Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jpak

(41,758 posts)
Thu Nov 19, 2015, 11:46 AM Nov 2015

Arrest Made In Theft Of Weapons From Worcester Armory

Source: CBS News Boston

WORCESTER (CBS) — A 34-year-old man has been arrested in connection with a weapons theft at a Worcester armory on Saturday.

The FBI announced Thursday morning that James Walker Morales was taken into custody Wednesday night by authorities on New York’s Long Island on state and federal warrants. Morales is charged with unlawful possession of a machine gun and unlawful possession of firearms.

<more>

Read more: http://boston.cbslocal.com/2015/11/19/worcester-armory-weapons-theft-fbi-arrest/

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Arrest Made In Theft Of Weapons From Worcester Armory (Original Post) jpak Nov 2015 OP
A few people predicted this would turn out to be an inside job. crim son Nov 2015 #1
Doesn’t sound like it... dorkzilla Nov 2015 #3
Good point. crim son Nov 2015 #5
They’ve updated the link - “Former Army Reservist” and some additional information dorkzilla Nov 2015 #9
In most Armories, there are NOT had to find, hard to get into but not to find... happyslug Nov 2015 #7
Apparently the guy was a former reservist dorkzilla Nov 2015 #10
They were right. It was an inside job. tabasco Nov 2015 #12
Wow, guy sounds like a gem... dorkzilla Nov 2015 #2
Jimmy Walker? Renew Deal Nov 2015 #4
Holy crap, charged with child rape in May but just wearing a monitor bracelet? denverbill Nov 2015 #6
dumbass jpak Nov 2015 #8
Charged, but not yet convicted? JustABozoOnThisBus Nov 2015 #11
One odd thing in the criminal complaint Crabby Appleton Nov 2015 #13

dorkzilla

(5,141 posts)
3. Doesn’t sound like it...
Thu Nov 19, 2015, 12:02 PM
Nov 2015

but i’m curious to know how he knew exactly where the gun vault was and that no one was going to be in the armory at that time. He may have had inside information.

dorkzilla

(5,141 posts)
9. They’ve updated the link - “Former Army Reservist” and some additional information
Thu Nov 19, 2015, 03:35 PM
Nov 2015
Morales was also convicted in 2013 of aggravated assault and battery, the FBI stated. He was at the armory two days before the burglary to pick up discharge papers, according to the FBI.


Inside job!
 

happyslug

(14,779 posts)
7. In most Armories, there are NOT had to find, hard to get into but not to find...
Thu Nov 19, 2015, 03:09 PM
Nov 2015

The feds have some very strict specs for such vaults, thick steel reinforced Concrete walls, the floors are first on the list, along with a thick steel roof. It must have electronic alarms (When I was in boot camp in Guard Duty if we needed backup we were told just hit the wall of the Armory with a stone, it would set off the alarms and the MPS will arrive quickly).

Now, some Armories do not have those thick Steel reinforced walls. My old First Sargeent told us of his arguments with the feeds and his old Hunt Armory In Pittsburgh. instead of steel reinforced concrete walls, it had six feet of oak. The Feds wanted Concrete for that what they regs wanted, but the six feet of Oak was even stronger and harder to get into then steel AND he had the Engineering studies and reports to prove it. Every so often the feds would come back and wanted their concrete and every time he would have to bring out the studies and show them what they wanted was WEAKER then what existed. Hunt Armory was built AFTER the 1877 General Strike and the National Guard wanted a secure place for weapons. In the 1877 Strike, Pittsburgh was one of the center of the Strike. Do to fears that the Pittsburgh National Guard were NOT help put down the Strike, the other two Brigades of the Pennsylvania National Guard, Philadelphia and Harrisburg, were sent to Pittsburgh. It is clear from day one of the strike that the Pittsburgh Brigade of the Pennsylvania National Guard was suspect (i.e. they supported the strikers). In one Incident, the Philadelphia National Guard open fired on the Strikers but that was stopped due to fears the Pittsburgh National Guard on their flank was going to open fire AND NOT ON THE STRIKERS. That night it was decided to sent the Pittsburgh National Guard home, since they had no place to secure the weapons, the Pittsburgh Brigade was sent home with their weapons. That night the remaining units had one of the worse nights in combat history, constant fire from the strikers. Gun Stores were giving away guns to be fired on them. It is suspected that Pittsburgh Guardsmen remained and fired on the troops that remained. The Strikers even managed to get a Civil War Cannon off its war memorial and were loading it when the Guardsmen open fire on the men manning the cannon. That fire fight to keep men away from the cannon lasted all night. The next day the National Guard marched out of town with the strikers at their heels. Gating guns were used on the Strikers to keep them away. Pittsburgh was left to the strikers, and then all food and other shipments were denied into Pittsburgh till the City Fathers managed to convince people that they would be no food till the strike ended AND anyone leaving the town would be gunned down. Trains still ran THROUGH Pittsburgh, but with Gating guns before the engineers with order shoot anyone on the tracks and NOT to stop for anything.

