Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,635 posts)
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 03:23 PM Jan 2016

Hillary Clinton's Campaign Blew Past Their Fundraising Goal For 2015

Source: Reuters

WASHINGTON, Jan 1 (Reuters) - U.S. Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton raised $55 million in the last three months of 2015, her campaign said on Friday.

The latest haul for Clinton, 68, brings her 2015 fundraising total to $112 million, and gives her one of the best-funded campaign treasuries in the race for the November 2016 U.S. presidential elections.

"At the beginning of this campaign, Hillary Clinton set a goal of $100 million in primary contributions for 2015 and blew past that goal, raising more than $112 million in primary money for the year," her campaign said in a statement.

It said she had raised $37 million for the primary campaign, the most for any non-incumbent in a non-election year, and $18 million for the Democratic Party in the fourth quarter.

Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hillary-clinton-raises-55-million-in-fourth-quarter_5686c98ae4b06fa688827756



Gee, imagine if there was "enthusiasm" for her...
39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton's Campaign Blew Past Their Fundraising Goal For 2015 (Original Post) brooklynite Jan 2016 OP
Money still doesn't equal votes. Scootaloo Jan 2016 #1
Right...because I'm wealthy so of course I MUST be opposed to Campaign Finance Reform brooklynite Jan 2016 #2
Where did I say that? Scootaloo Jan 2016 #3
You're also a corporation lap dog and a war monger ronnykmarshall Jan 2016 #4
That's the way some around here feel. Two of my siblings were bank tellers at a local branch..... George II Jan 2016 #8
Isn't that pathetic? ronnykmarshall Jan 2016 #11
And here I thought ChiTownDenny Jan 2016 #14
Only on friday ronnykmarshall Jan 2016 #22
I would think the majority of bank employees are less than middle class ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2016 #26
You are correct sir! ronnykmarshall Jan 2016 #27
And I suspect that ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2016 #28
That's for sure ronnykmarshall Jan 2016 #30
There are some clear inaccuracies in this article JonLeibowitz Jan 2016 #5
Not true. You're making the same mistake that Sanders did at the first debate. There is a big.... George II Jan 2016 #9
No, I have made no mistake. JonLeibowitz Jan 2016 #10
I fully understand the difference. George II Jan 2016 #17
Fine. My original point stands. JonLeibowitz Jan 2016 #18
well of course she did! wildbilln864 Jan 2016 #6
Equally or more interesting is how she spends it, elleng Jan 2016 #7
The big news here is the $18 million for down-ticket Democrats TekGryphon Jan 2016 #12
I was about to point that out - I wonder how much Sanders has raised for State Democratic Parties? George II Jan 2016 #16
You are not watching him. roody Jan 2016 #33
"Bernie's supporters" != Bernie TekGryphon Jan 2016 #36
That is exactly what I like most BlueMTexpat Jan 2016 #35
The Bernie Campaign is about getting Bernie elected. Dawson Leery Jan 2016 #38
Where I live, Bernie supporters roody Jan 2016 #39
Well, duh! MattSh Jan 2016 #13
Yeah that's it. ronnykmarshall Jan 2016 #23
Guess my small donations have made me a corporate friend. Who knew? Laser102 Jan 2016 #37
Come on Mrs. Clinton, please be my "Dream Team" with Senator Sanders Sunlei Jan 2016 #15
Because Vermont is a battleground State? brooklynite Jan 2016 #19
They're all battleground states. I want Mrs. Clinton & Sen. Sanders to run as President & VP Sunlei Jan 2016 #20
Two Eastern liberals? Not a chance... brooklynite Jan 2016 #21
I don't think she's "corrupt neo-con".Her experiences with wall street are a benefit for Americans. Sunlei Jan 2016 #24
Generally its best to pick a younger VP elmac Jan 2016 #34
dems ignore about $4bil FREE pro republican advertising every year certainot Jan 2016 #25
so she will spend millions to put trump in the oval office....good move hill bowens43 Jan 2016 #29
Keep telling yourself that honey. ronnykmarshall Jan 2016 #32
I admit that I fell for the appeal and was worried about sanders out fundraising the Clinton campagi Gothmog Jan 2016 #31
 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
1. Money still doesn't equal votes.
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 03:27 PM
Jan 2016

I know that that's a frustrating reality that persons of your means have been fighting against for many a decade Brooklynite, but it remains true.

brooklynite

(94,635 posts)
2. Right...because I'm wealthy so of course I MUST be opposed to Campaign Finance Reform
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 03:29 PM
Jan 2016

Any other lazy stereotypes?

