2011, an armed citizen admitted to coming within a split second of gunning down the wrong personone of the bystanders who'd helped tackle and subdue the actual killer.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/04/gun-free-zones-mass-shootings
LuckyLib
(6,819 posts)LastLiberal in PalmSprings
(12,586 posts)It reminds me of the FBI warning at the beginning of DVDs. Too many words, too little meaning.
valerief
(53,235 posts)the GOP wants. They don't want ANY tax money going to citizens. And what they end up with are dumb constituents who will ALWAYS vote GOP, because that's what dumb people do.
This is what the guns in schools are for. To kill public education.
Little Tich
(6,171 posts)LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)jonno99
(2,620 posts)GGJohn
(9,951 posts)If they're trained in the use of firearms and the relevant state law, then I don't see the problem, despite the gnashing of teeth by some.
jonno99
(2,620 posts)TipTok
(2,474 posts)I hope the school is facilitating appropriate training...