An ISIS defector explained a key reason people continue joining the group
Source: Business Insider
Despite ISIS's claims of ruling over a Islamic "caliphate" in line with Sharia law, a large number of the group's fighters joined for reasons having little to do with religion, according to a defector from the group that The Daily Beast's Michael Weiss interviewed in Istanbul, Turkey.
Instead, people are joining the organization because they are desperate for money and are struggling to find a way to survive in Syria, where four years of civil war have decimated the economy.
The ISIS defector, who goes by the pseudonym Abu Khaled, spoke with Weiss about the group's internal dynamics, and what it was like to live under ISIS's rule.
According to Abu Khaled, a large number of people are joining ISIS because they need money. After joining the militants, people are paid in US dollars instead of Syrian liras. Abu Khaled said that ISIS also runs its own currency exchanges.
Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/isis-defector-explains-why-people-continue-joining-group-2015-11
Once again, Bernie has been proven correct. It's the billionaires who are directly or indirectly causing the problem. Well, and governments haven't helped the situation.
Z
forest444
(5,902 posts)The Saudis.
When those poor bastards join for the money, that's Saudi money they're getting.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)Can you please connect the dots for us?
Remember that a key point in the article was that:
"People are joining the organization because they are desperate for money and are struggling to find a way to survive in Syria, where four years of civil war have decimated the economy."
Now, we're talking about thousands of people who, at a minimum, require provisions and other resources of at least a few thousand dollars per man annually. That's many millions of dollars - and it's no secret that millions in Saudi aid is being purposely diverted to ISIS (or whatever they call themselves these days) for the short-sighted and incredibly selfish goal the Saudis have of deposing Assad.
And what's worse, they're playing us like chumps - like they always do.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)Response to Buzz Clik (Reply #14)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)ISIS has their own oil wells and sell it in the international market. That oil gets them the $$ to pay their fellow terrorists.
forest444
(5,902 posts)But how did they get in the first place? By taking over large swaths of Syrian territory.
And how did they do that?
Remember, Syria is a heavily militarized country (this isn't Rwanda we're talking about here). To have gotten as far as they have, has to go down as one of the most notable military campaigns in history - and that, mon ami, requires access to gigantic amounts of the best equipment, as well as billions. Saudi billions.
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)forest444
(5,902 posts)Not to mention that it doesn't explain how they took over all that (heavily militarized) territory to begin with.
Someone should have to show me some pretty convincing proof of that - especially knowing what we know about the Saudis and their proclivity for financing extremist groups.
Nothing personal; but taking you at your word solely would be tantamount to giving them a huge benefit of the doubt - of the kind we at DU shouldn't do as people who consider ourselves keen observers of the world and all its madness.
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)This is just my opinion from what I've gathered. Take care, Forest.
forest444
(5,902 posts)And to be fair, it's not just the Saudis:
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)It is sold, no? To whom? How is this possible? Why hasn't this been cut off?
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)If you are serious, then:
1) How do I know, but they are selling it.
2) How is it impossible?
3) Good question. They seem to be trying harder. We'll have to see.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)Bernie said climate change was the biggest cause of terrorism.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)That Hillary logo won't protect you when you say shit like that.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)Don't even try to threaten me.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2015/11/17/fact-check-bernie-sanders-climate-link-terrorism/75950720/
Absolutely, Sanders said. In fact, climate change is directly related to the growth of terrorism. And if we do not get our act together and listen to what the scientists say youre gonna see countries all over the world this is what the CIA says, theyre gonna be struggling over limited amounts of water, limited amounts of land to grow their crops. And youre gonna see all kinds of international conflict.
On CBS Face the Nation the following day, Dickerson asked Sanders to expand on his statement that climate change in fact is related to terrorism.
Sanders, Nov. 15: Well, thats not only my observation, John. That is what the CIA and the Department of Defense tells us. And the reason is pretty obvious. If we are going to see an increase in drought and flooding and extreme weather disturbances as a result of climate change, what that means is that peoples all over the world are going to be fighting over limited natural resources.
If there is not enough water, if there is not enough land to grow your crops, then youre going to see migrations of people fighting over land that will sustain them. And that will lead to international conflicts.
