Syed Rizwan Farook was in touch with international terrorism subjects
Source: CNN
San Bernardino, California (CNN)[Breaking news update at 12:13 p.m. ET]
San Bernardino shooter Syed Rizwan Farook was in touch over the phone and via social media with more than one international terrorism subject who the FBI were already investigating, law enforcement officials said.
It appears that Farook was radicalized, which contributed to his motive, though other things -- like workplace grievances -- may have also played a role, other law enforcement sources said.
Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/03/us/san-bernardino-shooting/index.html
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)Isn't the NSA supposed to catch shit like this?
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)if they were yanking in every person who had contact with those viewed as bad buys, this board would fucking explode in outrage. Damned if they do, damned if the don't.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)Wasn't the whole point of monitoring international terrorist communications to prevent this kind of shit?
Apparently not. More like to fill the coffers of 'security' corporations.
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)also to help US corporations for economic ends
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)THIS one attack, throw out the whole program? Wow - one person drowned because they were wearing a seat belt. Let's all stop wearing seatbelts as they're obviously worthless. That's the argument you're making.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)leftynyc
(26,060 posts)the program hasn't worked as intended? I've already posted somewhere here today 4 different terrorist indictments in NY from the last 6 months alone (and that was just from the first page of a google search). Do you think the terrorists announced their plans to the NY Times?
blackspade
(10,056 posts)dragnet domestic spying are two different programs.
Conflating the two, too be charitable, is nonsensical.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)American terrorists?
blackspade
(10,056 posts)Now you're obfuscating.
Feel free to have the last word since you obviously have no intention of having a constructive conversation.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)what you're babbling about. Perhaps instead of whining that I'm obfuscating, you could be clearer so I could tell what you're talking about. Just a helpful hint.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)These animals need to be tracked and watched. What kind of people would leave their 6 month old to go kill 14 people because they believe that they will curry favor with God?
blackspade
(10,056 posts)Due to their overseas communications with known terrorists.
So, no need to double down, just act on the info that they already had.
applegrove
(118,767 posts)Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)what a coinky-dink
Renew Deal
(81,870 posts)christx30
(6,241 posts)They weren't avoiding being tracked because they knew about the tracking. They were being tracked. If the headline was "Farook was talking to terrorist subjects via walkie talkie and passenger pigeon to avoid Carnivore and NSA surveillance", then Snowden would be a factor.
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)with a wife. One catch. They must massacre Americans. But Farook was getting laid.
What men won't do for sex.
90-percent
(6,829 posts)As it applies to white American male mass murderers;
THEY ARE NOT GETTING LAID and they're sexually frustrated and socially retarded.
Talk about young people falling into the wrong crowd, which I actually think is part of the reasons these perfectly normal teens fly off to the ME and become apprentice terrorists. We all yearn for some form of acceptance from the cool kids.
-90% Jimmy
valerief
(53,235 posts)They get their recruits from frustrated men.
flamingdem
(39,319 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)Sad and sickening.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,358 posts)That's how your post reads. Which is bizarre.
DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)But religious orders of all sorts, from the large ones to the cults all use the promise of sex. It is usually not "kill and I will have sex" but more like "you can be the sort of alpha male the girls want!" and then sadly coercing those girls into playing the role for the beniift of the swine clergy.
valerief
(53,235 posts)Whatever man/men arranged for Farook to marry Malik probably made the deal.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,358 posts)and Farook killed multiple people yesterday, just because he agreed to do that as a condition of the marriage?
Do you really think that American men with steady jobs are such a bad marriage prospect that they have to agree to carrying out mass murder, almost certinaly leaving any future children as orphans, or with them in jail for life, just to get someone to arrange a marriage for them with a non-American?
I'm really trying to understand the world you imagine, but it just doesn't sound like reality. Wouldn't it be more likely that Farook made the decision to kill himself, rather than seeing it as something he couldn't avoid because he married 2 years ago?
valerief
(53,235 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,358 posts)I'm not sure why you posted #3 then, but I'm glad it wasn't meant seriously.
valerief
(53,235 posts)But he had to pay the price for that sex.
Of course, none of this could be true. But it could be. I've been questioning other people for their speculation and have decided to speculate myself.
Good luck with the scenarios you can imagine.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,358 posts)You really think that this man killed because he had been having sex with his wife for 2 years?
Why, in your theory of sexuality and murder, did she kill? Why is having sex with your spouse not a factor for everyone else in the world?
valerief
(53,235 posts)redstateblues
(10,565 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)I am afraid this election is going to be more and more focused on security, terror and war... which benefits the GOP.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Thank goodness the election is still a year away. If it was next month it could go GOP but we have a long time to go.
