Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Galraedia

(5,026 posts)
Mon May 21, 2012, 11:03 AM May 2012

Grover Norquist: Trying To Stop Billionaires From Dodging Taxes Makes You A Nazi

Source: ThinkProgress

After Facebook co-founder Eduardo Saverin avoided some $67 million in taxes by renouncing his American citizenship shortly before the company made its initial public offering, Sens. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and Bob Casey (D-PA) introduced the “Ex-Patriot” Act. The bill would make former citizens subject to the capital gains tax on U.S. investments and bar those who renounce citizenship for tax purposes from reentering the country.


To American for Tax Reform President Grover Norquist, Schumer and Casey’s effort is akin to Nazism or South African apartheid, as The Hill reports:

“I think Schumer can probably find the legislation to do this. It existed in Germany in the 1930s and Rhodesia in the ’70s and in South Africa as well,” said Norquist. “He probably just plagiarized it and translated it from the original German.”

The Nazis infamously implemented a departure tax on Jews who tried to flee Germany before World War II. Schumer is Jewish.


Read more: http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/05/21/487465/norquist-billionaire-taxes-nazis/



48 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Grover Norquist: Trying To Stop Billionaires From Dodging Taxes Makes You A Nazi (Original Post) Galraedia May 2012 OP
Turn it back on Norquist LiberalFighter May 2012 #1
Everytime these assholes Iliyah May 2012 #2
Anyone named Grover I can't take seriously anymore. Just like Laffer. Suji to Seoul May 2012 #3
I like Grover awoke_in_2003 May 2012 #41
On Sesame Street, I can take over seriously Suji to Seoul May 2012 #42
Godwin's law has been invoked. Thread over. Woody Woodpecker May 2012 #4
Your serious with Godwin's law? Phlem May 2012 #8
"Godwin's law is a farce." -- Amen to that! FiveGoodMen May 2012 #13
Nazi harun May 2012 #16
Hey! You can't say that! FiveGoodMen May 2012 #17
Godwin's law is simply that the probability of someone making the comparison... Recursion May 2012 #18
I know the rule and understand the Phlem May 2012 #34
Not "thread over" (no one in this thread is pulling the Nazi card) It's *Grover* who went to BlancheSplanchnik May 2012 #25
LOL@'Reductio Ad Hitlerum, and thus, should be OVER!! ' IF ONLY HE WAS... freshwest May 2012 #36
By all means, Grover leftynyc May 2012 #5
Okay. Remind him how the Nazis came for the disabled first. Same killing system he's pushing. freshwest May 2012 #6
+1 L0oniX May 2012 #7
Whoop there it is! lonestarnot May 2012 #35
Outted himself good, didn't he? Freud shouldn't have left that banana peel on the floor. freshwest May 2012 #37
Yes he did. lonestarnot May 2012 #43
If "le$$ $peech" is qualitatively the same as "more $peech", which is what Norquist implies patrice May 2012 #9
In short, he's pretending an extremely uneven playing field isn't uneven and that even if it were patrice May 2012 #10
That reminds me of Bill Maher's False Equivalency video. Pardon me if you've seen it before: freshwest May 2012 #44
Good stuff, that! Been a while since I've seen it. Thanks!! Still trying to think of patrice May 2012 #46
Break that down into paragraphs and I'm there, maybe. I realize we must come to know our choices... freshwest May 2012 #47
What you said is a different version ofwhat I'm thinking. We lose waaaay too much humanity to these patrice May 2012 #48
He saying there are NO emergent properties in these systems, other than the ones that HE SAYS there patrice May 2012 #11
You want to see a Nazi, Grover? No soup for you! KamaAina May 2012 #12
Who died & left him king? Dulcinea May 2012 #14
Privatization is the New Apartheid. Some may have forgotten the pure evil that is Nordquist: freshwest May 2012 #15
Here is a question DonCoquixote May 2012 #19
Indeed, Sir: Norquist Actually Is A Terrorist Supporter, An Open Agent Of Jihad The Magistrate May 2012 #20
I gave you a rec. for your Evil Idiots picture! Hubert Flottz May 2012 #21
Classic example of projection. Accuse other of what you are or wish to be. n/t kiranon May 2012 #22
I rec'd and shared on FB with this comment: BlancheSplanchnik May 2012 #23
Is that dog pomeranian? xtraxritical May 2012 #33
Damn furry furriners takin' Amurkin dog's jobs! Ikonoklast May 2012 #45
+1,000 freshwest May 2012 #38
He is an evil, evil man nobodyspecial May 2012 #24
Jack Rabbit: Helping the wealthy avoid taxes makes you a royalist Jack Rabbit May 2012 #26
Plus a million. freshwest May 2012 #39
so Jewish-American Chuck Schumer is a Nazi? provis99 May 2012 #27
the man who aligns himself with nazi views and their propaganda techniques fascisthunter May 2012 #28
Pre-emptive strikes R them, says my LOLZ translator. freshwest May 2012 #40
“Ex-Patriot” Act may3rd May 2012 #29
This tells me Grover knows he is not paying his fair share. Where is the cookie monster sarcasmo May 2012 #30
culture note: the finger icarusxat May 2012 #31
When you call a Jewish person a Nazi, it is probably the worst thing you can call him/her. Stuart G May 2012 #32