I bring up the 1877 Strike for Hunt Armory was built afterward basically to store the guns of the Pittsburgh National Guard. The internal armories were designed to be bomb proof thus the massive oaks used. Such Armories have been the norm ever since, thick walls that are bomb proof but do to their size hard to miss.

Now, most a such armories are unmanned most of the time. The only time their are manned is when the Unit is being called into service (actual service or training), where their weapons may be needed. At such times the bolts of the various arms in the armories are returned to the armory. I pointed this out below, but the bolts of the firearms in such National Guard Armories are RARELY kept in the same armory as the weapons. Most of the time the bolts are kept in some local police station armory, an armory that is manned 24 hours a day seven days a week, The weapons without their bolts are useless, except as decorations. In theory you can order new bolts, but that would be a dead giveaway as to who stole the rifles. Since the Mid 1970s the bolts of M16s and semi-automatic AR-15s have been slightly different to make then technically non-interchangeable (Prior to the Mid 1970s the only difference was in the trigger mechanism between M16 and semi-automatic AR-15s but in the mid 1970s Colt changed the bolt to the civilian AR-15 from its Military AR-15, the later is called by the US Military the M16, the change was do to a previous robbery where it was reported all the thieves had to do was order AR-15 bolts).

Anyway, I suspect it was easy to find the Armory and being unmanned but locked, he managed to break the lock and steal the weapons, but without their bolts. Thus he had some fancy toys but nothing functional.

Bolts have been kept separate from weapons since the days of Bolt Action Rifles in National Guard Armories that are NOT manned 24/7 (and most are NOT). Thus anyone looking for a bolt for an AR-15 will be reported to the Government by anyone who even heard of this robbery. Being how quick they caught the theft I suspect it was a crime of opportunity, he thought he was going to get something he could sell, but ended up with nothing but a long prison sentence.

dorkzilla

(5,141 posts)
10. Apparently the guy was a former reservist
Thu Nov 19, 2015, 03:37 PM
Nov 2015

and was there to pickup discharge papers 2 days before the break in.

Morales was also convicted in 2013 of aggravated assault and battery, the FBI stated. He was at the armory two days before the burglary to pick up discharge papers, according to the FBI.



 

tabasco

(22,974 posts)
12. They were right. It was an inside job.
Thu Nov 19, 2015, 04:07 PM
Nov 2015

Former member of the unit who was at the armory two days before the "heist."

dorkzilla

(5,141 posts)
2. Wow, guy sounds like a gem...
Thu Nov 19, 2015, 11:59 AM
Nov 2015
Authorities say the man left four “reddish brown stains” in and around the weapons vault. They claim DNA obtained from those stains was a match for Morales, who had been wearing a monitoring bracelet after he was charged with child rape back in May.


THIS is the kind of guy who needs to be locked away.

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,350 posts)
11. Charged, but not yet convicted?
Thu Nov 19, 2015, 04:05 PM
Nov 2015

In addition to the bracelet, he was probably also instructed to stay away from children.

Now he'll also be told to stay away from federal armories.

Crabby Appleton

(5,231 posts)
13. One odd thing in the criminal complaint
Fri Nov 20, 2015, 02:47 PM
Nov 2015

#7 & #8

state the alarm went off at 9:07 PM on 14 Nov, and the Army reported at 7:30 AM on the 15th that arms were missing. What happened between those times, did it take them that long to respond to the alarm or what?




https://cbsboston.files.wordpress.com/2015/11/affidavit-complaint-and-tt1-tt228229.pdf

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Arrest Made In Theft Of W...