Obama: It would be a 'mistake' to use ground troops against ISIS
Source: the hill.com
By Jordan Fabian - 11/16/15 10:28 AM EST
President Obama on Monday ruled out sending more ground troops to fight the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) in response to the terrorist attacks in Paris.
During a press conference at the Group of 20 summit meeting in Turkey, Obama pushed back against calls for the U.S. to broadly rethink its strategy against the extremist group.
It is not just my view, but the view of my closest military and civilian advisers, that that would be a mistake, Obama said of sending additional U.S. troops to take on ISIS.
A strategy has to be one that can be sustained, Obama added.
Given the fact there are sacrifices involved in any military action, it is best that we dont shoot first and aim later, the president added. Its important for us to get the strategy right, and the strategy that we are pursuing is the right one.
Obama showed frustration with multiple questions about whether he underestimated the threat posed by ISIS against Western nations.
The president sniped at reporters who asked him why the U.S. isnt doing more to fight the group in the Middle East. I just spent the last three questions answering that question, he told one.
He has come under fire for saying the group has been geographically contained, a remark which was broadcast just hours before the series of coordinated attacks in the French capital killed at least 120 people and injured many more. Republicans have resurfaced Obamas comment from last year calling ISIS a JV team.
But Obama said his critics have not presented a viable alternative to the strategy the U.S. has pursued against ISIS.
My only interest is to end suffering and to keep the American people safe. If there is a good idea out there, then were going to do it, he said.
He took a veiled swipe at Republican presidential candidate Ben Carson, who last week suggested he has better intelligence than administration about the conflict in Syria.
Folks want to pop off and have opinions on what they think they would do, present a specific plan, Obama said. If they think that somehow their advisers are better than the chairman of my Joint Chiefs of Staff or the folks on the ground, I want to meet them and we can have that debate............................
Read more: http://thehill.com/policy/defense/260252-obama-it-would-be-a-mistake-to-use-ground-troops-against-isis
Smack down to Republicans. Thank you
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)They think he's a puppet of the MIC.
Wonder what they think of this.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)Who was urging attacks in 2012 and who now calls for a no-fly zone, which could well bring us into direct conflict with Assad and the Russians.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)What is this bizarre notion that we don't have forces in Syria? Just because we don't have big ground numbers doesn't mean we aren't there.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)forest444
(5,902 posts)If we truly wish to honor the dead, let us never give those IS-hole bastards anything they want.
And what they want - besides (fucking degenerate) Saudi money - is publicity and anything that will rally the millions of desperates Bush's wars left behind in the Middle East.
Sending our men and women in uniform to die fighting them would be an answer to their prayers.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)Or do you mean people in the military? Please don't call people in the military "boots" as it dehumanizes then and makes it sound not so bad. Risking boots is one thing, risking people an entirely different thing.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,234 posts)mwrguy
(3,245 posts)Obviously we already have some.
Javaman
(62,530 posts)SpankMe
(2,957 posts)That's a slam, and a good one. Not only are Republican candidates talking out of their asses, but half the stuff they're proposing if elected is CURRENT POLICY anyway!
Xolodno
(6,395 posts)These guys don't wear uniforms and aren't afraid to hide behind civilians.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)but i don't trust that ground troops won't end up there in significant numbers.