LiberalFighter

(51,020 posts)
1. Turn it back on Norquist
Mon May 21, 2012, 11:07 AM
May 2012

He should be asked how much of his income is taxed and how much is not taxed. As well as how much is tax at each rate.

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)
2. Everytime these assholes
Mon May 21, 2012, 11:38 AM
May 2012

speak there should be people there with mirrors, put them up in front of them because they are exactly what they preach. He is the nazi in the room, no doubt about it.

 

Suji to Seoul

(2,035 posts)
42. On Sesame Street, I can take over seriously
Tue May 22, 2012, 10:20 AM
May 2012

on F Street, I can't seem to say his name without chuckling.

 

Woody Woodpecker

(562 posts)
4. Godwin's law has been invoked. Thread over.
Mon May 21, 2012, 11:46 AM
May 2012

Norquist automatically lost the argument the minute he mentioned the word "Nazi".

See Godwin's law

Phlem

(6,323 posts)
8. Your serious with Godwin's law?
Mon May 21, 2012, 12:12 PM
May 2012

Nail him on the facts instead of invoking this moronic lame rule.

Godwin's law is a farce.

-p

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
18. Godwin's law is simply that the probability of someone making the comparison...
Mon May 21, 2012, 02:31 PM
May 2012

...approaches 1 as the discussion continues. The notion that that "ends" or "loses" the discussion is a later and non-canonical addition.

Phlem

(6,323 posts)
34. I know the rule and understand the
Tue May 22, 2012, 12:03 AM
May 2012

definition, it's the people that invoke it that chaps my hide.....

.......put an effort into the conversation at least.

-p

BlancheSplanchnik

(20,219 posts)
25. Not "thread over" (no one in this thread is pulling the Nazi card) It's *Grover* who went to
Mon May 21, 2012, 04:30 PM
May 2012
reductio ad Hitlerum, and thus, should be OVER!!


 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
5. By all means, Grover
Mon May 21, 2012, 12:00 PM
May 2012

continue to compare the Jewish Senator Schumer to the nazis....that'll garner so much of the Jewish vote that repubicans can't quite figure out doesn't come their way. They should stop wondering why that is when you give someone like grover the microphone.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
6. Okay. Remind him how the Nazis came for the disabled first. Same killing system he's pushing.
Mon May 21, 2012, 12:01 PM
May 2012

Then... alright, I'm losing my temper again.

patrice

(47,992 posts)
9. If "le$$ $peech" is qualitatively the same as "more $peech", which is what Norquist implies
Mon May 21, 2012, 12:22 PM
May 2012

here, why should "more" be legally protected, when the "same" thing can be done with less money? . . . at least according to Norquist.

patrice

(47,992 posts)
10. In short, he's pretending an extremely uneven playing field isn't uneven and that even if it were
Mon May 21, 2012, 12:25 PM
May 2012

uneven, that would be insignificant to the value that he pretends to be supporting.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
44. That reminds me of Bill Maher's False Equivalency video. Pardon me if you've seen it before:
Tue May 22, 2012, 12:11 PM
May 2012


He gives a good examples of how unequal the playing field is.

We're approaching Flat Earth fall off the edge uneven...

patrice

(47,992 posts)
46. Good stuff, that! Been a while since I've seen it. Thanks!! Still trying to think of
Tue May 22, 2012, 01:17 PM
May 2012

how to say what I'm trying to say in this thread more clearly.

It's about similarities and differences between things, more precisely, how exactly are they similar and how exactly are the different and what are the consequences of those exact similarities and exact differences upon one another, separately as similarities and separately as differences (i.e. similarities compared to similarities and differences compared to differences) and then together, similarities compared to differences - in short all of the permutations of similarities and differences in the traits of the phenomena we are talking about, which we can't know directly, but can at least infer hypothetically to some extent from the systems we are talking about.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
47. Break that down into paragraphs and I'm there, maybe. I realize we must come to know our choices...
Tue May 22, 2012, 01:41 PM
May 2012

That there is good and evil in each of us; that they are part of each person's make up; and we need them in balance. They are part of a whole that we cannot escape.

Even the 1% that we like to hiss at, has performed valuable functions that created our lives, or at least we live our lives within their creation. Could it have been different?

Yes, I think it could have and will be done differently, no matter what either group wants.

