Justice Department will launch investigation into practices of Chicago police
Source: Washington Post
The Justice Department plans to launch an investigation into the patterns and practices of the Chicago Police Department, a wide-ranging review similar to those that scrutinized the police departments in Ferguson, Mo., and Baltimore, according to several law enforcement officials.
The civil probe, which the officials say could be announced early this week, comes as Chicago continues to grapple with protests after the release of a video showing the police shooting of Laquan McDonald, which prompted murder charges for the officer involved and the resignation of the citys police chief. The Justice Department is already investigating the McDonald shooting, but this new investigation by the departments civil rights division would focus on the police departments practices broadly to determine whether any of them contribute to civil rights violations.
A spokesman for the Chicago Police Department said Sunday morning that he did not know anything about the possibility of a second, broader federal probe into the force. A Justice Department spokesperson did not confirm that a new probe into Chicago PD is imminent.
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2015/12/06/justice-department-will-launch-investigation-into-practices-of-chicago-police/
It's a good thing that this police dept is finally being investigated.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)Why does Hillary stand behind him?
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)JonathanRackham
(1,604 posts)What took so long?
6chars
(3,967 posts)Just sayin'. Chicago may or may not be among the worst, but there seems to be a national problem with some aspects of police culture.
Chakab
(1,727 posts)Last edited Sun Dec 6, 2015, 06:18 PM - Edit history (1)
when it was revealed that Jon Burge and his subordinates were systematically torturing confessions out of black suspects.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)SmittynMo
(3,544 posts)I'm sure he has it coming. How could he NOT know about this for a year?
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,369 posts)Like the oval office.
He'll be ok.
SmittynMo
(3,544 posts)they'll find too much to where the oval office cannot help him. I don't think a pardon is in order.
erronis
(15,339 posts)Make every person up the chain personally responsible for those under their commands.
Just in case someone (RE, for example) wants to say the he didn't know about the sordidness within agencies under him, let him know that he is personally responsible. If there are monetary damages paid because of the misdeeds, then they should come out of the chain-of-commands wealth.
Of course RE knew about this within a week or so after the so-called law people knew that videos captured the misdeeds.
Of course RE had to give his blessing for the $5M payment to the family. And where did that 5M come from? Was it from the perps paychecks or from the Chi taxpayers?
RE has been a wheeler/dealer all of his slippery life. It'll be sort of fun to watch how he squirms his way into some other cushy spot.
OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)despite a 6,000 page Senate torture report?
O.K.
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/feb/18/guantanamo-torture-chicago-police-brutality?CMP=share_btn_tw
In a dark foreshadowing of the United States post-9/11 descent into torture, a Guardian investigation can reveal that Richard Zuley, a detective on Chicagos north side from 1977 to 2007, repeatedly engaged in methods of interrogation resulting in at least one wrongful conviction and subsequent cases more recently thrown into doubt following allegations of abuse.
Zuleys record suggests a continuum between police abuses in urban America and the wartime detention scandals that continue to do persistent damage to the reputation of the United States. Zuleys tactics, which would be supercharged at Guantánamo when he took over the interrogation of a high-profile detainee as a US Navy reserve lieutenant, included:
Shackling suspects to police-precinct walls through eyebolts for hours on end.
Accusations of planting evidence when there was pressure for a high-profile murder conviction.
Threats of harm to family members of those under interrogation used as leverage.
Pressure on suspects to implicate themselves and others.
Threats of being subject to the death penalty if suspects did not confess.
When Zuley took over the Slahi interrogation in 2003 his name has gone widely unreported he designed a plan so brutal it received personal sign-off from then-US defence secretary Donald Rumsfeld.
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/feb/18/american-police-brutality-chicago-guantanamo
From what I was told, General Miller thought he was the greatest thing since sliced bread, Couch said. Miller was amazed at the information he was getting. So apparently Zuley ratcheted up these techniques, with the backing of Miller, to go up the chain of command for approval.
~snip~
Miller retired from the Army in 2006. He has disappeared from public view after invoking his right against self-incrimination when called as a witness in an Abu Ghraib-related trial that year. Emails seeking comment about Millers relationship with Zuley bounced back, and a spokesperson for the US Southern Command, which oversees Guantánamo, did not know how else to contact him.
~snip~
As the military intensified its treatment of Slahi, the FBI and Fallons task force, uncomfortable with torture, pushed back. But the military took full control of Slahis interrogation. On July 1, 2003, Miller approved a special projects status request for Slahi from the Defense Intelligence Agency, with Zuley placed in charge. By August 13 of that year, Rumsfeld personally signed off on the Slahi interrogation, already under way.
In addition to using stress positions, sleep deprivation and auditory bombardment against him, Zuley intended to make Slahi think he was taken somewhere else, somewhere more dangerous for him. He would be placed on a boat, and taken around the bay to disorient him, though they would never actually leave Guantánamo. Dogs would be used during the transport, Zuley wrote in a memo uncovered by a Senate committee, to assist developing the atmosphere that something major is happening and add to the tension level of the detainee.
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/feb/24/chicago-police-detain-americans-black-site?CMP=share_btn_tw
Alleged police practices at Homan Square, according to those familiar with the facility who spoke out to the Guardian after its investigation into Chicago police abuse, include:
Keeping arrestees out of official booking databases.
Beating by police, resulting in head wounds.
Shackling for prolonged periods.
Denying attorneys access to the secure facility.
Holding people without legal counsel for between 12 and 24 hours, including people as young as 15.
At least one man was found unresponsive in a Homan Square interview room and later pronounced dead.
The secretive warehouse is the latest example of Chicago police practices that echo the much-criticized detention abuses of the US war on terrorism. While those abuses impacted people overseas, Homan Square said to house military-style vehicles, interrogation cells and even a cage trains its focus on Americans, most often poor, black and brown.
Unlike a precinct, no one taken to Homan Square is said to be booked. Witnesses, suspects or other Chicagoans who end up inside do not appear to have a public, searchable record entered into a database indicating where they are, as happens when someone is booked at a precinct. Lawyers and relatives insist there is no way of finding their whereabouts. Those lawyers who have attempted to gain access to Homan Square are most often turned away, even as their clients remain in custody inside.
erronis
(15,339 posts)Old Union Guy
(738 posts)I mean with respect to the very same issues of police misconduct and the cover up.
erronis
(15,339 posts)the most recent election.
Of course he won the prior one with the help of friends in very high places (BO).
sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)which approved the $5 million? They must have known
that there was a tape. How could RE approve of that
payout without knowing about its reason?
Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)Robbins
(5,066 posts)I don't actully hold out much hope on DOJ investigation of this.maybe like baltimore prosecutor they can prove me wrong but not holding my breath here.
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)What a joke!!!
We first learned about Homan Square in February.
From a foreign news outlet no less.
US Marshals should have raided the damn place immediately following that disclosure.
Our Injustice system is a pathetic joke.
Anyone in here saying good and commending this; I've got a bridge to sell you.