Sanders Raised More Than $1M After Data Breach, Aide Says
Source: CNN
By Dan Merica, CNN
Updated 6:08 PM ET, Sat December 19, 2015
Manchester, New Hampshire (CNN)Bernie Sanders' presidential campaign raised more than $1 million on Friday, in part off an email charging that the Democratic National Committee tilted the scales toward Hillary Clinton after the DNC cut off Sanders from a crucial voter database, a campaign aide said Saturday.
"The reality is that the huge turnouts that we've had at our meetings, our strong fundraising, our volunteer base, and quick rise in the polls have caused the Democratic National Committee to place its thumb on the scales in support of Hillary Clinton's campaign," read the email. "You see that fact evidenced in their decision to bury the Democratic debates on weekends during nationally televised football games. It's more or less an open secret."
The fundraising email, penned by Jeff Weaver, Sanders' campaign manager, went out to the campaign's fundraising list Friday afternoon. It was sent hours after the DNC withheld the campaign's access to its own voter data after revelations surfaced that the Sanders campaign seized on a glitch in a DNC database to spy on Clinton's voter data. Sanders filed a federal lawsuit against the party, and the two sides announced a settlement in the wee hours of Saturday morning, with Sanders' access restored.
In the lawsuit, the campaign argued it was losing $600,000 a day over an inability to conduct fundraising.
Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/19/politics/bernie-sanders-dnc-data-fundraising/
retrowire
(10,345 posts)bjobotts
(9,141 posts)That should have been done to all or none so it was apparent what the DNC was doing...cheating on behalf of Clinton.
LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)mahina
(17,673 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)zalinda
(5,621 posts)just like every one knew there were no weapons of mass destruction. Although, some people never learn.
Z
MeNMyVolt
(1,095 posts)Think I need a shower. Want nothing to do with them.
beltanefauve
(1,784 posts)MoreGOPoop
(417 posts)Screw us and we multiply. : )
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)jwirr
(39,215 posts)MeNMyVolt
(1,095 posts)good god.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)bjobotts
(9,141 posts)Always. Only closed minded people would think Sanders would be deceitful. He's never been that way and all his associates know this about him.
George II
(67,782 posts)....as Harry Truman said, "the buck stops here", meaning at the top.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)....and downloading went on.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Omaha Steve
(99,665 posts)Some people just make up replies and don't provide a link to back them up.
http://www.factcheck.org/2008/02/leftover-campaign-funds/
A: The big rule is: no personal use.
FULL QUESTION
Do candidates for elected office keep donations to their campaigns for personal use after they lose or drop out? Or do those donations have to go into a greater party fund?
FULL ANSWER
As Bob Biersack from the Federal Election Commission points out, most candidates dont have much left over to begin with. Campaigning is expensive, and leftover money gets used for bills and debts first, including expenses incurred while winding down an abandoned campaign or a lost political office.
Candidates do sometimes end up with surplus funds, though, particularly if theyre incumbent members of Congress who decide not to run for another term. State and local governments have their own rules, but those running for federal office including presidential candidates must abide by strict FEC guidelines when it comes to their extra campaign money. They can donate an unlimited amount to a charity or political party. They can also, within limits, make contributions directly to other candidates. A campaign committee can give up to $2000 per election to each candidate. If the committee is converted into a political action committee, the limit jumps to $5000 but to be established as a PAC, the committee would have to be in existence for six months, receive contributions from 50 donors, and make contributions to five recipients.
What candidates cant do with leftover money is use it for personal expenses. Retiring federal lawmakers used to be able to pocket extra cash and use it for cars, vacations, clothes, pet grooming, whatever but that changed in 1989 with the passage of the Ethics Reform Act.
Jess Henig
Sources
Federal Election Commission. "Permissible non-campaign use of funds." Code of Federal Regulations. 1 Jan. 2007.
Berke, Richard. "Cash of Campaigns Can Go Elsewhere." The New York Times. 22 Jan. 1989.
Categories:Ask FactCheck
You really think if Bernie doesn't get to the General Election he would give it to the DNC?
bjobotts
(9,141 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)....before a certain deadline, not the day that a campaign ceases to exist.
There are all sorts of things a campaign can do with money before it terminates its committee. It can be used to pay salaries, give staffers bonuses, can convert their funds to a PAC (as noted above), donate it to a political party (state or national, like the DNC), etc. There are many ways around the FEC regulations which, by the way, are very weak and porous.
Sanders' campaign has been the most frugal so far. He's raised $41M and only spent $17M (34%). Clinton has raised $77M and spent $44M (57%). O'Malley has raised $3.3M and spent $2.8M (76%).
There are no limits on what Sanders can give to his staff as a salary or bonus before his campaign ends.
Proserpina
(2,352 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)And often the money goes to the DNC, after expenses.
Welcome to Politics 101.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)tonight's debate. Even though no one will we watching because of the scheduling, this custom-made distraction will save Hillary from answering questions about her conservative ideology and voting record.
Good on the Bernistas for fighting back against the slimy party hacks.
XanGo
(21 posts)turbinetree
(24,703 posts)Honk------------------------for a political revolution it is about getting a progressive U.S. Supreme Court and Congress
Bernie 2016
bjobotts
(9,141 posts)Proserpina
(2,352 posts)mid-October....
George II
(67,782 posts)...has been the Sanders campaign.
Proserpina
(2,352 posts)it faster than it's coming in....I suppose bragging would be detrimental to your image. You're right. It's not exactly an accomplishment, especially when measured against actual results: mass turnout, volunteers, etc. You know, feet on the ground stuff.
You're absolutely right, bragging would be a faux pas on Hillary's part.
George II
(67,782 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)fredamae
(4,458 posts)WhiteHat
(129 posts)While the far right grows in strength, and big-money "moderates" like Hillary pretend to some sort of balance, Bernie clearly tells the whole truth. It works.
liberalhistorian
(20,818 posts)donations and plan to continue doing so for as long as he's running. If he's not the nominee I will switch the donations and votes to whoever is, but, for now, I'm sticking with him. And I'm even more disgusted with DWS and her "leadership" of the DNC than I was before. She MUST go.