OTOH, you may be joking with me?

Which is okay. Have a great week.

patrice

(47,992 posts)
48. What you said is a different version ofwhat I'm thinking. We lose waaaay too much humanity to these
Tue May 22, 2012, 05:47 PM
May 2012

over-simplified categories that we impose, often by force of one type or another, on others. What we lose matters, even when we are "right". And even if there is a more or less immediate solution anyway, what is lost to oversimplification can very very likely affect the future.

I'm not very good at jokes. What I said earlier was a complicated way of describing what a person might do to actually get to know someone/anyone else, or an idea, or a place, or anything. Parroting oversimplified labels, acquired from here or there, for stuff is not understanding; that takes experience and the willingness to question and one of the salient traits of experience of a person/place/thing/idea or event is how it is similar:different to/from any other person/place/thing/idea or event. Those are useful questions that help us to take a solid stand when we need to against the likes of Norquist. But mostly it seems people only process differences or differences matter waaaaaaaaay more than similarities, or anything else, so their critical rhetoric looses something powerful, i.e. the similarities.

patrice

(47,992 posts)
11. He saying there are NO emergent properties in these systems, other than the ones that HE SAYS there
Mon May 21, 2012, 12:37 PM
May 2012

are.

"There is no cake but Grover Norquist cake. And let them eat cake."

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
15. Privatization is the New Apartheid. Some may have forgotten the pure evil that is Nordquist:
Mon May 21, 2012, 02:09 PM
May 2012
Nordquist protege's push for charter school privatization plan in Southern California worries educators

http://rawstory.com/news/2005/K_Street_pushes_charter_school_plan_0125.html

The Tendency to Privatize

http://monthlyreview.org/2003/03/01/the-tendency-to-privatize

There is much, much worse that he has done:


Grover Norquist...

http://www.channelingreality.com/Cards/grover_norquist-1.htm

http://www.channelingreality.com/Cards/grover_norquist%20-%202.htm

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
19. Here is a question
Mon May 21, 2012, 02:40 PM
May 2012

Why do the Zionists support the GOP when Grover Norquist, whose wife is a Palestinian, is one of the more vocal anti Israel voices?

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2012/01/anti-israel-pro-jihad-grover-norquist-wants-anti-israel-ron-paul-paul-speak-at-convention.html
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/561786/posts

Granted, I dislike Zionism myself, but I would love to see the heads of people like Eric Cantor and Bloomberg pop when they realize who it is they bow to

The Magistrate

(95,251 posts)
20. Indeed, Sir: Norquist Actually Is A Terrorist Supporter, An Open Agent Of Jihad
Mon May 21, 2012, 03:03 PM
May 2012

It is amply documented in the Congressional Record.

Hubert Flottz

(37,726 posts)
21. I gave you a rec. for your Evil Idiots picture!
Mon May 21, 2012, 03:08 PM
May 2012

Looks like Mitch and the Big Boner have the bleeding piles! I hope so.

BlancheSplanchnik

(20,219 posts)
23. I rec'd and shared on FB with this comment:
Mon May 21, 2012, 04:25 PM
May 2012
Let's see---a billionaire tax cheat tries to get out of his responsibility by renouncing citizenship. Democratic Senators call him on it, and a Repub, famous for his efforts to protect the "stealing rights" of republican billionaires, pulls the Nazi card? Wow. That's some twisted crap. I say, BRAVO and THANKS to Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and Bob Casey (D-PA)

Jack Rabbit

(45,984 posts)
26. Jack Rabbit: Helping the wealthy avoid taxes makes you a royalist
Mon May 21, 2012, 05:39 PM
May 2012

Norquist, and Republicans in general, believe some people are just better than others and deserve a greater share of the boons of society that is out of proportion to their contribution to creating that wealth. They can live in castles and collect rent from starving peasants who, in their self-defined world view, don't matter.

The French invented the guillotine for people like that.

 

provis99

(13,062 posts)
27. so Jewish-American Chuck Schumer is a Nazi?
Mon May 21, 2012, 08:00 PM
May 2012

It amuses me when a Nazi like Norquist goes around calling Jewish people Nazis.

sarcasmo

(23,968 posts)
30. This tells me Grover knows he is not paying his fair share. Where is the cookie monster
Mon May 21, 2012, 09:35 PM
May 2012

when you need him?

icarusxat

(403 posts)
31. culture note: the finger
Mon May 21, 2012, 09:38 PM
May 2012

the gesture Grover is making in the above photo is the German equivalent of flipping the bird

Stuart G

(38,439 posts)
32. When you call a Jewish person a Nazi, it is probably the worst thing you can call him/her.
Mon May 21, 2012, 09:51 PM
May 2012

Norquest did this on purpose..or he is utterly, and completely stupid..
You tell me which is it?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Grover Norquist: Trying T...