Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)
Tue Nov 24, 2015, 06:15 PM Nov 2015

Edging right, Clinton seeks distance from Obama on ISIS

Source: The Hill

Hillary Clinton is putting space between herself and President Obama on the issues of national security and terrorism, even at the risk of offending the most dovish members of her own party.

... “Like President Obama, I do not believe that we should again have 100,000 American troops in combat in the Middle East. That is just not the smart move to make here.” But she added that U.S. forces should be utilized to “support local and regional ground forces in carrying out this mission.”

Clinton drew an even sharper contrast with Obama at the second Democratic presidential debate, declaring that ISIS “cannot be contained, it must be defeated.”

Obama has received considerable criticism for saying that ISIS was “contained” the day before the attacks on Paris that killed 130 people. Aides emphasized he had been using the word to describe the organization’s control of territory, rather than suggesting the threat had been neutralized.

Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/261157-clinton-seeks-distance-from-obama-on-isis

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
1. Here's what Robert Reich had to say about it:
Tue Nov 24, 2015, 06:22 PM
Nov 2015
Five Prerequisites for War Against ISIS


http://robertreich.org/post/133823574720

We appear to be moving ever closer toward a world war against the Islamic State.

No sane person welcomes war. Yet if we do go to war against ISIS we must keep a watchful eye on 5 things:

1. The burden of fighting the war must be widely shared among Americans.
America’s current “all-volunteer” army is comprised largely of lower-income men and women for whom army pay is the best option...If we go into a ground war against ISIS, we should seriously consider reinstating the draft.

2. We must not sacrifice our civil liberties. U.S. spy agencies no longer have authority they had in the post-9/11 USA Patriot Act to collect Americans’ phone and other records. The NSA must now gain court approval for such access. But in light of the Paris attacks, the FBI director and other leading U.S. law enforcement officials now say they need access to encrypted information on smartphones, personal and business records of suspected terrorists, and “roving wiretaps” of suspects using multiple disposable cell phones. War can also lead to internment of suspects and suspensions of constitutional rights, as we’ve painfully witnessed...We must be vigilant that we maintain the freedoms we are fighting for.

3. We must minimize the deaths of innocent civilians abroad. The bombing raids have already claimed a terrible civilian toll, contributing to a mass exodus of refugees...Some civilian casualties are unavoidable. But we must ensure they are minimized – and not just out of humanitarian concern. Every civilian death creates more enemies. And we must do our part to take in a fair portion of Syrian refugees.

4. We must not tolerate anti-Muslim bigotry in the United States. Already, leading Republican candidates are fanning the flames...It’s outrageous that leading Republican candidates for president of the United States are fueling such hate. Such bigotry is not only morally odious. It also plays into the hands of ISIS.

5. The war must be paid for with higher taxes on the rich. A week before the terrorist attacks in Paris, the Senate passed a $607 billion defense spending bill, with 91 senators in favor and 3 opposed (including Bernie Sanders). The House has already passed it, 370 to 58. Obama has said he’ll sign it. That defense appropriation is larded with pork for military contractors – including Lockheed Martin’s F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, the most expensive weapons system in history. Now Republicans are pushing for even more military spending. We cannot let them use the war as a pretext to cut Social Security and Medicare, or programs for the poor. The war should be paid for the way we used to pay for wars – with higher taxes, especially on the wealthy...

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)
2. I hope our next president shows caution in our engagement in foreign wars. I fear Sanders, O'Malley,
Tue Nov 24, 2015, 06:53 PM
Nov 2015

and sometimes (Paul if you catch him on a flip day instead of a flop day) are the only candidates from either party who share my concern.

Of these three, only Sanders is polling above 5% and has a campaign sufficiently well funded to make it to Super Tuesday (and Paul is a certifiable wingnut on every other issue -- probably shouldn't let that fact escape mention).

 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
3. I quite agree
Tue Nov 24, 2015, 07:07 PM
Nov 2015

I see no reason to do anything in the Middle East, and that means money, materiel, trade, etc.

We've done too much already, and to bad effect.

 

Android3.14

(5,402 posts)
4. And people thought her little red arrow meant moving forward
Tue Nov 24, 2015, 07:11 PM
Nov 2015

I suppose you have to admire her supporter's naivete.

PatrynXX

(5,668 posts)
7. next time they have a container of water
Tue Nov 24, 2015, 08:38 PM
Nov 2015

and walking across the room let me know what goes out. Contained in context means different things. smh

 

adir

(33 posts)
10. Hillary never saw a war she didn't like.
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 12:40 PM
Nov 2015

Her enthusiasm for destruction, suffering and chaos is disturbing.

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)
11. She'll triangulate right up to the most bellicose Republican. If we don't stop her in the primary,
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 12:55 PM
Nov 2015

our general election choice will be between a pro-war/pro-military-industrial-complex Republican versus a pro-war/pro-military-industrial-complex Democrat. That would suck.

Democat

(11,617 posts)
12. Who on DU doesn't agree with her statment on ISIS?
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 01:02 PM
Nov 2015

Who thinks ISIS can be "contained" and that they should not be "defeated"?

Response to Democat (Reply #12)

Wernothelpless

(410 posts)
13. Hillary (boots on the ground)
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 01:34 PM
Nov 2015

If the polls show 62% of Amurkans want ground forces it punches her ticket ...

Sellout ...

EndElectoral

(4,213 posts)
14. "US forces SHOULD BE utilized"..in what way utilized? How long? What cost? Who pays?
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 01:54 PM
Nov 2015

Edging right is NOT the correct term. She's simply evolving.

 

Sinpledon

(15 posts)
16. So saying "ISIS must be defeated" is a right wing thing now?
Thu Nov 26, 2015, 12:03 PM
Nov 2015

According to the clickbait - happy The Hill, it is.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Edging right, Clinton see...