I think, when we talk about all of the possible ravages of climate change, which, to my mind, is just a huge planetary crisis, increased international conflict is one of the issues that we have got to appreciate will happen.
Dickerson: But how does drought connect with attacks by ISIS in the middle of Paris?
Sanders: Well, what happens, say, in Syria, for example and theres some thought about this is that, when you have drought, when people cant grow their crops, theyre going to migrate into cities. And when people migrate into cities, and they dont have jobs, theres going to be a lot more instability, a lot more unemployment. And people will be subject to the types of propaganda that al Qaeda and ISIS are using right now. So, where you have discontent, where you have instability, thats where problems arise. And, certainly, without a doubt, climate change will lead to that.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)geez.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)Geebus effin cristo.
Take a step back accompanied by a deep breath, and try to keep in mind where the threat actual sits. *
=============
*zalinda actually insulted the hell out of you. And I get this?
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)Who even gives a shit about stuff like that?
zalinda
(5,621 posts)which means you can't eat. Can't feed your family, you will do anything so they don't go hungry.
Very simple, even a Hillary supporter should be able to follow that.
Z
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)The poster said it was billionaires and that Bernie was right about that
Bernie said it was climate change as I pointed out
LiberalLovinLug
(14,174 posts)to pollute and destroy third world countries environments.
But you are more interested in scoring a cheap hit on a somewhat vague OP description.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)The billionaires fund paying that labor.
Ghost Dog
(16,881 posts)the biggest cause, yet. (The "yet" is me speaking: my opinion - I have degree in Environmental Sciences from the 1970s- It will over time become an increasingly significant factor leading to more terrorism, police states, martial law and war, as well as drought, famine and disease).
peace13
(11,076 posts)Where do the US dollars come from to pay theses people? I read the article about where the funding comes from but it didn't explain this issue.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)own currency exchange?
carla
(553 posts)from the sale of oil. It only sells in dollars. I also wondered how much US tax money that actually is. Remember the billions of dollars on pallets that "went to war" in Iraq and disappeared?
90-percent
(6,829 posts)Ah, yes, the memories of the early parts of the invasion. Billions of dollars on shrink wrapped pallets. What could possibly go wrong? And so many memories of meanness, creepiness, ham handedness, hypocrisy and especially stupidity.
I knew the reasons for war were bogus, consider the absurdity of the constantly changing reasons for the invasion, started to stop the mushroom clouds and changed into bringing democracy to Iraq.
I did not know it would end up as an endless expensive craven sacrifice to the MIC and big oil and oligarchs everywhere.
What was especially painful about the corruption was the suffering it caused - including all the innocents betrayed for American bounty and off to Guantanamo. And torture. A terrorist attack by Dick Cheney and company on the fundamental principles we used to be proud of given to us by really really smart generous Forefthers that wanted fairness and equality for all. kind of, hiccups on the way with slavery and bogus wars and gilded ages and all that.
welcome to du
-90% Jimmy
tclambert
(11,087 posts)Apparently, no one could find a pen and paper to write receipts.
And what has become of the mercenaries that "helped" lose that $$?
peace13
(11,076 posts)FairWinds
(1,717 posts)our "ally" Turkey.
Nearly all ISIS supplies go through Turkey
with a wink and a nod.
Veterans For Peace
eissa
(4,238 posts)In a region where pre-marital sex can be punishable by death, and where due to economic reasons many have had to put off marriage, here's an easy way to not only get paid, but fuck some sex slaves.
I'm not giving these degenerates a pass by believing that they only joined up for a fucking job. They know exactly what these savages are doing to their countrymen -- the murders, rapes and upheaval they are causing. There is no excuse.
christx30
(6,241 posts)on the other hand, they have a good dental plan, and a 401(k), so what they hey."
jwirr
(39,215 posts)of control and fear. So it is not just a reason to join a group.
eissa
(4,238 posts)I'm just not buying that these guys joined up because there was a job opening. They believe the ideology, they want the power it gives them, and if fucking an Assyrian or Yazidi child is part of the package, all the better.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)much their belief in extreme Islam but the hatred between the groups or denominations that are found in the religion. If we look at the way the Reformation effected Europe for decades of religious wars it is easy to see what role religion plays in this.