Democat
(11,617 posts)The last twenty four hours have been quite a contrast to last week's "White Christian Terrorist" marathon.
LannyDeVaney
(1,033 posts)You want your fear justified. You enjoy cowering under a desk and being told what is right and wrong.
Admit it.
Democat
(11,617 posts)Many here are willing to condemn Christians without any evidence. But when it comes to other groups, no evidence will ever be enough.
LannyDeVaney
(1,033 posts)You have a real future in cable news.
We'll call your segment "SpeculationZone - where we only deal with facts"
christx30
(6,241 posts)He's a newly religious Muslim that travelled to Saudi Arabia. This couple was in contact with other terrorist subjects. They attacked where they worked, but it was just a target to them. Authorities found 12 pipe bombs in their home. They found a radio controlled car with explosives attached to them. This wasn't 'workplace violence' any more than Ft. Hood was workplace violence.
It wasn't because Jeff from accounting didn't clean out the coffee filter.
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]"The whole world is a circus if you know how to look at it."
Tony Randall, 7 Faces of Dr. Lao (1964)[/center][/font][hr]
ck4829
(35,085 posts)christx30
(6,241 posts)Terrorism is definitely a factor. And, since they can't fight "The West", they chose a target that they knew, hoping their familiarity with it could help ensure a successful attack.
blm
(113,083 posts)as they are actually blaspheming those religions.
When has there EVER been a lack of evidence against extreme christian terrorists or extreme islamic terrorists?
Perhaps YOU are the one willing to condemn without evidence the many here at DU who condemn all violent religious extremes, including those most popular in the US.
ck4829
(35,085 posts)I have no doubt religious fundamentalism played a role but I find it interesting that we also seem to think violent Muslims are apparently immune from mental illness.
840high
(17,196 posts)Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)I did not want it to. I do not want this to be our new normal. But it is. We have to deal with it.
ck4829
(35,085 posts)These guys don't like losing the limelight.
flamingdem
(39,319 posts)The photo alone of the PP nut grabbed all eyeballs.
patsimp
(915 posts)much more muslim and then radicalized and then mass killers. I have heard this story about Boston, England, Spain, France and now California.
Hmmm.
Elmergantry
(884 posts)Imams who are doing the radicalization and deal with them accordingly. Yes, survellience.
MowCowWhoHow III
(2,103 posts)https://twitter.com/AFP/status/672472858275221504
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Not good.
flamingdem
(39,319 posts)Right now I'm glad Hillary is hawkish
DCBob
(24,689 posts)If this shit keeps up it going to be tough for any Democrat.
AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)Hillary and Trump will jump on this for sure. Americans need to feel safe and will feel safe only with a supposedly tough person in the white house.
840high
(17,196 posts)with the dead and their families.
Elmergantry
(884 posts)was caused by GW didn't help his cause.
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)Trajan
(19,089 posts)Be fearless ... There is reason to believe that ANY bump these two receive from this will be minimal and short lived ...
This level of concern is unnecessary ... Bernie IS gonna win this ....
blackspade
(10,056 posts)KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)It's called "investigating".
blackspade
(10,056 posts)"San Bernardino shooter Syed Rizwan Farook was in touch over the phone and via social media with more than one international terrorism subject who the FBI were already investigating, law enforcement officials said."
And this:
Yet Farook himself had talked by phone and on social media with more than one person being investigated for terrorism, law enforcement officials said.
The communications were "soft connections" in that they weren't frequent, one law enforcement official said. It had been a few months since Farook's last back-and-forth with these people, who officials said were not considered high priority.
So, again, they knew. They just didn't consider it a high priority.
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)the warmakers must continue to promote their fear and terror agenda, it makes oodles of dollars.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)MosheFeingold
(3,051 posts)I assisted in drafting a law that made it difficult to change magazines without a tool (which occurred).
I am thinking the rifles had to have been illegally modified.
ozone82
(91 posts)Were bought in Utah, so I doubt they were CA legal...
MosheFeingold
(3,051 posts)They were brought into the state illegally.
Not that laws matter much.
christx30
(6,241 posts)If someone is determined to commit a crime like this, and if no cop or state official detects the illegal weapon being brought into the state, they can't do anything about it. All that can be done is clean up the mess afterwards.
How would you feel about state customs stations, like if you drive to Canada, someone's going to stop you and ask if you have weapons or fresh fruit.
Angel Martin
(942 posts)"I assisted in drafting a law that made it difficult to change magazines without a tool (which occurred).
I am thinking the rifles had to have been illegally modified."
who could have imagined that people planning mass murder would illegally modify their rifles ?
next you will tell us that they illegally removed the mag limiter...
