Hillary Clinton's Campaign Blew Past Their Fundraising Goal For 2015
Source: Reuters
WASHINGTON, Jan 1 (Reuters) - U.S. Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton raised $55 million in the last three months of 2015, her campaign said on Friday.
The latest haul for Clinton, 68, brings her 2015 fundraising total to $112 million, and gives her one of the best-funded campaign treasuries in the race for the November 2016 U.S. presidential elections.
"At the beginning of this campaign, Hillary Clinton set a goal of $100 million in primary contributions for 2015 and blew past that goal, raising more than $112 million in primary money for the year," her campaign said in a statement.
It said she had raised $37 million for the primary campaign, the most for any non-incumbent in a non-election year, and $18 million for the Democratic Party in the fourth quarter.
Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hillary-clinton-raises-55-million-in-fourth-quarter_5686c98ae4b06fa688827756
Gee, imagine if there was "enthusiasm" for her...
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)I know that that's a frustrating reality that persons of your means have been fighting against for many a decade Brooklynite, but it remains true.
brooklynite
(94,635 posts)Any other lazy stereotypes?
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Campaign finance? That just buys advertisng.
I'm saying you flat-out want your money to translate directly into votes. You're rich, so you count more. Everything you post here points towards this.
ronnykmarshall
(35,356 posts)and since I work of a bank I'm an evil bankster sucking the life blood from The People.
Cheers my fellow evil pig!!!
George II
(67,782 posts)....and my father and I worked in IT (me only 2 years) for a bank, and a Sanders follower here on DU put us all down and called us all "banksters"!
ronnykmarshall
(35,356 posts)These idiots don't have a CLUE that bank employees are majority middle class! I had some asshole tell me that I should quit my job and work for a non profit or something and I am part of "the problem".
I didn't tell him the REAL truth about how all of us that work for banks get to just grab hand fulls of cash everyday and instruct our limo drivers (who we beat daily) run old people off the road while smoking cigars and drinking champagne.
Shhhh. Don't tell.
ChiTownDenny
(747 posts)all you guys snorted coke in the back of your limos. Learn something new everyday.
ronnykmarshall
(35,356 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)aren't the majority of a banks workforce Tellers and administrative support?
But that said ... I have written many a time that in order for some segments of DU to make sense, one must ignore what we experience in real life ... and that segment of DU's constant refrain that employment choice (or, non-choice) equals a political statement, is a prime example, especially when they lambast, clear subject matter experts because the accrued their expertise from working at, and excelling, in the banking work.
ronnykmarshall
(35,356 posts)I work in a service center where we process the checks and transactions and admin support and IT.
When I was a kid I didn't sit and look at my mom's checkbook and dream of the day I would process those checks. It's something I basically fell into when I was 21. I started out working the grave yard shift distributing reports and sorting paid checks. I learned a lot of skills that enabled me to move to San Francisco where I lived paycheck to paycheck and loved every minute of it. I've busted my ass off and at 54 I think I'm doing pretty damn well for the going on 27 years at my bank.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)never in your wildest imagination that someone call your decision to work for a bank, to be held as a political statement!
ronnykmarshall
(35,356 posts)JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)No way. She would need 517,000 donors (edit: donations, not donors) who each contributed $100 for this to be possible. Or more donors who each contributed less.
edit:
Conflicting source revealing what we all know the correct numbers to be: https://twitter.com/AlbaMonica/status/682990425788039168
George II
(67,782 posts)....difference between "DONORS" and "DONATIONS".
Until caught misrepresenting the statistic, Sanders was running around the country claiming he had 1.25M "donors", then had to eat his words and backtrack to only 750,000 "donors" who gave his campaign 1.25M 'donations".
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)is very different from
The key is in understanding what "94% of the money raised" means. I suggest you try to understand this difference.
Hint: $51.7MM
George II
(67,782 posts)Here is what you said:
"She would need 517,000 donors who each contributed $100 for this to be possible. Or more donors who each contributed less."
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)The article is inconsistent with what HFA is claiming.
wildbilln864
(13,382 posts)Did anyone actually expect less?!
elleng
(131,016 posts)reflecting on her judgment (as well as values.)
TekGryphon
(430 posts)The Hillary team and her supporters are committed to the progressive movement as a whole, which extends far beyond her.
While I sit here on DU watching Bernie supports spend all day and night trying to turn people against the Democratic Party and convince them to sit out the election and let conservatives win - Hillary's team is fighting for the cause.
George II
(67,782 posts)I have a guess.
roody
(10,849 posts)He has done said nothing about those things.
TekGryphon
(430 posts)I'm well aware Bernie has tried, from Day 1 of his campaign, to keep his supporters focused on issues and not identity politics.
I don't blame him for the "burn the house down" fanaticism of his followers. I saw the same shit with Ron Paul supporters in 2008.
BlueMTexpat
(15,370 posts)about this report.
Thanks for emphasizing that point!
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)The Hillary campaign is about getting Democrats elected at all levels.
roody
(10,849 posts)are phone banking and canvassing on order to get people TO participate.
MattSh
(3,714 posts)She and her corporate friends were expecting a cakewalk to the nomination. Then Bernie happened.
So her corporate friends had to pony up more ca$h!
ronnykmarshall
(35,356 posts)Laser102
(816 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)brooklynite
(94,635 posts)Neither Sanders nor Warren will be on the ticket.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Because that Team will win it all easy
brooklynite
(94,635 posts)...and do you want Sanders to have to gove in to Clinton's "corrupt", "neo-con", "Wall Street" agenda?
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)elmac
(4,642 posts)someone who will be running for president in 8 years if the dems make it 2 terms. Both will be pushing 80 by then. Julian Castro would be a good pick.
certainot
(9,090 posts)while hillary and bernie supporters battle and celebrate their fundraising records and complain about hundreds of millions in corporate money, 1200 rw talk radio stations blast the country with about 4BIL $ worth of pro 1% and pro wall street hate and swiftboating and bullshit every year.
1200 stations x 15 hrs/day x 5 days/wk x 52 weeks x $1000/hr = way too fucking much think tank- coordinated pro-republican advertising that is basically invisible and ignored by liberals because it gives them a headache to listen to it.
all that advertising is basically free and at least 1/4 of it is endorsed by these 90 major universities
if dems started protesting those universities for helping republicans sell their lies and hate it would only take a few successes to shame other schools into doing the same. advertisers would flee all rw talk stations, the monopoly would fall apart, and and the biggest advantage the republicans have would be gone in time for the elections.
and bernie or hillary would have supermajorities
bowens43
(16,064 posts)ronnykmarshall
(35,356 posts)Gothmog
(145,413 posts)I gave money yesterday to the Clinton campaign and I feel good about this