I don't think that there is any one reason for the wars in the ME. In fact there is seldom an action that does not have more than one reason.
Not to mention that women and children are often the tools used to show power in wars. That is something that I have always found most sickening about war and why for the most part I am a pacifist.
WhoWoodaKnew
(847 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)"Dad, I'm hungry" and have no food, and no hope of getting food.
That won't make you into a war criminal, but ISIS has plenty of not-war-crime work that needs to be done.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)form of religion. This is what was behind many of the wars throughout history. This must be considered part of any attempt to stop these wars.
And as to your comment regarding governments - think about the rulers of the ME countries. They are equivalent to our billionaires. Hoarding all the wealth to themselves.
And then you add in the damage our war has done to their area plus a drought that brings a food shortage we see the world in our future unless we start getting rid of the inequality in wealth that causes this.
The fanatical religion is one of their tools to build their power through fear. They show us beheadings on the tv so that we become afraid just as our Rs use it for the same reason.
the beheadings, frequent random spectacular atrocities, scary desert garb, automatic weaponry... Branding to create their particular form of that age old human endeavor - the power grab.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)the cause.
carla
(553 posts)With aspirations. But thugs nonetheless. Give no quarter.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)might help stop it? WWII was a result of treaties from WWI that made things worse instead of better. Maybe just maybe we should remember that lesson.
RobinA
(9,893 posts)But that simple understanding does not lead to a way to counteract them effectively. There is no known antidote for Thug.
RobinA
(9,893 posts)as well to the people the recruit from Europe et al.? This partially answers the question I've been asking for a couple days now - Who are these people? It also makes them seem both more sophisticated and more vulnerable than they are normally portrayed.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)both the US and Europe they are usually young kids. Do you remember how many kids just out of high school ran to enlist during the Cuban missile crisis? To some youth war is romantic. An adventure.
that ever present problem - young men with too few meaningful things to do. For whatever reason.
Heeeeers Johnny
(423 posts)FLPanhandle
(7,107 posts)Hell, even the Nazi's had a better excuse. They at least believed their ideology or used the "I was only obeying orders" excuse.
"So, Dr. Megele, why'd you commit those atrocities?"
"Oh, it was for the money"
If ISIS members are doing this just for money, then they are lower than I even dreamed they could be.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Last edited Thu Nov 19, 2015, 03:23 PM - Edit history (1)
What army doesn't pay?
You think people sign up for even the US Army and say, "Oh, hey, cool, I can get college tuition too!" For some, that's the REASON they signed up.
And, no, I'm not making some cockeyed equivalency comparison. I'm simply pointing out that if you join any fighting force, you are going to get fed, clothed, housed, and paid. In an environment where people do not have other options for those things, then why is that a "bad reason" to join?
"Hell, even the Nazi's had a better excuse."
Surely you are familiar with economic conditions in Germany and Austria in the late 1930's. "Sound of Music" notwithstanding, the majority of Austrians welcomed the opportunities that consolidation with Germany provided. They were in pretty dire straights.
FLPanhandle
(7,107 posts)And many people join out of patriatism. Lots of folks signed up after 9/11, Pearl Harbor, etc. It wasn't for the pay. It wasn't because of some new college program.
ISIS isn't a army protecting thier country from outside It's a gang that is killing, raping, and making sex slaves of it's own people.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)I think if we quit paying them, a lot of people wouldn't show up for work. If the college program and other benefits were not inducements to join, we wouldn't have them.
My father was in ROTC long before Pearl Harbor, so it didn't have a whole lot to do with being upset at the Japanese, and it did have a whole lot to do with having no other way to attend college. He re-upped several times, served in two wars, was awarded a Bronze Star, and told me many times as a child, "Whatever you do, don't join the army."