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
3. Where did I say that?
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 03:31 PM
Jan 2016

Campaign finance? That just buys advertisng.

I'm saying you flat-out want your money to translate directly into votes. You're rich, so you count more. Everything you post here points towards this.

ronnykmarshall

(35,356 posts)
4. You're also a corporation lap dog and a war monger
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 03:32 PM
Jan 2016

and since I work of a bank I'm an evil bankster sucking the life blood from The People.

Cheers my fellow evil pig!!!

George II

(67,782 posts)
8. That's the way some around here feel. Two of my siblings were bank tellers at a local branch.....
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 03:45 PM
Jan 2016

....and my father and I worked in IT (me only 2 years) for a bank, and a Sanders follower here on DU put us all down and called us all "banksters"!

ronnykmarshall

(35,356 posts)
11. Isn't that pathetic?
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 04:02 PM
Jan 2016

These idiots don't have a CLUE that bank employees are majority middle class! I had some asshole tell me that I should quit my job and work for a non profit or something and I am part of "the problem".

I didn't tell him the REAL truth about how all of us that work for banks get to just grab hand fulls of cash everyday and instruct our limo drivers (who we beat daily) run old people off the road while smoking cigars and drinking champagne.

Shhhh. Don't tell.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
26. I would think the majority of bank employees are less than middle class ...
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 07:23 PM
Jan 2016

aren't the majority of a banks workforce Tellers and administrative support?

But that said ... I have written many a time that in order for some segments of DU to make sense, one must ignore what we experience in real life ... and that segment of DU's constant refrain that employment choice (or, non-choice) equals a political statement, is a prime example, especially when they lambast, clear subject matter experts because the accrued their expertise from working at, and excelling, in the banking work.

ronnykmarshall

(35,356 posts)
27. You are correct sir!
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 07:35 PM
Jan 2016

I work in a service center where we process the checks and transactions and admin support and IT.

When I was a kid I didn't sit and look at my mom's checkbook and dream of the day I would process those checks. It's something I basically fell into when I was 21. I started out working the grave yard shift distributing reports and sorting paid checks. I learned a lot of skills that enabled me to move to San Francisco where I lived paycheck to paycheck and loved every minute of it. I've busted my ass off and at 54 I think I'm doing pretty damn well for the going on 27 years at my bank.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
28. And I suspect that ...
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 07:49 PM
Jan 2016

never in your wildest imagination that someone call your decision to work for a bank, to be held as a political statement!

JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)
5. There are some clear inaccuracies in this article
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 03:33 PM
Jan 2016
Clinton has prided herself on raising funds from women and donors of small amounts. In the most recent quarter, 94 percent of the money raised was in donations of $100 or less, her campaign said.


No way. She would need 517,000 donors (edit: donations, not donors) who each contributed $100 for this to be possible. Or more donors who each contributed less.



edit:
Conflicting source revealing what we all know the correct numbers to be: https://twitter.com/AlbaMonica/status/682990425788039168

94% of Q4 donations to HFA were in increments of $100 or less

George II

(67,782 posts)
9. Not true. You're making the same mistake that Sanders did at the first debate. There is a big....
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 03:48 PM
Jan 2016

....difference between "DONORS" and "DONATIONS".

Until caught misrepresenting the statistic, Sanders was running around the country claiming he had 1.25M "donors", then had to eat his words and backtrack to only 750,000 "donors" who gave his campaign 1.25M 'donations".

JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)
10. No, I have made no mistake.
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 03:50 PM
Jan 2016
94 percent of the money raised was in donations of $100 or less


is very different from

94% of Q4 donations to HFA were in increments of $100 or less


The key is in understanding what "94% of the money raised" means. I suggest you try to understand this difference.

Hint: $51.7MM

George II

(67,782 posts)
17. I fully understand the difference.
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 04:50 PM
Jan 2016

Here is what you said:

"She would need 517,000 donors who each contributed $100 for this to be possible. Or more donors who each contributed less."

TekGryphon

(430 posts)
12. The big news here is the $18 million for down-ticket Democrats
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 04:04 PM
Jan 2016

The Hillary team and her supporters are committed to the progressive movement as a whole, which extends far beyond her.

While I sit here on DU watching Bernie supports spend all day and night trying to turn people against the Democratic Party and convince them to sit out the election and let conservatives win - Hillary's team is fighting for the cause.

George II

(67,782 posts)
16. I was about to point that out - I wonder how much Sanders has raised for State Democratic Parties?
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 04:44 PM
Jan 2016

I have a guess.

TekGryphon

(430 posts)
36. "Bernie's supporters" != Bernie
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 01:03 PM
Jan 2016

I'm well aware Bernie has tried, from Day 1 of his campaign, to keep his supporters focused on issues and not identity politics.

I don't blame him for the "burn the house down" fanaticism of his followers. I saw the same shit with Ron Paul supporters in 2008.

Dawson Leery

(19,348 posts)
38. The Bernie Campaign is about getting Bernie elected.
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 03:51 PM
Jan 2016

The Hillary campaign is about getting Democrats elected at all levels.

roody

(10,849 posts)
39. Where I live, Bernie supporters
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 09:55 AM
Jan 2016

are phone banking and canvassing on order to get people TO participate.

MattSh

(3,714 posts)
13. Well, duh!
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 04:19 PM
Jan 2016

She and her corporate friends were expecting a cakewalk to the nomination. Then Bernie happened.

So her corporate friends had to pony up more ca$h!

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
20. They're all battleground states. I want Mrs. Clinton & Sen. Sanders to run as President & VP
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 05:46 PM
Jan 2016

Because that Team will win it all easy

brooklynite

(94,635 posts)
21. Two Eastern liberals? Not a chance...
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 06:03 PM
Jan 2016

...and do you want Sanders to have to gove in to Clinton's "corrupt", "neo-con", "Wall Street" agenda?

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
24. I don't think she's "corrupt neo-con".Her experiences with wall street are a benefit for Americans.
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 06:32 PM
Jan 2016
 

elmac

(4,642 posts)
34. Generally its best to pick a younger VP
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 02:37 AM
Jan 2016

someone who will be running for president in 8 years if the dems make it 2 terms. Both will be pushing 80 by then. Julian Castro would be a good pick.

 

certainot

(9,090 posts)
25. dems ignore about $4bil FREE pro republican advertising every year
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 07:05 PM
Jan 2016

while hillary and bernie supporters battle and celebrate their fundraising records and complain about hundreds of millions in corporate money, 1200 rw talk radio stations blast the country with about 4BIL $ worth of pro 1% and pro wall street hate and swiftboating and bullshit every year.

1200 stations x 15 hrs/day x 5 days/wk x 52 weeks x $1000/hr = way too fucking much think tank- coordinated pro-republican advertising that is basically invisible and ignored by liberals because it gives them a headache to listen to it.

all that advertising is basically free and at least 1/4 of it is endorsed by these 90 major universities

if dems started protesting those universities for helping republicans sell their lies and hate it would only take a few successes to shame other schools into doing the same. advertisers would flee all rw talk stations, the monopoly would fall apart, and and the biggest advantage the republicans have would be gone in time for the elections.

and bernie or hillary would have supermajorities

Gothmog

(145,413 posts)
31. I admit that I fell for the appeal and was worried about sanders out fundraising the Clinton campagi
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 09:07 PM
Jan 2016

I gave money yesterday to the Clinton campaign and I feel good about this

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Hillary Clinton's Campaig...