Campbell says it supports federal standard for GMO labeling
Last edited Fri Jan 8, 2016, 01:40 PM - Edit history (1)
Source: AP
NEW YORK (AP) Campbell Soup says it supports a mandatory national labeling standard for products containing genetically modified ingredients.
The maker of Pepperidge Farm cookies, Prego sauces and Spaghetti-Os says it will withdraw its support from various efforts opposing such labeling, which has become a contested issue in recent years. The move marks a break from industry groups that have sought to make labeling voluntary.
About three-quarters of Campbell's products contain GMOs. The company has opposed a patchwork of state-by-state legislation that it believes would confuse customers.
States have tried to address the issue on their own and Vermont passed legislation requiring food makers to disclose when certain products contain genetically modified ingredients by July. But industry groups want to pre-empt such efforts with federal legislation that would make disclosures voluntary, said Michele Simon, a public health lawyer.
FULL story at link.
FILE - In this Jan. 8, 2014, file photo, cans of Campbell's soup are photographed in Washington. Campbell Soup said it supports federal legislation that would establish a national labeling standard for products containing genetically modified ingredients. About three-quarters of the company's products have GMO ingredients. (AP Photo/J. David Ake, File)
Read more: http://bigstory.ap.org/article/088968521d49438e93950d688fa75c69/campbell-says-it-supports-federal-standard-gmo-labeling
Campbell soup is on the dirty 18 list. Goggle dirty 18 and you get some strange results.
It used to be talked about on the DU ages ago.
OS
More here: http://www.citizen.org/pressroom/pressroomredirect.cfm?ID=2182
The report profiles the families and their businesses, which include the families behind Wal-Mart, Gallo wine, Campbells soup, and Mars Inc., maker of M&Ms. Collectively, the list includes the first- and third-largest privately held companies in the United States, the richest family in Alabama and the worlds largest retailer.
Paul Newman, actor and founder of Newmans Own food company, agreed in a separate statement: For those of us lucky enough to be born in this country and to have flourished here, the estate tax is a reasonable and appropriate way to return something to the common good. Im proud to be among those supporting preservation of this tax, which is one of the fairest taxes we have.
18 Families Bankroll Estate Tax Repeal Campaign: http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2006/04/25/5022/estate-18/
The 10-year effort to repeal the estate tax (aka the Paris Hilton Tax) on heirs of the super wealthy has been financed and coordinated by just 18 families, according to a new report by Public Citizen and United for a Fair Economy.
The families include the candy magnate Mars family, Waltons of Wal-Mart fame, Kochs of Koch Industries and Dorrance family of the Campbells Soup Co. Together, they are worth a total of $185.5 billion. The estate tax repeal would collectively net them a windfall of $71.6 billion.
Bending to the will of these families, House and Senate conservatives are proposing to permanently repeal the estate tax or seek a compromise that is nearly as bad even though such a move would cost over three quarters of a trillion dollars in the next decade. Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-TN) has promised a vote on repeal in May.
Meanwhile, a new poll finds that 57 percent favor reforming or leaving alone the estate tax; only 23 percent back repealing it. And for good reason: Americans are about four times as likely to be hit by lightning than to have to pay estate taxes on small businesses or farms.
roomtomove
(217 posts)I suspect they will be supporting "VOLUNTARY" labeling, vs mandatory labeling, to circumvent the movement for mandatory labeling.
proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)For Immediate Release:
Friday, January 8, 2016
WASHINGTON- Campbell Soup should be applauded for its leadership and support of mandatory GMO labeling, according to Scott Faber, EWGs senior vice president of government affairs. Faber said:
We applaud Campbells for supporting national, mandatory GMO labeling and we look forward to working with Campbells and other food leaders to craft a national GMO labeling solution. Consumers simply want the right to know whats in their food and how its grown just like consumers in 64 other nations.
Nine out of ten American consumers want the right to know, and want a GMO disclosure on the food package. They want to make their own choices. Campbells should be applauded for trusting consumers to do their homework and make the choices that reflect their values.
PSPS
(13,614 posts)Um, there hasn't been any "Campbell family" involved in the company for about 90 years.
proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)By Robyn Obrien
Posted: 03/22/2012 5:39 pm EDT Updated: 05/22/2012 5:12 am EDT
Campbell's Soup recently announced that they plan to remove a hormone-disrupting chemical from their soup cans. The move can't come fast enough, as consumers, especially young mothers, are running so quickly from the canned food aisles that sales are dropping.
And it's causing an upheaval in the food industry. Because even though federal regulators like the FDA (underfunded and dependent on industry-funded research) maintain that it's safe ("pink slime" was deemed safe, too), moms are having nothing to do with it and canned food sales are dropping, impacting everyone along the food chain including the chemical companies making the linings for the cans.
