Hillary Clinton Increases Her Lead Over Bernie Sanders
Source: NBC News
Hillary Clinton has increased her dominant lead within the Democratic Party's presidential contest, now besting rival Sen. Bernie Sanders by a margin of two to one among primary voters in the latest NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll. But the Democratic front-runner remains unpopular with the general electorate, and fewer than a third of Americans give her high marks for being honest and straightforward.
In the new poll, conducted October 25-29, 62 percent of Democrats chose Clinton as their top choice to win their party's presidential nomination, while 31 percent picked Sanders. Former Maryland governor Martin O'Malley received just three percent support.
That's up from Clinton's 25-point lead earlier in October, 58 percent to 33 percent.
...snip...
Among swing voters, the share who say they are not satisfied with her response to the Benghazi controversy has plummeted from 84 percent at the beginning of October to 40 percent now, although only about a quarter - 23 percent - are satisfied.
Read more: http://www.nbcnews.com/meet-the-press/hillary-clinton-increases-her-lead-over-bernie-sanders-n456111
newfie11
(8,159 posts)I feel left out.
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)But should we really believe a "NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll"? The corporations and wall street want us to believe in the inevitable election of Hillary Rodham Clinton. I still will wait until we hit the first caucus and primary states before I stop believing in the power of the people.
Nitram
(22,802 posts)"catching up"
olegramps
(8,200 posts)The election is a year away so it could change significantly. However, the facts are the facts and at this juncture Hillary is far ahead. Just hope and pray that a Democrat prevails because so much is stake. I am somewhat taken back by the extensive criticism of Clinton and hope that it doesn't translate into Democrats not showing up at the polls and backing the Democratic Party's candidate. I remain committed to voting for who ever is the Party's candidate and hope that Party loyalty is foremost. I consider everyone of the Republican candidates to be absolutely unqualified to lead the nation and no match for any of the Democratic Party candidates.
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)These people will never be counted until we actually go to the polls.
Nitram
(22,802 posts)If you're 34 and new to voting, you might not be a very reliable voter.
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)But these people are getting energized to vote - maybe for the first time. They feel they have to do something before their lives are totally FUCKED, and they see Bernie's policies as the ones that will prevent that.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)newfie11
(8,159 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)newfie11
(8,159 posts)I ask out of curiosity as we only have cell phones and neither my husband or I have been polled.
Never. Sometimes multiple calls a day on my home phone.
Renew Deal
(81,859 posts)Democrats prefer Hillary 2 - 1. There were people saying we should wait till the debates. This is post debate. The biggest help for Hillary was Biden choosing not to run.
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)Nitram
(22,802 posts)Something to look forward to.
Cobalt Violet
(9,905 posts)Nitram
(22,802 posts)Cobalt Violet
(9,905 posts)Here I was thinking he hasn't benefited at all from being a member of a political dynasty. Silly me.
Nitram
(22,802 posts)I'm just asking if that couldn't benefit Sanders just as easily if his performance is better than hers?
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)Nitram
(22,802 posts)"limiting the number of debates has served her well?"
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)Nitram
(22,802 posts)Don't confuse me like that!
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)All I was trying to say is IF Bernie was kicking her ass in the debates, MORE debates would always be better, because Bernie still has about 30% of the people that don't know much, if anything about him. More exposure for him the better. The MSM isn't helping him there.
Nitram
(22,802 posts)Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)Nitram
(22,802 posts)And it doesn't help Hillary. As long as he does well when he debates, he wins whether there's one or six.
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)Less debates helps H and hurts B due to her name recognition, etc.
Cha
(297,248 posts)the first debate and her ground game do.
Robbins
(5,066 posts)then why at JJ dinner In iowa and at events bernie has more engery than Clinton.
You say Clinton won debate.so did MSM say romney won first debate In 2012.I say both of them lied through their teeth.
Bernie is only now airing ads.and if race was over why need to smear bernie and his supporters.
Geronimoe
(1,539 posts)that $2 billion in corporate sponsors and Super-PACs.
People are rallying around more of the same establishment politics.
