U.S. Carrier Harry S. Truman Has Close Call With Iranian Rockets
Last edited Tue Dec 29, 2015, 09:52 PM - Edit history (1)
Source: NBC NEWS
EXCLUSIVE NEWS DEC 29 2015, 4:57 PM ET
by JIM MIKLASZEWSKI and COURTNEY KUBE
The U.S. aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman came about 1,500 yards from an Iranian rocket in the Strait of Hormuz last week, two U.S. military officials told NBC News on Tuesday.
As the Truman was transiting the strait, which connects the Arabian Sea and the Persian Gulf, Iranian Revolutionary Guards conducted a live-fire exercise right near the U.S. carrier Saturday, officials said.
A U.S. military official said an Iranian navy fast and short attack craft began conducting a live-fire exercise at the same time the carrier was nearing the end of the strait, firing off several unguided rockets. A French frigate, the U.S. destroyer USS Buckley and other commercial traffic were also in the area.
The official said the U.S. ships were in the "internationally recognized maritime traffic lane" at the time, not in any territorial waters, when the Iranian navy announced over maritime radio that it was about to conduct a live-fire exercise and asked other vessels to remain clear.
Read more: http://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/u-s-carrier-harry-s-truman-has-close-call-iranian-n487536
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)The world would implode if that hit the carrier. The president would have to act.....what? I don't know and glad we don't have to find out.
randys1
(16,286 posts)want in the WH when this happens again.
Cruz?
Dear god
Trump
please
Rubio
sure, you bet...
christx30
(6,241 posts)That said, I think you are absolutely right. I'd rather Clinton has the office in that situation before Trump or Cruz. Trump would be on TV 45 minutes after the attack (even if it was accidental) promising to rain hell fire on those godless heathens that dared to tangle with the US Navy, then all Hell would break loose.
I'd prefer Sanders in the office (voting for him in the primary), but I think Hillary would be safer for the country than the alternative, so I'll vote for her in the general.
Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)Anything to carry water for Israel against Iran?
You bet, Hillary would be right on top of that.
underpants
(182,865 posts)Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)So the reality is, the US ships were nearly a mile away from where the Iranians launched the rockets. And where they landed was a lot further away.
7962
(11,841 posts)So the Iranian ships were close, but firing further away.
Still a very stupid move on their part and obviously intentional to provoke & scare the ships. An unguided rocket like that wouldve been blasted out of the sky by a Phalanx or some other defensive weapon on one of the surrounding ships.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)The "S" doesn't stand for anything. It's just an "S".
christx30
(6,241 posts)you're absolutely right.
http://www.trumanlibrary.org/speriod.htm
Funny and interesting. Never considered anyone having just a letter as a middle name.
kirby
(4,442 posts)I was curious and read the Truman library link you mentioned and it actually says the exact opposite.
"The evidence provided by Mr. Truman's own practice argues strongly for the use of the period. "
Did I miss something?
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)used.
There are 'teams' of hosts who spend their day just looking for a reason to lock my threads so I don't dare alter even a lowly 'period'.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)Gore1FL
(21,151 posts)I stayed after class and halfheartedly argued that in using the period, I was simply abbreviating it!
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Did you consider a career in law?
kirby
(4,442 posts)According to another poster, http://www.trumanlibrary.org/speriod.htm gives info about using the period after S. It even mentioned several English Style manuals saying you should use it.
"Several widely recognized style manuals provide guidance in favor of using the period. According to The Chicago Manual of Style all initials given with a name should "for convenience and consistency" be followed by a period even if they are not abbreviations of names. The U.S. Government Printing Office Style Manual states that the period should be used after the "S" in Harry S. Truman's name. "
Peace Patriot
(24,010 posts)---including, of course, the U.S. Navy, the U.S. Air Force and other U.S. forces--throughout this tinderbox region of the planet. The situation is made-to-order for more war.
I'm reminded of Vietnam and the manufactured incident in the Gulf of Tonkin that resulted in more than 55,000 U.S. soldier deaths, and the deaths of 2 million Southeast Asians. The CIA, or some cabal within the U.S. military that wants another big war, have plenty of opportunity to create one right now. The warmongers simply tell big fat lies, and sometimes decades go by before "we, the people" know how we were conned.
I say we should withdraw the U.S. military from the Middle East, and let the hugely corrupt regimes of Saudi Arabia and Israel deal with their own goddamned mess. They drew us into the region in collusion with U.S. neo-cons and all the war profiteers. We should get out, now, before the inevitable happens and we get sucked into another major war. We should rely solely on diplomacy, on non-military aid where needed, and on strengthening of our own democracy and international institutions such as the U.N.--both badly, badly needed strengthenings--to help create a more peaceful world. The U.S. military will NEVER help create a more peaceful world. Its glory days as the winner of WW II are OVER. It is now merely a mercenary force, at the beck and call of unscrupulous fascists and resource thieves, with war profiteers plundering it (and us) at every turn.
A mercenary force in a tinderbox. Horrors are on-going, many of them inflicted by this mercenary force as well as by its scuttlebutt agencies (the CIA, et al). But much bigger horrors threaten.