And, yes, you are absolutely correct that ISIS is not an army protecting their country etc.. People wouldn't join criminal gangs either if there wasn't something in it for them. So, I don't understand the point you are trying to make. The fact of the matter is that ISIS provides an opportunity to get paid and, just like a lot of other things that are done on an organized full-time commitment basis, if it didn't pay, then a lot fewer people would do it. People don't join the Mafia out of any sense of higher purpose either. It does, however, pay.
FLPanhandle
(7,107 posts)Which is why I hold them in even lower contempt. They aren't doing this for some noble purpose or defending innocents. It's all about committing atrocitites for pay.
I
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)I guess I just don't get the point you are making.
you better believe that if ISIS could field an effective force WITHOUT paying, they surely would not be paying.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)The poster is specifically aimed at recruiting African Americans.
Note the absence of anything like "Help fight to free slaves".
Note the prominence of what you get paid.
Here's another one:
I can't read the fine print, but I can pretty much tell what I'd get for signing up.
FLPanhandle
(7,107 posts)Or protecting the union wasn't a consideration.
I suppose it the South had paid more, the Union army would have deserted in mass?
It's more than money and you know it.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Go argue with whomever designed it.
RobinA
(9,893 posts)were made up only of people willing to die for a greater cause they would be small indeed. In fact, the world would be a better place.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)"Manly exercises are encouraged"
and promises good hunting, fishing, and beautiful scenery.
So much for the meaning of "volunteers" in the modern sense.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)I don't know if the Navy ever paid the Village People for highlighted those manly exercises, though.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Note the stirring call to patriotic duty on this one:
FLPanhandle
(7,107 posts)Where did you find them?
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)A few months ago, I visited one of our local landmarks (Fort Delaware), which I had been to a zillion times as a kid. This time around, I was quite taken by a recruiting poster on display in the museum, and the various pay rates on it.
It sort of left me with a "they sure did emphasize the money" feeling.
Think about it, though. $438 up front. In the 1860's. $4 a month for single men, and $6 a month for married men.
Well, that's a plan right there, eh? "Oh, Betsy..."
Loads here:
https://www.google.com/search?q=civil+war+recruiting+posters&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0CAgQ_AUoAmoVChMIocSJ3qGdyQIVgXs-Ch0D8gqZ&biw=1568&bih=869
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Here is the average weekly wage for 60 hours a week:
Occupation 1860, 1870, 1880, 1890
blacksmith, 10.68, 18.24, 15.54, 16.26
carpenter, 10.92, 24.60, 16.56, 19.32
machinist, 9.48, 15.60, 13.62, 14.58
laborers, 5.88, 9.36, 8.10, 9.06
http://outrunchange.com/2012/06/14/typical-wages-in-1860-through-1890/
Can you imagine your best prospects for unskilled work being around $1 a day, and the state militia is offering to hand you a couple hundred in cold-hard cash - more cash than you've ever seen in one place - just for signing up?
So, out of further curiosity, I wondered what it looks like now:
http://www.military.com/recruiting/bonus-center/news/army-offers-$20k-quick-ship-bonus
Maj. Gen. Thomas P. Bostick, commander of U.S. Army Recruiting Command, credited the $20,000 quick-ship bonus with helping to motivate would-be soldiers who were on the fence into joining the ranks.
http://www.military.com/recruiting/bonus-center/
I think Gen. Bostick put it quite well. There are some substantial "motivations" to heed the call of patriotism.
eppur_se_muova
(36,269 posts)Civil War Draft Records: Exemptions and Enrollments
By Michael T. Meier
Grover Cleveland, urbane, sometimes wise, and a future President of the United States, never served in the military during the Civil War. He was healthy, of the appropriate age, and educated. His Buffalo, New York, law practice provided him a comfortable living.
George Templeton Strong, urbane, sometimes wise, and always opinionated, never served in the Union army. He, too, was healthy, of the appropriate age, and educated. His New York City law practice provided him a comfortable income.
John D. Rockefeller, a Cleveland, Ohio, merchant, was also healthy and eligible to serve in the armed forces of the United States. He did not experience the Civil War in uniform.