So what's the big deal? Most of us grew up eating cans of Spaghetti-Os and ravioli and turned out fine, right?
Well, in April 2008, the National Toxicology Program raised concerns that exposure to this chemical, bisphenol A (BPA), during pregnancy and childhood could impact the developing breast and prostate, hasten puberty and affect behavior in American children. In October 2010 in the Journal Reproductive Toxicology, another study demonstrated that in utero exposures to BPA cause precancerous prostate lesions in animals. And a Harvard School of Public Health team found elevated BPA measurements in pregnant women who eat canned vegetables daily, according to the Environmental Working Group (EWG).
In other words, it could have some pretty unintended consequences for our loved ones, especially the little ones.
Days after the 2008 study, the Canadian government decided to label BPA as "toxic."
And yet here in the United States, almost four years later, it appears we have literally kicked the can down the road under the premise that it has not yet been proven dangerous. Stunning, because while hundreds of studies demonstrate the toxicity of BPA, "Industry scientists have persisted in raising questions about the research methods of independent scientists," reports EWG.
Money can't buy you love, but if the tobacco industry is any indicator, it seems it can certainly buy you a favorable study or two.
So while the French have banned BPA in all food packaging materials, not just in baby bottles, not just in cans of infant formula, but in packaging materials for the "grown ups" too, the question becomes: "What in the world are we doing eating food that is marinating in this stuff?"
<>
Campbells Soup to remove BPA from soup cans
By Rita R. Robison on March 9, 2012 at 10:58 PM
Campbells Soup says it will stop using the chemical bisphenol-A, or BPA, in the linings of its cans.
The company has been testing alternative substances to replace BPA, a component of epoxy can linings, and plans to make the switch as soon as it can find feasible alternatives, the Environmental Working Group said in a statement.
When the worlds largest soup maker moves to remove BPA from its cans, that sends a signal to the rest of the food and beverage industry to do the same, said Jane Houlihan, EWG senior vice president for research. Unlike some of its competitors, Campbells has listened to its customers concerns. It plans to remove this toxic chemical, which is associated with a very long list of serious health problems, many of which are on the rise among Americans.
Last September, the Breast Cancer Fund launched their Cans Not Cancer campaign which, with the help of Healthy Child Healthy World, generated more than 70,000 letters to the company urging it to find an alternative can lining that didnt contain BPA, a synthetic estrogen that disrupts the hormone system.
<>
SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)I think not enough
still, it seems like progress
proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)sometimes I let myself think that there is a chance
Bernin
(311 posts)excuse my ignorance.
But, what is the dirty 18 list?
Omaha Steve
(99,709 posts)It used to be talked about on the DU ages ago.
OS
More here: http://www.citizen.org/pressroom/pressroomredirect.cfm?ID=2182
The report profiles the families and their businesses, which include the families behind Wal-Mart, Gallo wine, Campbells soup, and Mars Inc., maker of M&Ms. Collectively, the list includes the first- and third-largest privately held companies in the United States, the richest family in Alabama and the worlds largest retailer.
Paul Newman, actor and founder of Newmans Own food company, agreed in a separate statement: For those of us lucky enough to be born in this country and to have flourished here, the estate tax is a reasonable and appropriate way to return something to the common good. Im proud to be among those supporting preservation of this tax, which is one of the fairest taxes we have.
18 Families Bankroll Estate Tax Repeal Campaign: http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2006/04/25/5022/estate-18/
The 10-year effort to repeal the estate tax (aka the Paris Hilton Tax) on heirs of the super wealthy has been financed and coordinated by just 18 families, according to a new report by Public Citizen and United for a Fair Economy.
The families include the candy magnate Mars family, Waltons of Wal-Mart fame, Kochs of Koch Industries and Dorrance family of the Campbells Soup Co. Together, they are worth a total of $185.5 billion. The estate tax repeal would collectively net them a windfall of $71.6 billion.
Bending to the will of these families, House and Senate conservatives are proposing to permanently repeal the estate tax or seek a compromise that is nearly as bad even though such a move would cost over three quarters of a trillion dollars in the next decade. Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-TN) has promised a vote on repeal in May.
Meanwhile, a new poll finds that 57 percent favor reforming or leaving alone the estate tax; only 23 percent back repealing it. And for good reason: Americans are about four times as likely to be hit by lightning than to have to pay estate taxes on small businesses or farms.
Bernin
(311 posts)Your posts are always informative.
Please keep it up.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)I have a feeling that this will be a precursor to redefining what is GMO and what isn't.
I guess I'm a bit cynical about it...
jwirr
(39,215 posts)protest this law as much as we can.