Millionaire businessman not guilty of raping teenager after he accidentally penetrated her
Source: News Corp Australia
A MILLIONAIRE businessman has been found not guilty of rape after claiming he accidentally penetrated her when he tripped and fell.
Ehsan Abdulaziz, 46, was initially accused of forcing himself on the 18-year-old as she slept on a couch at his London flat after a night of drinking.
The Saudi property developer said he had already had sex with the young womans 24-year-old friend and it was possible his penis may have been poking out of his underwear when he tripped.
The Mirror reported the group had met at an exclusive West End club last year where he entertained them before offering them a lift home.
Read more: http://www.news.com.au/world/europe/millionaire-businessman-not-guilty-of-raping-teenager-after-he-accidentally-penetrated-her/news-story/fbe0a9c0ffd1d13d814908091b24545e
What's more surprising, that he actually used this as a defense or that he was acquitted after using this as a defense?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)annabanana
(52,791 posts)Xipe Totec
(43,890 posts)sarge43
(28,941 posts)Any functioning woman would have filed that under either the "I'll pull out in time" or "my wife doesn't care what I do" lying sack folders.
annabanana
(52,791 posts)disgusting and disturbing in equal degrees
Faux pas
(14,686 posts)he's rich.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)tomm2thumbs
(13,297 posts)ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)A: It depends.
Lochloosa
(16,066 posts)Dakota Flint
(219 posts)SoapBox
(18,791 posts)rurallib
(62,431 posts)certainly this guy:
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)...or they're just hostile to the victim.
840high
(17,196 posts)hedgehog
(36,286 posts)gregcrawford
(2,382 posts)... is that British courts and prosecutors are just as venal and corrupt as they are here.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)It doesn't surprise me. The hostility toward women is shocking for a lefty paper. I swear it's like flypaper for trolls. It has seriously made me think that all English men are raging misogynists.
gregcrawford
(2,382 posts)... but what you say does not surprise me. Weak, snivelling cowards are always quick to demonize women, and Republican politicians exploit that ignorant prejudice because they are carved out of the same turd.
I am reminded of the the disgusting Gamergate stories of a year ago or so. Pitiful, overweight worms who smell like feet and live in their mothers' basements playing video games of misogynistic aggression because they haven't the social skills to even speak to a woman. I'd pity them if they weren't such assholes.
truthisfreedom
(23,149 posts)Shocked that DU would be suspicious of a millionaire who obviously didn't mean to penetrate a teenager who he penetrated!
christx30
(6,241 posts)Yeah. Nothing screwy there at all.
A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)Because it never has. I doubt anyone could honestly say they or anyone they know had it happen to them.
christx30
(6,241 posts)some comics that MTV did.
http://comicsalliance.com/safe-sex-comic-psa/
hunter
(38,321 posts)Or the guys who show up in the E.R. with a shampoo bottle stuck up their bum, claiming they fell.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)whenever they end up with something very expensive that they in no way could ever afford on their salary.
MynameisBlarney
(2,979 posts)What a bunch of goddamn bullshit!
Marie Marie
(9,999 posts)But you said it perfectly!
bobthedrummer
(26,083 posts)Chapter 21-Omaha
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1016139460
keithbvadu2
(36,836 posts)Robin Hood would have been proud of that shot.
She sleeps with her legs that far apart?
"accidentally" - yeah! right!
Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)You forgot the part about the couch. She sleeps on the couch with her legs that far apart?
And she trips and fall (they both have their pants off, apparently) and . . .
Oh, nevermind.
2naSalit
(86,673 posts)Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)malthaussen
(17,209 posts)That the defense actually thought they would get away with such an asinine claim would be more amazing, except that, well, they did.