These men, and many others, avoided military service by simply taking advantage of that section of the Enrollment Act of 1863 allowing draftees to pay $300 to a substitute who served for them. 1 This amount, presumably a healthy sum in 1863, did not long remain the norm, for George Templeton Strong, pluckier than many of his contemporaries, paid a "big 'Dutch' boy of about twenty" $1,100 to be his "alter ego" in 1864. 2
http://www.archives.gov/publications/prologue/1994/winter/civil-war-draft-records.html
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)who just do what they're told and provide the footsoldiers.
FLPanhandle
(7,107 posts)I guess I should feel sorry for them. Poor lads, just trying to make ends meet.
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)and they also take strong drugs to keep them going on their sprees, so you're right, they're not the nicest of guys.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)ISIS is actually running a country. There are jobs to be done that do not involve committing war crimes.
I don't think it's reasonable to expect someone to choose to starve to death over directing traffic.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Among the participants in Shay's Rebellion were revolutionary war soldiers who were quite happy to take up arms against the United States because they hadn't received their pensions.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)ck4829
(35,077 posts)Just literally flood them with money, but mark that money of course.
It sounds ridiculous, but they are paying cash and they have their own currency exchanges, so they do measure this, so this exchange and their assets do gain and lose value according to their own analysis.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)it would greatly harm Daesh and significantly stabilize the area.
A significant amount of the aid would also find its way to Daesh, so such "aid bombs" are not going to happen.
Truprogressive85
(900 posts)Deash has a black market for oil, also there are people in Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states who are funding them
its time to stop p*** footing and call the fundies out ! Those who support Wahhabism/salafism support Daesh and they are not our allies
7962
(11,841 posts)It might be a little more believable if they were just a criminal organization stealing oil.
But they're not. They're actively killing everywhere they go
Beacool
(30,250 posts)How does someone go from needing to scratch a living to brutal killer, gang raping women, decapitating men and generally killing anyone in their path?
FLPanhandle
(7,107 posts)They are just poor boys looking for a paycheck.
Beacool
(30,250 posts)There's NO justification for bringing down planes or bombing civilians. To me they are a bunch of cowards. It doesn't take much courage to be fully armed and start shooting at unarmed people. If they are so manly, let them meet soldiers who are as well armed as them and look them in the eye. Killing women and children is not honorable and a sin in Allah's eyes.
RobinA
(9,893 posts)It's about trying to understand the problem so it can be solved. It's fine to sit around and make moral denunciations of some really nasty guys, but that doesn't lead to a solution.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)JEB
(4,748 posts)Works like a champ here until limping home or deep six-ed.
Beacool
(30,250 posts)That's insulting to our young people who mostly joined to get an education.
valerief
(53,235 posts)the first world countries.
Beacool
(30,250 posts)But that's where the comparison ends. These people act like monsters.
valerief
(53,235 posts)Hydra
(14,459 posts)People and their short memories...
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)But the organization itself has a lot to do with religion.
tclambert
(11,087 posts)But they didn't have any Boston Cream-filled donuts. So don't get too excited.
Vincardog
(20,234 posts)Offered by the economy devastated by the "Job Creator" parasites.
If your economy has been destroyed and you can't make a living you JOIN A GANG
The police or the military are just different brands than the Crips Bloods Shia or Sunni
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)embrace this hateful ideology and plotting terrorists attacks in Western countries.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)We'd be thrilled if we were down to the people coming from the West.
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)to join ISIS which I think is very likely in a number of cases. But poverty doesn't explain why Western men and women join.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)They go to "school" to learn bomb making, how to use a gun and the like. I was thinking, "Why would people give up their little boys to be suicide bombers and fighters?" It's the same as parents giving up their girls into sex slavery. They are so poor they need the money, and they don't see another way. Either the child leaves the home for these "jobs" or he/she/the family starves. These people are so desperate. We need to have some understanding of their motivations as this article shows.
We really need to tax the rich more to help out people who are so poor they sell their children.
zalinda
(5,621 posts)can't wrap their head around this type of poverty. They still seem to believe that poor people are poor because they don't work hard enough. Of course, these people couldn't handle one day in the life of these people, let alone years of grinding poverty. It's almost like telling someone that they should have been born to richer parents, these people should have born in safer countries.
Z