Chicago police union stands by cop charged with murdering teen
Source: Yahoo! News / Reuters
CHICAGO (Reuters) - The main Chicago police union is standing behind the white officer who was charged this week with first-degree murder for gunning down a black teenager. It is facing a backlash from leaders of the citys black community as a result.
On its website, the Chicago lodge of the Fraternal Order of Police (FOP), has posted a bail fund appeal for the officer, Jason Van Dyke, who is accused of shooting 17-year-old Laquan McDonald 16 times just six seconds after emerging from his patrol car on a street in Chicago on Oct. 20, 2014. An earlier link on the FOP's front page to a GoFundMe campaign was removed after the fundraising site said it violated a policy against its use by criminal defendants.
The FOP also is paying the lawyer representing Van Dyke, Daniel Herbert, himself a former FOP member the union pays to represent Chicago cops in misconduct cases. Funding such a defense is a common practice among U.S. police unions.
The FOPs support for Van Dyke appears to have support within the union, according to email and phone interviews Reuters conducted with a number of white and black active-duty and retired cops, as well as union and black police association officials.
Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/chicago-police-union-stands-cop-charged-murdering-teen-203741840.html
msongs
(67,420 posts)msrizzo
(796 posts)Don't they always support the killer cops?
ManiacJoe
(10,136 posts)hollysmom
(5,946 posts)it was not their job to judge, but to provide a defense for each worker before the arbitration committee. Although to be truthful, we used to joke about some of the cases, but still had to provide a defense. However these were people who worked on the line and took too many bathroom or smoke breaks, so it was not really as difficult.
CincyDem
(6,363 posts)...the fact that a Chicago city cop puts 16 rounds into a kid laying on the street, he's just a bad apple. It's not all the other cops...nope. It's just him.
Until it's the next one.
Sheesh.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)They think he's just ... misunderstood. After all, he was 'in fear for his life'. Just because the video camera shows the youth heading away, then falling down after getting shot doesn't mean he wasn't going to miraculously shrug off more than a dozen gunshot wounds and suddenly jump up and attack that officer!
happyslug
(14,779 posts)Last edited Sun Nov 29, 2015, 11:59 AM - Edit history (1)
Thus posting a bond is the duty of the Union. Remember if the guy skips, the union loses the money it posted. In fact the bond can be forfeited when the officer is convicted.
My Father once had a talk with his union seward. The Steward was complaining for he had to defend a Union member who was caught stealing. My Father pointed out thar was his duty. If the employer had the evidence the thief would be fired provided the employer had the evidence. The Steward' s job was to make sure the employer had the evidence. The same here, yes this is criminal not civil but it is the job of the Union to help this Union Brother.
I suspect the officer will be convicted the only question is what fine if any the Officer will be accessed. Remember the Union posted the bond and if a fine is accessed, the bond will be used to pay the fine.
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)That all sounds very wrong.
hay rick
(7,624 posts)marble falls
(57,106 posts)he didn't get due process.
carla
(553 posts)already available. Van Dyke MURDERED Laquan. Simple to see. His guilt is why he has been charged, actually. A presumption of innocence is hard to defend when video shows him plugging 16 bullets into a human and then starting to reload. An ideal for a system of jurisprudence, the concept is a good one. But in the age of video evidence...Van Dyke IS guilty. Presume what you will, we all do anyway.
hollysmom
(5,946 posts)do the steps.
SwankyXomb
(2,030 posts)JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)And Laquan's family gets a judgment - the Union should pay - not the citizens of Chicago.
happyslug
(14,779 posts)That is who the ability to prevent this and that is NOT the Union. The union power is limited, the union do NOT set up HOW an officer is to be trained, nor how is an employee is expected to work. Those functions always remain in the control of the employer.
In the case of the police, how, when and if an officer is to use his weapon is part of his job and thus under the sole control of his employer. In this case the people of Chicago. They elected politicians who refused to impose strict rukes on the use of firearms NOT the union. The union had a say is such regulations but the final decision was up to the City itself.
former9thward
(32,025 posts)They got $5 million. Chicago taxpayers paid.
JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)Should have been homeless first. That's a damn shame that Laquan's family has to pay themselves.
rpannier
(24,330 posts)Public Teachers in most states have legal representation if arrested in most places. Firefighters do as well. Chances are most public employees and many private union members probably have it as well
The job of the union is to represent their people regardless of whether they think they're innocent, guilty or whatever
Person 2713
(3,263 posts)public. Otherwise unless you were family or involved most would never have heard much about it
marble falls
(57,106 posts)manipulations of the various videos of the event itself. Why did it take a year to get uncut footage released? Why did it take one year to even acknowledge the existence of multiple uncut tapes? Police and city officials need to grilled over this event and its aftermath.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)But, it would be nice to see members questioning whether this is good use of membership dues in this case.
Realistically, I don't think the union has a lot of choice. But, maybe they need to rethink how they handle such obvious cases of abuse in the future. Still disappointing.
24601
(3,962 posts)stand for everything that result in a fair trial, who will?
Should California have prohibited OJ Simpson from having his defense team under the theory that an under-funded public defender was sufficient?
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)24601
(3,962 posts)When you jumped to the verdict without trial you made my case without reservation.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)24601
(3,962 posts)just execute him.
Then I'll pick somebody.
Then you can pick another defendant.
And so on.
Pretty soon, we won't have anyone waiting trial and won't need lawyers.
After WWII, the allies discussed whether summary execution would be the way to go for some within the Axis Powers. I for one agree with the decision to hold trials instead. As a result, some were executed, some were jailed and some were acquitted.
I'll stick with trials and a legal presumption of innocence. I'll stick with legal representation at trials.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)be on the jury, I'm entitled to express my opinion.
By the way, I thought George Zimmerman was a murdered too, and I detested the right wing, racist, gun nuts who sent him money for his defense.
24601
(3,962 posts)equivalent would be speech and religion are OK, as long as they are approved.
I disagree with selective application of the Constitution's Bill of Rights.
We are at an impasse and I need to go out.
My wish for you is that if ever you are accused, you will be presumed innocent by supporters and detractors alike and that no one would oppose you the resources for competent representation.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Won't ask my buddies to support me in an attempt to get off.
tblue37
(65,408 posts)radhika
(1,008 posts)Not just from the city's black community. This is an issue we should all stand up for.
Obviously, I'm dreaming of an America that doesn't exist, except in right wing fantasies of exceptionalim.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)I mean, I hope this guy goes to jail for a long long time, but the union's job is to do things like pay his bail and provide his lawyer.
hay rick
(7,624 posts)And the union should assume that he is innocent until proven guilty, no matter how bad it smells.
Gidney N Cloyd
(19,841 posts)mike_c
(36,281 posts)...in professional liability insurance. I would think that cops need way more than that from their union.
littlewolf
(3,813 posts)that were convicted in the press. but the DA was so crooked he couldn't see straight.
If they had jailed the woman who lied about it. a person would most likely be alive today.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)We need police and police departments who understand they are not above the law, they are to enforce the law. Or try anyway, that is their job.
marble falls
(57,106 posts)Dan de Lyons
(52 posts)Van Dyke stopped to refill the gun. Was he still then fearing for his life?
This is going to be a very difficult case to defend. Bet he cops a plea.
marble falls
(57,106 posts)another clip is nothing less than first degree capital murder.
RKP5637
(67,111 posts)spot by cops, no real questions asked. I certainly believe in innocent until proven guilty, but IMO that video is clear evidence as to what happened, and then a second clip, WTF.
RKP5637
(67,111 posts)duty bound to support him as a member until proved guilty in court.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,322 posts)That's a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice and/or accessory to murder after the fact.
RKP5637
(67,111 posts)and enough to be damn concerning!!!
PeoViejo
(2,178 posts)The Reichwing's wet dream: Police Unions as the model for all Unions.
packman
(16,296 posts)But this is just wrong, wrong, wrong. If I was a Chicago cop and asked to contribute to his defense fund it would be a real conflict.
Locrian
(4,522 posts)mainer
(12,022 posts)Every time a claimant wins a police brutality case, it should come out of the Police Union's insurance policy. When every cop realizes that he has to pay higher premiums for all the bad apples in their union, maybe they'll be quicker to get rid of the bad apples.