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)I think he is just being cautious and deliberate.
complain jane
(4,302 posts)12+ pipe bombs in the apartment, plenty of tools and ingredients to make new bombs, evidence of contact with known terror suspects around the world, recent ramp-up in Muslim religious ideology, I think it's clear these were terrorists who really, really despised these innocent people celebrating Christmas.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)A couple of years back, in El Cajon, CA, they found a house with so many weapons and bombs the only safe thing to do was to burn it down. There was no way they could safely defuse and dispose of the mass of weapons.
The guy was white, of course, so he was labeled an isolated gun nut.
So I will wait.
complain jane
(4,302 posts)So who knows, could very well be a mix of motives, but it seems clear that terrorism is definitely an ingredient.
My wild unsubstantiated guess is that he became radicalized after spending a month in Saudi Arabia and his new wife helped the process along. So finally this year's work Christmas party didn't sit as well with him as it had in previous years and he chose it symbolically.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)complain jane
(4,302 posts)I'm waiting to hear too. Just thinking out loud while I wait.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)I thought the NSA was collecting all communications from all Americans 24/7/365?
hibbing
(10,109 posts)It probably sounds bizarre to say this, but I was hoping it wasn't this type of thing.
Peace
I think most can deal with workplace violence "easier" than a terrorist event.
ellenrr
(3,864 posts)double the fun...
FairWinds
(1,717 posts)It need not, and should not, be done militarily . .
Veterans For Peace
The2ndWheel
(7,947 posts)MosheFeingold
(3,051 posts)Also oil. We could easily make domestic oil so profitable that we don't need to import. We've almost become a net exporter.
FairWinds
(1,717 posts)should have been done long ago. And . .
Economic sanctions - seize assets (which are huge)
Trade embargo
Diplomatic & travel sanctions
People tend to think, very incorrectly, that only military force can solve international problems.
In nearly all cases, soft power is more effective.
Veterans For Peace
And above all, don't play kissy-face with them !!
https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.democraticunderground.com%2F10026097717&psig=AFQjCNEcJZKAR90iqD-abtyVFnBzaRnHjA&ust=1449258598300510
The2ndWheel
(7,947 posts)And what is the whirlwind exactly? Are we talking about letting Saudi Arabia fall apart? Because Iraq and Syria aren't big enough problems?
Then with the oil being more profitable, that would help make our environmental issues that much more complicated. I'm just not seeing any leverage there. We even did the whole economic sanctions thing with Russia, and look where Putin is.
still_one
(92,372 posts)this had been planned for sometime, and looking for an excuse to slaughter innocent people, wasn't due to "being crazy", but to an ideology
I hope him and his girl friend suffered like hell when each bullet hit them
840high
(17,196 posts)redstateblues
(10,565 posts)before yesterday I had some confidence that our agencies charged with tracking these types were doing a remarkable job-today I'm not thinking or feeling that.
MosheFeingold
(3,051 posts)I suspect Seyyid & crew were but one of many cells quietly put in place throughout the USA.
He pulled a Leeroy Jenkins* because he was mad at work and has tipped us off to what is coming during the following holiday shopping season.
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leeroy_Jenkins
atreides1
(16,091 posts)Especially without actual evidence of the existence of these "many cells", you speak of!
MosheFeingold
(3,051 posts)Are the reports of buddies coming and going.
And the fact the bombs take some technical know-how.
Am I being pessimistic? Yes.
Do I desire to be proven wrong? Yes.
Angel Martin
(942 posts)"...the reports of buddies coming and going."
that is why i think this thing is not over.
Farooq in his work was involved with water system monitoring, food contamination... etc.
so what else in addition to shootings and bombings did he plan ?
I suggest the SoCal water authorities start testing for chem and bio agents that normal water treatment will not neutralize.
LannyDeVaney
(1,033 posts)Not sure how he was "placed" in the USA.
And I assume by "crew" you mean 1 person - his wife.
However, please stay home ... shorter lines and less traffic for me.
vadermike
(1,416 posts)This is horrible but should we just give up and let trump and or Cruz win the election cause we are all scared ??? Ugh we must not let the rW control the conversation. I surprised they have been fairly muted this far
Response to cigsandcoffee (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
complain jane
(4,302 posts)jihadists have taken to dating sites to bait sane people into radicalization.
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)Why even bother with wiretaps then? Reassign all drug agents to terrorism.
SylviaD
(721 posts)truthisfreedom
(23,152 posts)I don't get it. Years after the fact, they know that a killer who JUST killed was phoning up other killers years ago?
Shit. That's as bad as suggesting that rapists watched Cosby on TV.