Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,658 posts)
Tue Nov 24, 2015, 03:18 PM Nov 2015

Clinton: Saying 'illegal immigrants' was poor word choice

Source: AP

WASHINGTON (AP) — Hillary Rodham Clinton says her use of the term "illegal immigrants" was a "poor choice of words" and she's pledging not to use it anymore.

Clinton was asked about her use of the term to describe people who are in the U.S. illegally during a question-and-answer session Tuesday on Facebook held by Telemundo.

During a stop in New Hampshire earlier this month, the Democratic presidential candidate referred to immigrants that way while discussing her support for a barrier along the Mexican border as a New York senator.

Clinton says on Facebook that the people "at the heart of this issue are children, parents, families." She says, "They have names, and hopes and dreams that deserve to be respected."

Read more: http://bigstory.ap.org/article/2c321e5c8f1a43169a7f4a46f312050c/clinton-saying-illegal-immigrants-was-poor-word-choice



while discussing her support for a barrier along the Mexican border as a New York senator I didn't know that.
31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Clinton: Saying 'illegal immigrants' was poor word choice (Original Post) Omaha Steve Nov 2015 OP
I can't stand Hillary Clinton, but ... earthside Nov 2015 #1
You have every right to publicly show your ignorance. nt Xipe Totec Nov 2015 #5
As do you. Leontius Nov 2015 #15
Does your premise and labeling include all of history... LanternWaste Nov 2015 #6
It covers any sovereign nation skepticscott Nov 2015 #21
Except there is no right to control "borders" scscholar Nov 2015 #26
The right to control borders skepticscott Nov 2015 #28
Last I checked, the Rio Grande River S_B_Jackson Nov 2015 #31
Who decides who is "legal" and "illegal"? Kelvin Mace Nov 2015 #9
Some folks don't want to admit we have laws. ileus Nov 2015 #10
Yes, they are skepticscott Nov 2015 #19
I like Hillary and don't like that phrase at all. Starry Messenger Nov 2015 #22
What is she supposed to say? yeoman6987 Nov 2015 #2
Undocumented Omaha Steve Nov 2015 #3
Thank you so much yeoman6987 Nov 2015 #12
Why is she "supposed" to say that? skepticscott Nov 2015 #20
IF she wants the Hispanic vote Omaha Steve Nov 2015 #24
Yes, I can definitely see millions of Hispanic voters defecting to Trump skepticscott Nov 2015 #29
undocumented law breakers. ileus Nov 2015 #11
The legal term is illegal alien ripcord Nov 2015 #17
so in other words, she flip flopped...again. nt Javaman Nov 2015 #4
depending on which candidate is engaged as such, it's either a flip-flop and triangulation LanternWaste Nov 2015 #7
she flip flopped. first she was for a barrier and now she's not. Javaman Nov 2015 #14
"the other group of refugees my interventionism and economic policy caused" is too wordy MisterP Nov 2015 #8
Doesn't matter, don't care. Major Hogwash Nov 2015 #13
What about in the general election? philosslayer Nov 2015 #16
As a registered independent coyote Nov 2015 #27
So you won't vote for a Democrat skepticscott Nov 2015 #30
She Needs Plenty of Training McKim Nov 2015 #18
More concerned about her support for the wall than her use of the term. EndElectoral Nov 2015 #23
+1 n/t Joe Shlabotnik Nov 2015 #25

earthside

(6,960 posts)
1. I can't stand Hillary Clinton, but ...
Tue Nov 24, 2015, 03:22 PM
Nov 2015

... I'll defend her or anyone on this point.

Individuals who immigrate into the United States outside of the law are illegal immigrants.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
6. Does your premise and labeling include all of history...
Tue Nov 24, 2015, 03:38 PM
Nov 2015

Does your premise and labeling include all of north American history, or merely in the here and now? If the latter, what is the precise, relevant and objective distinction?

