Sen. Sherrod Brown: Mostly “White Males” Who Have Committed Terrorism In U.S. Since 9/11
Source: BuzzFeed
Democratic Sen. Sherrod Brown says most terrorist attacks in the country since the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks have been committed by generally white males.
I think most of us recognize, were concerned but we also know that we trust the FBI and our security forces to do this right, the senator from Ohio said on WAKR radio on Thursday morning. Since the beginning of the Bush administration when we were attacked, September 11th, weve not had any major terrorist attacks in this country. Weve had individual crazy people, of normally, they look more like me than they look like Middle Easterners. They are generally white males, who have shot up people in movie theaters and schools. Those are terrorist attacks, theyre just different kinds of terrorists.
Brown said the U.S. government does a good job at keeping us safe from foreigners seeking to attack the country, but not crazy gunmen who perpetrate mass shootings in schools and other public spaces.
But we have since the early Bush days, when September 11th happened, through the rest of the Bush years, and through the almost six years of the Obama administration, weve kept this country safe, said Brown.
Read more: http://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczynski/sen-sherrod-brown-mostly-white-males-who-have-committed-terr?utm_term=.kiglZ7MJZD#.gv1yXvKgXr
onehandle
(51,122 posts)Often on their own wives and family.
It's just not called terrorism.
If Homeland Security is going to continue to exist, then they should take over the Firearms portion of the ATF and get some things done.
[img][/img]
hack89
(39,171 posts)beevul
(12,194 posts)How are the aproximately 185000 of those who committed suicide, engaging in terrorism, domestic or otherwise?
(Not that I expect an answer)
I guess you thought nobody would notice, huh?
You and your anti-gun buddies claim we pro-gun folks don't care about suicides, but the fact is, you wont find us lumping them in with a bigger group and calling them terrorists.
That's all on you.
Bookmarked.
Response to beevul (Reply #32)
votetastic This message was self-deleted by its author.
beevul
(12,194 posts)Hekate
(90,714 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)7962
(11,841 posts)Such as Aron Alexis, John Allen Muhammed, Lee Malvo
6000eliot
(5,643 posts)7962
(11,841 posts)The word "mostly" wasnt used. Just another "bad white guy" post. I merely pointed out that white males dont have a corner on the market
mwrguy
(3,245 posts)NYCButterfinger
(755 posts)Saying things like that only aggravates white males. I see it every day in the tri-state area where I live. I go to places like Whitestone, Queens, Bensonhurst, Brooklyn, Bay Ridge, Brooklyn, Staten Island, Douglaston, Queens, etc; and when they hear things like this it makes them hate Democrats more. The Republicans will play this tape over and over in 2018 when Brown is up for re-election. Brown needs to be careful, but he may have a point. He has to be careful with what he says. It only increases the GOP's belief that the Democratic Party is the party of Islam.
BlueMTexpat
(15,370 posts)"aggravated" by such truths are part of the problem.
Fortunately, the majority of white males I have had the privilege of interacting with throughout my long life are rarely aggravated by truth. They would concur heartily with Senator Brown in this comment.
And yes, they are primarily either Democrats or Independents, with the occasional Republican who feels as if his party has left him.
Those white men who say that they "hate" Democrats likely never were Democrats and likely never will be. Their demise will certainly occur before that of the Democratic Party.
Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)Sherrod Brown will be senator just as long as he cares to be.
All the places you named are full of angry White male racists who can't vote in my state.
FLPanhandle
(7,107 posts)No one is going into a cinema and shouting "White Males!" and shooting up the place.
It's not done for one purpose.
The terrorists are all saying they are doing for Islam.
840high
(17,196 posts)liberal N proud
(60,336 posts)TomVilmer
(1,832 posts)"In a forthcoming book published by Princeton University Press, Diego Gambetta, a renowned sociologist at the European University Institute in Italy, and Steffen Hertog, an associate professor, provide a new theory for why it is that engineers seem unusually prone to become involved in terrorist organizations. ... It seems that engineers are common in clusters of terrorists that sprang up independently from each other, suggesting that there is some underlying factor that makes engineers more likely to be militants. Gambetta and Hertog find strongly suggestive evidence that engineers are more likely to become terrorists because of the way that they think about the world.
Survey data indicates that engineering faculty at universities are far more likely to be conservative than people with other degrees, and far more likely to be religious. They are seven times as likely to be both religious and conservative as social scientists. Gambetta and Hertog speculate that engineers combine these political predilections with a marked preference towards finding clearcut answers. ... Only a tiny, tiny minority of engineers are likely to become radicalized terrorists. In nearly all cases, engineers are ordinary people. Perhaps they are more likely to be conservative and religiously devout than people in other professions, but this is hardly cause for condemnation.