-- Mal
TexasBushwhacker
(20,205 posts)After all, she was only 18, drunk and asleep while he was having sex with her friend. Her friend was a skut, so that meant she must be a slut too.
gregcrawford
(2,382 posts)... if you examine the obvious sequence of events:
1. Pretty young girl passes out on couch after being plied with liquor.
2. Her panties just naturally fall to her ankles.
3. Solicitous host tries to cover her, but...
4. BAD blanket rubs him the wrong way, resulting in unseemly tumescence.
5. Naughty monkey is released in attempt to spank naughty monkey
5. BAD blanket trips solicitous host
6. Naughty monkey falls into unsuspecting pretty young girl again and again and again, etc.
See?!!? Perfectly reasonable mistake.
For the terminally obtuse:
asjr
(10,479 posts)Owner of that naughty monkey should put him back in his cage.
gregcrawford
(2,382 posts)Enrique
(27,461 posts)I've heard it affects your balance.
Flying Squirrel
(3,041 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)Xithras
(16,191 posts)His actual claim is that he never penetrated her at all. He says that she fell asleep on his couch while he was having sex with her friend in another room. He later walked out to offer her a taxi ride home when he tripped and fell on her. His claim is that she drunkenly wanted to have sex with him, he rejected her, and she pulled his hand to her crotch. He claimed the semen traces were from his hand, and were the result of the sex he'd had with her friend just before that.
It still sounds like a bogus story (he walked out to offer her a taxi ride while he was still half naked and covered in semen?) but the whole "tripped and fell in" thing was not his actual defense.
LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)complicated and therefore B.S.
Xithras
(16,191 posts)In order to transfer enough DNA to her to be detectable, his hands would have needed to be sticky with wet semen. He also claims that he was essentially naked when he "fell onto" this sleeping 18 year old girl who he "didn't want to have sex with" when he wanted to call her a cab.
First, who has sex with a stranger and then IMMEDIATELY (before the semen dries) decides to go wake up the strangers friend in another room to "call them a cab"? Second, who does that naked? Third, who does so with semen all over their body and then doesn't even wash their hands first?
And that's before even GETTING INTO the other glaring problem with this story. The guy, according to his story, JUST finished having sex with the girls friend, which is why he was still covered in wet semen. The young woman, finding the guy on top of her, freaked out, pushed him off, tried to wake her friend, and when she couldn't do so fled the house. Think about that for a second. By his own story, he had JUST finished having sex with the friend, and yet this young woman could not wake the friend up. That means the friend that he ADMITTED having sex with was either drugged or was so drunk that she passed out. Either way, she was too far gone to consent. His own story basically admits to rape, just not with THIS woman.
The guy is a creep and I'm 100% sure he committed a rape that night. I simply called out the "He fell in" headline because it's fictional and basically turns a serious assault into a humorous headline.
PersonNumber503602
(1,134 posts)and their stupid headlines.
valerief
(53,235 posts)jtuck004
(15,882 posts)If that's what the people want...but I suspect this was taken out of context. Sure hope so, anyway.
Vinca
(50,288 posts)I'm betting the affluenza kid is in the U.K., too. Can't wait for his reason for dodging probation. My BMW made me do it?
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)rug
(82,333 posts)erpowers
(9,350 posts)Last edited Tue Dec 22, 2015, 02:07 PM - Edit history (1)
The most surprising part is that he was not convicted. The fact that he tried to use that defense is not that surprising. It is extremely surprising that the defense worked. Who could have fallen for such a defense? Seriously, this guy was just walking around with his "penis...poking out of his underwear" and then he tripped and his penis landed in the girls Vagina. How in the world could that happen?
The only thing I can think happened is that the jury felt the girl brought the assault onto herself because she had been drinking. Other than that I assume they think the girl, at first, had consensual sex with the business man and then decided to claim he had raped her in an attempt to get money from him, or to punish him for not being nicer to her after they had sex.
JRLeft
(7,010 posts)this fucka is a rapist and a pedophile. How fucking stupid could the people whom decided he was innocent?
olddad56
(5,732 posts)olddad56
(5,732 posts)while she was lying on her back with her legs spread apart. What bad luck for this guy. She should have been charged assault. Good thing he could afford good reputable legal counsel. Those Saudi millionaires have the worst luck.
MissMillie
(38,568 posts)"I don't understand. Did you trip on something?"