 

skepticscott

(13,029 posts)
21. It covers any sovereign nation
Tue Nov 24, 2015, 08:37 PM
Nov 2015

which has chosen to exercise its legitimate right to set laws controlling its borders.

 

skepticscott

(13,029 posts)
28. The right to control borders
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 07:07 AM
Nov 2015

is inherent in the concept of sovereignty. And just because nobody has gone around with a big piece of chalk and drawn all those lines on the ground doesn't mean that there aren't or shouldn't be any borders.

If you think there should be no such thing as countries or nations or states, and that everyone on earth should just mill around wherever they please, just say so. You would find it very hard to collect taxes, provide services, or accomplish much of anything, though.

S_B_Jackson

(906 posts)
31. Last I checked, the Rio Grande River
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 08:59 AM
Nov 2015

does have a physical existence and does mark the agreed upon border between Mexico and the US state of Texas. And yes, there is a right by both the US and Mexico to control the integrity and passage of migrants across this border.

 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
9. Who decides who is "legal" and "illegal"?
Tue Nov 24, 2015, 04:29 PM
Nov 2015

I think you will find some conflict of opinion among Native American peoples as to the legality of the people currently making such distinctions.

 

skepticscott

(13,029 posts)
19. Yes, they are
Tue Nov 24, 2015, 08:32 PM
Nov 2015

They are in this country in violation of our laws, laws which we have every right to put in place. Lots of people try to paper over that fact with clever euphemisms, but shouldn't one of the main expectations of a visitor to this country be that they respect our laws and customs, even those they find silly or inconvenient, just as they would expect of an American visiting their country?

Our immigration laws may leave a lot to be desired, but that does not give people the right to violate them with impunity.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
12. Thank you so much
Tue Nov 24, 2015, 04:39 PM
Nov 2015

I hope she meant it when she misspoke. I'd feel the same way if Bernie did too. I would hope both don't think that way towards people who want a better life for their family. I think both are good people and she made a mistake.

 

skepticscott

(13,029 posts)
20. Why is she "supposed" to say that?
Tue Nov 24, 2015, 08:34 PM
Nov 2015

Because the PC speech police have designated that as the only acceptable phrase? Because no one is willing to be honest about the fact that they are in this country illegally?

 

skepticscott

(13,029 posts)
29. Yes, I can definitely see millions of Hispanic voters defecting to Trump
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 07:09 AM
Nov 2015

if Hillary isn't PC enough about it.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
7. depending on which candidate is engaged as such, it's either a flip-flop and triangulation
Tue Nov 24, 2015, 03:44 PM
Nov 2015

It's is consistent... depending on which candidate is engaged as such, it's either a flip-flop and triangulation, or the candidate is merely reaching out to its constituents with a maturation of wisdom.

Human bias is ever on display... yet most obvious during primary season.

Javaman

(62,530 posts)
14. she flip flopped. first she was for a barrier and now she's not.
Tue Nov 24, 2015, 05:06 PM
Nov 2015

she seems to change with what is politically convenient for her at the moment.

 

coyote

(1,561 posts)
27. As a registered independent
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 02:18 AM
Nov 2015

I won't vote for her in the GE either. I cannot vote for a corporate candidate that actively works against my best interest, not to mention her history of bad judgement. Most likely, I will sit that election oupt. This country needs a hard turn to the left, not some status quo candidate that is out for herself, not the people.

 

skepticscott

(13,029 posts)
30. So you won't vote for a Democrat
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 08:53 AM
Nov 2015

But you'll help a racist nutball warmongering corporate Republican get elected by sitting home on election day.

Got it.

McKim

(2,412 posts)
18. She Needs Plenty of Training
Tue Nov 24, 2015, 07:28 PM
Nov 2015

She clearly needs training to get up to speed with what people are thinking out there. Too many fancy dinners and too many managed "focus groups" from the uninformed leave her thinking in the past. But is there time enough for training or do we go with Senator Sanders who needs no training on social justice talking and doing points.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Clinton: Saying 'illegal ...