This logic, however, applies to other people than engineers. If we shouldnt draw problematic generalizations about engineers based on a tiny minority, we plausibly shouldnt be drawing problematic generalizations about refugees, or for that matter about Muslim residents of the U.S. or Europe. Its hard to imagine prominent politicians or pundits making frightening sounding warnings about the dangers of letting engineers walk among us. Yet its no more ridiculous, given the evidence, than their fearful statements about Syrian refugees."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2015/11/17/this-is-the-group-thats-surprisingly-prone-to-violent-extremism/
liberal N proud
(60,336 posts)I don't deal much with faculty any longer since I no longer live in a college town, did for 20 years though and never saw any of the profs in church and the community was a pretty faithful community.
The conservative part is neither true or false from my observations over the years, but the engineers I have worked with over the years are either adamantly conservative or adamantly liberal, you learn who you have to be careful discussing your view around as you learn how they will handle differing views.
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)find out why they are afraid to embrace the term "Radical Christian" domestic terrorism.
7962
(11,841 posts)Compared to how many have been done by mentally ill people?
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)7962
(11,841 posts)Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)that promote Islam?
Are you thinking that the Paris attack was to promote Islam? How do you think that works? Does your church blow people up as part of its community outreach program? Of course it doesn't. No one blows shit up to promote a religion.
Do you think the Irish Catholics and Northern Irish Protestants were attacking each other (and innocent bystanders) to promote Catholicism or Anglicanism?
Do you think the violence between Palestinians and Israelis grows out of an effort to promote Judaism or to promote the Sunni Muslim faith?
BlueMTexpat
(15,370 posts)keep promoting the same tired bigotry with the same tired RW rhetoric.
"Promoting" Islam - or any other religion - by blowing people up is hardly a successful technique.
If anything, it reduces the number of potential converts.
EX500rider
(10,849 posts)It's more submit to Islam or die then it is to promote....but still done with a religious motivation.
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)religious act any more than the burning of witches in Salem was a Christian religious act or IRA car bombs was a Catholic religious act.
840high
(17,196 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)see how Bush has a more enlightened and tolerant view than you:
http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/infocus/ramadan/islam.html
840high
(17,196 posts)sofa king
(10,857 posts)I was just looking down this long list of headlines that would have been considered absurdist comedy twenty years ago, and wondering to myself if there was anyone sane left in this poop-spattered future, and yes! Yes there is, thanks to Senator Sherrrod Brown and brooklynite!
shenmue
(38,506 posts)Maeve
(42,282 posts)Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)I've been saying this for a while.
Mass shootings in the US? Not done by Muslims.
Every single successful Presidential assassination, and assassination attempt in History - adult white male christians.
School shootings? Hmm, what's the physical traits of all of those again? What's the religious background? hmmm.
Yet we don't profile every single white christian male.. now do we? Of course not, that would be ridiculous. So, why is it okay to profile every single one of a 1.6 BILLION person demographic for the crimes of an extremely small percentage of their demographic?
7962
(11,841 posts)John Hinckley did it for Jodie Foster. Oswald was a communist, not a Christian.
But if you want to go that route, then we should also factor race into ALL shootings and other violent crime. Look those stats up.
Judi Lynn
(160,545 posts)7962
(11,841 posts)Just that he WAS a communist. ANd he didnt kill for religion. He also didnt like the fact that his wife baptized their child either.
Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)ridiculous to profile on that basis?
Judi Lynn
(160,545 posts)spooky3
(34,460 posts)7962
(11,841 posts)although I would call the Hassan massacre a "major incident" of terrorism for sure.
spooky3
(34,460 posts)Is what I reference. See the 3rd line from the bottom of the OP.
George II
(67,782 posts)WestIndianArchie
(386 posts)Sounds like Sen. Brown wants to get to the root of the problem.
olddad56
(5,732 posts)and their names start with George, Dick and Donald.
EX500rider
(10,849 posts)madville
(7,412 posts)"white males" so technically his statement could be even more true.
EX500rider
(10,849 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Taitertots
(7,745 posts)Just wait for the horrific implications of treating every heinous crime as terrorism.
They_Live
(3,236 posts)Every day, the main stories on local news on TV consists of shootings and murder. I'm usually just waiting for the weather forecast, then turn it off.
IronLionZion
(45,460 posts)unless it is done by a muslim.
In all seriousness, while mass shootings ares terrifying, GOP politicians have claimed they are not terrorism unless there is a political agenda. It's a murky legal move as the government has tried using anti-terrorism laws and patriot act to investigate and prosecute organized crime syndicates, drug smugglers, and gangs who commit mass murder.
EX500rider
(10,849 posts)Hekate
(90,714 posts)zwyziec
(173 posts)missing a key descripitve word of local terrorists
madville
(7,412 posts)and just a "White Male" can also be a White Muslim Male. Just saying "white male" is lazy and alienates a large portion of the population.