Shadowflash
(1,536 posts)The status quo seems to be really popular. It's a shame, really.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)LOL!
Cha
(297,248 posts)rock
(13,218 posts)Wow!
rock
(13,218 posts)Wilms
(26,795 posts)Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)curious that
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)where HRC is concerned
frylock
(34,825 posts)riversedge
(70,234 posts)kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)brooklynite
(94,577 posts)I do a lot of number crunching with respect to the candidates I'm asked to support: "I believe" doesn't tell me a lot.
Omaha Steve
(99,642 posts)Need I say more?
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)Omaha Steve
(99,642 posts)Bernie is a real liberal unlike Obama.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)President.
It seems that Hillary supporters are not the ones needing reassurance.
We aren't the ones writing the nasty OP's.
We are the ones constantly making up shit.
We are winning we are happy
Omaha Steve
(99,642 posts)Where is that Obama Hillary is playing the victim video?
Same thing I heard in 07-08.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)I know they are nothing like anti Hillary posters.
Today we were compared to flees.
We are not not the ones who are angry because we are losing. We don't have the motivation anger brings on.
Omaha Steve
(99,642 posts)? I got all day.
You do know there are conservatives here with multiple names that fight with themselves to make all Dems look bad right?
AGAIN Bernie is losing just like Obama & Edwards 08! Bernie is raising more $ and has a long history of where he stands. Obama only had a speech in 04 and voted present a lot.
SunSeeker
(51,559 posts)Say it ain't so, Omaha Steve!
Omaha Steve
(99,642 posts)There are a couple places where they brag about it.
frylock
(34,825 posts)Using those metrics, he's better than Obama.
Geronimoe
(1,539 posts)Unless you think Dr Info-commercial Ben Carson is going to win.
Nitram
(22,802 posts)Or "catching up."
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Stallion
(6,474 posts)"But the Democratic front-runner remains unpopular with the general electorate"
No politician in Washington DC is popular in this environment of 3 parties (Democrats, Republicans and Independents)
But she is more popular than the rest:
Obama 44
Clinton 40
Carson 37
Sanders 34
Republicans 29
Trump 27
Rubio 26
Cruz 23
Ryan 23
Jeb Bush 19
So if she is so unpopular what does that make the rest especially Trump
The take-away from all these polls is that NO politician in America is POPULAR because no PARTY is POPULAR. I'm sure a lot of her negative scores are coming from Sanders votes who have no viable alternative but to vote for Clinton in the general election
SunSeeker
(51,559 posts)Hillary definitely surged after people saw her commanding performance in those events.
Francois9
(54 posts)When is the other shoe going to drop?
Nitram
(22,802 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)... and they've shown they can't hit the broad side of a barn.
Nitram
(22,802 posts)Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)Gamecock Lefty
(700 posts)We were told to wait until America hears about Bernie. OK, we did.
We were told to look at his massive crowds on the campaign trail (a la Howard Dean). OK, we looked.
We were told to wait until after the first debate. OK, we waited.
We were told to see what happens to Hillary after the Benghazi hearings. OK, we saw.
Now we're hearing whining because "nobody polled me."
Now we're being told to just wait until those with no land lines vote.
Now we're being told just wait until Bernie unloads on Hillary.
Yawn . . .
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)Now we are on getting to the primaries it will be fun to see what happens then.
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)Beacool
(30,249 posts)He will not be the Democratic nominee. Even if Hillary was not in the running, the nomination would go to someone else. Sanders is an Independent, a self described "Democratic Socialist" and will be 75 years old on election day.
This country is not ready to elect a Socialist for president. Let alone one who would be in his mid 70s when he started his presidency. I have nothing against Sanders and I'm glad that he is in the race, but he will not be the nominee. The only way I see Sanders winning would be if something catastrophic happens to Hillary's campaign. A big if.........
Response to Beacool (Reply #61)
Post removed
riversedge
(70,234 posts)ronnykmarshall
(35,356 posts)I saw an online poll at www.hillaryhasastinkyass.com showing Bernie winning EVERY state by 5000% and and beating every GOP candidate by 7000%!
FEH!! This poll is foolish!